answers: 99

  1. Ivan
    17.08.2020

    I don't know why the author of the article had a question about different slots for memory cards. CF is for professional use and SD is for more common use. It's a plus when you have a choice.

    Of course, it is possible to change the strap, but for comfortable carrying of a heavy camera there are different unloadings - over the shoulder, criss-cross on the back ...

    Sea water is extremely aggressive. In no case should she wash any objects at all, and even more so, the camera. Only fresh water! And any electronics can be washed from dust only in distilled water.

    Reply

    • Alexander
      17.08.2020

      What does “for professional” mean and what does “for more common” mean?
      If we are talking about speed, then SD cards are not inferior to CF cards now ... Or do the Nutcrackers need fast cards, but just cards for normal photographers?

      Reply

      • @ Lex
        17.08.2020

        CF is recognized as more reliable card than SD

        Reply

      • Alexander
        17.08.2020

        I am certainly not a professional. I have two Nikon D7000 and D7100 cameras. SD cards are the cheapest for many years and everything is fine with them. Once every five years, for that price, I can buy new cards and just change them. Although, I think that those old cards are safer than I will buy the same ones, just made now. I shoot not so much, but not very little either. When I realize that what I'm shooting is very valuable to me, I turn on parallel recording on two cards. That's all professionalism.

        Reply

      • Ivan
        17.08.2020

        You are not talking about that at all. The requirements for professional tools are completely different.

        Reply

      • Alexander
        17.08.2020

        I'm talking about reliability. You mean it?

        Reply

      • Roman
        17.08.2020

        Basically, using SD is a thing of the past. I, for example, would prefer a pair of duplicate SDs over one CF card. Yes, potentially more cells can be placed in the CF form factor, or these cells will take up less space, which increases their reliability, but the connector itself also has rather fragile legs, unlike flat SD contacts.

        The speed has practically leveled off, the sizes are the same, two cards of smaller volume are more reliable than one - it is better to take several cards with you and change them as you fill them than to carry one large one. If we are not talking about super-professionals who prefer fully protected equipment, then there is no special reason to be proud of CF and prefer it to SD.

        Reply

      • Ivan
        17.08.2020

        Alexey answered correctly, I will add to Roman and Alexander about speed. Both of you operate with modern concepts. Do not forget when the camera left this review, when it was designed with that time in mind.

        Reply

      • Roman
        17.08.2020

        * use of CF is a relic of the past

        Reply

      • Alexey
        17.08.2020

        nonsense. I develop industrial equipment and avionics, and if I need some kind of removable storage medium, then this is only and exclusively CF, as the most reliable device. on temperature, mechanics, protection against failures and other parameters. CF will be released for a very, very long time.

        Reply

      • Roman
        17.08.2020

        We are talking exclusively in the context of photography. And so - some of them still fly in the Unions. Promelectronics is generally quite conservative.

        Reply

      • koba
        18.08.2020

        Many photographers may not be aware that CF cards are produced. industrial level of security. There is a different memory and they are made in a completely different way, by the way, they are not designed for very high speeds, but they are guaranteed to store data even in difficult conditions. In fact, all more or less important industrial products have just such cards, they are produced by several companies (for example, Smart), including Chinese ones, and most of them are not widely known. These 4GB cards cost about $ 80, while a 64GB card costs about $ 1600 (!). Basically, cards are issued up to 1GB and less.

        Reply

      • Pokemon
        18.08.2020

        Koba:
        Yes, for example Transcend 8GB 200x Industrial grade TS8GCF200I from 205 $

        Reply

      • Roman
        18.08.2020

        For these many photographers, the total lifetime value of footage will not exceed the cost of a memory card. Then a man went to the beach - already an event. And you are talking about memory cards for satellites or mine workings.

        Reply

      • APh
        21.08.2020

        You write nonsense! The fact that you develop does not mean that you are a professional.

        Reply

      • APh
        21.08.2020

        Radio tubes are also produced, but this does not mean that they are put everywhere.

