Reviews from readers Radozhiva

Writing a Sigma 200-500mm f / 2.8 for review is difficult, but making a quality note about the lens is easy

Writing a Sigma 200-500mm f / 2.8 for review is difficult, but preparing the best quality note about the lens will not be difficult

Dear readers of Radozhiva, on my site there are already a lot of reviews of interesting photographic equipment. Basically, all the photographic equipment for reviews was provided by readers of Radozhiva, less often, by official representatives of large companies or online stores. Unfortunately, many cannot send me photographic equipment for review due to shipping problems, or they are simply very worried about the integrity of their equipment in the wrong hands. Therefore, I invite everyone to share information on their unusual / unique / rare lens (or other photo equipment) with readers of Radozhiva. To do this, you can try to write a brief review / note about the lens yourself.

I do not want Radozhiva to turn into a hotbed of micro-comments on photographic equipment, because there will be no forum or registration on the site yet. In order for your review to appear on Radozhiva, you need to prepare at least 5 photos of the appearance of the lens and at least 5 sample photos using it, as well as write any useful text on its features. It is very important that the text has not been published anywhere before. To everyone who is interested and ready to share information, I will help with writing a review / note / article.

Reviews from readers Radozhiva

Canon:

  1. Canon Zoom Lens EF 11-24mm 1: 4 L USM Ultrasonic (review from reader Radozhiva)
  2. Canon Zoom Lens EF-S 10-18mm 1: 4.5-5.6 IS STM. Reader Review
  3. Canon EF 28-70 f / 3.5-4.5 II, a review from the reader Radozhiva
  4. Canon Lens EF-S 24mm 1: 2.8 STM. Radozhiva Reader Review
  5. CANON LENS EF 50mm 1: 1.4 USM. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  6. CANON LENS FL 50mm 1: 1.8. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  7. Canon Lens EF 100mm 1: 2 Ultrasonic. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  8. Canon Speedlite 600EX-RT (review by reader Radozhiva)

Nikon:

  1. Nikon 1 AW1 (joint review)
  2. Nikon Df
  3. Nikon F4. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  4. Nikon F50. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  5. Nikon Series E 28mm 1: 2.8 MKII. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  6. Nippon Kogaku Japan Nikkor-P Auto 1: 2.5 f = 105mm. Radozhiva Reader Review
  7. Nikon Nikkor 50mm 1: 1.8 (AI-S). Review from the reader Radozhiva
  8. Nikon NIkkor 85mm 1: 2 (AI-S). Review from the reader Radozhiva
  9. Comparative review of Nikon AF DC-Nikkor 135mm 1: 2D Defocus Image Control by reader Radozhiva
  10. Nikon AF Nikkor 24-50mm 1: 3.3-4.5. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  11. Nikon AF Nikkor 75-240mm 1: 4.5-5.6. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  12. Nikon AF-P DX 70-300mm 1: 4.5-6.3G ED VR. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  13. Nikon 1 J3. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  14. Nikon Micro-NIKKOR 200mm 1: 4 (AI). Review from the reader Radozhiva

Sony:

  1. Sony 85mm f / 2.8 SAM (SAL85f28) (review of the lens from the reader Radozhiva)
  2. Minolta AF 50mm f / 1.7 (review of a lens from the reader Radozhiva)
  3. MINOLTA MD ROKKOR 50mm 1: 1.2. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  4. Minolta AF ZOOM 70-210mm 1: 4.5 (22) -5.6. Review from the reader Radozhiva

Sigma:

  1. Sigma 85mm 1: 1.4 DG HSM | A (Art)
  2. Sigma EX 150mm 1: 2.8 APO MACRO DG HSM Optical Stabilizer review by reader Radozhiva
  3. Sigma 24-105mm 1: 4 DG HSM | A (Art)
  4. Sigma 10-20mm 1: 4.5-5.6 DC HSM

Tokina:

  1. Tokina AT-X PRO SD 16-28 F2.8 (IF) FX Aspherical N / AIS (review from the reader Radozhiva)
  2. Tokina 17 / 3.5 RMC (II). Review from the reader Radozhiva
  3. RMC TOKINA 80-200mm 1: 4. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  4. Angenieux Zoom F.28-70 1: 2.6 AF. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  5. Tokina AF Aspherical 28-105 1: 3.5-4.5 (JAPAN C / EF). Review from the reader Radozhiva
  6. RMC Tokina 100-300mm 1: 5.6. Review from the reader Radozhiva

Tamron:

  1. Tamron 28-75mm F / 2.8 Di III RXD (Model A036). Review from the reader Radozhiva
  2. Tamron Adaptall-2 35-70mm F3.5 CF Macro (17A)
  3. Tamron SP AF Aspherical Di LD [IF] 17-35mm F / 2.8-4 A05. Review from the reader Radozhiva

Pentax:

  1. SMC Pentax-DA 1: 3.5-5.6 18-135mm ED AL [IF] DC WR. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  2. SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1: 4 70-210mm. Review from the reader Radozhiva

Soviet lenses:

Industar:

  1. I-26m (Industar-26M) 52 / 2.8, redone for EF mount with preservation of infinity (review from the reader Radozhiva)
  2. Industar-22 1: 3,5 F = 5cm P (KMZ, 1954) (review from a reader of Radozhiva)
  3. INDUSTRAR-61L / D 2,8 / 55 (review from the reader Radozhiva)
  4. Industar-55U 140 / 4.5, adapted for SLR cameras. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  5. Industar-58U photo zoom lens adapted for SLR cameras. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  6. Rangefinder lens Industar-22 1: 3,5 F = 50mm P (KMZ), adapted for the M42. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  7. I-100U. Article from the reader of Radozhiva

Helios:

  1. Helios-44 1: 2 F = 5,8 cm P KMZ (with replaced lenses, a review of a rare lens from a reader Radozhiva)
  2. Helios-65T 1: 2 F = 5cm (KMZ), adapted for the M42. Review from the reader Radozhiva

ERA:

  1. Era-12 125/4 (review from the reader Radozhiva)

Jupiter

  1. Jupiter-21T 200/4, KMZ (1968). Review from the reader Radozhiva
  2. JUPITER-9 1: 2 F = 8.5cm (KMZ). Review from the reader Radozhiva
  3. MC Jupiter-9 2/85 (LZOS). Review from the reader Radozhiva
  4. JUPITER-8M 1: 2 F = 5 cm. Review from the reader Radozhiva

World:

  1. MC MIR-20M 3,5 / 20 (review from the reader Radozhiva)
  2. MIR-1 2,8 / 37A. Review from the reader Radozhiva

Zenitar:

  1. MC Zenitar 1.2 / 50s (review from the reader Radozhiva)

Tahir:

  1. TAIR-3 4,5 / 300-A (ZOMZ, 1967)
  2. Tair-62T 95 / 2.5
  3. Tair-41 50/2 (LZOS)

Vega:

  1. Vega-5U 4/105 (MMZ) (review from the reader Radozhiva)
  2. Review of the deeply modified Vega-22UTs F / 5.6 (2.5) 103 mm (MMZ) from a reader Radozhiva
  3. VEGA-3 2,8 / 50 (KMZ). Review from the reader Radozhiva

Others:

  1. TRIPLET Triplet 2.8 / 78 (MMZ) (overview of a slide projection lens from a reader of Radozhiva)
  2. PO 500-1 F9CM. 1: 2 P. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  3. Soft achromat 135 / 2.8. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  4. Triplet-69-3 4/40. Review from the reader Radozhiva.
  5. Triplet 69-3 4/40 from the Silhouette-Electro camera
  6. Overhead lens Triplet 78 / 2.8
  7. KO-120M 1: 1.8 F = 120mm (review of a film projection lens from a reader Radozhiva)
  8. 35KP-1.8 / 120 (review from the reader Radozhiva)
  9. Overview of aerial photography lens Uranus-27 (Uranus-27) 2.5 / 100 from a reader Radozhiva
  10. Instrument lens option FS-2 300 / 4.5
  11. Filming lens LOMO OKS1-40-1 40 / 2.5
  12. LENKINAP RO500-1 F = 9cm 1: 2 P. Review from the reader
  13. ZM-5A 8/500. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  14. LOMO T-43 40/4, adapted for cameras with EF mount. Review from Realogiva Reader
  15. A review of a homemade 50 / 3.5 achromat lens from gluing a Zenith-TTL viewfinder from a reader of Radozhiva
  16. F = 137 137 / 5.6 (3.5), KOMZ. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  17. FED-5. Review of the film camera from the reader Radozhiva
  18. FED 5. Thoughts from the reader Radozhiva
  19. LOMO OKS11-35-1 F = 35 1: 2. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  20. HANIMAR LENS 1: 1.7 f = 50mm. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  21. ADMIRAL TELEPHOTO LENS 1: 4.5 f = 200mm. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  22. The lens from the MBS-2 microscope, its adaptation for a SLR camera. Note from the reader Radozhiva
  23. KONICA HEXANON 1: 1.8 f = 45mm. Review from the reader Radozhiva

Fujifilm:

  1. Fujifilm X-T1. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  2. Fuji X-T10 or mirrorless in the hands of an amateur (review from a reader Radozhiva)
  3. Fujifilm Finepix X-T10 with Fujinon XF 56mm f / 1.2 R lens, review by reader Radozhiva

Zeiss:

  1. 1Q T 1: 2.8 f = 50 aus Jena (Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 50 / 2.8 DDR). Radozhiva Reader Review
  2. Carl Zeiss Jena 1Q Pancolar 2/50, adapted for Nikon. Radozhiva Reader Review
  3. MC Carl Zeiss Jena DDR Pancolar auto 1.8 / 80. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  4. Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 1: 2,8 f = 8cm. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  5. MC CARL ZEISS JENA PRAKTICAR 1: 1.4 f = 50mm. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  6. Carl Zeiss Sonnar FE 1,8 / 55 ZA T * (Sony FE 1,8 / 55). Review from the reader Radozhiva

Other:

  1. Samsung 1: 2 30mm. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  2. Vivitar 135MM 1: 2.8 MC TELEPHOTO. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  3. Vivitar 28MM 1: 2.0 MC CLOSE FOCUS WIDE ANGLE. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  4. 7artisans 55mm f / 1.4 lens. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  5. VMC Vivitar Series 1 Macro Focusing 28-90 MM1: 2.8-3.5. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  6. AUTO Vivitar TELEPHOTO 200mm 1: 3.5 from the reader Radozhiva
  7. Lensbabies 2.0 (review from Radozhiva reader)
  8. AUTO PROMASTER MC ZOOM 1: 3.8 f = 75-150mm (review from the reader Radozhiva)
  9. FANCIER video tripod. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  10. Westron 35 / 2.8. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  11. Manfrotto Tripod MT190GOA4TB 190 Go! Review from the reader.
  12. X-1 system and Godox V850II flashes. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  13. Flash Andoer AD-980II. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  14. Meyer-Optik Görlitz Primoplan 1: 1.9 / 58 V. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  15. MC PENTACON PRAKTICAR 1: 2.4 f = 50mm. Review reader Radozhiva.
  16. KONICA HEXANON AR 40mm 40mm F1.8 (40 / 1.8). Review from the reader Radozhiva
  17. Angenieux Zoom F.28-70 1: 2.6 AF. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  18. Implementation of vignetting control “in glass and iron”. Material from the reader Radozhiva
  19. Best practices for using Defocus Image Control. Material from the reader Radozhiva.
  20. Color profiles in the photo. Article from the reader of Radozhiva
  21. Color model and more. Article from the reader of Radozhiva
  22. Schneider Super Cinelux 70/2. Review reader Radozhiva.

You can contact me on these contacts. Leave all questions, suggestions, etc. under this entry in the comments.

Thank you for attention. Arkady Shapoval.

Save

Add a comment:

Comments: 57, on the topic: Reviews from readers of Radozhiva

  • anonym

    On the Tamron Adaptall-2 35-70mm F3.5 CF Macro (17A) tab, an overview of Vega opens.

  • anonym

    And on veg industrial

  • Andrij

    Be a weasel, to look around Nikon F100. Dyakuyu

    • notapic

      Arkady does not write reviews on film cameras. This was stated in the review of the Nikon F8008s, sort of like.

  • Ivan

    Why is the Nikon F50 located in the “Other” section and not in the “Nikon”?

    • Ivan

      Arkady, the question remained unanswered.

      • Arkady Shapoval

        Fixed

    • BB

      Because all readers reviews are in the “Other” section.

      • Ivan

        Oh really?

Add a comment

Copyright © Radojuva.com. Blog Author - Photographer in Kiev Arkady Shapoval. 2009-2020

English-version of this article https://radojuva.com/en/2015/12/end-of-line/