answers: 563

  1. BB
    06.03.2020

    Ochepyatka: 'amatro':
    “On the official Nikon website there are only two sections for modern SLR cameras - this is a professional section and an Amatro one”

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      06.03.2020

      Fixed

      Reply

  2. BB
    06.03.2020

    The beginning of the review: “The matrix of the Nikon D200, although some of its parameters are similar to the sensors used by the Nikon D80, D40x, D60, D3000 models, is still different. Details here.”

    End of review: “you can look at Nikon D80, which has exactly the same matrix from Nikon D200”

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      06.03.2020

      Fixed

      Reply

  3. Alexander
    18.04.2020

    Hello everyone, help me choose a great universal lens for this old camera and its number of megapixels? I take pictures of landscapes, animals and sometimes my wife) the price is not very important

    Reply

  4. Ssirman
    02.09.2020

    Are there any differences in the picture between the D200 and D3000?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      02.09.2020

      Yes there is

      Reply

      • Alexander
        10.11.2022

        What are the differences and in whose favor?
        D200 or d3000?

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        10.11.2022

        d200 is 2 classes higher, but in general the sensors are very similar in their capabilities, as is the focus module. A matter of taste and needs of certain options.

        Reply

  5. Ruslan Bond
    16.10.2020

    This is the only such camera with such a sensitive thing that is responsible for the white balance in auto mode) And something that is only in some special optics will help to fix the blue channel! :)
    Here is the solution to the warm-yellow-green color during the day, which many people encounter .. Partial solution))

    Reply

    • B. R. P.
      17.10.2020

      You are not Bond, you are Sherlock Holmes!

      Reply

    • Charles
      17.10.2020

      My girl has one little thing and ... what to talk about! (from)

      Reply

  6. Necrophil
    04.11.2020

    Hello dear community.
    Tell me, please, in which direction to develop)
    I use the D200 for portrait shooting outdoors (80%) and shooting dynamic scenes with (child 9 years old) Lens - 50mm 1,8D
    Not satisfied with the soapiness of pictures from a short distance with an open aperture. Well, I would also like to try other focal ones.
    I am considering Nikon AF Nikkor 70-210mm 1: 4Yu, the price is captivating, it is embarrassing that it is rather dark.
    Nikon 35-70 2,8D - according to reviews, an excellent portrait lens, I even looked at a couple, one with a fungus, the second without screws. I don’t quite understand whether it is needed, in the presence of 50mm., And the price is not much lower than 85mm 1,8 G ...
    Well, actually 85mm 1,8 G.

    Or from the wrong side, I get down to business, and go to Ktitorchuk's courses, or somewhere else?
    Prompt

    Reply

    • BB
      04.11.2020

      35-70 on a crop, no matter how that or that: as a station wagon - 35 is too much for a crop, I would take at least 20mm, the portrait starts at least from 70mm. That is, if you do not strive for a wide angle, then either 85mm, or something of the 70-200 / 210/300 class. f / 4 for such phased arrays is already quite good (if the model is sufficiently distant from the background, the background blurs well)

      Reply

    • Trueash
      04.11.2020

      Slightly exaggerating: you can shoot anything with anything. Here is a portrait at 16mm: https://thevaluablefriends.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Sony-A6400-Sigma-16mm-1.4-Low-light-test-The-perfect-combo-1280×640.jpg
      And James Popsys shoots landscapes on TV. Yes, 1.8D is slightly soapy at full open - well, cover up to 2,2 or 2,5 - my copy comes to life on this.
      If you really want a zoom, then there are not so many inexpensive lenses with a constant 2.8. I would recommend Tamron 2,8 / 28-75, but I did not like its bokeh (“onion rings”). But it focuses quickly, which is important for dynamic scenes.
      In general, any lens, even the most extreme one, is always a compromise. We must learn to bypass problematic moments and use strengths.

      Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      04.11.2020

      70-210 not the sharpest, more creative
      35-70 2.8d finding normal is difficult
      50 1.8d on the open, also not ice
      Develop in the direction of improving skills, with 50 1.8d you can do wonders, especially if you slightly modify the photo in editors, which is much more important than finding new lenses

      Reply

  7. Necrophil
    04.11.2020

    Thank you very much Arkady, thank you Trueash, thank you Vv.
    Indeed, everything is bad with photo processing for me) Chukchi is not a writer))) I like to shoot more. This means training, plus refinement in the editor.

    James Popsys looked up. Cool)

    Trueash - the portrait of the girl is cool of course) Especially the model
    When I need a wide angle - I shoot on a phone (Samsung), such a normal wide angle, with Kenon colors)

    Reply

  8. Vladimir
    12.02.2021

    There are two cameras Nikon D200 and Canon 500D. And whatever Canon 500D says here I think the results are better!

    Reply

    • Victor
      12.02.2021

      Nifiga.

      Reply

      • Vladimir
        12.02.2021

        Disadvantages: weight. battery drains quickly. winter exposure +2 stops should be set or shot in RAW!

        Reply

    • B. R. P.
      12.02.2021

      Pretty incoherent text. In any case, the results are better or worse for the photographer, not for the camera.

      Reply

      • Specialist
        12.02.2021

        Gold words.

        Reply

      • Vladimir
        12.02.2021

        Thanks for support! I used to lean towards Nikon. Now the color reproduction is better for Canon! Yes, and there are fewer problems!

        Reply

      • Victor
        12.02.2021

        Come on. It had both 50d (with the same matrix as the 500 and the 200) and the d500 - two hundred is better - the picture is clearer on the basic isos, the color is better, the control is much more convenient (it's even embarrassing to say that the 50d has a better viewfinder) 500d, it's even a shame to talk about XNUMXd again)

        Reply

      • Vladimir
        12.02.2021

        The camera is not for sports. reporting! For extremely leisurely shooting! If you shoot in JPEG THEN MANDATORY several shots with different exposures! Bracketing, in my opinion, does not work out its functions very well ...

        Reply

      • Victor
        12.02.2021

        Two hundred is not for sports / reporting? For extremely slow shooting?)))

        Well, don't tell fairy tales))

        I shot a lot of sporting events with a XNUMX - everything is fine there.

        Reply

      • Vladimir
        12.02.2021

        At what distance did you shoot? RAW?

        Reply

      • Victor
        12.02.2021

        At various distances. I always shoot Rav.

        Maybe you have something with optics ... wrong?

        Reply

      • Vladimir
        12.02.2021

        Well then, of course, we are sitting in Photoshop.

        Reply

      • Victor
        12.02.2021

        Well, “we are sitting” - it will be very loudly said, I almost never spend more than a couple of minutes per frame, more often - a minute.

        Reply

      • Vladimir
        12.02.2021

        What is the picture?

        Reply

      • Vladimir
        12.02.2021

        And the second one is not visible!

        Reply

      • B. R. P.
        12.02.2021

        ))) The fly is just visible) If something doesn’t work out for you (color reproduction, exposure, flies become invisible, etc.), what does the camera have to do with it? Any camera needs to be mastered and learn how to work with it.

        Reply

      • Vladimir
        12.02.2021

        A fly is visible - but no sharpness!

        Reply

      • B. R. P.
        12.02.2021

        What's with the camera?)

        Reply

      • Vladimir
        13.02.2021

        I shot as a child on Smena-8m. Is the camera good? or so-so? And the camera is useless! Here Victor admitted that he was “sitting” in the editor. Because he understands that there is no time to shoot well otherwise! Athletes run. Animals run. People are also impatient!

        Reply

      • Victor
        13.02.2021

        Victor "confessed" that he "sits" in the editors from one to two minutes per frame, which corresponds to the basic correction on ANY camera.

        If you have masterpieces at 500d right in a chamber jeep in any conditions, and it won't be difficult to give a couple of examples of this miracle, it would be extremely curious to look at them :-)

        Reply

  9. Vladimir
    24.02.2021

    More than 2 MB does not add.

    Reply

    • Victor
      24.02.2021

      What should this picture show?

      The fact that a card from a canon 500d can be reduced to the size of a nokia n70 display of a bearded year? ))) Well, yes. Can.

      Reply

  10. Vladimir
    24.02.2021

    Write your phone number.

    Reply

    • Victor
      24.02.2021

      This is to whom the appeal?

      Reply

      • Vladimir
        24.02.2021

        To you.

        Reply

      • Victor
        24.02.2021

        What would you like to discuss that can't be done in blog comments?

        Reply

  11. Vladimir
    10.03.2021

    How to remove pictures from white balance from presets D1-D4 Nikon d200?

    Reply

    • Michael
      10.03.2021

      No, it's not necessary. If annoying - you can do a factory reset

      Reply

      • Vladimir
        11.03.2021

        Thanks for the answer.

        Reply

  12. Vladislav
    30.05.2021

    Hello Arkady!
    Thanks for the great review of the retro camera pro. But which is still relevant today.
    You are often asked - which camera is better?
    But you always answer correctly, you can’t say and not advise d90 at one time, it’s more progressive in some respects, and you are a professional and for progress!
    Therefore, you should always learn to read your texts, and understand what everyone needs.
    And this comes with experience.
    You are very tactful in your blog, and intervene in the discussion only on the merits of the issue.
    Thank you.

    Reply

  13. Vladislav
    30.05.2021

    Another question for you, Arkady. I searched and did not find a sensible answer on the Nikon D200 firmware. I now have A-2.00, B-1.00. Do I need to update to the latest on the site nikon A-2.01, B-2.01.
    What do my firmware say, and what will be added after the new one?
    There is no flashing battery icon. Everything works fine.
    As they say, "Perfect is the enemy of good." My camera was shipped to Australia, ser. number starts 603…,
    Therefore, I have doubts whether it is necessary to update, are there any deterioration after the update? ?
    I need your advice, given your knowledge and experience in firmware updates.
    If possible, in more detail, not briefly.

    Reply

  14. Vladislav
    30.05.2021

    Once again - great review!
    In general, it’s very good that this camera was produced a long time ago, it’s good that there are a lot of complex settings, it’s good that it’s heavy and big ...
    Thanks to these qualities, it can now be bought quite inexpensively, in very good condition.
    But the most important thing for those who bought it is very pleasant film colors, lively and balanced.
    It's like sound tube amplifiers at a rather high price, but giving a lively natural sound, are now valued by music lovers all over the world. By the way, in the West, lamps and tube amplifiers themselves are still produced, as well as films for cameras. That is, everything for a person.
    I will add once again - the choice of camera depends on the tasks and preferences of the photographer.
    And nothing more.

    Reply

  15. Vdadislav
    03.06.2021

    Good afternoon.
    Arkady can not answer my question, I updated the firmware on the camera, everything is fine. It's good that the nikon website still has these firmware, although many years have passed.
    I will add to your review that there is no such delay of 3-5 seconds when you turn on the menu or view pictures. The delay is no more than 1 second, which is normal. Both before and after the firmware, this delay did not change.
    This remark will be useful to potential buyers of this wonderful camera.

    Reply

  16. Vladislav
    14.10.2021

    Good evening !
    Tell me how to understand the intricacies of the settings in the “Custom Settings” Nikon D200.
    With sharpness, contrast is understandable. But with the tonality, shade, I do not understand.
    How and in which direction to adjust in order to change these characteristics, and what will change in the photo?

    Reply

  17. Basil
    26.01.2023

    I took it. Mileage-0.

    Reply

    • Viktre
      26.01.2023

      Aha

      Reply

      • B. R. P.
        27.01.2023

        “See the run? -No. “But he is!” © almost DMB

        Reply

    • Dmitry Kostin
      27.01.2023

      Look at the condition and can be taken to the service for diagnostics.
      D200 with such mileage probably only from Japan in a box can come from a collector.
      The service software for old Nikons goes on the Internet and there you can correct the mileage (I saw it myself), but I didn’t see this to reset it to zero.

      Reply

      • Ilya
        18.01.2024

        The mileage is adjusted to the maximum possible for display and another photo is taken to reset it to zero. Don't thank

        Reply

      • Victor
        18.01.2024

        Are you joking like that now?)

        Reply

    • Stanislas
      25.02.2023

      I now have 6348, when I bought it, it was about 5500. In my opinion, this is also zero, for a collector the mileage is zero or one frame, this is probably a fetish, I don’t see anything negative in this. But for an ordinary person, the Nikon D200 mileage of 5500 frames is the same zero as for a collector

      Reply

  18. Basil
    27.01.2023

    Yes, colleagues, you were right in your skeptical comments. When I clicked on the frame and sent it to the mileage site/site, it showed 1. So I lied with 0.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      27.01.2023

      proofs?

      Reply

    • B. R. P.
      27.01.2023

      Mileage is quite easily reset to 0 using the so-called. service software. Aleksey 68 can tell you here from his rich practice. If you want)

      Reply

    • Viktre
      27.01.2023

      Your sarcasm, colleague, is understandable and forgivable.

      But please take a look below.

      Oops..)

      Reply

  19. Basil
    27.01.2023

    But no, colleagues. Believe it or not, I opened the box myself. Okay, let's say you can solder. Looks like it hasn't been touched. On the battery - not touched.
    Arkady, I don’t know what proofs are. :(
    Tell me where else you can look to check, although I believe without it.

    Reply

  20. Basil
    27.01.2023

    Ready to trade for a decent Epson RD1. For 200 years I have been dreaming of a rangefinder and still nothing.

    Reply

    • B. R. P.
      28.01.2023

      Vasily… do you have any idea how much this Epson RD1 costs? not to mention something else. Get ready to dream another 200 years)

      Reply

      • Basil
        28.01.2023

        I represent. But. First, I did not write that I was ready to change one for one. There would be a desire, you can discuss everything. Second - New Epsons flicker much more often than new Nikon D200s. Otherwise, they are comparable. Nikon will also be cooler. Here to whom as. Without departing far from this site, you can see what someone has a grip on, someone with one hand (it’s always interesting what he does with the second), someone has autofocus, someone has a rate of fire, video, a monitor, etc. ... and someone has a rangefinder and the absence of all of the above. People are different.

        Reply

    • Garik N.
      11.04.2024

      By the way, the Nikon D100 has exactly the same matrix as the Epson...
      This matrix was not installed anywhere else.

      Reply

  21. Eng
    30.07.2023

    There is a canon 450d, there are two nikons d40 and d200.
    At the canons, I went through all the pros 1d and dx, and the BZK Rki

    I stopped at Nikon d40, she is constantly with me with a whale lens 18-55, I shoot 90% on her now. Light, fast, but there is not enough live view, clean high ISO in the dark, and so on.

    I’m thinking of getting rid of the d200, well, it didn’t fit me at all.

    I like the picture better with Nikon's d40, but light and contrast are important.

    Canon 450d is convenient to work with manual lenses, and optics for canon in any country in a shaft :-)

    Reply

    • Andrii
      31.07.2023

      Sort out professional cameras and turn Nikon D40? Seriously?
      Simply, for the sake of tsіkavostі, but what didn't Canon EOS-1D and Canon EOS-1D X think?

      Reply

      • Eng
        01.08.2023

        I am a pro lover, the 1d and dx family eventually disappeared due to weight (broke my back).
        Namely, I like jpeg from 40, but here, as they say, for an amateur.

        Reply

      • Andrii
        01.08.2023

        Lover of what? Nothing came to mind. My google translation cannot translate into normal language those that you have written.

        Reply

      • B. R. P.
        01.08.2023

        Translate, Ukrainian)))

        Reply

      • Andrii
        01.08.2023

        Vіn same maє pobachiti hoch yakіs know the words, Chukchi.

        Reply

      • B. R. P.
        02.08.2023

        like a turbo. better than your mova ti vivchiv, hero.

        Reply

      • Viktre
        01.08.2023

        It was always interesting how you can tear your back with an extra kilogram.

        Reply

      • Dmitry Kostin
        01.08.2023

        neck.
        If the camera hangs around the neck.
        By the evening (depending on age, someone starts in 3-4 hours) the neck and lower back can become wooden. Well, things like darkening in the eyes will begin, when, for example, at a car show, you squat or kneel and then abruptly get up with a unit or something like D3-D4 and 24-70 / 2.8.
        If there is something like the D750, or even more so the weightless D40, then you get less tired.

        Reply

      • Dmitry Kostin
        01.08.2023

        And with light cameras, there will be no darkening.
        *
        And another such moment is already typical for the tropics - when it’s something like + 32-34С and high humidity outside, the belt is soaked with sweat and starts rubbing your sweaty neck and the next day you can’t hang a heavy camera around your neck.

        Reply

      • Eng
        02.08.2023

        That's right, I'm talking about this kilogram. The other day I tried sigma 30 1.4, it seems like a good glass, now a new dream :-)

        Reply

      • Garik N.
        11.04.2024

        I’ve never understood lugging around heavy DSLRs, and even with large heavy lenses around my neck.
        Small, lightweight cameras are another matter, there is no discomfort.
        How inconvenient it is, there are convenient photo bags and backpacks...

        Reply

      • Dima
        10.09.2023

        When you plan to constantly carry/carry a camera, you want minimal size and weight. You can’t just pull single bricks because you have nothing to do, you have to take them purposefully. Previously, with 1dm3 I rode a bike to the reservoir to photograph the sunset, in the evening 60 km with this brick behind my back was very felt, and also a lens, a tripod) That’s why now I’m also attracted to either a bzk or small DSLRs like d40 or 100d.

        Reply

  22. Nick
    18.11.2023

    Good afternoon, I have the following question: I now have a nikon d200 and a nikon 35mm f1.8 in my hands, I want to get a Helios 44-2, what do I need to buy/do in order to have an infinity focus?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      18.11.2023

      adapter with lens, this

      Reply

  23. Ilya
    18.01.2024

    On Kufar (RB) a d200 (20k+ mileage) appeared for almost $70, and there is a d7000 (120k mileage) for a little more than $100. If I had a need, I would not hesitate to take the d7000 in tandem with the existing one, rather than the overrated “professional” d200. Comrades who have read a lot of joy sometimes sell us a tired D40 at the price of a D5100 out of the box)) this is an SSD matrix with fat pixels))

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      18.01.2024

      If only they could shoot better with this “pixel” and sell it

      Reply

    • Dima
      25.03.2024

      The d7000 is also overrated, in my opinion, from that era of the most crooked and crooked cameras from Nikon) the d200 for $70 is an excellent option. You need to understand that CCD matrices today are more like a toy for the soul.

      Reply

      • Viktre
        26.03.2024

        It’s better then d80)

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        26.03.2024

        James Webb for 10 billion USD with CCD sensors cries loudly in halo orbit

        Reply

      • Dima
        27.04.2024

        Are there any proofs? On Hubble, yes, on Hubble it is very ancient.

        Reply

  24. alex
    31.01.2024

    Hello, while using the camera I encountered a focusing problem - it constantly misses, it’s especially painful when I use a manual lens, I don’t trust the focus indicator at all. For example, autofocus in my F100 works much faster and more accurately, I don’t understand how this can be. Maybe someone knows - this is the norm or it can be fixed somehow, for example with newer firmware.

    Reply

    • Alexander
      28.02.2024

      You need to adjust to the focus indicator. On my Nikons, focus will only come into focus when the indicator just starts blinking, and only if I turn the ring from the MDF towards infinity. If you turn the LED until it lights up steadily or rotate it from infinity to the MDF, then you won’t see a hit like your own ears.

      Reply

  25. Load more comments ...

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer