02.03.2015/XNUMX/XNUMX Nikon introduced a new camera Nikon D7200.
Nikon D7200
UPDATED
Review Nikon D7200 already here.
Comments on this post do not require registration. Anyone can leave a comment. Many different photographic equipment can be found on AliExpress.
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval. Training/Consultations | Youtube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Telegram
Norm, cho .. but without a rotary screen - unshielded .. waiting for d7500 with wifi and turn signal
In general, nothing has changed except the numbers and everything. The quality of the video and photo has not advanced.
and what didn’t suit you as a photo in d7100?
The rotary screen makes sense if the device has fast autofocus in Live View. In DSLRs, as I recall, this is not very good, except that the Pentax K-3 is good in this regard.
But this is not bad: “f / 8 supported by one sensor”, ie. autofocus works with dark glasses, even if only on one point.
it is indicated that the focusing system is similar to the d750. Look at the demo about the d750, there they shoot a very dynamic video on the lavas.
After switching from Sony A77 to Nikon D750, I can safely say that you can only shoot video in LV mode. Photos with convenience from the ground are the lot of mirrorless cameras (A7 for example) and “translucent” DSLRs.
Static still could be removed, but for example, “long jump” - only hoping for luck or lying down.
AF is the same as on 7100
Oleg, the D7100 could also work with F / 8.
I continue to be able to work with F / 8 :-)
D7100 plus Wai Fai and NFC. Intermediate model D7200 rather than something new ..
AF from D750. It is very good. Now you can focus on what is not visible.
True, I am shooting what is visible, and my D610 does it very well.
For example, in the botanical garden late in the evening. There, in general, even an eye is gouged out of the light, only the illumination of all sorts of cacti.
You can’t put the autofocus module of a full-frame camera on the crop, the 7200 module has its own DX module for 51 points, as well as for 7100, read the specification on the official website in black and white.
Nikon Advanced Multi-CAM 3500 II autofocus sensor module with TTL phase detection, fine-tuning, 51 focus points (including 15 cross-type sensors; f / 8 supported by one sensor), and AF-assist illuminator (range approx. 0.5 to 3 m / 1 ft 8 in. To 9 ft 10 in.)
36 megapixels are written on the camera’s icon, and in the specs 24. full ashdi from 60 frames per second only with crop 1.3. The same autofocus module as in the 6 year old three hundred, and the speed is 6 frames per second, which is lower than in the six year old three hundred. Darkness. the killers of the second seven did not work
Indeed, another jamb from Nikon. Apparently, they just took the badges from D810a and copied them ... thoughtlessly ...
damn, "" ashdi "" in what language? Oh, or "eich idi" (English) or "ha de" (German) ... sorry, but illiteracy is not cool ...
It’s not cool to shoot with crop 1.3 on the AO camera. And this is so, seeds))
on an APS-C camera
in Latin
on which icon? I examined the entire camera, there is no icon with megapixels there.
Well ... ... progress is not enough and it is annoying that now the old d7000 will have to be dropped for a penny ...
what for??
besides - someone is happy, he will buy a normal d7000 for a penny and be able to calmly shoot;))
he became old, the body was rubbed a little, the shutter mileage of 50 had already passed in three years, the rubber bands began to swell .... in short, while the external and internal state is good - it's time to sell ...
all the more why should a museum of prehistoric technology be bred ... if adequate money is paid for the shooting, which is enough for bread and butter and red eggs, then the equipment should also be changed in step with the times
It is truth too.
It’s better to sell it to some good person, he will change the rubber bands and calmly take another thousand 200 frames.
you can change the rubber bands and tint the pigment and rinse / blow off the matrix .... so you look over time a cemetery / warehouses of unnecessary and old equipment is formed ... half of the resource has been unwound - everything is in good new hands ...
Not half, but only a third!
He has 150 declared.
50-000 for three years it almost never took off =)
I had 7000-70 on d000 in a year :)
70 per year! run off shit, photographer blah (
D7000 is a good device, do not blame it, pliz.
do not get high! a normal workhorse from 70-200 2,8 for sports and other ... but in general, the main camera has to be full-frame
hi-bullshit full
The D7000 is a good device, but when I bought the D7100 and compared night shots at ISO 3200 from them, the result was shocking for me ... The D7100 at ISO 3200, by and large, has practically no noise, but the D7000's picture is simply deplorable .... Even at ISO 1600 the D7000 has a MUCH noise picture! worse at D7100 at ISO 3200…. So now I think that Nikon's marketing moves are probably designed for this, and not for a buffer, which by and large is not needed by an amateur, but professionals will shoot with completely different cameras .... It's all about the cost .. If everyone had enough money, no one would even look at the cheap segment ,,,,
In general, the d7000 makes a lot less noise than 7100)))
I proceed from my own comparisons of these two cameras, because I have both of them ... Well, before buying the D7100, I read reviews and forums and wrote everywhere that monochrome noise at ISO100 and more noise at high ISO ... .. If you go into the technical field, you can basically see the monochrome noise in the D7100 at ISO 100, so under the same conditions it is on the D7000…. As for the noise at high ISOs, I can say with confidence that the ISO 3200 of the D7100 is comparable to approximately the ISO1000 of the D7000… .. And you can't argue with that…. This has been verified by me more than once…. And even without comparisons, the d7100's picture looks better than the D7000 just at first glance .. But I can still say that up to ISO1600 the D7000's picture looks very decent ... ..
D7000 is a good device, the only thing that bothered, the presence of 39 focus points. overall positive memories from the camera ..
Moved to full frame.
Although I had a chance to take a few orders on the D7100, on the whole the camera is worth the money and is very good.
Everything is clear with noises. But what about the detail? By suppressing noise, perhaps details are lost, Maybe with 7100 noise less but also less details. I myself did not compare these cameras at the same time. (7000 and 7100) But I saw portraits on the 7100. plasticine ... maybe just because of noise reduction ...
7100 is a cut above 7000. The detail is better and the color and video too. I don’t advise shooting with a noise canceler, it makes no sense.
I thought so too)
Little progress, a jamb with a description ... The waffle, of course, pleases, but no more than a nice trick. We are waiting for a more detailed description, reviews, and then suddenly the matrix there is not Toshibov, but something new
well, yes, and the number of pixels is the same as in Toshibovskaya ... fuck us, not a new matrix
Sonya’s matrix is there (well, yes, after buying Toshiba Sonya, the former toshoskoska, but not the one that costs 5200 and 7100, although they have the same size and area)
Death to marketers!
Give the device with the insides of the D750, the D700 Enclosure, a translucent mirror and a rotary screen from A77.
Dreams (:
Well, for example, I don’t need a rotary screen, a touchscreen and a translucent mirror for nothing)
A translucent mirror in a reflex mirror? And what will it give? Darkening JVI?
The mirror is there for autofocus. It turns out, as it were, mirrorless, but with real phase autofocus. At the cost of loss of aperture. JVI is not there.
And why in our time do this if you have long learned how to incorporate phase autofocus into the matrix and get rid of the mirror in principle?
Will give a mirror with a translucent mirror. Sony did not hear?
Sony can hardly be called a DSLR, because the sight there goes on the screen, and not on the JVI. Yes, and a translucent mirror eats up the luminous flux.
With the release of d7200, the d7100 should become cheaper. only this fact is already pleasing =)
minor changes. in principle, the d7100 was already a good device ... DX cameras have reached their technological limit! and lost the bestbuy and musthave labels. now you can and should buy a “full frame”!
Buffer increased, this is excellent. The rest and the cattle are wonderful.
where did you see about the buffer? how much has become?
It seems like 18 frames with a 14-bit rav
up to 27 12-bit RAW images and up to 100 high-quality JPEG images
What do you mean when you say "great cattle"? What redneck?
I apologize. He wrote from a smartphone and he replaced the word. He didn’t write cattle, but it was.
While thoughts are such that the price of $ 1200 per carcass is not very adequate and you will have to take the D7100 for an upgrade. Although, the purchase is not planned for tomorrow, let's wait for the full review and sample photos for the D7200 ...
at such prices you can take in very good condition Bush FF, for an upgrade. )))
even D3s can be found already.
Well, yes, and change the park of optics to FF ... As an amateur, I do not earn anything on the photo business, there is still enough crop. And upgrade from D3100 to D7100, quite a good upgrade IMHO
but sho, the fleet of optics is great, after the whale, 55-200 and others are small there, which are easily fused for the same hefty price for which to take them?
I did not understand even if there is enough bread and butter for caviar too, so where is the point in sitting on the crop ???
shhh! scare!
the point is that the d7000 as a second camera with a telephoto class 70-200 2,8 for sports
Everything is as if simple. If a photographer knows the advantages of FF, and knows how to realize these advantages, then he does not need agitation.
And if he doesn’t know, then it makes no sense to buy FF.
In general, I think the camera is excellent. It remains to wait for the tests, hold it in your hands, determine the working ISO and you can take ... .. the cheaper (hopefully) D7100)))
But I’m thinking about buying an Olympus OM-D E-M10 OPC :) It will be a good addition to the old D700
Damn, except for the buffer, there are no pleasing changes at all, besides, the case is now half plastic ... although, perhaps, with the new processor there will be less noise. Eh, I wish Fuji did something like s6pro with its low-noise matrix and a nikon d300 body ...
so he was already half plastic
overlooked =)
AF from D750.
So in the case of Khujah KhT-1, and so in everything except the price, super. Especially considering the last two lenses from Fujinon.
Still an extremely small fleet of optics at sky-high prices, and the new fudimatrix kakby is not at all like in fuji firmware
Yes, my d 7000 can already be said old man :-)
Pleased. If D7K is an old man, then what can I say about my father's "Smena" 53rd year, here it is :))
I’m interested in two points: is it possible to control the aperture while shooting a video, and how it focuses in Live View. Is there any info about this?
Nikon becomes a real "brake". Three years ago, when choosing the Nikon system, I was guided by a combination of characteristics, price and quality. Nikon would not have chosen today. In my opinion, this year they will lose a significant part of the market. In favor of Sooney, Canon, Fuji and even Samsung will take a bite. Specifically for this camera. Non-rotatable, non-touch screen with a resolution of 640/480 :( Opportunities for videographers to shoot at 60p only with a crop of 1,3 and again not a rotary screen :( Poor, stripped-down (without the possibility of camera settings) Wi-Fi :( System focusing from FX cameras! Cool! It was. A couple of years ago. Today, with focusing systems developed by competitors ... :( Maybe they will take it at a price? :) It is unlikely that: (Nikon will only have fans of the word "Nikon" or weighed down with a park of optics. Sonya put Nikon's bayonet on a part of her alpha 77-2 ... Gamplyk to Nikon would come very quickly.
I agree one hundred percent ... D7200 is as you like, or the last breath of a drowning man or before death you will not breathe ....
And what are the possibilities for kenon for filming ?? Even in new cameras they cannot insert 60p out of greed! Mirrorless Sony does not know how to focus at all in the dark and on moving objects. And the "revolutionary" focusing system from the kenon with holes in the matrix, instead of color sensors, built-in focus sensors, which allow the matrix to make noise already at ISO 400!
The point is not what other firms have. And the fact that 7200 from 7100, in principle, differs only in name. About this speech. canon has 60p. at 7dm2 there is definitely.
A normal camera, I don’t know why everything has gone wrong, time goes on cameras are improving little by little, in the line of cameras Nikon 7200 a long-awaited model, someone will switch to it from younger models or from something older. A revolution in production does not lead to profit. The same canon has nothing revolutionary, evolution on all fronts. So for me it’s such a normal camera for its segment. there are revolutionary sigma and liter something not really for sale)
Canon had revolutionary autofocus and probably had a revolutionary touch-screen swivel screen. And full-fledged camera control via Wi-Fi. And not as miserable as Nikon.
Wretched on Canon shadows stretch. DD is lower than Nikon. Let's not!))))
I agree. Matrix Canon worse. But we are not talking about that. It's about new technologies.
Victor, someone is the first, someone is the second. In general, I consider parity. But there are no truly breakthrough technologies, such as to take your breath away from the capabilities of the camera, now. And over the past five years or so, both offices, that Nikon, that Canon, are spinning in one place, have made only slightly inherently changes.
That Canon, that Nikon - if to globalize - is one gang, with common goals and objectives. And no one will arrange technological breakthroughs with capturing the spirit - it does not correspond to the concept of entrepreneurship. And everyone's breath will be taken when the on-air technology breaks through)
Matrices on canon and nikon are the same difference.
they are adjusted taking into account the specifics of the optics of the systems. (nikon, for example, in the included ADL, the underexposed is left for post processing) and so on ...
COLOR - can be described as how the auto white balance algorithms work differently.
What does it mean the time goes on, the cameras are improving ...? For a long time Nikon could make a normal camera…. So no, in every next model they add drop by drop in the sea to get more money out of the photographers .... This selfish policy of mowing grandmothers has simply gotten enough ... But it cannot last forever ... .. When will this greed end ... And then everyone ... Bankrupt ... ..
Nikon rivets “new” cameras every week :) Wi-fi was plugged into the D7100, the model name was changed, and here's the new Nikon D7200. A week later, the swivel screen will be stuck, and here is another new Nikon D7300, and in a month you will see up to 32 megapixels and already D7400
7400 will not) they do not like (Asians) 4-ku. 5400 missed. The truth is not clear how they reconciled with D4? )))))
Well, not that they don’t like at all. I had a Toyota jeep with the name 4runner :)
Renat, “everyone took it” because they expected to see a really new camera with a bunch of goodies / bows ala rotary screen, touchscreen, 1080p at 60 fps (although it's time to master 120 fps), etc. But the celebration on Nikon Street is canceled, because the new product, apart from autofocus and buffer, is not particularly innovative. It reminded me very much of the situation with the d750, in which everyone wanted to see the heir to the seven hundred, but got a modified six hundred.
750ka is an excellent camera, if anything 700, 800 and 810 are still in use
For a photo, a touchscreen is not needed. If Nikon everywhere also starts to blame it (and in 5500 it has already begun) it is generally unclear what to buy.
here is the swivel screen handy thing. for example, during interval shooting, I recently estimated it and indeed with a tripod.
The D7200 seems to have an EXPEED 4 processor, and in the 7100 EXPEED 3, the same update
The 7100 EXPEED 3, indeed. Because of this, he could not shoot video at 60p. EXPEED 5300 was inserted into the younger 4 and the problem was solved. Now 7200 is set to EXPEED 4, and 60p can only be obtained with 1,3 crop. Is it normal? But this is of course only critical for videographers. But I think that due to the lack of a rotary touch screen and slow contrast autofocus in live view, they will not buy this model. But the rotating screen and hybrid or spirit of pixel focusing (like Canon's) are also needed by photographers. This is shooting moving objects (children, animals, insects, etc.) from a lower angle, and hidden shooting of people. I already wrote that in my opinion Nikon "slows down". I was looking forward to this model. I was sure that there would be a worthy answer to the same Canon. Zilch.
As this 7100 does not know how to shoot 60p, everything is the same on a 1,3x crop. Now I have eaten all my eyes trying to find the main differences. It seems that in addition to Wi-Fi and a buffer with a processor, there are no changes. But 7100 is already a good camera, and 12 bit ROs in 7200 promise as many as 27 pieces, probably this crop is already quite suitable for professional work. I was very looking for aperture control in the video, but it seems not. This is a pity. This alone could have given many points in her favor.
No Zhenya, you were mistaken. You have 7100. Look, with a crop of 1,3 it doesn’t take 60p, but 60i :)
It became somehow boring to learn about Nikon's new products ... No matter what "slap", - everything is some kind of incomplete, incomplete, bewilderment, incomplete ... Deadlock ... Half my life I have been working in the Nikon system, but such an engineering mess is encountered for the first time. Are we really present at the end of some line of progress?
easily. On the other hand, old, good Nikon equipment may last for a long time.
that sapop half a year ago released a crop head and shoulders above 7100, and Nikon’s dumbass. Probably swell
Here are all the differences
http://cdn-4.nikon-cdn.com/en_INC/o/jf7fu8O_WGK45E0Lx_mnnvhRroI/PDF/D7200-D7100_Comparison_Sheet_en.pdf
So he also had DX autofocus ... And it seemed to me that I came across some info, that autofocus was inserted from the 810th. It turns out that almost all changes are at the software level.
Detection range -3 to +19 EV
It's like a D750
All FF AF cameras from DX.
Arkady, in his review of the 7100, wrote the following: “Nikon D7100 uses Advanced Multi-CAM 3500DX, and Nikon D4 uses Advanced Multi-CAM 3500FX. The difference is that the Nikon D4 can focus with F / 8.0 lenses using 11 points, while the Nikon D7100 can focus using only one point. ”
You are not right
Clarify :). There were two in the dialogue. I do not say anything at all. I refer to the opinion of Arkady. :)
in many crop cameras, the focusing systems are not the same with the FF.
I mean, in terms of coverage, AF has not yet been done for the full frame. In some places, the components on the AF matrix are shuffled based on the size of the crop only.
how many megapixels are there? in the picture 36, and in the table 24. Have not decided yet?