answers: 284

  1. Nicholas
    20.10.2014

    Tell me please! And the Nikon D3200 has a viewfinder compared to the D3300! Pentazerkalo and Prism?

    Reply

    • Igor
      20.10.2014

      The usual pentazerkalo there.

      Reply

    • Vladimir
      20.10.2014

      The Nikona website still states that the D3300:
      Viewfinder Mirror direct viewfinder with pentazerkal

      Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      20.10.2014

      I'm concentrating my review

      "Both cameras use the same optical viewfinder with 95% coverage and 0.85x magnification based on a pentamirror."

      It is urgent to switch to video reviews, to read everything a long time ago forgotten how.

      Reply

      • Lynx
        20.10.2014

        no need to follow the unthinking part of the audience.

        Reply

      • Artyom
        20.10.2014

        Arkady, no video reviews needed! Unsubscribe instantly))
        You have great articles, keep up the good work!

        Reply

      • anonym
        20.10.2014

        Arkady, personally spinning this carcass in the media market. Ivsyo still there is a pentrum MIRROR. The viewfinder is as dark as on 3xxx and 5xxx. Nearby, standing 7xxx and my d90 have a Penta PRISM and a clearly lighter viewfinder. A heavy pentaprism would not allow a carcass to be made so light =)

        Reply

      • R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
        20.10.2014

        Did not write the name =)
        Foreign sources say that the d3200 and d3300 have a Pentamirror.

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        20.10.2014

        Fixed Honestly, I really thought I wrote for the mirror.

        Reply

      • Nicholas
        20.10.2014

        Arkady! Honestly, I myself wanted to quote just that, what you quoted! the first time I read the review, it seemed to me to be written pentaprism !!! On this I asked. I read your reviews very carefully!)

        Reply

  2. anonym
    20.10.2014

    I agree, it makes no sense to overpay !!!

    Reply

  3. Sergei
    20.10.2014

    Arkady, please explain what you mean by the concept: "And after the pictures taken with the Nikon D80, the pictures with the Nikon D3300 seem to be much better"? In your reviews, you always say that the matrix is ​​better and the quality is better in new cameras. In other comments, you write that in the same D80 the picture is even better than in the d700, etc.…. So it turns out that the D3300 is nicer and more colorful than the D700 and D80? What do you mean by “better pictures” and “better quality”? (We don't take high ISO into account)

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      20.10.2014

      Each situation has its own context, depending on the tasks. Quality is a very subjective thing in the world of photography. Sometimes I get out of the concept of color, sometimes out of noises, sometimes it just pops into my head (this also happens). There is always some context, get out of it. As for the d80 and d3300, yes, in the d3300 in general, if you somehow super-generalize, then the picture and photo quality will be better. But at the same time, we can say that d80 gives more pleasant colors, unobtrusive and neutral ... to each his own :)

      Reply

      • Vladimir
        20.10.2014

        My daughter has a D90, and so she also noticed that even without processing the pictures from my D80 are somehow “warmer and livelier”.

        Reply

      • Sashko Selling D3s
        20.10.2014

        + 1.
        The older the camera, the more pleasant the color it produces.
        Older cameras have a single problem, noise.
        Otherwise, they are simply gorgeous.
        An exception is perhaps Fujifilm.
        In which the new mirrorless models continue to please with a beautiful unobtrusive color.
        And on the new Nikon cameras, even when you put Picture control on Neutral, you still get a beautiful picture.
        Without a doubt, everything can be processed. But why? Isn’t it easier to get a good result right away.

        Reply

      • Anonimous
        21.10.2014

        +2
        CCD matrix drives.

        Reply

      • Elephant
        23.11.2014

        The most pleasant and lively portraits I get on CCD - Nikon D200 + good glasses and Sony A390 + Soviet glasses. Alas, it's more difficult for me personally to achieve this on wonderful modern multi-pixel low-noise matrices. You have to do some magic in editors to somehow transform the beautiful plastic of faces into living human skin. But for filming objects, events, interiors, architecture, new matrices rule.

        Reply

      • Jury
        20.10.2014

        I use two cameras - D3200 and S5Pro (exclusively for amateur photography). So it turns out that each task has its own camera: if a landscape or night shooting - D3200, and if during the day, a portrait, leaves and flowers - definitely S5Pro. D3200 falls into hands much less often :)

        Reply

  4. Pastor
    20.10.2014

    Ay-yay-yay, how can I change the “warm tube” d80 :)) And on the topic - an interesting camera for a beginner. With a noticeable difference with the d5 *** line, the image quality is the same. And in d7100, it turns out that the matrix is ​​the same. Autofocus, in principle, on the central point and in the old d3100 worked fine. The exposure metering is also quite decent. Another question is that for the price of the new d3300, you can take a canon 5d or a nikon d7000. And there is already something to think about :)

    Reply

    • Alexey
      20.10.2014

      Considering the possibility of working 7000 - 7100 with manual glasses with metering, as well as accurate focus adjustment - there is not even anything to think about here)))

      Reply

      • Pastor
        09.07.2015

        In less than a year, I bought the d3300 for only half the price of the d7000. And, although the younger camera is inferior in many other respects, in terms of the quality of images at high ISOs, in my opinion, the d3300 is better than the other Nikon crop that I used, including the d7000.

        Reply

  5. Alexander Gvozd
    20.10.2014

    I am glad that Nikon is improving, including in amateur cameras! Thank you for the interesting and capacious review!

    Reply

  6. Arkady Shapoval
    20.10.2014

    No OLPF filter, officially indicated, for example, on a promotional video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPNNue-FyB8 and also in the review there are links to 5 more sources.

    Reply

  7. Yarkiya
    20.10.2014

    Thanks, interesting review. So the camera was provided by the official Nikon, does this mean that in the future, Nikon will continue to share technology?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      20.10.2014

      I count on it :) and time will tell, now I need to start raking with the autumn weddings, and then take up the reviews.

      Reply

  8. Sergei
    20.10.2014

    Arkady, thank you for the detailed answer! It's always a pleasure to read your articles! Your site for me is the main guideline when choosing photographic equipment!

    Reply

  9. Vladimir
    20.10.2014

    Everything would be fine, but the file size from such a matrix of about 24 MB is annoying. You can’t save any drives.

    Reply

  10. Jackie
    20.10.2014

    Arkady, and in the paragraph below you have a little crap, or are you really upset by the independence of modern central control centers? :)
    “But 'simple' by no means means 'bad', with this little D3300 you can get just fabulous photos, the main thing is a little desire, and the camera will do the rest :(.”

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      20.10.2014

      Fixed

      Reply

  11. Michael
    20.10.2014

    In all the photos, the colors are not funny, or the author is not in the mood. What to take 3100 or 3300?

    Reply

  12. Konstantin
    20.10.2014

    The happy owner of this device has been around for several months. I have already managed to purchase Helios 81N on the advice of Arkady and am learning to shoot in manual mode. Saving up on the Nikon DX AF-S Nikkor 35mm 1: 1.8G.

    Reply

    • Sashko D3s
      20.10.2014

      Good luck to you Konstantin and beautiful shots.

      Reply

      • Konstantin
        21.10.2014

        Thank you very much!

        Reply

  13. Valery
    20.10.2014

    Ai good review! THANKS !

    Reply

  14. anonym
    20.10.2014

    And how does this camera work with old optics? I have a D40x. Does the 3300 have any differences in this regard?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      20.10.2014

      There is no difference except Live View :)
      About metering with the manual is written here https://radojuva.com.ua/2012/06/nikon-ai-s-old-lens-about/

      Reply

      • DimDimych
        21.10.2014

        As Arkady wrote many times, if you want to use the Soviet optics for automatic exposure metering, you need a camera of 7000 and higher. If you want, as one of the commentators wrote here, “warm lamp” then you will have to adjust the exposure pair, that is, shutter speed and aperture, independently on cameras of 5100 class and below. In general, the manual "scoop" is revealed in full frame. I here screwed Helios 81H and Jupiter 135 to D610 from a friend. Lord! I don't know how, but they give such a picture !! Crop eats away the frame and uses only the central part on these glasses. Because of this, there is a decrease in the resolution of old lenses and a recalculation of the focal length and a large DOF. In general, I regretted that I took the 7100, and did not wait for the 610th to be released in due time, just because excellent and cheap old glasses cannot be used 100% on the crop. And, in principle, only for this.

        Reply

  15. Andrei
    21.10.2014

    Great review. Arkady thanks.
    We are really looking forward to the D810 review.

    Reply

  16. Lapwing
    21.10.2014

    Hello Arkady! I regularly follow all the reviews. Thank you for the helpful tips. The quality of the pictures from this camera (for me) is very good. The dynamic range is particularly impressive. Did you use post-processing, or does the device produce such a finished picture?
    I look forward to a review of the Nikon AF-S Nikkor 300mm f / 4D IF-ED.
    Thank you.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      21.10.2014

      I quote a review:

      All photos in the gallery are untreated, just a smaller on-camera JPEG.

      Reply

  17. AM
    22.10.2014

    Arkady, thanks for the review, but I would like to see at least 2-3 pictures in low light conditions, in the evening for example. I would really like to see pictures at high ISO values ​​in low light conditions, in order to estimate at what value the camera starts to “make noise”. Thanks in advance.
    PS: applies not only to this review.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      22.10.2014

      See the archive with RAW, there is.

      Reply

    • anonym
      25.10.2014

      The camera starts to make noise ... Dhomark gives a value for 3300 - 1385 and I agree with them.

      Reply

  18. Amatich
    22.10.2014

    Thanks Arkady.

    Reply

  19. Dmitriy
    22.10.2014

    Great visibility and wonderful shots. Thanks Arkady!

    Reply

  20. varezhkin
    23.10.2014

    oh, I would give the D750 Arcadia a test ... It looks like Nikon has finally corrected the color.

    Reply

  21. Gene jb
    24.10.2014

    About colors, etc. Does it seem to me alone that CCD gives a more interesting picture than CMOS?

    Reply

    • varezhkin
      24.10.2014

      No, not one. Go to wowcamera.info.

      Reply

    • Lynx
      24.10.2014

      In a respectable society, for the phrase built according to the school-Bashi pattern “it seems to me alone” it has long been customary to clarify the situation with the help of a device for holding wax candles.
      As for the essence of the issue, on this site there is even a separate article CCD vs CMOS, not counting the repeated references to this issue in articles on the review of cameras on the SSD-matrix and comments on them.

      Reply

      • Gene jb
        25.10.2014

        I did not study this question on the Internet, therefore I asked. It’s just that there is a CCD camera, there are CMOS, they are of course completely different, but CCD gives the best picture despite its antiquity.

        Reply

      • Lynx
        14.11.2014

        good evening Cap!

        Reply

  22. AgentSmith13
    24.10.2014

    I shoot on D3100, mostly recently, exclusively on manual optics - Helios 81, Jupiter 37, Arsat 80-200, and Nikkor 35: 1,8 is the same as in the review, kit and the rest of the autofocus except for 35 (18 -105, 55-200) - clean indoors with flash (Sigma 610). Wondering how much better is the new whale? (Mine is, in principle, selected from 3, no back fronts, etc., the picture is ok). Well, 3300, as you can see, tolerates high ISO normally.

    Reply

  23. Felix
    25.10.2014

    I myself use the d200 camera. The camera is quite suitable, but ISO 800 is already stretched with a stretch, 1600 is already extremely tight, it’s not possible to shoot at 1600 already, it’s impossible to stretch it if it is shortened, and if it is not shortened, then the grain. I myself would rarely use 1600, but 800 is often needed. Having downloaded the ravs, I saw a phenomenal result, most likely the owners of the d3300 will be very pleased to have such a low-noise camera :) the d3300 on iso 3200 is about the same as the d200 on 640

    Reply

  24. anonym
    09.01.2015

    19.12.2014/5200/3300 bought Nikon d 4. Does it make sense to change to Nikon DXNUMX? attracted by the price, the absence of an AA filter and percent XNUMX.

    Reply

    • The Hedgehog
      13.01.2015

      Are you buying a camera to shoot or to rush among an amateur crop in search of a “masterpiece” button?

      Reply

  25. Anton
    19.01.2015

    I won’t buy a FF-camera, for sure. Therefore, I am satisfied with the crop.

    Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer