answers: 21

  1. Pokekmon
    24.07.2017

    Nice picture and color.

    Reply

  2. zengarden
    24.07.2017

    I had one, only for Nikon (with the letter D), sold it along with the camera. In general, not bad, although the focal points are inconvenient on the crop. Sharpness was inferior to Tamron 17-50 / 2.8.

    Reply

  3. Dmitriy
    24.07.2017

    Than to shoot with such a sigma ... It is better to take Gelik-81N. Twist your hands and bring home a gorgeous shot!

    Reply

    • Fedor
      24.07.2017

      Wow! Compared F ... with a finger! It is still necessary to think of it is necessary to compare the fix (whatever it is) with the manual fix ...….)))))))

      Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      24.07.2017

      If you suddenly offered a choice between G81N and this Sigma, I would definitely choose Sigma.

      Reply

      • Dmitriy
        25.07.2017

        well then nikon 28-105mm is better than that !!! not so much money it costs

        Reply

      • anonym
        25.07.2017

        But what about Helios 81N?))

        Reply

    • Valentine
      26.07.2017

      Dmitry, well, you really compared a very mediocre manual fix, with prof. zoom. Meanwhile, for people who make money with photography, the choice of zoom is an essential thing. I would like to see how you will photograph a wedding or corporate event… Customers, to put it mildly, will not understand your “gorgeous shots”.

      Reply

  4. Dmitriy
    26.07.2017

    By the way, I had only good impressions for the G81N. This is my first lens and took very good pictures on this glass. Now I only have top glass (Nikon 14-24 / 2.8G, 35 / 1.4G, 85 / 1.4 ART), but I will never say bad things in my life for 81N. But if they told me you could have only ONE glass. I think it’s already clear that this would not be this gopo-sigma!))

    Reply

    • Pokekmon
      26.07.2017

      "Not this gopo-sigma!)"
      It costs the very little money that they ask for at the flea market.
      Not everyone has a brand new $$$: Tokina 24-70 / 2.8, Sigma 24-70 / 2.8 ART, Nikkor 24-70 / 2.8Е.
      For the keen but not wealthy amateur, this Sigma is quite an option.
      If you do not want 28-70 / 2.8 EX, then at flea markets and in some places in stores there are slightly more expensive 24-70 / 2.8 EX DG, which Arkady spoke well of.

      Reply

      • Dmitriy
        26.07.2017

        I agree with you! 24-70mm EX DG will be more interesting in comparison with this model!

        Reply

    • Hob
      29.05.2024

      Back in 1993, this Sigma was not so “gopo”. Then there was no trace of “Arts” or “Nans”. It’s like proudly (no matter what) now choosing a black-and-white tubular TV set when there are color ones with the latest modern technologies. And so with any technology, progress does not stand still. But this is not specifically my (and maybe not even your) merit.

      Reply

  5. reader
    27.07.2017

    I apologize for being a little off topic! I have this question: is it worth putting a polarik to tessar 50 2.8?

    Reply

    • Oleg
      27.07.2017

      Yes, you can put it, but I think the polarik on the crop behaves best on focal lengths from 15-35 mm, and 50 seems to be already too narrow.

      Reply

      • Jury
        27.07.2017

        I used to have a polarik on the crop and 17mm, if there was a lot of blue sky in the frame, it had a very uneven color. Color leveled starting at about 24mm

        Reply

      • Oleg
        27.07.2017

        Well, probably yes, the 15mm most critical points are wider, it makes no sense to climb at all, but at 18mm it still looks like that. Simply, if you take a polarik, then for a lens that is sharpened for a landscape, and if the tessar's diameter is less than that of a landscape painter, then you can use the adapter ring. For example, your landscape painter has a diameter of 58 mm, you buy a polarizer with a diameter of 58 mm and through an adapter ring 58 to 49, of which there are a lot on Ali-express, install it on Tessar. But I don’t see any reason to buy a polarik specially for Tessar

        Reply

  6. Alexey
    27.07.2017

    And I liked the photos from this sigma. Let sigma, albeit ancient, but the quality of professionalism in personnel is felt.

    Reply

  7. Maksim
    24.09.2017

    Years of release are not entirely accurate. In fact, from 1998 to 2000.

    Reply

  8. Jeanne
    27.05.2018

    Hello! Is this lens suitable for the Sony NEX-VG900 camcorder (E-mount, full frame)? Are there any video files captured with this lens?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      27.05.2018

      Will not work. If you really want to, you can install it through the Nikon-Sony E, Pentax Sony-E adapter (depending on the Sigma modification, it is desirable that the version has a manual aperture control ring), with only manual focus and only manual aperture control).

      Reply

  9. Paco M
    11.04.2023

    Tengo un sigma 28-70F2,8 D EX. alguien sabe el modelo de parasol que necesita

    Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer