answers: 102

  1. Dmitriy
    03.07.2017

    My 5 cents, the day before yesterday I bought a similar device for Sonya A77 $ namely
    Tokina 28-70 / 2.8 AT-X Pro, construct-FIRE!
    2.8 - conditionally working (very soft), but on 3.2 it is already possible to take pictures, and from 4.0 - a razor., The color rendition is excellent, catches hares, but not critical ... I am very pleased with the glass, especially since I bought a used one in a state new) for only 5000 rubles.

    Reply

    • Pokekmon
      04.07.2017

      2 Dmitry:
      You are a bit mistaken about the topic by writing about 28-70 / 2.8 in the commentary on the 28-80 / 2.8 review.
      All the same, the glasses are a little different.

      Reply

    • EvAlex888
      23.09.2019

      Zaitsev also needs to be caught sometimes. It’s not for him to run after them.

      Reply

  2. Pokekmon
    01.10.2017

    Now I communicate with sellers about this glass and one of them amused me with this characteristic of this glass:
    “Tokina GLOW is 2.8 like in 70s porn movies, very cinematic).
    At 3.5, it is present in a minimal amount and is almost invisible. " :-)
    I also talked with the Japanese, the owner of such a glass, which he uses on an old D3S.
    He complained to me that this glass accentuates greens in the pictures.
    I saw another Japanese girl taking pictures with Angenieux 28-70 / 2.8, which she made friends with D800E.
    I even asked her again and she confirmed that it was Angenieux, and not something else.
    Either she knows how to process pictures or I don't know ... but the picture is different. There is no software / soap and veil even on the open one (with D800E it shouldn't be ...). The picture is also different - somewhat similar to the film. Much more interesting than on Tokin 28-70 / 2.8.

    Reply

  3. Pokekmon
    07.10.2017

    It was possible to compare the 28-70 / 2.8 AT-X PRO II and the AT-X PRO 28-80 1: 2.8 Aspherical N / AIS.
    The first one works with my camera is not very stable - as I wrote earlier, I have to constantly monitor the metering and set the -0.7EV correction, otherwise the camera tends to set a longer shutter speed in the aperture priority mode than necessary, and the picture becomes overexposed. Now I also noticed that the camera tends to lighten the first frame, and make the next a little more accurate (in the sense of a little darker). Sharpness floats - in the 0-35mm range it is maximum, 50-28mm less, 35-50mm even less. Checked on a closed diaphragm to 70.
    At 28-80 / 2.8, you also have to track the metering. But the camera works with this glass a little more accurately and the -0.3EV corrections are more likely, while at 28-70 / 2.8 you need to set -0.7EV under the same conditions.
    The sharpness of the 28-80 / 2.8 is slightly better than the 28-70 / 2.8.
    Compared on fotkanii brick wall of the house opposite. The weight of files at 28-80 / 2.8 consistently turned out to be more. Sharpness in the range of 35-50mm is again maximum, at 28-35mm it is almost the same. At 50-80mm falls, and the more to 70-80mm, the more soap. Although the picture is not much worse than 28-70 / 2.8, in the range of 50-70mm. About the same.
    In the range of 70-80mm, the 28-80 / 2.8 is noticeably lighter (more than 70mm for the 28-70 / 2.8) the picture - the shutter speed increases.
    28-80 / 2.8 is noticeably larger and heavier than 28-70 / 2.8.
    28-80 / 2.8 more emphasis on green than 28-70 / 2.8.
    This was confirmed to me by the Japanese from the flikra, which uses 28-80 / 2.8 on the D3S.
    Focusing is fast enough with both lenses, but 28-80 / 2.8 misses more often than 28-70 / 2.8. M. b. didn't work out with my camera - xs. The percentage of misses is small, but it is there.
    I do not know what this is connected with. There seems to be no back / front focus with my camera. Specially rechecked.
    At 28-80 / 2.8, it seemed to me that distortion was more and more unpleasant in the range of 28-35 mm than in 28-70 / 2.8 in the same range. The camera (old FF Nikon) does not automatically correct it.
    The distortion is not as terrible as on the old Sigma 28-70 / 2.8, but it is very similar.
    I forgot to add both at 28-70 / 2.8 and at 28-80 / 2.8 the aperture 2.8 is not working.
    And there and there soap and a whitish “veil” (aka Tokina glow).
    Everything becomes working on aperture 4 and above.

    Reply

  4. Andrei
    08.10.2017

    Good afternoon, Arkady. I bought the same lens on Ebee from Japan. I liked the lens, but it has a color of enlightenment green (not purple as in your review) and a plate with the name of the lens is all completely golden. Is this some other modification of this lens?
    Thank you.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      08.10.2017

      This is the same Tokina as in this review. Over time, small decorative elements can change, the same applies to enlightenment. Green enlightenment is usually newer. The same is observed with Nikon lenses.

      Reply

      • Andrei
        08.10.2017

        Got it. Thank.

        Reply

    • Pokekmon
      09.10.2017

      2 Andrew:
      I also have green enlightenment at 28-80 / 2.8 :-)
      The lens was purchased in Japan.

      Reply

  5. Alexander
    05.02.2018

    Good afternoon. I bought a kind of lens on Ebay for 11k rubles. I just wanted him, the constructive is very convenient. But immediately disappointment - 28 went to the back, and 80 to the front. and of course a fotik would not be able to fix this. Knowing how he understands (was previously 28-70), he removed the aperture ring stopper, the zoom elastic band and the cap under this elastic band. and lo and behold - it turned out that a removable plate was lost, which gives indications of focus, corrected it (the old bolt attachment points are noticeable) and everything worked. Hooray)
    P_20180205_095121_1

    Reply

    • DmitryK
      10.02.2018

      I also have a bit of 28mm back focus.
      True, when closing the diaphragm to 8-9, this is not visible due to horse sharpness.

      Reply

  6. Anatoly
    26.02.2018

    I liked the photo - I'm thinking of buying such a lens for my pentax k5 camera !! s - but will he be friends on the crop? - from Japan now you can take for 13000r.

    Reply

    • Zed
      26.02.2018

      Somehow I came across the reviews of Tokin owners under your mount at the pentax club.
      On older models like K20 everything seemed to work. 2.8 was not working, but this is the norm for these glasses.

      Reply

  7. DmitryK
    16.03.2018

    Cyril, and on which carcass did you use this glass?

    Reply

    • DmitryK
      20.03.2018

      Cyril, thank you for the information, I won’t argue about 24-85, but I'm a little surprised about Nikkor 28-70 / 2.8)
      Have you tried Tokin on another carcass after 50mm? Mb Is it the firmware of the camera or has it already been tried and did not help?

      Reply

  8. Denis
    06.05.2019

    Thanks for the review! Interesting.

    Reply

  9. Ivan Nikolaevich
    07.05.2019

    interesting colors ...

    Reply

  10. Alexander
    19.06.2019

    I bought this lens in 2016. I use it with D700. As one of the commentators correctly noted, it is ambiguous. Sometimes you are amazed at its sharpness, and sometimes it is annoying that the open hole is not usable beyond the 50mm focal length. I notice that there is not enough width by 28, I want 24.
    But the focus is fast, accurate, well done - heavy, iron, not all of these tamrons with sigma.
    But most likely, I’ll sell, I want 24-70, Nikkor is Nikkor.

    Reply

  11. Viktorych
    03.09.2019

    By samples, the picture is of course rubbish, as for a staff with a “golden ring” :)

    Arkady very mildly spoke of him as “a lens with software that you need to be able to use” (almost (c))

    It is no coincidence that their price on the secondary market fluctuates around around FOUR cheaper than their own, 24-70.

    Reply

  12. EvAlex888
    23.09.2019

    Hello everybody! I don’t know if anyone noticed, but out of the multitude of lenses (short) from your reviews, I liked this “Tokina 28-80” more, precisely with its sharpness, even at the edges, and with an open aperture. In general, there is a wish when If you are testing short optics, then it would not hurt to take a couple of group shots. I mean, groups of people, like 10-15 people in a row. Then people will see for themselves what optics are and what they cost.

    Reply

  13. EvAlex888
    23.09.2019

    And why is there a photo that does not show the lower end of the lens? Can Tokina AF 28-80 f / 3.5-5.6 for Sony Alpha come up with NIKON? For some reason, there is no description anywhere, a review about this lens. Straight, it’s kind of secret for our reviewers.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      23.09.2019

      If you have one, you can prepare a short review about it, I will post it. If he is for Sony, then Nikon is not suitable.

      Reply

    • Pokemon
      23.09.2019

      Tokina 28-80 / 3.5-5.6 is a very budget lens. It makes no sense to take it if Tokina 28-70 / 2.8 or Tokina 28-80 / 2.8 are sold nearby at a flea market not much more expensive.

      Reply

      • Vitaly N
        23.09.2019

        This is a real fludist, he does not need advice.

        Reply

  14. andry
    13.11.2019

    expensive day! vibachte, scho is not the topic. I’m joking a hood to the given warehouse. bazhano rіdnu. dyakoy.

    Reply

  15. EvAlex888
    20.11.2019

    What is known about the TOKINA 8mm F 1.2 lens? There is no information anywhere. Who knows about this? There is a thread connecting O-23mm.

    Reply

  16. Alexander
    18.01.2020

    Hello, I am very grateful to you for your work, this is the brightest and most informative site that I have met.

    Reply

  17. Anatoly
    19.02.2020

    Yesterday Tokina AT-X 280 AF PRO acquired this miracle glass !!! This is love at first sight !!! I got it completely new, the only one, the previous owner used it a couple of times and because of its weight and software put it for a long time in storage in general, he didn’t understand it, like many commentators here, but in vain !! 10000 tugriks weren’t a big amount, I decided to take experiments. Today I went out and shot 130 frames in RAW on different FRs, with different holes. It is soft, and not soap, in general, at all values, regardless of the FR, at all aperture values, to a greater or lesser extent, and, interestingly, there is no clear boundary for the depth of field, the blur tends to zero, turning into sharpness and again goes into blur, depending on the FR, with different intensities. So what I think about, this transition between blurring the foreground, the sharpness point and blurring the background again creates a soft effect, which is corrected in the editor by the sharpness slider. 130 photos 10 rejected from behind the front focus, shot a walking goal By, without turning on the tracking autofocus, it’s my fault !! The rest of the photos were brought in the editor to perfect, pixel-by-pixel sharpness !!! Yes, the lens is really sharp on all FRs, at all aperture values, the soft effect is a feature of this glass and can be easily treated in editor or used as a feature. Used Nikon D200. Editor Capture One 12

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      19.02.2020

      Sincere congratulations :) Can you prepare a gallery for d200 from this Tokina over time?

      Reply

      • Anatoly
        20.02.2020

        Yes, of course, as soon as I take it off. The size of the photo changed in ACDSee Pro 10.

        Reply

  18. Anatoly
    19.02.2020

    same after editor

    Reply

  19. Anatoly
    19.02.2020

    and crop

    Reply

  20. Anatoly
    19.02.2020

    more photos

    Reply

  21. Anatoly
    19.02.2020

    add

    Reply

  22. Anatoly
    20.02.2020

    More

    Reply

  23. Anatoly
    20.02.2020

    + crop

    Reply

  24. Anatoly
    20.02.2020

    sorry)

    Reply

  25. Anatoly
    20.02.2020

    28mm f / 2.8

    Reply

  26. Load more comments ...

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer