Reviews from readers Radozhiva

Writing a Sigma 200-500mm f / 2.8 for review is difficult, but making a quality note about the lens is easy

It is difficult to submit a Sigma 200-500mm f / 2.8 for review, but preparing a high-quality note about the lens is not difficult.

Dear readers of the Radozhivs, on my site there are already a lot of reviews of interesting photographic equipment. Basically, all photographic equipment for reviews was provided by Radozhiva's readers, less often - by official representatives of large companies or online stores. Unfortunately, many people cannot send me photographic equipment for review due to shipping problems, or they are simply very worried about the integrity of their equipment in the wrong hands. Therefore, I invite everyone to share information on their unusual / unique / rare lens (or other photographic equipment) with Radozhiva's readers. To do this, you can try to write a short review / note about the lens yourself.

I do not want Radozhiva to turn into a hotbed of micro-comments on photographic equipment, because there will be no forum or registration on the site yet. In order for your review to appear on Radozhiva, you need to prepare at least 5 photos of the appearance of the lens and at least 5 sample photos using it, as well as write any useful text on its features. It is very important that the text has not been published anywhere before. To everyone who is interested and ready to share information, I will help with writing a review / note / article.

Reviews from readers Radozhiva

Canon:

  1. Canon Zoom Lens EF 11-24mm 1: 4 L USM Ultrasonic (review from reader Radozhiva)
  2. Canon Zoom Lens EF-S 10-18mm 1: 4.5-5.6 IS STM. Reader Review
  3. Canon Zoom Lens EF 24-70 1: 2.8 L II USM. Review from reader Radozhiva
  4. Canon EF 28-70 f / 3.5-4.5 II, a review from the reader Radozhiva
  5. Canon Lens EF-S 24mm 1: 2.8 STM. Radozhiva Reader Review
  6. Canon EF Lens 50mm 1: 1.0 L Ultrasonic. Review from reader Radozhiva
  7. CANON LENS EF 50mm 1: 1.4 USM. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  8. CANON LENS FL 50mm 1: 1.8. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  9. Canon Lens EF 100mm 1: 2 Ultrasonic. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  10. CANON ZOOM LENS EF 100-300MM 1: 5.6 L. Review by reader Radozhiva
  11. Canon Speedlite 600EX-RT (review by reader Radozhiva)

Nikon:

  1. Nikon 1 AW1 (joint review)
  2. Nikon Df
  3. Nikon F4. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  4. Nikon F50. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  5. Nikon Series E 28mm 1: 2.8 MKII. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  6. Nippon Kogaku Japan Nikkor-P Auto 1: 2.5 f = 105mm. Radozhiva Reader Review
  7. Nikon Nikkor 50mm 1: 1.8 (AI-S). Review from the reader Radozhiva
  8. Nikon NIkkor 85mm 1: 2 (AI-S). Review from the reader Radozhiva
  9. Comparative review of Nikon AF DC-Nikkor 135mm 1: 2D Defocus Image Control by reader Radozhiva
  10. Nikon AF Nikkor 24-50mm 1: 3.3-4.5. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  11. Nikon AF Nikkor 75-240mm 1: 4.5-5.6. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  12. Nikon AF-P DX 70-300mm 1: 4.5-6.3G ED VR. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  13. Nikon 1 J3. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  14. Nikon Micro-NIKKOR 200mm 1: 4 (AI). Review from the reader Radozhiva

Sony:

  1. Sony 85mm f / 2.8 SAM (SAL85f28) (review of the lens from the reader Radozhiva)
  2. Minolta AF 50mm f / 1.7 (review of a lens from the reader Radozhiva)
  3. MINOLTA MD ROKKOR 50mm 1: 1.2. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  4. Minolta AF ZOOM 70-210mm 1: 4.5 (22) -5.6. Review from the reader Radozhiva

Sigma:

  1. Sigma dp1
  2. Sigma 85mm 1: 1.4 DG HSM | A (Art)\
  3. Sigma EX 150mm 1:2.8 APO MACRO DG HSM Optical Stabilizer from reader Radozhiva
  4. Sigma 24-105mm 1: 4 DG HSM | A (Art)
  5. Sigma 10-20mm 1: 4.5-5.6 DC HSM

Tokina:

  1. Tokina AT-X PRO SD 16-28 F2.8 (IF) FX Aspherical N / AIS (review from the reader Radozhiva)
  2. Tokina 17 / 3.5 RMC (II). Review from the reader Radozhiva
  3. RMC TOKINA 80-200mm 1: 4. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  4. Angenieux Zoom F.28-70 1: 2.6 AF. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  5. Tokina AF Aspherical 28-105 1: 3.5-4.5 (JAPAN C / EF). Review from the reader Radozhiva
  6. RMC Tokina 100-300mm 1: 5.6. Review from the reader Radozhiva

Tamron:

  1. Tamron 17-35mm F/2.8-4 Di OSD
  2. Tamron 28-75mm F / 2.8 Di III RXD (Model A036). Review from the reader Radozhiva
  3. Tamron Adaptall-2 35-70mm F3.5 CF Macro (17A)
  4. Tamron SP AF Aspherical Di LD [IF] 17-35mm F / 2.8-4 A05. Review from the reader Radozhiva

Pentax:

  1. SMC Pentax-DA 1: 3.5-5.6 18-135mm ED AL [IF] DC WR. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  2. SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1: 4 70-210mm. Review from the reader Radozhiva

Soviet lenses:

Industar:

  1. Industar-29 1: 2,8 F = 8cm P (Arsenal). Review from reader Radozhiva
  2. INDUSTAR-22 1: 3.5 F = 50mm. Moscow (KMZ). Review of the lens from Rodion Eshmakov
  3. Industar-50 3,5 / 50 (LZOS, 1969). A review of the rangefinder lens from Rodion Eshmakov.
  4. Industar-61L 2,8 / 50 (LZOS). Overview from Rodion Eshmakov.
  5. Industar-24M 1: 3,5 F = 10,5 cm P (KMZ). Review from Rodion Eshmakov
  6. I-26m (Industar-26M) 52 / 2.8, redone for EF mount with preservation of infinity (review from the reader Radozhiva)
  7. Industar-26m 1: 2,8 F = 5 cm P (FED). Review from Rodion Eshmakov
  8. Industar-26m 1: 2,8 F = 5 cm P V2
  9. Industar-22 1: 3,5 F = 5cm P (KMZ, 1954) (review from a reader of Radozhiva)
  10. INDUSTRAR-61L / D 2,8 / 55 (review from the reader Radozhiva)
  11. Industar-55U 140 / 4.5, adapted for SLR cameras. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  12. Industar-58U photo zoom lens adapted for SLR cameras. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  13. Rangefinder lens Industar-22 1: 3,5 F = 50mm P (KMZ), adapted for the M42. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  14. I-100U. Article from the reader of Radozhiva

Helios:

  1. Helios-44 1: 2 F = 5,8 cm P KMZ (with replaced lenses, a review of a rare lens from a reader Radozhiva)
  2. Cyclop 1,5 / 85 (ROMZ) - a technical version of Helios-40-2 for use in night vision devices, adapted with an iris diaphragm. Review from Rodion Eshmakov
  3. Helios-65T 1: 2 F = 5cm (KMZ), adapted for the M42. Review from the reader Radozhiva

ERA:

  1. Era-12 125/4 (review from the reader Radozhiva)

Jupiter

  1. Jupiter-21T 200/4, KMZ (1968). Review from the reader Radozhiva
  2. JUPITER-9 1: 2 F = 8.5cm (KMZ). Review from the reader Radozhiva
  3. MC Jupiter-9 2/85 (LZOS). Review from the reader Radozhiva
  4. Jupiter-9 1: 2 F = 8,5cm P (KMZ, 1959) in a frame for Zenit cameras. Review from Rodion Eshmakov
  5. JUPITER-8M 1: 2 F = 5 cm. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  6. JUPITER-8 2/50 (KMZ, M39). Review from Rodion Eshmakov
  7. Jupiter-3 1: 1,5 F = 5cm P (ZOMZ, 1963) for Contax RF / Kiev. Review from Rodion Eshmakov
  8. Jupiter-12 2,8 / 35 (LZOS, 1973) for Kiev / Contax cameras. Review from reader Radozhiva
  9. Zorkiy BK 1: 2,8 F = 3.5cm P for Kiev cameras. Review from Rodion Eshmakov

World:

  1. MC MIR-20M 3,5 / 20 (review from the reader Radozhiva)
  2. MIR-1 2,8 / 37A. Review from the reader Radozhiva

Zenitar:

  1. MC Zenitar 1.2 / 50s (review from the reader Radozhiva)

Tahir:

  1. TAIR-3 4,5 / 300-A (ZOMZ, 1967)
  2. Tair-62T 95 / 2.5
  3. Tair-41 50/2 (LZOS)

Vega:

  1. Vega-5U 4/105 (MMZ) (review from the reader Radozhiva)
  2. Review of the deeply modified Vega-22UTs F / 5.6 (2.5) 103 mm (MMZ) from a reader Radozhiva
  3. VEGA-3 2,8 / 50 (KMZ). Review from the reader Radozhiva
  4. VEGA-M-1 2,8 / 35 from the rare Narcissus chamber. Review from Rodion Eshmakov

Others:

  1. Boyer Paris Saphir 1: 1.9 F = 75
  2. MC RUBINAR 300/4.5 Macro
  3. MC Rubinar 5,6 / 500 Macro
  4. MC Rubinar 8/500 MACRO
  5. MSZM-7K 5,6 / 300
  6. TRIPLET Triplet 2.8 / 78 (MMZ) (overview of a slide projection lens from a reader of Radozhiva)
  7. Triplet 78 / 2.8
  8. PO 500-1 F9CM. 1: 2 P. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  9. KO-90 1: 1,9 F = 9cm
  10. Soft achromat 135 / 2.8. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  11. Triplet-69-3 4/40. Review from the reader Radozhiva.
  12. Triplet 69-3 4/40 from the Silhouette-Electro camera
  13. Overhead projection Triplet-5 100 / 2.8 (Rogachevsky plant "Overhead") with a homemade 0.7x speed booster. Review from Rodion Eshmakov
  14. Overhead lens Triplet 78 / 2.8
  15. KO-120M 1: 1.8 F = 120mm (review of a film projection lens from a reader Radozhiva)
  16. KO-120M 120 / 1.8 with a diaphragm and a helicoid. Review of the adapted cinema projection lens from Rodion Eshmakov
  17. 35KP-1.8 / 120 (review from the reader Radozhiva)
  18. 35KP-1,8 / 75
  19. 35KP-1.8 / 100 (MMZ named after Vavilov). Review of a projection lens adapted in a two-aperture version from the reader Radozhiva
  20. Overview of aerial photography lens Uranus-27 (Uranus-27) 2.5 / 100 from a reader Radozhiva
  21. Instrument lens option FS-2 300 / 4.5
  22. Filming lens LOMO OKS1-40-1 40 / 2.5
  23. LENKINAP RO500-1 F = 9cm 1: 2 P. Review from the reader
  24. ZM-5A 8/500. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  25. LOMO T-43 40/4, adapted for cameras with EF mount. Review from Realogiva Reader
  26. A review of a homemade 50 / 3.5 achromat lens from gluing a Zenith-TTL viewfinder from a reader of Radozhiva
  27. F = 137 137 / 5.6 (3.5), KOMZ. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  28. FED-5. Review of the film camera from the reader Radozhiva
  29. FED 5. Thoughts from the reader Radozhiva
  30. LOMO OKS11-35-1 F = 35 1: 2. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  31. LOMO OKS1-22-1 F = 22 1: 2.8. Review of a cinema lens from Rodion Eshmakov
  32. The lens from the MBS-2 microscope, its adaptation for a SLR camera. Note from the reader Radozhiva
  33. Minitar 1 1: 2.8 32mm (LOMO), adapted for Sony mirrorless cameras. Review from Rodion Eshmakov
  34. LOMO Zh-53 F = 75 1: 2. Review of an adapted cinema projection lens from reader Radozhiva
  35. LOMO P-6M F=12cm 1:1.6

Fujifilm:

  1. Fujifilm X-T1. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  2. Fuji X-T10 or mirrorless in the hands of an amateur (review from a reader Radozhiva)
  3. Fujifilm Finepix X-T10 with Fujinon XF 56mm f / 1.2 R lens, review by reader Radozhiva

Zeiss:

  1. Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 1: 2,8 f = 7,5cm
  2. Carl Zeiss Jena Dokumar 8/38
  3. 1Q T 1: 2.8 f = 50 aus Jena (Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 50 / 2.8 DDR). Radozhiva Reader Review
  4. Carl Zeiss Jena 1Q Pancolar 2/50, adapted for Nikon. Radozhiva Reader Review
  5. MC Carl Zeiss Jena DDR Pancolar auto 1.8 / 80. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  6. Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 1: 2,8 f = 8cm. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  7. Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 1: 2,8 f = 80 mm T
  8. Carl Zeiss Jena 1Q Tessar 3,5 / 105 T
  9. MC CARL ZEISS JENA PRAKTICAR 1: 1.4 f = 50mm. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  10. Carl Zeiss Sonnar FE 1,8 / 55 ZA T * (Sony FE 1,8 / 55). Review from the reader Radozhiva
  11. Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2,8 / 85 by reader Radozhiva
  12. Carl Zeiss Jena 1Q Sonnar 2,8 / 180 [author Rodion Eshmakov]
  13. Carl Zeiss Jena DDR Sonnar 4/300. Review from Rodion Eshmakov
  14. Carl Zeiss Jena DDR Tevidon 1.8 / 50. Review from reader Radozhiva

Other:

  1. Petzval 180 mm f / 4.5 (A. Darlot, Paris, 1862)
  2. Samsung 1: 2 30mm. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  3. HANIMAR LENS 1: 1.7 f = 50mm. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  4. ADMIRAL TELEPHOTO LENS 1: 4.5 f = 200mm. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  5. KONICA HEXANON 1: 1.8 f = 45mm. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  6. Vivitar 135MM 1: 2.8 MC TELEPHOTO. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  7. Vivitar 28MM 1: 2.0 MC CLOSE FOCUS WIDE ANGLE. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  8. 7artisans 55mm f / 1.4 lens. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  9. 7Artisans DJ-OPTICAL 50 / 1.1
  10. VMC Vivitar Series 1 Macro Focusing 28-90 MM1: 2.8-3.5. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  11. AUTO Vivitar TELEPHOTO 200mm 1: 3.5 from the reader Radozhiva
  12. Lensbabies 2.0 (review from Radozhiva reader)
  13. AUTO PROMASTER MC ZOOM 1: 3.8 f = 75-150mm (review from the reader Radozhiva)
  14. FANCIER video tripod. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  15. What to look for when choosing a tripod for a camera or camcorder. Note from partner Radozhiva
  16. Westron 35 / 2.8. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  17. Manfrotto Tripod MT190GOA4TB 190 Go! Review from the reader.
  18. X-1 system and Godox V850II flashes. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  19. Flash Andoer AD-980II. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  20. Meyer-Optik Görlitz Primoplan 1: 1.9 / 58 V. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  21. MC PENTACON PRAKTICAR 1: 2.4 f = 50mm. Review reader Radozhiva.
  22. Technical lens 2.8 / 125mm (Pentacon) adapted for Canon SLR cameras. Review from Rodion Eshmakov
  23. KONICA HEXANON AR 40mm 40mm F1.8 (40 / 1.8). Review from the reader Radozhiva
  24. Angenieux Zoom F.28-70 1: 2.6 AF. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  25. Implementation of vignetting control “in glass and iron”. Material from the reader Radozhiva
  26. Best practices for using Defocus Image Control. Material from the reader Radozhiva.
  27. Color profiles in the photo. Article from the reader of Radozhiva
  28. Color model and more. Article from the reader of Radozhiva
  29. Schneider Super Cinelux 70/2. Review reader Radozhiva.
  30. Rodenstock Rodagon 1: 2.8 f = 50 mm. Review of the lens for the enlarger from the reader Radozhiva
  31. Fisheye lens projections, or entertaining geometry of wide viewing angles. Article from the reader Radozhiva
  32. Zenit-12SD. Review of a film camera from reader Radozhiva
  33. Pentakta 2.8 (2) / 30 projection lens adapted for Sony mirrorless cameras. Review from the reader Radozhiva.
  34. Konica Minolta Dynax 5D. Review from the reader Radozhiva
  35. Konica Minolta Dynax 7D from reader Radozhiva
  36. The lens of the PUSK-16 (50 / 2.8) precision universal high-speed camera, adapted for SLR cameras. Review from Rodion Eshmakov.
  37. Olympus E-20
  38. Canon PowerShot Pro1

Article:

  1. LCCO Action
  2. Major update for Adobe Lightroom Classic
  3. Mask / selection tools update
  4. About perspective distortion
  5. Lightroom Classic 11. Learn more about the new selection tools
  6. Alteration of Jupiter-3 1.5 / 50 for Sony E mount. Article from reader Radozhiva

You can contact me on these contacts. Leave all questions, suggestions, etc. under this entry in the comments.

Separate reviews from Rodion Eshmakov here.

Comments on this post do not require registration. Anyone can leave a comment.

Material prepared Arkady Shapoval.

Save

Add a comment:

 

 

Comments: 61, on the topic: Reviews from readers of Radozhiva

  • anonym

    On the Tamron Adaptall-2 35-70mm F3.5 CF Macro (17A) tab, an overview of Vega opens.

  • anonym

    And on veg industrial

  • Andrii

    Be a weasel, to look around Nikon F100. Dyakuyu

    • notapic

      Arkady does not write reviews on film cameras. This was stated in the review of the Nikon F8008s, sort of like.

  • Ivan

    Why is the Nikon F50 listed under “Other” and not “Nikon”?

    • Ivan

      Arkady, the question remained unanswered.

      • Arkady Shapoval

        Fixed

    • BB

      Because all reader reviews are in the "Other" section

      • Ivan

        Oh really?

  • Tim

    Sonya A290 with a whale 18-55 fell into my hands, is the review interesting?

    • Arkady Shapoval

      Yeah why not

  • Michael

    Good evening, how can I add my review?

    • Rodion

      Send it to Arkady using the contacts listed on the site?

Add a comment

Copyright © Radojuva.com. Blog author - Photographer in Kiev Arkady Shapoval. 2009-2024

English-version of this article https://radojuva.com/en/2015/12/end-of-line/

Version en español de este artículo https://radojuva.com/es/2015/12/end-of-line/