        Reply

      • Alexey
        17.08.2020

        and yet - the reliability of CF contacts under vibration (and exposure to moisture) is higher than that of SD. durability (the number of docking / undocking cycles is also an order of magnitude higher)

        Reply

      • Alex
        18.08.2020

        If you work “professionally”, in harsh conditions, when you need to frequently change lenses, cards, etc., then the more rigid CF or XQD / CFexpress cards are now more reliable due to the more durable body. SDs are less rigid and can simply break physically. The same applies to the weight of the camera. Magnesium cameras are not as scary to use as their amateur counterparts.
        This does not apply to studio shooting or other leisurely camera activities. Do not forget that there is military photography, sports, nature, and so on, where maximum reliability should be.

        Reply

      • APh
        21.08.2020

        You will only break the SD card if you are a crooked hand. Or you store flash drives in bulk, and not in a case.

        Reply

      • Ivan
        17.08.2020

        Read about CF-format. It's not just about speed.

        Reply

    • Stas
      17.08.2020

      When you shoot a lot, for example, when traveling, it is not very convenient to carry different types of cards with you. And the sea did not ask whether to pour me over or not. It happened, but the camera was not damaged at all.

      Reply

      • Ivan
        17.08.2020

        Why do you need different types of cards? Do you duplicate pictures on both cards for reliable backup?
        From your text it seemed that you yourself deliberately washed with sea water. Even if it was necessary for some reason, then afterwards it is necessary to rinse with fresh water. This applies to any item that has been in seawater, even scuba diving equipment.

        Reply

      • Ivan
        17.08.2020

        The camera was not damaged, but over time, the salt residues will eat away at everything.

        Reply

      • Ivan
        17.08.2020

        I had photos of a professional Canon somewhere, which I took apart. He was in an underwater box that was leaking. The boards and all metal elements that got into the sea water were almost completely corroded by rust.

        Reply

      • Alexey
        17.08.2020

        This is a photo from an Internet, I don't know the author. but indicative.

        Reply

      • Ivan
        18.08.2020

        That is:

        Reply

      • Ivan
        18.08.2020

        And so:

        Reply

    • Alexey
      17.08.2020

      if you really rinse electronic equipment with water, then not just distilled, but deionized.

      Reply

      • Ivan
        17.08.2020

        This is how the Japanese taught us. They talked about distilled.

        Reply

      • Alexey
        17.08.2020

        (smiled) and I myself am writing the technology for the workshop. and there they do as I have prescribed. although deionized water is quite expensive. and it is not so easy to handle. more often we wash it in a special liquid in an ultrasonic bath. then the block is dried and sealed in dry nitrogen. and then put on board and flew))

        Reply

      • Stas
        17.08.2020

        The Japanese spoke correctly.

        Reply

  2. Olen.
    17.08.2020

    I didn't get 810 f50 on 1.4. Apertures 1.2; 1.4; 2.0 are not workers in the literal sense of the word. The wildest vignetting, instead of a picture of porridge, there is no sharpness at all. The picture is formed only from f2.8. If possible, describe in detail the adjustment process.

    Reply

    • Olen.
      17.08.2020

      Sorry, 50 / f1.2

      Reply

      • Alexey
        17.08.2020

        what is 50 1.2 on nikon ??

        Reply

      • Vyacheslav
        17.08.2020

        Perhaps this means manual Nikkor 50 / 1,2 (or 55 / 1,2, there were such and such)

        Reply

      • Alexey
        17.08.2020

        but with them everything is just fine in terms of the picture. if you can work with them, essno.

        Reply

      • Stas
        17.08.2020

        Physical adjustment first, and then only correction.

        Reply

      • Alexey
        17.08.2020

        physical alignment WHAT ?? good old optics? she doesn't need it

        Reply

      • Stas
        17.08.2020

        Autofocus sensors. Why do you need it? Asked the one who needed it. I share my experience, especially since I did it with different cameras and successfully. And this is thanks to the lazy service. But every second person starts being clever without any practical experience.

        Reply

      • Stas
        17.08.2020

        First, you need to check the focus at the widest aperture, with zero autofocus correction in the camera, and do this from a tripod. A tripod is required. Diode lighting is not desirable, natural daylight is better. Search the net and print a table to check focus. At an open aperture, it is difficult to understand where the focus is, so you need to navigate by the contrast of the resulting image. Also, you need to do this with multiple lenses, if any. Everyone should be about the same on an open aperture. This is for a start. If this goes well, I will explain the procedure further. Before this check, you do not need to climb into the chamber.

        Reply

    • Stas
      17.08.2020

      First, you need to check the focus at the widest aperture, with zero autofocus correction in the camera, and do this from a tripod. A tripod is required. Diode lighting is not desirable, natural daylight is better. Search the net and print a table to check focus. At an open aperture, it is difficult to understand where the focus is, so you need to navigate by the contrast of the resulting image. Also, you need to do this with multiple lenses, if any. Everyone should be about the same on an open aperture. This is for a start. If this goes well, I will explain the procedure further. Before this check, you do not need to climb into the chamber.

      Reply

      • Alexey
        17.08.2020

        why is this all? there is also a service software. everything adjusts without problems. for each AF point separately.

        Reply

      • Stas
        17.08.2020

        Physical alignment first.

        Reply

      • Alexey
        17.08.2020

        this is done at the stand. and not so.
        and after such craftsmen, the people in the ASC have to reinstall everything for a long time and tediously.
        moreover, in 99% of cases this is not required. unless the AF unit was replaced or the camera was hit very hard.

        Reply

      • Stas
        17.08.2020

        Do you work in the service? I adjusted mine once, no more need. And I'm not alone.

        Reply

      • Alexey
        17.08.2020

        I repeat - there is no need for mechanical adjustment of the AF unit position. everything can be configured much more accurately programmatically. and, I repeat - at all points. and also separately for the vertical and horizontal CCD rulers at each point.

        Reply

      • Stas
        17.08.2020

        Help a man named Olen.

        Reply

      • Andrei
        09.04.2021

        Hello, please describe in detail the adjustment process, ignoring the paranoid. There are people who are interested in this, but there is no such thing on the internet, only for d90. The review is great, thanks.

        Reply

  3. Alexey
    17.08.2020

    Gentlemen with naughty hands! Spin what you want and where you want, thereby you only increase the number of clients in the ACC. Yes, and I, too, often bring this. You have to build a stand, return everything to its original state and then programmatically adjust. All service software, special equipment and service documentation are available, therefore I look so skeptically at the attempts of craftsmen to twist what is not intended for it))

    Reply

    • Stas
      17.08.2020

      You speak so well and predict the future ... Please continue. We will not interfere.

      Reply

      • APh
        21.08.2020

        Keep writing useless comments. We will not interfere.

        Reply

  4. Vera
    18.08.2020

    Whatever one may say, I nurture confidence in the selections only from your resource. You have selected elite masters of their craft.

    Reply

    • Ivan
      18.08.2020

      There are many photo resources. Arkady did a great job, he systematized the scattered information, described in detail and established feedback with his readers, who form a solid and expanding circle.

      Reply

    • JJ Tesla
      13.09.2021

      I strongly agree with you.

      Reply

  5. notapic
    18.08.2020

    Some kind of chaotic review, without systematic decomposition on the shelves. The video is mentioned 2 times, but for these 2 times the frame rate and bit rate are not written, in principle, the suitability of the camera for video recording is not described. About working ISO and ergonomics, too, not a word (okay, little is written about ergonomics at the end), and these are very important details in the camera review. Also not mentioned is incompatibility with non-Ai lenses, despite the fact that they are also from film cameras.

    Reply

    • Onotole
      23.08.2020

      Of course, nothing is compatible with non-AI, you cannot use such lenses on the D810 without first converting them (read filing).

      Reply

  6. Girl with a paddle
    18.08.2020

    If someone shared their experience and told how to use banks of settings on the D810, it would be very good. On D7200 buttons U1 and U2 returned presets, even if they corrected something for a specific shooting. And here, if something has changed, then there is no return to the originally set settings? Help me figure it out, please

    Reply

    • Eugene
      18.08.2020

      I don't know how on Nikon, but on Canon there is an item to save changes or not.

      Reply

      • JJ Tesla
        13.09.2021

        Yes, also, after the changes, you need to go to the menu with the key and select save the settings. They will be written to the currently selected bank.

        Reply

  7. Alexey
    18.08.2020

    to Koba
    if we talk about flash memory in principle, then it should be mentioned that in relation to NAND microcircuits, there are two fundamentally different technologies - SLC and MLC. if in the first one in one cell is stored one bit (there is a charge / there is no charge), then in the second one can store more than one bit, that is, in fact, this is already analog storage of information, according to the level of charge. and it becomes clear that the storage reliability in the SLC memory is much higher than in the MLC, but at the same time we get a proportionally smaller volume, which leads to the need to increase the number of microcircuits in the assembly, which increases the size, consumption and price, but increases reliability many times over.

    Reply

  8. Dim
    22.08.2020

    Thank you very much for the review, very atmospheric - you read it and it is as if you were walking with this camera yourself. *** There are amazing comments like: no, you can't like it, because I don't eat it :-) The man did us all a favor: he gave a wonderful, well-tailored impression. No thank you to say and share your impression, if it really hurts

    Reply

  9. Valery
    22.08.2020

    The phase focusing module used in the Nikon D810 is well known to us from previous models. This is the same Multi-CAM 3500FX, working with 51 points, which cover a fairly large area of ​​the frame. But the autofocus algorithms have also been improved. Automatic focusing by a group of points was implemented. We first saw this feature in the flagship Nikon D4S some time ago. This uses five adjacent points to avoid accidental focusing on the background rather than on the main subject. Focusing priority will be given to the closest object or face to the camera, if it is recognized by the automation. The Nikon D810 metering module allows you to recognize the shooting scene, including people's faces when shooting using the optical viewfinder.

    Reply

  10. Onotole
    23.08.2020

    "The camera works with any F-mount lenses." -
    This is, to put it mildly, not true.

    Reply

  11. Victor
    07.09.2020

    Quite a subjective review, which clearly required, among other things, error checking before submitting. Yes, and the cat cried photos)) And, the feeling is, they were made on from ... smiling (as if snapped on an iPhone on vacation).

    I understand that the author tried his best, but nevertheless, the initial reviews from Shapoval taught me good things.

    Reply

    • JJ Tesla
      13.09.2021

      Thanks for that too. The management approved, so you can trust.

      Reply

  12. Victoria
    15.12.2020

    Hello! Thank you very much for your blog! This is the most informative resource! Every day I discover something new for myself!

    There was a question about this and I will be very grateful for the advice)

    The situation is this:

    Camera Nikon D810
    Lenses
    50 mm Ф1.8
    24-70 F2.8
    80-200 F2.8

    On zooms, the blur is not particularly noticeable, and the fix is ​​very noticeable. I made diagnostics of all lenses along the line, there was a noticeable back focus on all, about the same. I made fine-tuning AF (- 20). The situation has improved a little, but judging by the sharpness on the ruler scale, it would be possible to make a correction by another -5 -10, back focus still goes a little (

    Can this be fixed and what should be done in this case? Camera alignment (software or mechanical)? Will this procedure help?

    Reply

    • B. R. P.
      15.12.2020

      I think you need to contact the service with a camera and lenses. It is unlikely that they will help in absentia.

      Reply

    • Sergei
      21.02.2022

      dealt with the problem?

      Reply

  13. Maria
    07.06.2022

    Tell me, is it suitable for this camera - Nikon 50mm f / 1.8S Nikkor Z lens?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      07.06.2022

      no, it won't fit. Look at 50/1.8G

      Reply

  14. Bohdan
    27.08.2022

    Hello, tell me. Does it make sense to overpay, d850? I plan to use it for portraits, landscapes. From optics there are AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f / 2,8G, Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm 1: 1.4G

    Reply

    • Bohdan
      27.08.2022

      * Meaning, used market

      Reply

    • B. R. P.
      27.08.2022

      Doesn't have. For portraits, overpay better for a good portrait lens.

      Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        27.08.2022

        yes, 810 for the eyes with a good lens it will be great

        Reply

  15. All3201
    04.09.2022

    Hello everyone, I can’t understand. Is it wind dust or from the outside?
    https://ibb.co/bQK2596

    Reply

    • Viktre
      04.09.2022

      Most likely from the outside. Oh, it seems not, inside. Although wait…. Maybe still from the outside? ... But by the way, it looks a little like inside.

      Flip a coin, in general, it will be more reliable.

      Reply

  16. All3201
    04.09.2022

    Just in case, I’ll produce it. So far, only the bots have responded. Hello everyone, I can’t understand. Is it dust inside or from the outside?
    https://ibb.co/bQK2596
    Thank you

    Reply

  17. andrud
    04.09.2022

    Inside, not outside

    Reply

  18. Bohdan
    07.09.2022

    Good day. Tell me the best landscape lens for d810, d850? Up to $ 500, used if possible

    Reply

  19. Bohdan
    07.09.2022

    https://radojuva.com/2015/12/tokina-at-x-pro-sd-16-28-f-2-8-if-fx/ Is this one suitable for landscapes on d810, d850?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      07.09.2022

      Yes it will fit

      Reply

      • Bohdan
        07.09.2022

        Arkady, what else can you recommend besides Tokina AT-X 16-28mm f / 2,8 Pro FX. I looked at the photo, it catches a lot of glare (Perhaps there is an analogue, nikkor 14-24 f2.8? Or from 15 but with f2.8 .Please tell me

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        07.09.2022

        Any that fall within the budget https://radojuva.com/2009/11/super-wide-nikon-with-af-lenses/
        16-35mm 1:4G and 14-24mm 1:2.8G from relatives are just right. Each has nuances.

        Reply

      • Bohdan
        09.09.2022

        Thank you. Give me more advice on bokeh, like here https://ibb.co/XsB4qhH
        But on the d810, with what lens is this, bokeh maybe?
        It seems to be on Helios-81, similar bokeh

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        09.09.2022

        Ask Oleg and do not forget to find out if the prices for Buryat weddings have risen

        Reply

      • Bohdan
        09.09.2022

        Ahahah, thanks. But still I wanted to know from you. I want boke nuts

        Reply

      • Bohdan
        09.09.2022

        I looked, in your reviews, it seems to be Helios 103, it gives such a bokeh as the one from the video. I found it under the m39, what do you say it will be the same bokeh?

        Reply

      • Rodion
        09.09.2022

        Any old 50/1.4 practically. SMC Takumar 50/1.4 for example.

        Reply

      • Bohdan
        09.09.2022

        Thank you!

        Reply

  20. Bohdan
    15.09.2022

    Please help me find the front cover for this lens https://radojuva.com/2015/12/tokina-at-x-pro-sd-16-28-f-2-8-if-fx/
    I looked at alik, something was missing.
    MB knows who is where, you can find it in Ukraine, thanks in advance.

    Reply

  21. Bohdan
    18.09.2022
  22. Bohdan
    18.09.2022

    MB, who knows. D850 / 810 are there any f0.95 lenses? Or are they current on the BZ?

    Reply

    • Dmitry Kostin
      18.09.2022

      At the BZK.

      Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      18.09.2022

      no, under zk Nikon only 1.2

      Reply

  23. Igor
    09.05.2023

    Tell me plz, carcasses 810, 850 have an autofocus engine? That is

    Reply

    • Igor
      09.05.2023

      That is, is it possible to use lenses for a screwdriver?
      I want to switch from d7000 to 800 series and leave old lenses

      Reply

      • Dmitry Kostin
        09.05.2023

        Yes, there is a “screwdriver” for 810 and 850. As well as on the D780 and older D5 / D6.

        Reply

      • Igor
        10.05.2023

        Thank you very much

        Reply

      • B. R. P.
        10.05.2023

        It’s interesting how it turns out, the amateur 7000 has a screwdriver, but the pro 810 and 850 may not have it))) You can use lenses, preferably on ff)))

        Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer