Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro review

Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro review

Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro review

Below is the evolution of all of the Fujifilm FinePix series of CZK:

  1. Fujifilm FinePix S1 Pro - january 2000, based on the film Nikon F60 (aka Nikon N60), the first generation SuperCCD.
  2. Fujifilm FinePix S2 Pro - january 2002, based on the film Nikon F80 (aka Nikon N80), SuperCCD III (the matrix third generation).
  3. Fujifilm FinePix S3 Pro - february 2004, on the base Fujifilm FinePix S2 ProSuperCCD SR II matrix (second generation SR matrix)
  4. Fujifilm FinePix S3 Pro UVIR - August 2006, upgraded Fujifilm FinePix S3 Pro for shooting in IR (Infra Red) and UV (Ultra Violet) spectra.
  5. Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro - september 2006, on the base Nikon D200, slightly upgraded SuperCCD SR II matrix (similar to the one installed on Fujifilm FinePix S3 Pro).
  6. Fujifilm FinePix IS Pro - June 2007modernized Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro for shooting in IR (Infra Red) and UV (Ultra Violet) spectra.

The Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro is an amazing camera. You take it in your hands, and you understand what it is Nikon D200, only labeled 'Fujifilm Super CCD' and 'Nikon F mount'. Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro body completely copied from the camera Nikon D200... Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro uses Nikkor lenses compatible with Nikon F-mount (cameras have the same bayonet mount), as well as all other peripherals - flashes, butblocks, remote controls, and more.

The Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro has another modification called Fujifilm FinePix IS Pro, designed to work in the infrared and ultraviolet spectra. In the spring and summer of 2007, when the camera became available for orders and pre-orders, the price of the S5 Pro was $ 2.000, which somehow hints at its capabilities.

Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro

Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro

Important: Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro is not a clone Nikon D200. Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro and Nikon D200 - completely different sensors (matrices) that create an image and a radically different menu. There are other minor differences as well.

Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro

Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro

Main differences from Nikon D200

  1. Different batteries (not interchangeable).
  2. A completely different menu. Important: S5 Pro does not have Russian language.
  3. Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro Live View
  4. The Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro has the ability to view the number of frames taken by the camera for its entire life through the menu. Have Nikon D200 there is no such function, in order to see the number of frames captured by a camera in a lifetime, you need to use a special program and watch the frame counter in EXIF module of any photograph taken with Nikon D200. To see the mileage S5 Pro, just go to the menu 'SETUP->Maintenance->Maintenance Counter' where the camera mileage and even the number of shutter replacements will be indicated.
  5. The cameras are different frame buffer. About this is separately written below.
  6. Different maximum shooting speed (5 fps Nikon D200, versus 1.5-3 fps for the S5 Pro).
  7. Different ISO limit (3200 S5 Pro vs 1600 D200), although Nikon D200 reaches ISO 3200 in Hi1 mode.
  8. Different image quality.
  9. The S5 Pro has an image processing menu. The D200 is sorely lacking a post-processing menu.
  10. There is no Basic compression mode for JPEG.

Important about batteries:

  • Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro battery can be used with cameras without problems Nikon D100, D70, D70s, D50. Camera data use battery Nikon EN-EL3which does not have a programmable chip.
  • Accumulators Nikon EN-EL3e и Nikon EN-EL3 Cannot be used in Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro. That is, batteries from Nikon D200, D300, D300s, D700, D80, D90 (Nikon EN-EL3e) and Nikon D100, D70, D70s, D50 (Nikon EN-EL3) are not suitable for use with Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro.
  • The Fujifilm NP-150 battery cannot be used with D200 cameras, D300, D300s, D700, D80, D90. Although outwardly these batteries are identical.
Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro with Nikon ED AF Nikkor 80-200mm 1: 2.8D (MKII) lens

Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro with lens Nikon ED AF Nikkor 80-200mm 1: 2.8D (MKII)

The most important

Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro can use film simulation modes. In fact, it always shoots with certain settings for film simulation.

There are 6 simulation modes (Film Sumulation) available in the camera menu:

  1. STD is a standard mode suitable for a very wide variety of scenes, including portrait and landscape photography. Unlike all other simulation modes, it allows you to adjust not only the color (Color), contrast (Tone) and sharpness (Sharpness), but also the dynamic range (D-Range).
  2. F1 is a film simulation mode specially designed for studio portraits. Simulates working with professional negatives. Primarily suppresses flares and flares from studio flashes in the maximum brightness zone. Does not tint the image (that is, the essence of the simulation is in a good study of the highlights).
  3. F1a is the same mode as F1, but with slightly raised chroma.
  4. F1b - conveys skin tone (facial skin tone) with smooth transitions. Also, this mode captures vivid natural colors and is great for outdoor portraits.
  5. F1c is the same mode as F1, but sharpened.
  6. F2 is a high saturation mode similar to FUJI-CHROME slides. Great for landscapes or architecture.

Additionally, in almost every mode F1, F1a, F1b, F1c, F2, you can adjust the color, contrast and sharpness, but only in a certain range of values.

Below is a diagram with the evolution of Super CCD matrices:

The evolution of the first SuperCCD / SuperCCD SR matrices

The evolution of the first SuperCCD / SuperCCD SR matrices

Critical: only native utility works best with RAW files Fujifilm Hyper-Utility HS-V3. Third party converters have a number of limitations and do not fully understand the complex structure of the SuperCCD SR / SR II sensor. Of the third-party converters, in my experience, Adobe LightRoom works best.

S-pixels have the usual photosensitivity of classic CCD pixels; R-pixels are smaller and less sensitive to light than S-pixels and are designed to capture details in bright areas of the frame.

S-pixels have the usual sensitivity of the classic pixels / subpixels CCD matrices. R-pixels are smaller and less sensitive to light than S-pixels and are designed to capture details in bright areas of the frame. During shooting, the camera's processor combines data from these two types of photodiodes to obtain a wide dynamic range. Also pay attention to the complex polygonal structure of the sensor (somewhat similar to the structure of a honeycomb). Actually - this picture is the 'essence' of the S5 Pro camera.

I am very pleased that the Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro pays a lot of attention to portraiture and skin tone. Perhaps, every camera should have such functions.

live view

Live View (live view / screen) is present in the camera, but has a number of features:

  1. In Live View mode, the images themselves slow down when sighted, like video recording on older phones. It seems that the frequency of image display in Live View is about 10-15 frames per second.
  2. In Live View, two methods are available: black and white and color.
  3. Live View does not support auto focus. In general, in order to focus through Live View on a number of non-motorized lenses, you need to switch the camera to manual focusing “M”, and on lenses with a motor, switch to M or (M / A) mode.
  4. Live View only turns on for 30 seconds. When Live View is on, you see a timer that counts down from 30 seconds to one second, after which Live View automatically turns off. For thoughtful focusing personally, 30 seconds may not be enough for me.
  5. When Live View is on, the PC link indicator blinks. Typically this indicator on the Nikon D200 shows the actual computer-to-camera relationship.
  6. And the most annoying thing in Live View mode is that when you press the shutter button, the camera does not take a picture. You must first manually turn off Live View, or wait for it to turn off automatically after 30 seconds, and only after that - take a picture. When you focus with your left hand using the focus ring on the lens, and then move your hand to the Live View off button in order to take a picture, the focus is lost, it is very annoying.

Important: mode live view It turns on very quickly with just one button. To turn it on, just hold the bottom button for a couple of seconds in the vertical row of buttons to the left of the display (button with a magnifying glass and a man).

Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro with Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm 1: 1.8G SWM Aspherical

Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro with lens Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm 1: 1.8G SWM Aspherical

My personal opinion is that the Live View limitation of 30 seconds is an imprint of the mechanics and electronics of the shutter from the D200, which 30 seconds is simply the longest manually set excerpt... The Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro most likely had to adjust to the mechanics and part of the electronics of the Nikon D200 itself. As a result, the Live View function is very poorly implemented and rather difficult to use. But for manual optics it is undoubtedly a godsend.

The Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro camera is very easy to operate. Ergonomics are great, after you shoot with the D200 and then take the S5 Pro in your hands - you don't feel any difference, except in the image quality and at a slightly slower speed during continuous shooting.

The camera accepted from its parent all the basic properties:

What is special about the S5 Pro?

The main feature of the S5 Pro camera is high dynamic range and a colorful picture (this is my only review where I mention the phrase "colorful picture"). The dynamic range of the Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro is 200 stops higher than that of the Nikon D2 (4 times, 11.5EV vs 13.5EV).

The dynamic range of the Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro is even higher than Nikon's top cameras: D5, D4/D4s, D3/D3s, D2X/D2Xs, D2H/D2Hs and Canon: 1DX, 1Ds/1Ds Mark II/1Ds Mark III, 1D Mark II /1D Mark II N/1D Mark III/1D Mark IV etc. (by the way, interesting stuff about dynamic range data with photonstophotos and dxo is here).

Actually, after the comfortable ergonomics, the high dynamic range is one of the strongest points of the S5 Pro.

Compartment for batteries and memory cards S5 Pro

Compartment for batteries and memory cards S5 Pro

Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro uses Fujifilm SuperCCD SR II sensor (second generation Fujifilm SuperCCD SR sensor, also sometimes called Fujifilm Super CCD SR PRO), which includes two types of pixels (diodes): S-pixels in the amount of 6.17 MP, and R-pixels in the amount of 6.17 MP. In addition, these pixels have a specific orientation and position on the sensor. Different pixels have different sensitivity to light and allow you to work well in shadows and highlights, thus achieving a large dynamic range. The principle of operation of SuperCCD SR II is described in another my review of S5 Pro here.

In fact, 12.1 (12.3) megapixels in JPEG mode are 'bloated' interpolation. But still, I am of the opinion that the S5 Pro still has 12 MP, albeit with some reservations.

S5 PRO with Industar-50-2 3,5 / 50 lens

S5 PRO with lens Industar-50-2 3,5 / 50

Speed ​​and frame buffer

S5 PRO, unlike Nikon D200, can shoot at a maximum speed of 3 frames per second.

Attention: to get camera speed 3 fps, be sure to use STD Film Simulation and be sure to turn D-Range to 100% (STD). In this mode, only S-pixels of the matrix will work, and RAW files will weigh only 12 MB. And only in this mode the Seutp-> Shooting-> Shooting Speed: 2 fps function works correctly, which sets the shooting speed in CL mode.

Important: in all other film simulation modes, or in STD mode, but with a D-range of 130% or higher, the maximum burst speed will be 1.5 frames per second.

Frame buffer:

  • 19 frames RAW at D-RANGE 100% STD (very, very good, more than Nikon D750!)
  • 16 frames in RAW + JPEG or JPEG format with any quality setting at D-RANGE 100% STD
  • 9 frames RAW at w2 (8 at IMAGE DISPLAY-> ON)
  • 8 frames in RAW + JPEG or JPEG format with any quality setting at w2 (7 with IMAGE DISPLAY-> ON)
  • about 1 RAW files can be obtained in 30 minute of shooting (at w2, ISO <= 640, IMAGE DISPLAY-> OFF)
  • for 1 minute of shooting, you can get about 70 JPEG L FINE files (at w2, ISO <= 640, IMAGE DISPLAY-> OFF)
  • about 1 RAW files can be obtained in 25 minute of shooting (at w2, ISO <= 640, IMAGE DISPLAY-> 2 sec)
  • for 1 minute of shooting, you can get about 30 JPEG files (at w2, ISO <= 640, IMAGE DISPLAY-> 2 sec)
  • in 1 minute of shooting, you can get about 18 RAW + JPEG L FINE files (at w2, ISO 1000, IMAGE DISPLAY-> 2 sec)

UPDATE: critical... Function 'SETUP-> DISPLAY-> IMAGE DISPLAY-> OFF' adds 1 frame RAW or JPEG with extended D-Range to the buffer.

Critical... If the 'SETUP -> DISPLAY -> IMAGE DISPLAY' function is set to 'CONTINUOS', or '4 SEC, or' 2 SEC ', then the camera very slowly writes the footage to the memory card. The recording speed does not depend on the memory card bandwidth. Even if you use the fastest CF memory card, the data recording speed will not change. Most likely the problem is that after recording each frame, the camera spends time reading it again and displaying it on the display, which significantly increases the time it takes to record the remaining frames from the frame buffer queue. Once the frame buffer is full, one picture is recorded for 2.5 secondseven if it is a small size 'S' JPEG with medium quality 'NORM'. This function can be disabled and the duration of the frame sequence can be significantly increased. If you use this recommendation, then in 1 minute of shooting, the S5 Pro can take about 70 JPEG L FINE pictures (at w2 and ISO <= 640)... Details here.

Please note that changing the size of the recorded JPEG file (L, M, S) or its quality (Fine, Norm), as well as changing the settings of the noise reduction function does not affect the number of frames in the buffer. After the buffer is full, the camera stops shooting and waits for data to be written to the memory card.... During this time, you cannot view the footage or adjust the menu. The next frame can be taken immediately after recording at least one file from the frame buffer to the memory card. You can view the filmed material or enter the menu only after the buffer has been completely cleared.

Camera RAW files with D-range 130% and higher at ISO 100-1000 use 14-bit color depth, are recorded without compression and weigh 25 MB (!). The same Nikon D200 could only afford 12 bit color depth. Perhaps this is the reason for the low speed of the camera. Nikon only switched to 14-bit color depth in 2007 with the release of the Nikon D3 / D300.

UPDATE: Critical (updated 04.02.2022/XNUMX/XNUMX). When using ISO 1250 and above, at a D-range value of 130-400%, only S-pixels (only half of the sensor) will still work, and the maximum burst speed will increase to 3 fps. Due to the fact that R-pixels will not work, there will be no significant increase in dynamic range at D-range 130-400% and ISO 1250-3200. In this case, the RAW file size at ISO 1250-3200 will be half the size of the RAW file at ISO 100-1250 when using D-range 130-400% . This situation is discussed, for example, here. The instructions for this say like this. To summarize, large D-ragne values ​​of 130-400% have a physical justification only at ISO 100-1250 values.

UPDATE: critical... When using ISO 800 and higher, additional forced noise reduction is enabled, which results in slower recording of pictures to the memory card (pictures undergo additional noise reduction processing before recording). This results in shorter burst times at ISO <= 640 and at ISO> = 800.

Rumor has it that due to the fact that the Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro shutter is taken from the Nikon D200, which is designed to work at a speed of 5 fps, shooting at a speed of 1.5 fps, the Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro shutter lasts much longer than on Nikon D200.

Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro with Nikon AF Nikkor 35-70mm 1: 3.3-4.5 (MKII) lens

Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro with a lens Nikon AF Nikkor 35-70mm 1: 3.3-4.5 (MKII)

Sample photos on Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro (different lenses)

Below are sample photos on the Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro, shot with different lenses.

Fujifilm S5 Pro + Sigma 135 / 1.8 Art = Dream Team!

