On September 5, 2018, the announcement of the new Canon R mirrorless system took place.
On this day, presented:
- camera Canon EOS
- Canon grip BG-E22
- lens Canon Lens RF 35 mm F1.8 MACRO IS STM
- lens Canon Lens RF 50 mm F1.2 L USM
- lens Canon Lens RF 28-70mm F2 L USM
- lens Canon Lens RF 24-105mm F4 LIS USM
- flash Canon Speedlite EL-100
- adapter Canon Mount Adapter EF-EOS R
- Adapter Ring Mount Adapter EF-EOS R (with control ring)
- Drop-In Filter Mount Adapter EF-EOS R (with the ability to install filters)
- Canon RF mount
- lens Canon Lens EF-M 32mm 1: 1.4 STM
- Canon EF 400mm 1: 2.8L IS III USM Lens
- Canon EF 600mm 1: 4L IS III USM Lens
Canon EOS
- full frame digital mirrorless camera
- dustproof and waterproof housing
- 30.3 Megapixels (6720 X 4480)
- Support for dual pixel RAW, RAW with 14-bit color depth, C-RAW
- electronic viewfinder with 3.690.000 points, 100% frame coverage
- ISO 100-40.000 (expandable to 50 or 102.400 units)
- excerpt from 30 seconds to 1/8000
- DIGIC 8 processor
- focusing using Dual Pixel Cmos AF, you can manually select 5.655 focus points, sensitivity up to -6 EV, 88% X 100% coverage of the frame with focus points vertically and horizontally. -6 EV is only available with specific lenses. Focusing is also supported with lenses with F / 8-F / 11. Focusing on the eyes. Focus picking
- 8 frames per second
- 4K video 30p, 10-bit HDMI, Full HD 60p, HD 120p. For 4K, only ISO 100-12800 range is available
- 3.15-inch touchscreen and swivel screen with 2.100.000 dots
- one slot for SD memory cards (UHS-II supported)
- weight 660 grams with battery and memory card
- high peripheral compatibility for SLR cameras
- price: here
Canon r
Canon r
Canon R with lens Canon Lens RF 24-105mm F4 L IS USM
Canon R with lens Canon Lens RF 24-105mm F4 L IS USM
Canon R with lens Canon Lens RF 24-105mm F4 L IS USM
Canon R with lens Canon Lens RF 24-105mm F4 L IS USM vs. Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
General Details here.
A little later I will add information on each of the new products.
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval. Training/Consultations | Youtube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Telegram
And Panas EF is coming out.
And in general - Nikon and Canon are now competing in the size of the hole in the mount, apparently. Who is wider
I’ll add everything, it’s called I went to the wedding all day, so everyone decided on that day to release their new items :)
Here they have just a normal, adult. And Sonya is thoughtlessly small.
Could they have a plan for the Maybutniy pid? The same bayonet mount in the middle format?
There will be no medium format for this mount, this was officially specified by Nikon, most likely by Canon as well.
The full-scale introduction of mirrorless technologies has started.
Extreme speed of 3 frames per second. in “pinpoint AF” mode (it seems so). And in other modes, accuracy is not needed, you panic about self-indulgence.
This is to say that very soon the BZK will catch up and overtake the mirrors.
And the stub on the sensor is also pampering, or what? Or will there be an extra fee?
Once again, DSLRs have a second matrix. You can cram a lot of different large and oily sensors on it, they do not block the image.
How can a BZK overtake a DSLR? She will always be one step ahead, how many new technologies do not invent.
Judging all UPCs on the basis of castratos from canon - here it is, the whole depth of the sofa analysis!
We don’t miss the progress, whether you want it or not, but in the future they will abandon mirror technology.
Conservatives damn it.
Of course they will not refuse. As well as not abandoned rangefinder or format technology.
But you need to hype on this!
There is no progress ... There is a "thirst for profit" and this "thirst" forces you to invent and invent all the time, although this race makes no sense to anyone except the manufacturers of this very invented ... In the last film age, the same Nikon produced one mirror model for decades ... And the photographer, having once bought a DSLR, shot it for decades too ... And now the most important thing is to fuck up people's brains so that they would buy the new one all the time, but this does not happen ... This is the same pyramid as MMM ... Most have already bought their camera and this majority is not wants to give money again and again just because someone wants to mow money all the time ... The market for both household appliances and photographic equipment is oversaturated and shops are slowly closing, because "no one is buying anything" ... These were the words of the seller of one of the photo shops in Moscow, when I recently, two years later, came to Moscow again and discovered that many photographic equipment stores had disappeared ...
And all these new items sound no more than a Japanese video recorder sounded in our 70s, because it cost while Lada and cameras are now approaching the cost of a car ... It seems that in Russia, these cameras are needed only for that that such sites as Radozhiva would print about them and that people would write a lot of stupid comments below and that's all ... The feeling that everything that Nikon and Canon is currently producing is only on the screen and only for discussion ... And this discussion is generally incomprehensible about what ... For a long time already digital cameras have acquired their digital form and Photoshop has long been there ... And some incomprehensible discussions: what color gives which camera in general at the level of delirium ... The photo consists of a Raw - file that you made no matter which camera and Photoshop , in which you, skillfully, take for yourself the photo that you need, how it will look and to the bulb from which camera this file was ... The only thing that distinguishes the cameras is the size of the matrix (physical) and the price ...The larger the matrix and the more expensive the camera costs, the higher its working ISO ... Everything else is generally secondary ... And what a clear, sharp and “transparent-air” picture will be depends only on the lens ... According to the Jpeg file created by the camera, nothing at all is possible define ... This is an internal software that can be configured in different ways ... A RAW file is like a film, then it all depends on the quality of the photo paper, enlarger and photo process, or on the correct work of the photographer in Photoshop ... ISO values in low light conditions nothing more makes sense ... Exactly the same as with the film ... Everyone is so diligently discussing the new technique, but if you don't look at the photographers, everyone is shooting with old cameras like D700 ... Why ...? Because buying new ones is devoid of any common sense ... For a long time cameras have been filmed correctly ... The only exceptions are those pros to whom Nikon and Canon give their new cameras for free as an advertisement ...
And it has long been clear that manufacturers of any devices are cunning as they can, which would make people unobtrusively buy what they produce ... The point is only for manufacturers ... For people, it's just feeding speculators and manufacturers themselves ...
Henri Cartier-Bresson bought himself a rangefinder Leica and shot with it all his life ... And his pictures were good at any time ... And apparently, he was not thinking about technodrochestvo and feeding speculators and marketers, but about PHOTOS ...
“Everybody is filming with old cameras like D700 ... Why ...? "
But because of poverty.
Because "there is no money, but you hold on, happiness to you, good mood and good luck!"
And soon because the VAT will be 20%, and the pension will be 65 years old.
Everywhere so, everyone is shooting on old cameras. Why take a new one if the old one copes well? Change the shutters and all. What is the difference between D5 and D4s? That is, they must of course be somewhat different. But how relevant is it?
Now, if the new one has something that you definitely lack in work, then another thing. Personally, I will never take a new camera, unless I know for sure how it will be better than the old one. All sorts of whistles in the form of a touch screen and 100500 AF points do not count here, of course.
A worthy import substitution is needed. Give me a digital zenith!
..funny!)))
"... But because there is poverty, ... there is no money, but you hold on, ... VAT will become 20%, and the pension at 65 ..."
Yes, at least 120% VAT, and a pension of 105!
Why do I need a new camera which is more expensive if I have an old working one?
If photography is a serious hobby or even making money, then you would not have asked this question into the void.
Everything once breaks and becomes worthless.
Problems will begin with batteries, then the turn of the shutter will come, and then there won't be any details on the camera even in Nikon's native service. As, for example, on the legendary 28-70 / 2.8 ... There are no new parts and they often refuse to repair it, but how old is he, is it a lot?
A bit of humor. Official presentation:
Good old Plumbus should also be updated:
He laughed heartily. Thank you Arkady!
This plumbus reflects the essence of modern progress in products.
For those who are not yet in the subject, but familiar with English.
https://www.dailydot.com/parsec/plumbus-rick-morty/
and who is not familiar, then at least look at the first video on the link.
All cameras shoot in different ways, and one of the reasons why people use old cameras is that the picture is better with them, and if you tint all the photos in the lightroom, then yes, don't care what to shoot.
Shooting in RAW is not a panacea, these same old Fuji on SuperCCD are capable of delivering a picture directly into a jeep that you will never even wind from other cameras from RAW, it will untwist the navel.
They wrote a lot, almost more than in the announcement article. But everything is clear and correct, I completely agree !!!
I agree. to the last letter. The consumer needs the result. A photograph. And with what apparatus it will be made.-He is deeply indifferent And constantly updated, as it were. equipment. is one way to get into our skinny wallets.
I could be wrong. But there is a feeling that the main ones from Nikon and Canon meet and decide who, what year or what, will not report to their cameras, so to speak, so that they don’t hang out under each other. They put a little bit of different chips, but they don’t show off much in front of each other.
28-70 / 2 is very curious)
But the price of $ 3k is very painful ...
Weight 1400. A nightmare.
Ruslan, Sigma ART 24-70 / 2.8, Canon 24-70 / 2.8 and Nikkor 24-70 / 2.8 are also not easy. Nothing wrong. Then the muscles in front of the fair sex will boast.
Nikon has gone bad with marketing this time. Canon is a marketing genius.
The entire Internet for 2 weeks released accumulated steam (and something else, a different consistency) about one plug-in for a card (but a very good and reliable XQD by the way) and the lack of something else there.
And then the canon produces a no less trimmed (from the point of view of a professional) camera (IMHO), which suddenly costs more, and everyone is already normal towards this. Steam has already been released. :)
Just the perfect strategic move. Now in each thread about new cameras, Nikon has a negative. And the canon is already like the norm. :)
Nevertheless, I am pleased with the current situation.
More competition means better products, this is great for us buyers in the future.
Thanks Nikon, thanks Canon, thanks Sony.
All this steam does not make any sense, because Nikon and Kenon released cameras for their users, and not for everyone. It is possible to compare Sonya Nikon Nikon for a long time, but Kenon users, with rare exceptions, will not run after Sonya, they were waiting for their UPC. They do not care deeply for any comparisons there, these are the comments on Keonon and show. Sonya can release her cameras for a long time, drum, if I shoot on Nikon for example, I do not buy cameras every six months to rush from system to system. And even more so now, even five-year-old cameras give an excellent result no worse than the new BZK. Just new cameras are the future, N and K have no way out. And the more players on the market, the more interesting and cheaper for the end user. Trolls are tied to numbers, and a person takes pictures first of all.
Nikon owners sucked tuna because they have a NEW completely bayonet mount.
And not the fact that third-party glasses through the adapter will work adequately with z6 / z7.
Anyway, sooner or later, the owner of the z6 / z7 will get divorced into his native glass under this mount.
Everything is aimed at this, so that we sell the old junk at the flea markets and run for a new one-time.
Just like an iPhone or Samsung Galaxy something there. For 1-2 years. Hi there.
Rolling tuna is obtained. Do not find?
Sony licked it five years ago. In the canon, he also surfaced a second time in 30 years. (they generally have 4 different mounts now).
Why suddenly a new one-off at once? Do you have statistics on the quality of the new Nikon O-rings or other products of this company?
Why do you suddenly need to sell the old if it (not a screwdriver) works? Yes, and another adapter can give a ride with prof. UPC, then compatibility will be almost complete. I think the chance of such a development is very large. Sostrich dough for the second adapter (for those who have already managed to buy the first) it really comes out very tasty. But everything can be.
And about third-party glasses - Nikon and Canon have always been policy - full compatibility only with their optics. Purchasing a third party lens is at your own risk.
Because manufacturers are not profitable to do quality things now.
It is beneficial for them when you come for a new iPhone or Samsung or an Intel processor with a new motherboard, like for sausage and bread.
And is it profitable for you to pay more and use a smartphone from materials that will last 10 years, despite the fact that its filling expires in 2 years?
It is beneficial because if it becomes obsolete, it will not lose functionality. Android 2,1 completely suited me
You wanted to say it won't stop calling? It won't stop, but we're talking about a smartphone. For calling, and for 10 years to work, there are such indestructible telephones. But the smartphone becomes obsolete in 2-3 years. What I want to say is cheaper materials, simplification of products, not only a cunning plan of cunning marketers or a conspiracy of manufacturers, all together to make products worse. There is a second side that actively influences the process, and we are consumers. We ourselves often prefer to take it cheaper, because we don’t need it forever, because after a while it’s all the same to buy new, because we just want it cheaper ...
I wanted to say that everything that I need in a smartphone has been invented for 5 years already and there is simply no need to “update” the device. Like a video in a camera. Your point is clear, but consumers rarely influence the process, more marketers.
Here you are a little wrong. A smartphone, unlike a camera, does not become obsolete on its own, but thanks to a huge army of “programmers”, mostly web-oriented, who generate tons of govnokod on the Internet on various frameworks. The meaning of the existence of these frameworks is not to do well, but to do quickly, cheaply and not look for a specialist. As a result, if after a couple of years of inactivity you try to use a two-three-year-old smartphone, and a smartphone without an Internet, this, you see, is not a smartphone, it is in deep frustration. That is why replacing a smartphone is a necessity, and replacing a camera can take into account common sense.
Valentine, Japanese products with the Made in Japan brand, these were once.
Clocks, cameras, video recorders, televisions, radio tape recorders and music centers.
Is it bad to get a quality reliable and indestructible thing for your money?
Manufacturers realized that they needed a constant flow of money.
And I need a modern camera that can survive Putin / Lukashenko and I’m ready to pay for super reliability.
C'mon, I've been using the same thing for 4 years. And you know what? There is a CPU frequency limit of 50%. Usage is normal and active, except that from games only chess. Browser, video, reader, office applications, mail work with a bang. Oh yeah .. If you take a ruler and measure pipisku (the text is crossed out) If you take some Ant-tu, the result is not impressive, especially with frequency limitation)) But the charge is saved. Yes, fullhd screen. If you take the lens and look through it, you can (oh, horror) see the pixels. Technodrocher negodue.
DmitryK, so what's the question? Nikon D850 will easily outlive those named by you. If you're willing to pay for super-reliability - here you are, the top-end D5 / D850 line is for you.
Anonymous, the replica is not about a specific Vasya, who is 100 years old with one phone. You can pass it on to the grandchildren with the words that all the fools who bought a new one. It’s just that wallet consumers are forcing manufacturers to do cheap things, including reducing their durability. Highly reliable products go into the advanced and professional segment.
“Canon R versus Canon EOS 5D Mark IV” - the shoe on the EOS R is too small versus the 5D, isn't it?
Photo taken from the official site. Most likely, the Canon R has a new bamshak for new flashes, such as the Canon Speedlite EL-100
Something I can’t find, but how is the name of the new RF mount decrypted? R?
Past had:
EF (Electro-Focus)
EF-S (Electro-Focus, Small image circle)
EF-M (Electro-Focus, Mirrorless)
RF?
... denotes a new concept of "Reimagineoptical excellence" ...
If R is' R'eimagineoptical, then what is' F '?
Focus?
Bullshit turns out, Reimagineoptical excellence Focus
I asked them. Waiting for an answer.
“… Canon Russia Ruslan, we still find it difficult to help you with the decoding of the name of the RF mount…”. They themselves do not know.))) Unprofessional.
The abbreviation RF has one common reading in the photography community - rear focusing.
And how does it relate here? I don’t think that all the lenses of this system have rear focusing, and it was silly to call it that.
Canon Russia Ruslan, RF is just the name of a mount for the EOS R system, without decryption.
Arkady, if you did not find an explanation for the name of the RF mount, then most likely it is from English. range-finder, which means FAR.
This is not a rangefinder camera. + in any case, official confirmation is required
I didn’t seem to claim that the name was derived from this common abbreviation. It is possible that it is from the word Rangefinder
What the hell is this ??? Plumbus (Plumbus X) !!!!!!!!!!!!!! Am I behind the civilization chtoli ??
After Canon, the prices for Sony and their lenses seem to be not so high) at the moment, except for Sony this year, only Fuji were able to pleasantly surprise ... we are waiting for Panasonic
Hello ladies and gentlemen. I don't consider myself to be technodrochem and super photographers. Due to the scarcity of the budget and the constantly wailing toad, I have a 40D Boot, which I am immensely happy about. This “old” camera allows me to shoot, I emphasize, to REMOVE. I am completely satisfied with the quality of the pictures he receives. You can think of me as a lamer and someone else like that. I don't see any practical reason to pay for a camera with money that can buy a good car. You can shower me with anything, but the majority of the people huddling here are not professional photographers who, in one session, can “beat off” the cost of the carcass announced here. So tell me, if you please, why all this banter? In taste and color, all markers are different. Someone, like me, is happy with the old stuff, but someone's libido is already played out from wanting a super super device. So let's keep the photography enthusiasts and techno enthusiasts apart!
By the way, about the RF abbreviation ... I think that the intriguing letter F stands for EfUSiKeying. I fully support Monsieur Alexander with his long and thoughtful tirade about marketing.
All good and good photos.
And yet you looked into the announcement of a new technology. So there is interest, you are certainly comparing your favorite with this camera. And all this passion due to the result of comparisons.
I believe that the news to consider and discuss, the right thing.
Radozhiva does not force to buy this camera after reading the announcement.
I don't force anything at all :) The main thing is to shoot and have fun. And technology is a constantly changing business and it's not worth it to waste your nerves on discussing it.
If you give permission, I think I'll shower you with mmmmm ... whale dark zooms with dust and fungus.
Your opinion is the same inadequate and one-sided as that of those technoaners whom you so ineptly try to expose here, only with the opposite sign - that's what I am all the difference.
Spoiler: if you personally don’t see the point in yourself, this does not mean that it is not for anyone.
Even bigger mistakes are attempts to speak for the “majority” and to hang ridiculous labels without reason.
Hot pixels to you :)
I believe that we will be united by the publication on the joyful, albeit belatedly, announcement of the Leica M10-P, and this will come off both the Nikonists and the Canonists, and the Soninists will also throw it over.
Of course, I would like some kind of folk full frame at a price of 1000 ye, but manufacturers are going to increase the cost of the system, and non-spoiled users will look towards the tampon 28-75
I apologize for tamron28-75 due to dialing on the phone
I decided to disengage myself and read about AF phase sensors at my leisure.
I must say right away that I am only FOR any innovations in photography. I am completely neutral towards the BZK, wait and see.
In general, the problem is that phase sensors on the BZK matrix receive much less light than DSLRs. In addition, due to the design features of the matrix itself and its microscopic dimensions, the PD ultimately receives about 8% of the light rays incident on it. Hence a very high noise level, and in poor light the PDs become of little use, AF mainly works in contrast. And here it doesn’t matter how much PD is on the matrix, they work equally badly.
The DSLR is much larger in size, with additional bells and whistles for straightening and separating light rays, collecting beams for brightness, etc. In addition, the signal from the matrix is faster processed again by a separate microprocessor. Etc.
On prof. DSLRs use some other cunning way to help the PD use other sensors, from the exposure metering system and the BB.
It just seems to me that all the advantages of the AF system of DSLRs are due to the enormous and we can say the joint work of all manufacturers for decades. Everything is already known, adjusted and honed. Therefore, it works better. Let's see what they can do with the UPC.
Thank you for your attention, I have everything)
Why do they get less light? It seems there is no loss on the mirror? Do not give links to articles? I read, interesting.
Because in the CDC, the AF system collects light beams into beams (focuses the light on the phase AF sensors). In this case, one ray (from one conditional point) is divided into two.
Light passes through a translucent mirror and accordingly loses 50%. But then the losses are made up for by all these deeds.
On the BZK, phase focusing sensors simply get their microscopic fraction of the light, like all other matrix cells. It’s only effective that only 8% reaches the sensor due to filters, coatings, dispersion and something else incomprehensible.
In addition, half of the sensor cell is always darkened. Unlike the AF TsZK system, the beam cannot be divided into two parts, and the sensor is simply painted over half. Why they are so painted over, I really did not understand.
Here there are pictures and an explanation of the AF TsZK system from Kenon (in English). There also seemed to be articles about focusing on the BZK: http://www.learn.usa.canon.com/resources/articles/2017/how-does-af-work.shtml
Thank you.
Something is probably out of date, because from dpreview reviews:
For Fujifilm X-T3 - Phase detect AF works down to -3EV (lens not specified)
For Canon R - Covering 100% of the frame vertically and around 88% horizontally, and rated down to -6EV (with an F1.2 lens) the EOS R's autofocus chops are impressive.
Now, probably, no one is using an AA filter. Do they use collecting microlenses in doubt, since the control transistors that were previously located next to the photo sensor have long been placed in the layers under the layer of photo sensors. As it became with the linear paths of conductors going also between the photo sensors, but I think at least the emitter lines went deep.
The guys got excited. Just look at the information on Fuji on their website. In the case of -3EV, we are talking about the entire hybrid AF system, not phase.
By the way, the D610 can also focus in the moonlight, with separate lenses like 85mm f / 1.8D. If you know how to do it.
So far, we hear only a retelling of the writings of marketers. Let's see how it really will be.
The future of digital photography, in my humble opinion, might look like this:
1. Mirrors will die out as a class, it is only a matter of time. They will die out just as the analogue sound recorders became extinct at one time, giving way to digital.
2. The development of mirrorless (with interchangeable optics, of course) can go in two directions:
AND). Each of the manufacturers will have a crop (amateur) and full (pro) series of cameras, which will be constantly improved in the "stuffing".
B) Only full cameras will remain, in which case they will be divided into younger and older models in terms of functionality, as is happening now with Sony.
3. The exterior of mirrorless cameras will quickly level out and cameras from different manufacturers will become similar to each other as a whole, differing only in small design details that give a particular camera a recognizable look, and “highlights” of the internal filling, which will be protected by patents from each manufacturer.
4. Gradually, all manufacturers will begin to produce cameras that are perfect in all respects - from design to electronics - because it will become economically unprofitable to produce cameras that are ordinary in filling or innovative in design.
5. “Double crop” and “thumbnails”, not to mention cameras with a smaller matrix, will disappear into oblivion, their niche will be occupied by incredibly “wiser” smartphones.
Talking about the time when this will happen is a thankless task, but I can assume that all the above processes will be completed in general not earlier than in 15-17 years, maybe a little earlier. And the main time problem here is not the pace of development of electronics, but the lack of compact and powerful energy sources, because a real revolution in camera construction will occur only when batteries are created on which a mirrorless camera will make one and a half to two thousand “shots”, and not 300 400 like now.
Fortune-telling ... Twice the crop is not only not going to give up, but is developing very well. Including in a professional direction, so that they do not write about it here. All cameras will not be full-format simply because the performance of even cropped sensors can cover so many needs. And the system is determined not only by the sensor format. In the presence of full-format cameras from Sony, cameras from Olympus and Panasonic with the appropriate optics are sold a lot, and the price for them is considerable.
I will quickly and swiftly break into the thread of this discussion) Here I agree with you about the crop. Crop is never a shame. And sometimes you can't tell what the crop was taken on or not (I'm talking about the photo now). Plus, lenses for all these sleepyheads and Olympuses are somewhat more expensive than the same lenses, for example, kenon. And the lens park is much wider. And R-ka they have the first of the BZK. At least they immediately thought about protecting the sensor from dust. ))) Sony did not do that in the first cell. Of course, you can scold as much as you like, the camera has the right to a worthy place among the UPC
Not the first, there is also EOS M
In the distant, near future, when smartphones will be a translucent screen that combines the function of a translucent photo matrix, registering light falling from the back side and amplifying it by the glow of the same color pixel towards the user, a flat matrix of magnetically deflected optical channels on liquid crystals in the form of a lattice (like phase antennas) matching 1: 1 with the matrix in resolution and aiming focus in the direction of the user's gaze ...
Well, really new items are not new items, crafts have not yet gone on sale, and few people see their future, most are wondering what will happen next.
Photons are not magnetic and light is not deflected by a magnet. You can check it yourself by removing the magnet from the refrigerator and looking along it - if the light were deflected, there would be an effect similar to refraction. If you think that the kitchen magnet is too weak - well, firstly, the smartphone is stronger than this and will not develop with the current development of batteries, and secondly, you can look, for example, at a tomography machine, there magnetic fields are such that from habit it is even difficult to imagine ...
I did not mean the deflection of light by magnetic fields, and the theoretical Faraday effect with large fields.
I tried to foresee some simpler device in the future for deflecting light - like a single-mode optical fiber (you can take the pictail out of the modem yourself and deflect a ray of light with your “hands”), only in miniature and whose properties can be controlled like liquid crystals in matrices of modern monitors, bringing electricity to them. Or some piezoelectric elements made of graphene (it was not for nothing that they discovered it, let them learn how to make it transparent), which change their size and local density under the action of an external electric potential.
PS: Once they said that the phones will not even get to the digital dust boxes, neither in the quality of the picture (due to the size of the matrix), nor in the capabilities of the optics (zoom). But years later, new material technologies, and the old simple decision to use multiple lenses on the same camera (read the phone) gave the present.
https://youtu.be/r_7gBzFjLU8 watch from 4:18. Hawaii, presentation, not a pre-sale model. 1 slot for SD and 3 times the flash drive was covered while they were shooting a video review about the video capabilities of the camera
Lexar cannot be bought, in the photo my CF card was used almost in greenhouse conditions (2 times, during its lifetime, the time-lapse was recorded on it at -5 for 6 hours) and about three months ago it died. There was one in the camera, because I took out the 64 GB CD card from the camera, shortly before the death of CF, thinking that “CF is reliable, and I need a CD elsewhere” :) It's good that I'm an amateur and there are no such important pictures on the card.
I had a question about video and the number of card slots: does any PHOTO camera have video recording on two memory cards at once in 4k mode?
Photo from the presentation in Japan EOS R + 28-70 / 2
The lens is huge
https://www.flickr.com/photos/minami/43996406734/in/dateposted/
It’s filmed on a twig, if it were a fifty-fifty.
here are tests and comparisons of images with 5dM4 6dm2, sony a7m3 and a7P3
https://youtu.be/IwUHBolbCbU
In short, Canon wins over Sony a7m3 in sharpness, but Kenon has problems with dynamic range ... but 7p3 wins over Canon both in sharpness and in dd
And Canon wins in terms of cost and the number of lenses) it seems to me that this is a pretty weighty argument, especially if you switch from younger models, since you can also attach glasses with a different mount to the eos r through the adapter
Prices for EOS R and its lenses in Akihabara (Tokyo):
https://www.flickr.com/photos/fumitake1969/44730461462/sizes/h/
Now even though Nikonists gloat about the “absence of infinity” for Nikkor Z lenses on Canon - you give us an adapter with a lens and a chip!
used how much?