If you cannot find a suitable topic for your question, add it to this section.
Perhaps a site search will help you:
Just enter your search query in the specified field:
In the comments, you can ask a question on the topic and they will answer you, as well as you can express your opinion or describe your experience. For the selection of photographic equipment, I recommend large catalogs, for example E-Catalog. Many little things for the photo can be found on AliExpress.
Please note that for some questions I do not know the answers, or the answer requires 10 pages of text. When asking questions, try to formulate them correctly and in a detailed manner, honestly, neither I nor other readers of Radozhiva have telepathy and can not understand and even more so answer short, meaningless questions.
If you are completely stuck, then consult with me on my contacts (preferably through any messenger and / or social network).
The material was prepared by Arkady Shapoval. My Youtube channeland Radozhiva's group on Facebook и VK.
I have a Canon 600D.
Please help me choose a lens for shooting birds. I'm already completely confused about these telephoto cameras🤯
Look at focal points. Conditionally from 70mm (80, 100, 150) to 400mm (500, 600). If the birds are not particularly wild, maybe up to 300mm will be enough. Or even a native 55-250.
I myself have a 75-300 III USM telephoto lens. For birds, taking pictures is just the thing. Focusing is very fast and accurate despite the size of the lens. =)
You can also buy a regular 75-300 III without a USM motor. He is also normal, in principle, no worse than mine.
I really like the Canon EF-S 55-250 IS STM - it's inexpensive, lightweight, quiet focusing and there is a stabilizer. In theory, the non-STM version will be just as good, just there will be a noticeable sound from the autofocus.
I advise you NOT to take a telephoto lens without a stabilizer, as at such focal lengths without it there will be frequent smears in weather other than sunny.
Nikon 3200 18-55
I want to take up product photography and upgrade. Tell me to change the device to the D5200 18-105 or to save up on the D7100 or get a better lens? Fix 50 mm, 85mm ...?
Why change the camera? An advanced camera is handy, of course. Only objects don't run anywhere. Macro lens and light is what you need
It is definitely not necessary to change your camera for product photography. Just what do you mean by subject shooting? What are the sizes of the items? It depends on whether you need a macro lens.
And what exactly are the advantages of these cameras are you going to use in your product photography? They even have the same matrices, plus or minus. Everything must somehow go from specific needs a la “I got down to business, faced such and such difficulties, found out that it is the limitations of the camera (and not the lens / light / skills) that hinder me, and such and such a camera is the restriction removes ”.
nikkor 105 2.8D micro, but only manual focus will be on the soap dishes.
> soap dishes
лол
Some comrades disparagingly call Nikon's initial cameras, which do not have a focusing screwdriver, “point-and-shoot”.
True, today the situation has become somewhat more complicated with the release of premium segment mirrorless cameras))
I've never seen anything like it
"I've never seen anything like it"
So here, just now :)
Is there a screwdriver on the UPC? here is the answer.
Nikon has exactly one soap dish, which is not quite a soap dish, although it is very similar to it. and I even have it :)
Are you talking about the 3000 series? So the 5000th series is the same in size, only the functionality is a little wider. And even the lack of broad functionality does not prevent the entry-level cameras from taking good pictures.
I think a conversation about one
Of course not. 3xxx and 5xxx are not cameras. even the gift of ninnada. and the one that I called a soap box, but not quite, is called te-pisyat. a very peculiar camera. although, in its essence, the camera is extremely entry-level, it has a screwdriver, a top display and an excellent color CCD matrix. And the funny thing is that the 80-200 2.8 focuses on it exactly on any FR, while the older Nikons, which I also have, smear the focus at 200mm, and I have to shoot at 175-180mm.
although I generally shoot with kenon, and I just collect nikons :)
> 3xxx and 5xxx are not cameras
> I called it a soap box, but not quite, my name is te-pisyat
> Nikons just collect
Very exciting. Well, and those cameras that cameras - you probably love them very much, dress them up in suits and play with them?
There is certainly no point in changing the carcass for a subject. Is that at 5xxx, because of the rotary display. Or immediately to the Federation Council, if the budget allows. If not, it's better to spend money on something else: light, table, backgrounds, etc.
Absolute IMHO: if you intend to constantly work with an object in a static location of the device, then it is important to make sure whether it is possible to control the operation of the device from a computer, via Remote Control for Nikon. In this regard, the younger Nikon line is severely cut even in comparison with the 5th series, except that you can try the third-party digiCamControl program. I use digiCam myself with my Nikon d3100. But the d5100 is already normally controlled by Nikon's native toolkit. Although ... Nikonovsky somehow falls short of the capabilities of the Canon software, unfortunately ...
Should I go from nikon d5100 to d7100? Thanks.
It depends on what you want from such a transition.
What doesn't suit you about the D5100? Why exactly on the D7100?
Any camera is a compromise. Lose the swivel screen, get the top display. The 7100 is stronger but heavier. The files are larger, and the computer will have a harder time handling them. But the 7100 has a screwdriver, you can use non-motorized lenses ... And so on. There are a million nuances
There is simply an opportunity to buy for 22 with a shot of only 000. I love macro photography and, as I read, the 9 gives a sharper shot.
Trueash! Thank you for your feedback, all this is familiar, I just wanted a new technique. The sight was at first at 750, but ... a lot of priblud for a crop and being torn between two fires is not for me. I need one thing for me.
Thank you all and all the best. Do not be ill!
Hello! Can you please tell me if you need to disable the “VR” option on the camera if the “VR” option on the lens is on? (Nikon D3500 camera.Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-140mm f / 3.5-5.6G ED VR lens)
Does this camera have a stabilizer ?!
Setting “vr” in the camera for lenses that do not have this switch on the body, but with a stabilizer, for example, af-p 70-300 vr.
Look, they were wise)
there is
now it is turned on in the camera and manually turned on on the lens ... I think some option should be excluded
Hello! Can't categorize this lens! Help pzhlsta ... ..https://www.avito.ru/krasnoyarsk/fototehnika/nikon_af_50mm_f1.4_japan_2111645959
Nikon 50mm 1: 1.4 AF Nikkor
In the review about 50 1.4 D is mentioned in the list (item 1,2)
thank you
Good evening.
I have added the MTO-1000 object for the photographic month.
On the new M-39-42 (I attach a photo) it looks like screwing.
I can’t hook on my Nikon D750 through the sleepers.
K_ltse KP-A / N does not get screwed up, croc is prickly yakis іnshy.
Krishka is screwed onto the obverse from the Zenith.
I’ll be for help.
KP-A / N is not guilty of mother of any money and obviously not to screw up the M42. If the ob'ktiv does not become through vbudovanie sleeps, then the best time is to sell the ob'ktiv.
Dyakuyu for a comment. And yak KP-A / N is guilty of krypitisya to the obktiv? three bolts?
KP-A / N can only be attached to the object with the shank "A", so, three guintics (dorechi, thread in tsikh gvitikakh стат :)) https://radojuva.com/2011/04/optika-na-nikon/comment-page-1/#m42-mount
And I think for what are the cogs)
Having tried їх screw it up - virivaє, do not worry about what to cry about.
For all the shank is іnshy, for all the hands :)
Shvidsha for everything will have to, whichever transitions are screwed, I don’t know anything else.
Mabut treba vidihnuti, and re-read the article on my head.
“Then there are lenses with M42 thread, the use of which imposes some difficulties when working with the Nikon system. The working distance of the M42 is shorter than that of Nikon, so here the problem of focusing at infinity arises. To install such lenses on Nikon cameras, there is an adapter KP-42 / N and KP-42 / N with a lens. These adapters are also called M42-Nikon and M42-Nikon with corrective lens. "
I will try the M42-Nikon adapter.
There is a margin at infinity, with the m42-Nikon adapter it should work.
I have a similar one, but 500 mm, 3M-5A, everything is ok.
There is a review https://www.nikon.ru/ru_RU/product/nikkor-lenses/auto-focus-lenses/dx/af-s-dx-nikkor-16-80mm-f-2-8-4e-ed-vr ?
Not yet, send the lens for a test - it will :)
I will not send my darling. I love him myself. Yes, and I live far away
In Novosibirsk.
"In Novosibirsk." Are you talking to me?
I made a mistake?