Shown below are images with Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro and lens Sigma 135mm 1: 1.8 DG A [for Nikon F mount]. JPEG from camera, no processing. Everything was filmed at F / 1.8 - only hardcore and positive emotions.

Original photos in JPEG format ('.jpg') can be at this link (164 photos, 800 MB). These photos were prepared for notes on NikonRumors.

Sample photos on Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro + Tokina 12-24 / 4 and Nikon 50 / 1.8G

In 2021, I was on vacation, shot a little with Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro paired with good lenses Tokina AT-X 124 Pro SD 12-24 F4 (IF) DX II Aspherical и Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm 1: 1.8G SWM Aspherical, some photos were taken using a polarizing filter CITIWIDE CPL 77 mm (for Tokina) and Hoya 58mm PL-CIR... (for Nikon). JPEG everywhere straight from the camera, but some photos were cleaned of 'spots' due to a dirty sensor.

Original photos in JPEG format ('.jpg') can be view / download from this link (gallery on GOOGLE DRIVE, 50+ photos).

Original photos in format RAW ('.RAF') can view / download from this link (gallery on GOOGLE DRIVE, 40+ photos). The same photos can be found here, here и here.

Many examples of photos with RAW source files can be found in the following reviews.

  1. Sigma 135mm 1: 1.8 DG A (ART) [there is a working link to the original JPEGs in the review]
  2. SIGMA ZOOM 18-50mm 1: 2.8-4.5 DC OS HSM Optical Stabilizer [there is a working link to the original JPEGs in the review]
  3. YONGNUO 35mm 1: 2 (YN35mm F2N) [there is a working link to the original JPEGs in the review]
  4. Tamron SP AF LD 70-210mm 1: 2.8 67DN [there is a working link to the original JPEGs in the review]
  5. Nippon Kogaku Japan Nikkor-S Auto 1: 1.2 f = 55mm [there is a working link to the original JPEGs in the review]
  6. Nikon DX AF-S Nikkor 12-24mm 1: 4G ED SWM IF Aspherical [in this and all reviews below, original RAW / JPEGs are lost, but RAW files can be found here]
  7. Tokina AT-X PRO SD 50-135 F2.8 DX N / AIS
  8. Nikon DX AF-S Nikkor 16-85mm 1: 3.5-5.6G ED VR SWM IF Aspherical
  9. Sigma EX 85mm 1: 1.4 DG HSM
  10. Nikon DX AF-S Nikkor 18-200mm 1: 3.5-5.6G ED SWM VR IF Aspherical
  11. Nikon AF Nikkor 28-85mm 1: 3.5-4.5 (MKII)
  12. Nikon N AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm 1: 4G ED SWM VR IF Nano Crystal Coat
  13. Samyang 8mm 1: 3.5 UMC FISH-EYE CS II Aspherical NI
  14. Nikon ED AF Nikkor 70-300mm 1: 4-5.6D
  15. Voigtlander APO-Lanthar 90mm F3.5 SL N / AI-S
  16. Nikon ED AF VR-Nikkor 80-400mm 1: 4.5-5.6D Vibration Reduction
  17. Nikon DX AF-S Nikkor 10-24mm 1: 3.5-4.5G ED SWM IF Aspherical
  18. Tokina AT-X PRO 80-200mm 1: 2.8
  19. Sigma 50-500mm 1: 4-6.3D HSM EX APO
  20. Nikon AF Nikkor 28mm 1: 2.8 (MKII)
  21. Quantaray AF LD 55-200mm 1: 4-5.6 Macro
  22. Nikon AF Nikkor 20mm 1: 2.8D
  23. A small interesting video on the topic here
  24. And an interview with me about Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro here

You can also find my photos with Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro at the links:

Personal experience:

The Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro is my soul camera and has the nicest color I've ever shot. And I shot with almost all Nikon and Canon cameras and many others. The Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro can only compete in color reproduction pleasantness Fujifilm FinePix S3 Pro.

No matter how much I shoot, I still come to the conclusion that the number of particularly successful shots in color with the Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro is the highest. But do not think that the Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro immediately makes masterpieces. The Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro is a rather capricious and difficult camera to understand. Its potential is only available to advanced users.

Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro - this is exactly the conversation about the sensor Fujifilm SuperCCD SR PRO / Fujifilm SuperCCD SR II, with all the pros and cons.

A worthy Fujifilm SuperCCD SR II sensor

  1. Sufficiently high dynamic range (due to the combination of R and S pixels).
  2. Good / excellent / peculiar color rendition inherent in many cameras based on CCD sensors
  3. Fairly flexible RAW (.'RAF '), especially for' pulling highlights'. 14-bit color depth (rare for APS-C CCD sensors) + data storage without compression and loss

Disadvantages of Fujifilm SuperCCD SR II sensor

  1. Small detail due to interpolation. At best, we can talk about 'honest' 6-8-10 MP, but not about 12 MP
  2. Detailing is lame due to thick anti-moor filter (need 'sharp lenses' to maximize sensor capabilities)
  3. High noise level at high ISO
  4. Wide dynamic range is only available at ISO values ​​of 100 to 1000 (at ISO 1250, R-subpixels are automatically disabled)
  5. Diagonal 'ladder' pixelization due to different rendering of details in the vertical/horizontal and diagonal directions, associated with a special arrangement of subpixels and interpolation (treated by shooting in 6 MP mode)
  6. Due to the unusual structure and arrangement of photosensitive diodes in the form of a polygonal structure, vaguely similar to silver halides in photographic film, the resulting image has its own 'character'
  7. Difficulty developing RAW files with third-party converters (due to the complex structure of the sensor)
  8. Image posterization when shooting in JPEG (treated by shooting in RAW with further conversion to TIFF)
  9. Pixel/subpixel burn-in over time (a common affliction in CCD sensors). Over time, the number of 'dead, broken, burnt' pixels increases significantly
  10. The sensor is afraid of gamma radiation, frequent flights are not recommended for the Fujifilm Super CCD SR II sensor
  11. Loose 'bumpy' picture with strong 'shadow pulling' from RAW or JPEG
  12. Noise reduction can not be turned off (even at ISO 100, even in the native converter and even when shooting in RAW)
  13. Yet totally a problem  CCD Blooming (CCD blooming) not solved
  14. High power consumption of the sensor
  15. Rapid sensor heating when working in Live View mode. Live View works for a maximum of 30 seconds
  16. There is no way to easily and simply implement video shooting on this type of sensor
  17. High complexity and high cost of manufacturing such sensors

RAW / RAF Conversion, HYPER UTILITY HS-V3

Render original RAW files (with '.RAF' resolution) is best done with the old original utility Fuji Hyper-Utility HS-V3... For the best quality, you should configure the converter like this... This converter may not work on modern operating systems, or it will require a lot of cleaning tools to install it. The repackaged version (all unnecessary is cut out), optimized for working with Windows 7/8/10, can be download from this link... Your use of the Fujifilm Hyper Utility HS-V3 remains entirely at your own risk.

Also Adobe Lightroom and Adobe Camera Raw (a built-in plug-in in Adobe Photoshop) allow you to work well with Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro RAW files. In my opinion, if you want to use third-party RAW converters, then the best way to use Fuji Hyper-Utility HS-V3 is to convert the original RAW files (with '.RAF' resolution) to TIFF format with 16-bit color depth ( the output should be files of 70 megabytes each), and later TIFF files should be processed by third-party converters, such as, for example, Capture One, Lightroom and any others. The TIFF format allows you to preserve the correct color rendition (which third-party converters cannot provide), 12 MP resolution and a margin of data for easy manipulation of sources.

UPDATED: A new version of the original (count 'native') FUJIFILM RAW FILE CONVERTER EX 3.0 (powered by SILKYPIX) now digests RAW files from Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro. You can download on the official website... But it makes it noticeably worse than the original old FujiFilm Hyper-Utility HS-V3, the situation disassembled by me here.

More information about Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro

  1. Review by Sergei Merkulov (2024)
  2. Review by Sasha Akimov (late 2022)
  3. Review of Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro, 2021, Vadim Om + comments
  4. Stream about Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro, 2021, Vadim Om + comments
  5. Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro 2021 Full Frame Review
  6. Interview about Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro, 2021, Olegasphoto + Radozhiva
  7. Text review Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro, 2021, Olegasphoto
  8. A detailed review of the capabilities of the Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro sensor, 2022, Dmitry Evtifeev
  9. An interesting feature UPGRADE Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro
  10. Another review of Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro on andrew-lazarev.com

All Fujifilm X APS-C Interchangeable Lens Digital Mirrorless Cameras

Results

Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro - camera with excellent professional ergonomics (controls like Nikon D200). The strength of the S5 Pro is sufficiently high dynamic range and pleasant color rendering... A serious drawback of the camera is the low burst speed when using a wide dynamic range - the shooting speed is only 1.5 fps. In many things the camera very much outdated.

Personally, I find the Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro one of the best 'for the soul' cameras (another one is Fujifilm FinePix S3 Pro). Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro - it's a legend.

Comments on this post do not require registration. Anyone can leave a comment. Many different photographic equipment can be found on AliExpress.

Material prepared Arkady Shapoval. Training/Consultations | Youtube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Telegram

Add a comment:

 

 

Comments: 925, on the topic: Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro review

  • Simon

    Ris.10

    • Vitaliy U

      If you have this, what camera settings do you use? If possible, more details.

      • Simon

        Yes, is it a chamber jpg settings? And there is a huge selection of them? Ask specifically what setting bothers you not to write me instructions ...

        • Vitaliy U

          Understood. I will read the instructions))) Thank you for not giving up (but it meant: in which mode it was removed, if "standard", then what settings are there, for example, dynamic range, although there are 5 more important settings, like fine tuning autoBB is a very important parameter in Fuja. And there are also 5 film simulation modes, each is adjusted separately. And so ... read the instructions?))

  • Vitaliy U

    ))) Oh well. On page 108 of the manual for this camera, everything about film simulation. For "emulation" there is no.

    • Simon

      What an ass, you name it, its essence will not change ...

      • Vitaliy U

        Oh!) I felt like it would end.))) For the ass, you just noticed. I agree)

  • Vitaliy U

    Here so approximately:

  • Vitaliy U

    More

  • Vitaliy U

    ISO 500

  • Vitaliy U

    On humans

  • Simon

    Nicely Oh-oh-oh-oh-chen ... What lens was there?

    • Valery A.

      I agree that it is beautiful. Fantastic and beautiful color, especially on charcoal. Inherent in SSD matrices. And the model, with the horizon, you still do not need to bring down :)

  • Vitaliy U

    Thanks. On the first two Nikkor 55 f2,8 Macro, on the rest-Nikon 50 f1,8 G. Manual Healing-hard labor! The VI is small, the LV is just for show (and the matrix heats up a lot, which is critical for SuperSSS, dead pixels appear.), The confirmation does not work reliably, it is difficult to estimate the depth of field on the LCD monitor (I have a histogram on the monitor, it is no longer on which will not work). Facial / waist can still be caught by the eye, further, trouble. But all these inconveniences are bearable ... because of the color produced by the camera.

  • Simon

    Here are the S5Pro's new advances with a new lens ...
    For hesitant and crooked ...

    • Alexander

      Just one question is nice to watch. Filmed on a cloudy day? No light is visible, only colors ...

      • Simon

        Shadows are upper left light by the nature of the light you can see - it was cloudy ... Soft shadows.

  • Simon

    Figure 2

  • Simon

    Figure 3

    • Vitaliy U

      The picture is gorgeous, but I would slightly subtract the red (by 5 units) - this is a typical "bug" of Healing, pouring red. In d700, the same is with yellow, for example. (Now the person "Valery A." will come and tell you beyond the horizons / verticals))

      • Simon

        Subtract ... who's stopping you? And the work of the authors must be accepted as the author sees. Everyone in their place does things - in their own way ... Some wear skin tones and many like it very much - the same I want to work with cinematic skin tones it turns out very nicely, I think ...

      • Simon

        I lower the opinion of builders and architects about horizontals into the trash can ... I'll show you how, breaking the horizontal, I got out of the situation and took an excellent picture ... With horizontals, this is when architecture is removed and that is not always ... There are rules and people who know how to beautifully violate these rules ... and this is for many darkness ...

        • Arkady Shapoval

          Specifically, the photo above (with the tractor) has many flaws, not only the horizon. The horizon is the first thing that catches your eye. There is no excuse for him.

          • Simon

            In my opinion, the tractor is very much even by the way ... there are two shots and without it and with it ... and with it it is more creative ...

          • Vitaliy U

            Arkady, good day to you. There is a usual flood room ... Could you (as a moderator) clean it up? People on your site are looking for useful (for themselves) information, and not the opinions of dubious authors in all respects.

      • Simon

        Here, breaking the rule, I got beauty ...

        • Yarkiya

          Have you ever heard of the auto-align feature? You have all the pictures piled to the left. You can persuade yourself as much as you like that this is your individual “prettiness”, but when a tendency is traced in this, you involuntarily begin to think that you may be a hammer or saxophonist by profession.

          • Simon

            I vrt after reading yours, the same began to involuntarily think maybe you have a roll by nature ... :)))))

            • Yarkiya

              Those. the horizon is littered with you, and I roll by nature?

              • Simon

                Your opinion is not true. It is caused by your personal impression. And let's stop - since the device itself is discussed here and not my personal photos of the work that I posted in order for people to see the capabilities of this device. Since they constantly doubt and ask the same questions. That is why let's skip the discussion of the content in the photos.

        • Valery A.

          God be with him, with a fot. Just now I noticed that in the photo of the bride and girlfriends everyone has busts as if it were a feast for the eyes. Simon, voice, from what area is this charm? So, out of curiosity.

      • KalekseyG

        in your photo above “on humans” the horizon has dropped too.

        • Vitaliy U

          I could have slapped a “clever man”, but alas, I didn’t see it, but it’s impossible to correct / delete here ... The one who does nothing is not mistaken.

          • KalekseyG

            Why get nervous, already forgot how to use the keyboard.

    • Valery A.

      "Sticks must be papendicular" (Kataev, Two captains)

      • Simon

        :)))

      • Valery A.

        Foolish - not Kataev, but Kaverin, the rest is true.

        • Simon

          You don't need to be clever and everything will be all right with your head ...

  • Vladimir

    Good day to all.
    Tell me, who knows from a friend about the attack and the feeling that she is not up to exhibit. I watched a series of 5 jeeps so it seems to me there is the same situation. Question pro10ka really not up to expose or eye problem?

    • Simon

      With eyes, look a little higher where the dog is ...

    • Simon

      Pro5 doesn’t have such a thing, it’s kind of tighter than the jpegs… Those who are used to having light-colored shots just like that react. This density is interesting. But who's stopping you from twisting your tail and getting what you need?

    • Simon

      In pro5 there is a correction (exposure correction) set and rejoice ...

    • Vitaliy U

      Go to the Setup menu, then the Exsposure submenu, then the submenu)) Fine Tune Exposure, in it you can fine-tune and customize the metering for each metering mode. It’s easier to just set the amendment to +, Pryatka loves light (and aperture optics (!))

      • Vladimir

        Thank you!

  • Vladimir

    Thanks for the answer.

  • Vladimir

    Good day to all. Tell the guys how to configure the camera so that the exposure data is correctly displayed when working with old optics, in particular, World 24n. Now displays aperture from 0 to 7.

    • Vitaliy U

      I have configured the "View DOF" button for the choice of manual optics. I choose FR with the front wheel, the maximum aperture with the rear wheel.

      • Vladimir

        A good idea.

      • Vladimir

        Vitaliy, please tell me how to set the button depth of field setting non-lens lenses? Thank you in advance.

        • Vladimir

          How to configure the FUNK button for CPU-free lenses is described in page 120-121. Link to instructions in Russian in the comments below.

  • Vladimir

    perhaps you need to register as in nikon in some of the sections?

    • Jury

      Set Up - MISC.- NON-CPU LENS DATA - select the focal length and maximum aperture

      • Vladimir

        thanks for the help Yuri!

      • Vladimir

        Yuri good afternoon. Tell me, with each installation of the lens without a motor and a chip, do you need to prescribe the lens parameters, or is it possible to save several options like Nikon?

        • Jury

          Hello, Vladimir, it seems that every time you prescribe, there is no memory.

          • Vladimir

            Thanks, thanks.

  • Oleg K.

    Is it worth it to upgrade Nikon 3100 for a hitch? And how much mileage for her is 80 thousand

    • Simon

      My wrong opinion: Is it worth changing or not worth it how to ask me to marry this girl or not? 80 thousand, this is not a very high mileage, below average ...

    • Lynx

      YES

    • Lynx

      In the sense - it costs, and 80 .. well, a lot, but you have enough remaining resource for your eyes.

  • anonym

    It would be very interesting to compare with the new Fujifilm X .. in terms of pictures of course.
    If you don't need high ISO / rate of fire, is the option competitive?

    • lesa

      Arkady, prohibit anonymity already (: you don’t feel like it, but no, no, yes, ananimated ..

      • Lynx

        what's the point? maybe people don’t want to disclose their email.

        • Denis

          rather password problem remember)

          • Lynx

            if you work in one browser, then he substitutes the email and the name.
            no passwords.

    • Lynx

      in terms of the picture ... in terms of the pleasantness of the picture, no one is catching up.
      x-trances of new Fujiks is a completely different matter (and a completely different DD, which is very sad).
      if you do not work with high ISO and rate of fire (and do not require pixel-by-pixel sharpness), then the wash tears the x-series like a hot water bottle.
      another thing is that their tasks are still different.

  • Simon

    We look what Fuji S5pro can do:
    Photo yesterday ISO high first indoor 800 other 2000

    • Simon

      Ris.1

      • Alexander

        In this series, it's a different matter ... There are not only colors, but also light. Great pictures.

    • Simon

      Ris.2

    • Simon

      Ris.3

    • Simon

      Ris.4

    • Simon

      Ris.5

    • Simon

      Ris.6

    • Simon

      Ris.7

    • Simon

      Ris.8

    • Simon

      Ris.9

    • Simon

      Ris.10

    • Simon

      Development of RAV ...

      • Ivan

        Excuse me, the vile materialist, in the pictures I see only sharpe and noise. Moreover, Sharpe in such quantities as I have not seen for a long time.

        • Simon

          It's good that you see, everything is in your hands, now see the rest ...

          • Ivan

            Ris.11

          • Denis

            wonderful colors

        • zengarden

          It seems to me that the author is too keen on post-processing. Such refried colors, especially on faces, are difficult to obtain naturally. In some places it looks like 256-color gifs.

          • Simon

            There is certainly a bit of overkill, but I wanted more contrast. I would not want a discussion and evaluation of my work here. That's not why I placed them here. I believe that each of you has your own taste and your GOLDEN hands to twist the RAVs. And for a general understanding of what Fuji S5pro is ...

            • Ivan

              So you are not talking about creativity. Everyone has his own, we are now talking about technology. Specifically, now that the development of the camera is not visible. Similar poster colors and sharp contours could be obtained from almost any camera during processing. I didn’t have a glimpse, but it seems to me that these examples do not characterize the camera at all.

              • Simon

                It only seems to you ... Buy pro5.

              • Ivan

                Or Lightroom yet?

              • Simon

                Do the same for what you have and show. Why talk a lot in vain.

  • Vladimir

    Hello everybody.
    Tell me good people where in Ukraine you can buy baht. block to 5pro? Maybe someone wants to sell yours?

    • Simon

      My wrong opinion: You don't need this unit, buy 6 batteries with this money in China and rejoice ...

      • Vladimir

        Yes, its cost is an average of 2000 UAH. as it’s not at all Ale) and you used this device?

        • Simon

          From experience: God forbid every camera has a grip ... very full-fledged and without this prankish handle. The capacity of one of my batteries (far from new) is enough for a whole day of street ... I have never sat down in general for two days of use one battery. The second is always with you, more than once it was not useful. Canon, yes ... the grip is uncomfortable and with a handle it would be better. Want to spend money? Here is: http://ali.pub/2i8cc5

          • Vladimir

            I have three batteries, one 2000mAh and two 1500mAh batteries each, which is less enough for 100 frames without viewing the one that more will cover up to 200 photos. The bat caught fire in the block I saw the price I started to look used. I'll look at the Chinese with a large volume battery and buy it. Thanks for the advice.

      • Pastor

        On the one hand I agree, on the other not :) It depends on what to use. I do not have a butt on the fujah, but I have a d200, which is the same as the fuj. And it is convenient to shoot with fujim with glasses up to kg, but from above the buttlock helps a lot with long shots. But the fact that Vladimir has enough batteries for 100-200 frames indicates some kind of malfunction. My fudge holds, according to my calculations, from 500 to 700 pictures with viewing and even sometimes with life view.

        • Vladimir

          Good afternoon, what kind of malfunction can there be7 is it in the cell and you need to say goodbye to Akum?

          • Pastor

            I don’t know, they will most likely determine in the service (although you still need to look for a service that will take on a mirror fudge). Maybe the batteries are old and no longer hold, maybe something with the contacts in the camera, maybe some small circuit drains the charge. But 100 and even 200 frames on one fuja battery are critically small. Even at d200 it could have been like that, and even that is not enough, but the fuj according to my observations for some reason holds a charge better than the exact same nikon.

    • Ivan

      Kind..
      I can offer a new, original booster + original battery.
      Write highfisherman@bigmir.net we will agree.

  • Simon

    But who has experience with using EN-EL3e batteries, they are put in the handle and the Proshka's battery compartment will rise? NP-150 stands there. Unsubscribe who knows ... http://ali.pub/2i8c7h

    • Vladimir

      Simon, I ordered an ali baht block, I'll try with Akum from Nikon I will give feedback.

    • Jury

      Nikon's battery will fit into the battery compartment of the firmware - this is 100%, I tried it in the store, but it will not work.

      • Vladimir

        Well, as an option, you can try to put a native camera to determine it and then add it to a non-native one.

        • Jury

          possible, but I have not tried it. Unsubscribe when you try, here the info will remain for future generations :)

          • Vladimir

            I used to cheat a carcass on Nikon 5100. I’ll write it anyway.

          • Vladimir

            The bat unit got working with non-native batteries that the camera sees, but I can not try the batteries for the D200. Friends do not have such (((

  • Simon

    Fuj, I will not part with him :))))

    • Jury

      And EXIF ​​says that the Canon EOS 5D

      • Simon

        Yes, I just came to my senses with the heat of the heat ... and there is no way to fix it ... There are two devices and sometimes files are in the same folder ... I like both of them ... The error came out.

      • zengarden

        This is the name of the girl :)

        • Oleg

          Meet this Fuj, is she my girlfriend?

  • Voznesensk - Nikolaev region

    Tell Simon, which lens did you use for your above laid out photos, with a Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro camera?

    • Simon

      One person asked the right question :)
      Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro + 35KP 1,8 / 100

    • Simon

      And the last photo got here by mistake; it was taken on a Canon 5D + Sigma 50 / 1,4

  • Voznesensk - Nikolaev region

    Thanks for the answer, Simon!
    Clarification, and it’s for sure 100, and not the former at Arcadia’s 120mm review (https://radojuva.com/2015/12/35kp-1-8-120/)?
    Do you have the opportunity to shoot the same lens only with a Fujifilm FinePix S3 Pro camera?
    In order to compare the three with the five with this lens. (as for me he is gorgeous).

    • Simon

      I don't have a triple, it seemed to me too archaic ... But I think there is nothing to compare here ... The lens draws as not one other glass. I have 100 mm. exactly ... six lenses ... The one that in the 120 mm review is the same as six lenses, I think it will not be worse, but for the crop it will be many millimeters ... 100mm + 1,5 = 150 mm. This is enough ...

  • Igor

    Tell me where can I buy this miracle?

    • Vladimir

      Igor, I bought myself not long ago at OLH. Here's a friend who sells in my opinion the price is 6,8 k. If interested, write your email, I'll throw off the link.

      • Igor

        Thank you so much for the answer, Vladimir. But, I obviously was mistaken and did not leave my question there. I'm interested in the camera itself, I think you are writing about the lens. I apologize again. I'm interested in a camera.

        • Vladimir

          Igor, I’m writing about the camera, it’s just that the camera is not new but was in use, you can see the condition and talk directly to the seller. It’s not correct to write a link to the seller here, if you are interested write to the mail.naum29@ukr.net

Add a comment

Copyright © Radojuva.com. Blog author - Photographer in Kiev Arkady Shapoval. 2009-2023

English-version of this article https://radojuva.com/en/2012/05/obzor-fujifilm-finepix-s5-pro/comment-page-6/

Versión en español de este artículo https://radojuva.com/es/2012/05/obzor-fujifilm-finepix-s5-pro/comment-page-6/