answers: 25

  1. Oleg
    28.11.2016

    It turns out that old screwdrivers are still at least where compared to the new product, sadly.
    He himself shot the 270th PRO II at Pentax, foolishly sold it, and then could not find it in a good copy, but the Japanese generally have solid condensate and mold.

    Reply

  2. Alexander
    28.11.2016

    Only the price is not clear in what units for a lens without a stabilizer just makes you smile ... The price is apparently in Japanese yen or in rubles, only in those years when we were millionaires ...

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      28.11.2016

      999 forever green :)

      Reply

    • Vladimir
      29.11.2016

      ... this is not a price, these are the phone numbers of Tokina distributors :(

      Reply

  3. Pokekmon
    28.11.2016

    And if you compare this Tokin with Sigma 24-70 / 2.8 EX DG? At a price, Sigma wins.

    Reply

    • zengarden
      28.11.2016

      I have Sigma 28-70 / 2.8D EX, but she is far from the same “dermatological” sharpness ...

      Reply

      • Pokekmon
        28.11.2016

        It seems to me that if you choose what is more important - glass sharpness or AF errors, then ... IMHO, it is better to sacrifice a little this sharpness than to lose a few valuable photos due to an AF error.
        I just can’t understand why this glass is almost twice as expensive as Sigma. Maybe it works fine on ff Nikonov?

        Reply

  4. anonym
    28.11.2016

    Oh, how I was waiting for this review. I read other reviews of this lens, all reviews praise sharpness, some of which give examples where it is sharper than nikkora 24-70. From the reviews of Arkady it is not always clear whether the objects are good. One figs he always has cool pictures, even if he shoots on a tin can, still the pictures are on top!
    The most important thing that became clear:
    1. He is heavy and do not say that just pump up your hands. The lens hangs 1 kg, this is a really heavy lens. I began to feel weight and fatigue in my hands with my 24-70, only when I sold 300 and bought 7100, the camera is lighter, but there is no counterweight, and it became more difficult to hold.
    2. It is expensive, only $ 150 cheaper than Nikkor and as much as $ 250 more expensive than a tamron with a stub (price comparison in Belarus https://catalog.onliner.by/compare/sp2470f28dinf+270mmf28gedafs+atx2470f28profxn ) are positioned as a pro, and given its focal points, this is a REPORT. And at the same time, he does not have a stub, he focuses mediocre, far from the most tenacious, in control he catches hares.
    3. High performance. Metal-constructive-constructive-metal, it's damn harsh. What can I say, we must wait for the sigma.

    Reply

    • andrei2911
      29.11.2016

      Yes, glass is not an option in comparison with Tamron.

      Reply

  5. pchel
    28.11.2016

    It’s a little strange to review the lens, but put a protective glass. Even very good.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      28.11.2016

      That was the condition. Who will give me a brand new lens per piece of greenery straight out of the box and allow me to shoot without a protective filter :). To counter it, I removed the filter, by the way, there was no difference with or without it.

      Reply

      • pchel
        29.11.2016

        Clear. Honestly, I would not be afraid to entrust you with a lens of similar value without such ridiculous requirements.

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        29.11.2016

        They are a store, and the lens will still be selling.

        Reply

  6. Dmitriy
    29.11.2016

    Sigma had another 24-60 f / 2.8 ex dg http://aflenses.net/sigma-24-60mm-f28-ex-dg-2004/

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      29.11.2016

      Thanks. Added by.

      Reply

  7. lesa
    29.11.2016

    That would be the updated "AT-X 280 PRO" in the same case with internal focusing .. yes for the Sony FE mount (: It was a wonderful piece of iron. Perhaps one of the most pleasant to use, although quite heavy.

    Reply

  8. andrei2911
    29.11.2016

    Yes, the glass is very mixed. Despite the good sharpness, it keeps light very weak. And AF is just a disaster, and this is in the reporting, in fact, zoom. In short, for Nikon there is Tamron 24-70 in this segment for price / quality without competitors. I doubt that Sigma will keep its Art 24-70 in the budget, all the same the Art series is quite expensive.

    Reply

  9. Pastor
    29.11.2016

    Yes, if not for autofocus, it would be quite suitable glass. But still, against the background of tamron, this tokin fades. Stub is a very useful thing. Nikon understood this and added a stub to the new 24-70, and the canon for some reason stupid :) The sharpness seems to be better in tokina than in my 24-70 2.8L, but it does not reach the second version. In general, I would like to see 24-70 2.8 with a stub and sharpness of the second version from Canon - and all this for a thousand bucks maximum :)

    Reply

    • Basil
      01.12.2016

      Haha

      Reply

  10. Toad
    29.11.2016

    Yes, I hope Arkady in this beautiful store will finally be allowed to review the Tamron USD DI SP 24-70mm F / 2.8 VC and at the same time 70-200 2.8 VC USD, otherwise they can already be said to be old people on the market (since 2012), but there are still no reviews ...;)

    Anticipating the comments of unbalanced comrades, this is by no means a claim (since it is clear that everything depends on the practical availability of technology), but only a wish (wishlist).

    Many thanks for the current review!

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      29.11.2016

      They promised to give stable 35 and 45.

      Reply

      • Pokekmon
        29.11.2016

        > "They promised to give stable 35 and 45."
        Great news! Review on Tamronovsky fix 35 / 1.8 with a stub will be interesting to read :-)

        Reply

  11. anonym
    29.11.2016

    Hmm at the moment, tamron is the best option, if you do not consider the native with a stub. I don’t know a lot of lenses for which the manufacturer would officially give a 5-year warranty!

    Reply

    • Pastor
      30.11.2016

      Tamron gives such a guarantee on almost all of its products, even on plastic fiction 17-50 2.8 :) Like the brand name of the tamron.

      Reply

    • Vasil
      24.12.2016

      I also thought about this (Tokina) lens, I really liked the picture, but at the last moment before buying I changed my mind about VR and took Nikkor 24-70 2.8E VR for the D810 bundle, the speed is fantastic in everything. While testing a couple of days and more like it.

      Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer