answers: 448

  1. Kirill
    09.12.2018

    How did you attach a fifty dollars from Canon to a camera from Nikon? Can you educate?

    Reply

    • Igor
      16.03.2019

      Adapter FD-Nikon F

      Reply

  2. Olga
    23.01.2019

    Good evening!
    I really need the help of professionals! I want to buy the first DSLR, rented on the phone, soap box, like hands from the right place :)))
    Tell me, what is better for a start Canon 650D or Nikon D3200 ???
    Thank you in advance for your help :)))

    Reply

    • Valery A.
      23.01.2019

      Kind. I’m not a professional, but I’ll tell you. You have brought cameras of different levels, the equal of the Canon 650D is Nikon D5200, and the Nikon 3200 is Canon 1200D. Therefore, Canon 650 is cooler, i.e. more functional. And so as the first, you can love any obsolete. Take a DSLR, even though Nikon D40 (3000, 5100 ..) or Canon starting from 350d to 600d.

      Reply

      • Olga
        23.01.2019

        Thanks for the help :))

        Reply

      • Igor
        16.03.2019

        As a person who shot with the 1000 series canons, I will say no, no match). I shot on the 1100D, and it seemed that everything was fine with me, but when I bought a used D3100 to replace it, I had the feeling that I had bought a camera of a completely different level. Build quality first: the 1100D feels like a toy with its very cheap plastic. Nikon has normal plastic, there is no feeling that you are pushing it with your finger). Rubber bands: Canon didn't have them, just bald plastic. Against its background, the two silicone rubber bands on the D3100 seem like some incredible luxury. The camera itself is slow, the buffer holds about five frames in RAW. Video - nominally it is in the 1100D, in fact, consider it not. 720P non-autofocus with fully automatic settings. In the D3100, the shameful 1080p 24, in which you can still raise the bitrate higher with the firmware, if only the memory card allows it. And working autofocus. Constant monitoring of this to himself, of course, like all cameras of that time, but the single, when half-pressed right during the recording, is nice. I would like to believe that everything was much better in the 1200D, but still a small buffer even at a lower resolution and the Deshman case has not gone anywhere, and compared to the D3200, everything is sad there. There is no microphone jack, no sensor cleaning, lower resolution and display quality, lower continuous shooting speed and noticeably less buffer size. And if we compare it with the D3300, which was released in the same year as the 1200D, the latter is already losing a lot in terms of video. They are not equal, well, at all)

        Reply

      • Denis
        16.03.2019

        By the way, compared to the D3200, the D40 buttons are made even better

        Reply

      • Valery A.
        16.03.2019

        Igor, I meant “equal” in terms of user niche and exit time, both of them did not “use” them, but at one time I chose between the new 1100 and 3100, purely outwardly (larger screen, neat look) I chose 3100. You have now confirmed correct choice. Since then on nikon.

        Reply

  3. Inga
    07.02.2019

    I recommend your site to everyone! Everything is written in great detail and “chewed” for beginners and photo lovers! Thanks for your work!

    Reply

  4. Question to Arkady
    20.03.2019

    Hello! I read the review of the D3200 camera and decided to look at the RAW files attached to the review ... What I saw at 100% crop on the monitor is something! Arkady, do you really think that the noise or graininess of the images obtained with this camera at ISO100 are comparable to the D5100 and D7000? Yes, it seems to me, in general, incomparable things - such graininess on the D5100 and D7000 can be obtained only by raising the ISO to 800 and higher! And the grain on the D3200 is so “nasty” that it conceals detail - instead of hairs and eyelashes, there is one continuous mess, and straight lines seem to be torn and zigzag ... Maybe you had “sharpening” at maximum in the camera settings? Honestly, the detail is so bad that you don't even want to sprinkle photos. I myself am the owner of the D5100 and at ISO 100-400 the grain / noise is similar to that of 3200 - in general it is impossible to see RAW in pictures, so when choosing a camera, definitely look towards the D5100 and D7000, but not towards the D3200. Even the grain on the D90 looks less flawed, somehow more “filmic” and pleasant than on the D3200….

    Reply

    • anonym
      20.03.2019

      389 comments, 6 years old and suddenly, unexpectedly, a person appeared with eyes. Of course, hundreds of flies will not convince anyone of the gastronomic properties of poop, but one taste of the cake is trying to spoil it.

      Reply

      • Denis
        21.03.2019

        To me, subjectively, photos with the D3200 seem noticeably worse than with the D5100

        Reply

      • Sergos
        02.01.2020

        There are adapters with a glass, but this is with grief, and without contacts on the bayonet.

        Reply

      • Dima
        28.08.2023

        And I listen to such comments more, critical ones, so to speak. They are true and without honey)

        Reply

    • Michael
      21.03.2019

      So, 24 megapuxels do their job. Naturally, there will be more noise, and detailing will require appropriate lenses. It is not necessary to watch 100% crop from such cameras, it is very harmful to the eyes))

      Reply

      • Nicholas
        22.03.2019

        As far as I understand, when shooting, Arkady set Sharping + 9 (maximum), Saturation + 2 in on-camera settings, which actually leads to the appearance of grain in RAW files. Perhaps this is his trick - to make the pictures grainy (under the film). And if the parameters are set by default, then the grain is not visible at ISO 100-200. Yesterday I ran the D3200 myself, tested it. A camera was chosen as a gift from used options. But under all conditions being equal and on the same lens, the D5100 has an advantage. And viewing 100% of the crop allows you to evaluate the misses or “soapiness” of the lens. If you make photos for an instagram or a web site, then it doesn't matter what to take - even on a smartphone - no one will notice the poor quality of optics or carcasses. And if you buy 24MP and at the same time do not think about framing (sprinkling) from the photo, then why are these 24MP needed at all, if the detail is poor?

        Reply

      • Michael
        22.03.2019

        This is if you open a regular developer. And Sharp RAW on the side

        Reply

      • Dima
        28.08.2023

        These settings only work in zhipege or native developer. For a rav, if you open it in lightroom or ACR, then I don’t care.

        Reply

      • Dima
        28.08.2023

        But what about the vaunted dxo? ))) According to the tests, everything is just so sweet there))) They have some kind of special love relationship with Nikon along the way)

        Reply

      • Dmitry Kostin
        28.08.2023

        To dxo for a long time questions.
        If you rely only on it, you will get the impression that some cameras have almost no dd.

        Reply

  5. Антон Ш.
    21.04.2019

    Hello! Please help me decide. Questions to practice. I choose the first mirror. I am guided by used - Nikon d3100, 3200, 5100. I tend to the 3-thousandth series, because there is a guide mode, although I don't know how useful it is. At a price almost the same 3100 and 3200, the second is newer, but confuses 24 MP. Will my old laptop - asus k52f intel core i3, 4 GB of RAM with integrated video card handle photos. At the same time, I believe that processing will be minimal. I also heard opinions that 3100 makes less than 3200 noise at working (low) iso values. Tell me which camera is better?

    Reply

    • BB
      21.04.2019

      Guide (guide, in Russian) is almost useless, better read the article by Arkady here, there will be more benefit.
      Of these, I would take the D5100 - there is a better matrix than the 3100, and the files are not as heavy as the 3200. Functions are reduced to a lesser extent + a rotary screen.
      The laptop, of course, will not fly, but you can work (I have a backup laptop about the same)

      Reply

      • Антон Ш.
        22.04.2019

        Thanks for the advice!

        Reply

      • anonym
        22.04.2019

        A DSLR without fine tuning AF is suitable only for dark shit and for braked live view.

        Reply

    • First Substation
      22.04.2019

      More laptop memory and you can still work

      Reply

      • Антон Ш.
        22.04.2019

        Thanks! So you need to buy a bar with memory

        Reply

    • Sergos
      02.01.2020

      This is two-dimensional graphics, not 3D. The old pentium4 2.8GHz works great with Photoshop. If you are not a professional and do not work with layers, I advise you to choose acdsee from version 8. Well, i3 will be guaranteed to work quickly with any editor. As for video processing, then this is a special topic.

      Reply

  6. Anatoly
    03.05.2019

    tell me which is better to buy 3200 or 7000?

    Reply

    • anonym
      03.05.2019

      7000

      Reply

  7. Anatoly
    29.05.2019

    My 3300 auto is heavily lying on my BB car, even during the daytime overexposed shots on the street, how to cure who knows?

    Reply

    • BB
      29.05.2019

      You already decide: your BB is lying, or metering? There are no telepaths here, and if the first time your question was not answered, then you asked it incorrectly.
      To get started, read the article by Arkady (https://radojuva.com/o-fotografii/), read the instructions for the camera (yes, there is also a lot of useful information), sometimes it is useful to make a complete reset. And then, when you have exactly decided on the problem, then if it’s not about crooked handles, then the path to your service.

      Reply

  8. Valentine
    24.08.2019

    Igor. Please tell me whether autofocus will work with the FD-Nikon F adapter if it is installed on the Canon EF 75-300 1: 4-5.6 ultrasonic. I will wait for advice.

    Reply

    • Alexander
      26.11.2019

      Does such an adapter exist? Nikon, after all, has the largest working length, and without dances with a tambourine, only optics with F mount becomes on it.

      Reply

    • Sergos
      02.01.2020

      there will definitely not be autofocus

      Reply

      • Sergos
        02.01.2020

        There are adapters with a glass, but this is with grief, and without contacts on the bayonet.

        Reply

  9. Sergos
    02.01.2020

    They talk about noise in a strange way, abstractly. But concretely, nothing. Firstly, what is the ISO of the picture, secondly, they compare 100% crop 24mp and 14 d3000 \ 24mp -noise, and if you click down from the 24mp crop a couple of times to 14mp crop, what We'll see. I saw and started 36 megapixels, although I will never give up and say 10MP ssd matrix \ this is personal, especially since there is a penny on the secondary.
    This is SW. Arkady can jokingly pull ex. shot with d40 \ 6mp \. The amateur is better to have a carcass more modern \ of course who has what wealth.

    Reply

    • Sergos
      02.01.2020

      d3100-14 mp wrong

      Reply

  10. an25673
    08.01.2020

    Hello, who has a Nikon D3200 camera, tell me, should autofocus through Life View sound an alarm when autofocus has worked or not? When autofocusing, I get a signal through the viewfinder, but not through Life View, although the focus areas change color from red to green. On the D3100, my signal is triggered both during autofocus through the viewfinder and through Life View.

    Reply

  11. Vlad
    11.03.2020

    Good afternoon, Arkady. Please help with advice. The task is to shoot backstage from master classes and lectures at the conference. Shooting indoors is likely to be difficult lighting. There is a choice of Nikon d90 and d3200. I will rent the lens, nikkor 35 / 1.8 or sigma 18-35 / 1.8. What is better to choose based on noise at high iso and accuracy af? There is no way to test in advance.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      11.03.2020

      accuracy + - they are similar, 3200 makes less noise, 18-35 just right

      Reply

  12. Artem
    15.04.2020

    I have been using D3200 + kit 18-55 since 2016. I want to buy all 50mm f / 1,8G because Well, very dark pictures at 18-55 indoors or in the evening. Automatically piles ISO 3200 almost always (in the settings it is worth: pull the exposure to ... and you can choose any ISO. By default, 3200). Therefore, the noises are very annoying, which, by the way, are already perceptible at 800, and sometimes at 400. I thought about changing it to the canon 600d, but I see they write that the d3200 is better (or am I mistaken?)
    By the way, the question is on the mount. The D3200 does not have a built-in motor, so the lens needs an AF-S. And what about Canon with mounts, in particular at 600d.
    Sori if you wrote a hogwash))

    Reply

    • Michael
      15.04.2020

      3200 maybe a little better. There will be no fundamental differences at high ISO. Everything is simple for Canon - everything with an EF / EF-S mount will work, no pitfalls, unlike Nikon. If 50mm suits the room, you can buy it. It's better indoors, it's easier to shoot with flash

      Reply

    • Alexander
      23.04.2020

      For the room, the flash should be taken, but not fast, and also with a fairly small viewing angle, the fix. 50mm on the crop will become a portrait, in the apartment it is a bit crowded. Better to take 35 / 1.8, it will be something like a staffer.

      Reply

  13. GadgetPostal
    15.09.2020

    Here I read the reason for the poor quality of jpeg on the site: the 24-megapixel Sony D3200 CMOS sensor brings with it a number of real advantages: high resolution and extended dynamic range. While we applaud Nikon's bold strategy of introducing the best sensors into cameras intended for the general public, we cannot help but regret the JPEG quality generated by the D3200, which a priori appears to be inferior to that of its competitors ... due to Nikon's restrictions on your software. That being said, with a good RAW converter, the D3200 will deliver image quality no worse than an expert-grade camera.
    https://www.dxomark.com/nikon-d3200-review/

    Reply

    • Andrei
      25.01.2023

      Where did Sony end up in the D3200? There Nikon NC81369R

      Reply

  14. a lion
    21.09.2021

    Strange affair. I got into my hands here 3200. When shooting at a long exposure, the same amount and thinks after. Those. if the exposure is a minute, then after lowering the mirror, it will hang for a minute, as if writing on a card. As if the longer the shutter speed, the harder it is to save the file. Very uncomfortable.

    Reply

    • Oleg
      21.09.2021

      try disabling long exposure noise reduction

      Reply

  15. Alexander
    16.10.2021

    Hello, please help. There is an option to purchase nikon D90. D3200. D3300 with 18-105 lens, the price is about the same, It is supposed to be used for personal purposes, i.e. shoot on vacation, travel. Mostly a photo, occasionally a video. What is better? And with this use, do you need a second lens? if so, which one is better, there is Galios-44M, though without fitting for nikon. Thank you

    Reply

    • Michael
      23.10.2021

      In any case, the D90 loses to both other devices. And the 3200 is not much inferior to the 3300. For amateur tasks they are almost equal, the main difference is in the matrix manufacturer. 3300 gives the picture a little "sharper".

      Reply

  16. Elena
    22.10.2021

    For those who don't understand at all, here is a list of telephoto lenses that will definitely fit and all functions will work. Thanks!

    Reply

  17. Alex
    14.09.2022

    Tell me why the electronic rangefinder function (ranchfinder) is still suitable in cameras 3100, 3200, 5000 and 5100

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      14.09.2022

      for convenient work with manual optics, or with optics in manual focus mode

      Reply

  18. Konstantin
    01.11.2022

    3200 pleasantly surprises in cloudy weather.

    Reply

    • B. R. P.
      01.11.2022

      With what?

      Reply

      • Dima
        27.08.2023

        in focus)

        Reply

      • B. R. P.
        28.08.2023

        )))

        Reply

  19. amella
    10.03.2023

    Witam, czy ten aparat jest odporny na różne warunki klimatyczne? Zastanawiam się nad kupnem, ponieważ chciałabym go wziąć do Włoch, ale boję się, że się zepsuje.
    Thank you in advance for your answer.

    Reply

  20. Dima
    27.08.2023

    A friend threw me a couple of ravens from this camera, I thought the files would weigh 26-27 meters and they weigh 22-23. Despite the fact that the frames are quite rich in content, not empty. And at the same time, the Canon EOS M at 18 megapixels also weighs 22-23 sometimes more meters. It turns out that in the younger Nikon models, the default files are slightly compressed? On Nikon D5100 at 16 megapixels, again, on average, 14 meters. Rarely more than 16.

    Reply

    • Viktre
      27.08.2023

      That's right, the files are slightly compressed.

      Reply

      • Dima
        28.08.2023

        That is, the canon of the rava does not compress, but the nikon in the younger cameras compresses? Well, now it’s not surprising that we see what we see) Nikon loses some of the shades, apparently, and in general there is some kind of skew in colors.

        Reply

  21. Dima
    28.08.2023

    I twisted a few files from this device, where there is a lot of green, while spring. While surprised, green is adequate and not vyrviglazny. The color is more balanced. In vain, Nikon still doesn’t put its matrices ... At first glance, everything is very good after Sony’s poisonous matrices.

    Reply

  22. Sergei
    14.12.2023

    There is such a feature of this camera that if you install a manual lens like Helios, then in M ​​mode it is impossible to make exposure compensation using the button and control dial, the exposure compensation button in M ​​mode controls the aperture, and exposure control has to be done through the device’s display, which is not very convenient

    Reply

    • B. R. P.
      14.12.2023

      How do you control the aperture from the camera on Helios? tell me more)

      Reply

      • Sergei
        15.12.2023

        I wrote that in M ​​mode the exposure compensation button + control dial does not work, because... This button in M ​​mode only works with the aperture value, I didn’t write that I control the Helios aperture, I wrote about a feature of the camera

        Reply

      • B. R. P.
        15.12.2023

        Using buttons from any device, you can influence the shutter speed and ISO (with lenses like G.) in M. All.

        Reply

  23. Load more comments ...

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer