Nikon D7000 review

For the opportunity Nikon D7000 Review many thanks to Igor

Review of the Nikon D7000 body. Near Vega-11U.

Review of the Nikon D7000 body. Near Vega-11U.

Nikon D7000 is a very unusual digital SLR camera. On the one hand, it has some indicators better than professional cameras Nikon D300, D300s, on the other hand: Nikon D7000 does not reach the professional level. Historically, the Nikon D7000 is difficult to attribute to one of two categories, therefore, I will dwell on this in more detail.

Signs of a Nikon D7000 indicating a professional level:

  • Compatible with old manual (non-studded) lenses AI-S. The camera works perfectly with any manual lens, even with non-native AI compatible.
  • The presence of two slots for memory cards
  • Save option 14-bit RAW File
  • Dustproof and waterproof
  • 100% frame coverage in the viewfinder, a clean viewfinder
  • The presence of over short excerptsequal to 1 / 8000s.

Signs indicating that the Nikon D7000 refers to amateur (amateur cameras)

  • At the camera part of the body is made of plastic. The case is not all made of metal alloy, as in older models D200, D300, D300s.
  • Camera does not support fast CF cards
  • Frame buffer total 9 (maybe 10) RAW shots
  • The burst speed is fixed and does not expand with the booster
  • Well, of course, the presence of automatic modes of use, as in a number of models Nikon D80, D90.
  • Camera does not allow saving uncompressed RAW file

I stand in solidarity with Nikon, which classifies the Nikon D7000 as an amateur camera. It so happened that the line of professional cameras is Nikon D100, D200, D300, D300s, D500. In turn, the range of cameras Nikon D70, D70s, D80, D90 has been improved and supplemented by Nikon D7000 cameras, D7100, D7200, D7500. You can see for yourself composed by me Nikon camera geneology chart. Therefore, the Nikon D7000 is simply an improved level of advanced amateur cameras, but not a professional line.

Review of the Nikon D7000 body. Redesigned shooting mode selector.

Review of the Nikon D7000 body. Redesigned shooting mode selector.

The most important thing in the Nikon D7000 for the photographer:

1. CMOS sensor in 16.2 megapixels DX format with crop factor 1.5x. The same matrix is ​​in Nikon D5100. The same number of megapixels in the flagship Nikon D4. The number of megapixels is not so importantbut the working range of ISO is 100-6400 and expands to 25.600. Believe the range ISO-100 25.600 - this is already serious. Moreover, we can say that at ISO 3200 you can very often get a satisfactory result. Funny, but Nikon released an amateur Nikon D3200which has as much as 24MP. True, the quality of pictures at high ISOs is much worse than full-frame cameras, such as D700, D3 etc.

Very similar to the fact that Nikon D7000 uses a matrix that Sony produces, the same matrix is ​​available in cameras

Photo on Nikon D7000

Photo on Nikon D7000

2. Burst speed 6 fps. It is worth noting that the D7000 did realize fast shooting with 14 bit RAW without losing the shooting speed. D300(s) loses shooting speed at 14 bit RAW, in fact D300(s) speed with 14 bit RAW is poor 2.5 fps. 6 fps for the Nikon D7000 is very good. I do not recommend chasing a rapid-fire camera, very often the rate of fire is not important at all. For example, in a studio, flashes are sometimes recharged within one second, and few people shoot faster than 2 fps. For home and leisurely photography I have enough Nikon D40 and 2.5 fps. But high shooting speed is important for reporting, unfortunately high speed requires a good buffer size. The buffer is where pictures are stored in the camera before being written to the memory card. An analogy can be drawn that the buffer is the camera's RAM, and the card is its hard drive. The Nikon D7000 has a small buffer, see below.

Review of the Nikon D7000 body. Rear view camera. The main panel of buttons.

Review of the Nikon D7000 body. Rear view camera. The main panel of buttons.

3. The number of frames in the buffer depends on the image recording format. What interests me most is the buffer when shooting in RAW format, and for maximum 14bit RAW quality with lossless compressionhe makes up 9 frames. With a shooting speed of 6 fps, the camera starts to slow down after the second second of shooting. You immediately understand that the D7000 is far from a professional camera. Here are other buffer metrics:

  1. JPEG maximum quality, quality priority with disabled ADL, Noise reduction, High ISO Noise reduction, etc. - 15 frames.
  2. JPEG maximum quality, quality priority with ADL, Noise reduction, High ISO Noise reduction, etc. - 11 frames.
  3. RAW 12bit lossless compression - 9 frames, the file weighs about 12MB
  4. RAW 12bit normal compression - 9 frames, the file weighs about 11MB
  5. RAW 14bit lossless compression (the absolute maximum quality for Nikon D7000) - 9 frames, the file weighs about 20MB
  6. RAW 14bit normal compression - 9 frames, the file weighs about 15MB

Frame buffer is one of the most important indicators of camera speed... Even my old lady Nikon D200 squeezes 21 frames of continuous shooting and gives as much as 4 seconds of shooting without brakes in a series of 5 fps. The camera buffer of the Nikon D7000 in RAW mode greatly disappointed, I don’t know what those who say about the professionalism of Nikon D7000 think.

Photo on Nikon D7000

Photo on Nikon D7000

4. Nikon D7000 has convenient help with tips, different shooting modes like “night portrait” or “sports”. The camera has a convenient photo editing system. For those who are too lazy to mess around with editing programs on a computer, the Nikon D7000 has an excellent image editor built in. Also, in addition to JPEG processing, the Nikon D7000 camera supports RAW processing.

Black shutter button on the D7000. View of the shutter button and monochrome display.

Black shutter button on the D7000. View of the shutter button and monochrome display.

5. The display of the camera is excellent, with 920.000 pixels. The display is very large and bright. Viewing images on the display is a pleasure. The same display is on Nikon D90, D300, D300s, D700, D3 etc.

Photo on Nikon D7000

Photo on Nikon D7000 Neutral Picture Control

6. The ergonomics of the camera is excellent. The additional display helps a lot. It is very convenient to configure the basic parameters for an external monochrome display. The external monochrome display has a backlight. U1, U2 modes allow you to save all the necessary settings and quickly switch between the settings of the camera U1 and U2.

Example photo on Nikon D7000

Example photo on Nikon D7000

7. Nikon D7000 supports AF lenses without built-in focus motor. For example, Nikon D7000 will work fine without motor cheap and high quality lenses. Nikon 50mm F1.8D, Nikon 85mm F1.8D, Nikon 70-210mm F4.0 AF etc. And also, Nikon D7000 gives the chance to work with AI, AI-S and any other old lenses. For example, the camera can easily make friends with manual lenses Nikon 50mm f / 1.2 AI-s Nikkor, Helios-81H, and Nikon 100mm F / 2.8 Series E etc .. If you specify the parameters of the manual lens in the camera menu, then matrix metering will be available exposure... The camera can store 9 'non-CPU' lenses (the same number in the more serious D300s / D3s / D3X). Only the following DX cameras could work with old lenses: Nikon D200, D300, D300s. Nikon D7000 uses a unique focus module Multi-CAM 4800DX with 39 sensors (9 cruciform)which is the same as a full-frame camera Nikon D600... 39 focus points are enough for any kind of photography. Focusing accuracy and speed are highly dependent on the lens rather than the focusing system. And the camera has a new one 2016 pixel RGB sensor measuring exposure.

Nikon D7000 - rear view

Nikon D7000 - Back View

9. Viewfinder 100%. This means the following: what you see in the viewfinder when you zoom in is fully consistent with what will be in the photo. Typically, coverage is 95% of the frame. For example, Nikon D90 also 95% and often at the edges of the photo extra details appear, since they are not visible in the viewfinder. A trifle, but very nice.

Example photo on Nikon D7000

Example photo on Nikon D7000

10. The camera can shoot video with a maximum quality of Full HD 1,920 X 1,080 (24p), while using a mono microphone (for stereo sound, you should buy a separate stereo microphone). The camera has automatic focus when shooting video, which they could not Nikon D90, D5000... The video is of sufficient quality (according to the reviews of my colleagues, I myself am not good at video analysis). The maximum length of a video is 20 minutes. Of course, the camera has a Live View mode. In this mode, focusing is performed by contrast and much slower in speed for normal focusing with the optical viewfinder and phase sensors. The Live View button is combined with the video recording button. In focus mode AF-C and with Live View turned on, the camera automatically monitors focus, even if the shutter button is not pressed.

Sample photo on Nikon D 7000

Sample photo on Nikon D 7000

11. The flash can work in command mode on system Nikon CLS. When using external flash units S, S, S, S, S (or from third-party manufacturers) quick synchronization with shutter speeds up to 1/8000 is possible, this is very important when photographing with flash at slow shutter speeds.

Photo on Nikon D7000

Photo on Nikon D7000

12. A bunch of pleasant things: the shutter withstands at least 150.000 operations, the camera has a gyroscope, the ability to shoot at intervals, alignment (adjustment) of precise focusing and many others.

Two memory card slots on the D7000

Two memory card slots on the D7000

Personal impressions:

The camera is very good. The camera menu is very large, it is not so easy to figure it out. In the review, I touched only on vital points for the photographer, if you need to find some trifle in the settings, then the instructions will help.

In many ways, the Nikon D7000 is one of the best DX-format cameras. When they ask me which advanced camera I recommend, then Nikon D7000 is the best option.if the issue price does not play a role. In my hands, in my opinion, the camera looks more like Nikon D90than on Nikon D300s. Image quality: at a high level, however, you can only talk about matrix noise, color reproduction, etc., since the image itself forms the lens and at low distinguish one camera from another. Some of my colleagues video operators shoot video on the Nikon D7000, and it is for the sake of video that they take this camera. Also, very often the Nikon D7000 is very popular as a second camera with professional photographers.

Example photo on Nikon D7000

Example photo on Nikon D7000

Comparison with other, similar in functionality, cameras from Nikon

Nikon D90 VS Nikon D7000

Nikon D7000 is one step higher than ISO, and two steps higher than the limit (extended) ISO. Added 4MP. The viewfinder covers 100%. Support for manual lenses was added, autofocus appeared when shooting video, video quality reached Full HD, and the shooting speed increased by 1.5 fps. Another memory card slot has been added; Nikon D7000 can use more capacious SD XC cards. The number of focus points has increased, the metering has improved, and a virtual horizon has been added. Generally, D7000 all better for the Nikon D90. Ergonomics and overall functionality are very similar. I do not recommend changing Nikon D90 to D7000.

Nikon D7000 VS Nikon D300, D300s

The D7000 outperforms the D300s at 6fps in 14-bit RAW versus 2.5fps in 14-bit RAW on the D300s. Also, the D7000 has 1 stop higher ISO sensitivity, better video with autofocus. But the D300s has a more reliable body, more focus points (51 versus 39), support for CF memory cards, higher burst speed, larger buffer and professional ergonomics. Nikon D300 performance is better for Nikon D7000. I do not recommend changing D300, D300s to Nikon D7000, and vice versa, D7000 to D300s.

Nikon D7000 has a younger brother, the continuation of the line - Nikon D7100.

Sample photo on Nikon D7000

Sample photo on Nikon D7000

In general, a review about Nikon D7000 can be written endlessly, the camera is simply full of different functions and settings. There are few photos in this review, since while I was testing and delving into the settings, the battery ran out and the charging was not given to me. Please note that the quality of photos depends very much on the lens and other important things when shooting.

Sample photo on Nikon D7000

Sample photo on Nikon D7000

The parameters shown in the photo gallery:
All shot with Nikon D7000. On-camera JPEG L. Everything was shot in NL picture control mode: contrast correction - 0, brightness - 0, saturation - 0, hue - 0, sharpness - position 9 between 0 and 9. Used white balance: 'Auto', 'Shadow' and 'Cloudy'. The size of the photos was reduced to 3 MP. All shot using a lens Nikon Nikkor AF-S 35mm 1: 1.8G DX.

Prices for modern Nikon cameras in popular stores can look at this link.

Comments here on the site do not require any registration. In the comments, you can ask a question on the topic, or leave your feedback, or describe your experience. For the selection of photographic equipment, I recommend E-Catalog. Many little things for the photo can be found on AliExpress.


Conclusions:

Nikon D7000 is a great advanced amateur camera. Many indicators excel in the quality of the camera of a professional line. Nikon D7000 will be useful for both amateur and professional. I recommend.

The material was prepared by Arkady Shapoval. My Youtube channeland Radozhiva's group on Facebook и VK.

Add a comment:

 

 

Comments: 1 574, on the topic: Nikon D7000 review

  • riffier

    Good evening. I have nikon d 3100 for a long time. I read reviews, comparisons, and wanted to change it to d 7000. I have sigma 17-50 glass 2.8 / 4.0. Or, as they say, was sewn to soap?

    • BB

      D7000 is damp. If possible, look at the D7100 / 7200

    • Dmitriy

      If you ask OTHERS how profitable / necessary for YOU to replace the D3100 with the D7000, then you definitely do not need it. In general, the D7000 is very different from the D3100 in all respects. But whether it is YOU who will profit and to what extent these differences, except you yourself, no one will answer this question for you. And when a person answers this question for himself, then he does not ask others.

      • Anatoly

        We must not immediately flog a fever. For three years I collected money not for D3000, but for D90, and then another 15 months - for D7000. This model will be with me until the end. While the eyes will distinguish something, see. Alas, diabetes is attacked and on its basis cataracts with glaucoma ... Today, if I were younger, most likely, I would buy a mirrorless Sonya (or Pentax?). I always liked the latter. He has a stronger body, and superb protection against dust and moisture, and the matrix is ​​wonderful, and sharp glasses are more affordable.
        "Nikon" screwdriver bought without love, according to the calculation, -
        because I had 5 new lenses with Nikon mount since Soviet times.

    • BB

      Also, the purpose of the replacement is not announced. What does not suit, what is missing, what do you expect from the new device? (When buying the second and next devices, I knew what I was missing in the old and what to expect from the new)

    • Ed

      Well, the reason may be elementary. Just "WANT"
      Actually, for this reason, I changed 3200 to 7000.
      You can be sure that this is definitely not a “mess”. In addition to the simply increased convenience of working with the LCD display, there are also such tasty goodies as the opportunity to buy inexpensive AF lenses instead of the same AFS lenses at a price of 2 or even 3 times more. Well, high-speed sync with Nikon's flashes, starting from the sb-700
      But get ready for the fact that in your hands will be a VERY unusual camera, very different in ergonomics and governing bodies from your 3100.

      • Anatoly

        This is yes. Note that I personally don't need 60% of the camera's functionality. Useless or little useful troubles. Designers could strain their brains in the directions that amateur photographers need. The professional camera still didn't work out of the D7500 either. In general, the Nikon corporation (and other old "sperm whales") has been degrading by seven-league strides since the 90s. The exception is Sonya. This is the opposite. It's a pity, everyone is frantically holding prices. Even for amateur cameras, lenses. And this, too, artificially slows down the world photographic technological progress. I am sure that in 10 years, even media professionals will not use "cheap and dear" mirrors. Is it peripheral, provincial, trans-Ural, on a whim ?!

  • Alexander

    And tell me how wide the diopter adjustment range of the viewfinder is. I had a Nikon 5100 camera. Well, everyone was happy with everything except the menu, which was very different from canon. Only the problem was vision. I have about 1 minutes and there wasn’t enough settings. Often I saw everything not in sharpness. I had to change to canon 600d. There is a wide range of adjustments. And I really like the quality and picture in photos from Nikon.

    • Dmitriy

      Canon 600d -3 +1
      Nikon D5100 -1.7 +0.7
      Nikon D7000 -3 +1

      • Alexander

        Thank you.

    • Anatoly

      If exactly minus 1, then no problem ... But no more than 2.

  • Alexander

    Hello! Is it worth changing Nikon d300 to nikon d7000?

    • Alexey

      change a professional camera to an advanced amateur?

    • Pokemon

      D7000 with low runs a lot at flea markets, and they are very inexpensive.
      Therefore, you can just buy as a second camera.

  • К

    Hello everyone! Arkady and everyone in charge, many thanks!
    1. Help with the choice. D5100 or D7000?
    2. Now D3100 + manual from film 24 / 2,8, 50 / 1,8, TelearN 200 / 3,5, sigma 135-400. I’m used to focusing manually. There is still 18-105 with more or less sharpness from f11, lies dead weight
    3. What do you want. First of all, high ISO workers. I often photograph birds 1/800 and shorter; landscapes, macro a little, people rarely. That's because of the birds and I want a higher ISO, the D3100 on the ISO 800 is already quite bad. I definitely won’t buy anything more than 20t.r, I’ll better buy 150-600mm over time. I doubt 5200 and 7100 pixels a lot, but the optics are old, will it allow.

    • B. R. P.

      D7000.

    • Arkady Shapoval

      D7000
      But you don’t get anything tangible directly from d3100 to d7000. These are the generations that stand nearby. D7000 and D5100 in terms of noise are almost identical.

      • К

        I understand that the "shydvr" button will not be there and I don't expect much. To increase the working ISO is the main task. Exposure metering will be good, there will be no norms either. It's the same with a screwdriver. I have adapted for a year already,

        • US6IBD

          For high ISO workers, this is for FF. D600, 610, 750, 800, 810 - on a secondary housing with a mileage of several thousand or even several tens of thousands - for most amateurs, the shutter resource will last for the rest of their lives. And their working ISO is from 2900!

          • Pokemon

            Is the D800 / D800E / D810 fully working 2900 without noise reduction? But the owners write about ISO2000 ... I saw the noise in the photo from these cameras already at 1600. Then you can't set 600/610/750 to 800 / 800e / 810 - they are not equal in noise. If the 750/610 iso 3200 is still normal, then at 800/810 the picture is loose and gray. I saw a comparison of 850 and 810, the d850 holds up better and there are 2000-2500 workers in general. I guess you took the number 2900 from the dxomark website. But this dubious resource and their recent failure and apologies to Canon for the 1dx mk3 test speak for themselves.

            • US6IBD

              I won't vouch for all the models, as well as for the accuracy of the data on Dxomark, but on the D610 I use ISO 3200 without noise reduction without any problems. Previously, on the D80, ISO 400 was already pissed off. In fact, I did not use more than 200. Although Dxomark gives 524 ...
              At prices:
              I took one camera D610 with a mileage of 3300 for 980 USD. four years ago, another D610 (daughter) - a year ago for $ 750. with mileage 3600. It is unlikely that the mileage is twisted, because the cameras were in perfect condition, as if they were from the packaging.
              I shoot a little - 10 thousand a year. My daughter flew 40 thousand in a year.
              As a result, both on one and on the other for 40 thousand - the flight is normal. No complaints.
              I switched to FF precisely because I wanted to have high ISO workers. Therefore, I did not even consider any five-thousanders and seven-thousanders.

              • Gregor

                Plus

              • Pokemon

                The D600 / D610 are indeed more popular among amateurs and can be found with low mileage. But the D750 is a different story, there are a lot of cameras with swapped shutters and there were a few recall companies. I also came across a camera, despite the late year of release, which fell under a revocable company. Ideally, before buying a used D750, you need to ask the seller for the serial number and see if it fell under the revocable company or not, whether it was from defective lots or not.
                In this sense, the D610 is a less problematic camera than the D750, although I read reviews on the D610 on club.foto.ru where they wrote that the camera was completely leaky and someone also dripped oil from the shutter.
                Another question that I have NOT voiced is the profitability of the purchase of the potentially problematic D600 (oil), D750 (shutter and electrical problems, many cameras after weddings), D800 / D800e (there were problems with autofocus, with the shutter giving lubrication and with specific color rendition ) with low runs. The market for used full-frame cameras is oversaturated. And if possible, it is better to avoid the above models. Plus, the Z6 and EOS R will inevitably appear at flea markets. Better to take them.
                I sold the D750, stayed on the D4. Perhaps this year my friend will give me the D3x on these cameras and will sit further - a decent resource has been laid.

            • US6IBD

              Or do you think that D7000 with its ISO 1100 according to Dxomark will be somehow better than FF?

              • Pokemon

                No, I do not think so. However, under certain conditions, iso1600 on d7000 is working (much more working than on d90 with noise reduction) and given the small price of used d7000 at flea markets and their large number with low runs after amateurs (exactly the same as Sony a57, Canon 650d), then this is a bargain for novice amateur photographers and simply for those who do not shoot anything at night. Especially considering the STARTING price of d7000.

              • Pokemon

                Although if you hang Sigma 7000-17 / 50 with a stub on d2.8, then there will also be quite nothing for a vacation and you can shoot at dusk.

          • Pokemon

            Then, with low mileage, cameras of this level are usually not given away cheaply, but if they are sold, then they are dull.

            • К

              There are a lot of them on Avito with a price of ~ 15 sput and not a lot of mileage. Judging by the not overwritten cases and buttons, the runs are fair. I judge by my 3100. I shot ~ 35 thousand in a year and 3 months, the buttons and the case have a completely different look

              • Pokemon

                d7000 is really a lot with low mileage, like Sony a57, Canon 650d.
                These cameras were often bought with whale lenses in order to travel with these cameras on vacation. Now they sell as they bought - with boxes, bags, cleaning pears and whale lenses.
                My comment about “low mileage muddy” did not refer to the d7000, but to the d750 and some other full-frame Nikons. Thank God, the D7000 was not taken for work, so they do not need to be checked as carefully before purchasing as the d750.

  • Vladimir

    Does it make sense to change d3200 to d5200 or d7000?

    • B. R. P.

      Purpose?

      • Vladimir

        Sorry didn't see your answer. Arkady replied that there would be no big difference between these cameras in ordinary home / street photography.
        Yes, there are some Wishlist, and d3200 above 800 iso is no longer a cake.
        It seems to me that if there is a choice, then there are always doubts, what if it's better?
        Can I count the photo https://cloud.mail.ru/public/jHJc/2ETDG6mXc
        normal for this camera? Yes, it is natural to have to finish in the editor.

  • Oleg

    Hello. Which is better - D7000 + sigma art 30 1.4 or D7100 + nikon 35 1.8G?

    • B. R. P.

      Sigma is better in the picture, but there may be problems with af.

  • Andrei

    Hi! My first and so far the only camera Olympus pm-2 (kit). In principle, it suits me, but I want to experiment with high-aperture glasses. On a mirrorless, they are too expensive, to put it mildly, even used. Will the Nikon D7000 in conjunction with the 35 1/8 be suitable for night shooting and what is the DXOMARK LOW-LIGHT ISO rating more or less acceptable for this?

    • twm

      Night photography - in the case of the D7000, it's always about a tripod. Even with f / 1.8 glass and (conditionally working) ISO 3200: shutter speeds even in this case will be out of range (when shooting handheld).

      IMHO, you can experiment in the same way with your Olike. Except that exposures with the whale will be longer, and you will have to focus manually. Alternatively, you can buy an inexpensive Chinese manual like Pergear (aka Andoer) 25mm f / 1.8 or 35mm f / 1.7 - the first one was reviewed on Radozhiv. Or put some old Hexanon Konik through an adapter: 50mm ~ 1.7 will cost even cheaper than the mentioned "Chinese".

      • twm

        PS however, 50mm of the aforementioned Koniki will already give too narrow an angle of m4 / 3 (for some plots).

      • Neustrdm

        Strange, in the light of streetlights on D7000 + 50mm 1: 2 I set ISO 800-1250, f = 2, s = 1/50 and shoot handheld.

    • Michael

      Panasonic 25 1.7 is cheaper than D7000)))

  • Anton

    All health! Tell me, an acquaintance sells a d7000 in good condition with low mileage for relatively little money. I have a D3000 camera. I shoot the subject, landscapes, and of course my family. So I wonder if it makes sense to replace the camera, or buy new glasses for your d3000? Will there be any improvement in the picture or not? Of course, the d7000 attracts an additional display, and a live view, and a screwdriver, of course, plus a much larger number of buttons on the carcass itself. But now I am now in thought. What do you advise?

    • Konstantin

      Nikon D7000 will give you a bunch of new possibilities and make life easier in many situations, it's not even a matter of additional control buttons.
      And it will also be possible to use AF (non-motorized) optics.
      I shoot myself with the D7000 paired with an AF 24-85 F / 2.8-4D IF lens for amateur photography.
      Further, if I go, it will only be “full frame”, but so far everything suits me.

      • Anton

        Thank you!

  • Timothy

    Thank you for the article sir. It was informative and I understood it pretty well. I am a professional photographer whose work was done mostly in Russia and other European countries. I use the D7000 as backup for the D4 and D600, all using the same sensor. There are many times in which I could not distinguish between the D7000 and the D4. It's that good. I highly recommend this camera to anyone or the D7200 which is the best of the 7000 series. Most of my work was (is) landscape, social / cultural and historic. This camera always goes with me and I sometimes find myself grabbing it first.
    Please sir, tell where your hometown is? I am curious. Thank you again.

    • Ivan

      If you ask about the author of the site, he lives in Kiev, Ukraine.

Add a comment

Copyright © Radojuva.com. Blog author - Photographer in Kiev Arkady Shapoval. 2009-2020

English-version of this article https://radojuva.com/en/2012/05/obzor-nikon-d7000/