answers: 21

  1. Oleg
    26.03.2014

    “It's a bit unusual that as the focal length decreases, the lens trunk lengthens, so the lens is the shortest at 85mm and the longest at 28mm.” - this solution allows you to use the hood correctly, since the hood will overlap the view angle of the lens; 28 mm is the largest angle of view, and the hood covers only a small part, and 85 is the smallest angle of view, and the front lens seems to be hiding in the hood. Exactly the same solution on the first version of Canon 24-70 / 2.8 L USM

    Reply

    • AM
      26.03.2014

      No, you are wrong - the hood moves with the trunk. As for the hood, we can say that it is exclusively nominal for this lens and practically does not protect the lens from light.

      Reply

      • Oleg
        26.03.2014

        Then it’s not clear why you flip at focal lengths. On a Canon 24-70 / 2.8, the lens hood works exactly as described above.

        Reply

      • AM
        27.03.2014

        I suppose that this is somehow connected with the design features of the lens;)
        In general, if you are interested, you can find a service manual on the net - there is a separate chapter (with pictures! :)) dedicated to zooming and focusing.

        Reply

  2. anonym
    26.03.2014

    Arkady, thank you for your work. Every day I read your boric with pleasure. I think some details are related to it with the Nikon28-85mm f3.5-4.5 macro. apparently at that time the lenses were structurally very similar and actually were a work of art.

    Here I am tormented by the question: what to take as a standard lens for the d80? nikon 28-85, it really captivates with its good quality. or Nikon 18-70 will be wider on the crop ...
    closer to me is a plastic picture with a fairly clear flu zone. and to be beautiful yesterday, like a gelik or jupiter. .
    guys help someone advice.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      26.03.2014

      At the same price, 28-105 / 3,5-4,5 is very good. If a wide angle is important, then 18-70 / 3,5-4,5 will be the best option.

      Reply

      • anonym
        27.03.2014

        Kartika plays a huge role and there is one BUT, I can’t find 28-105 in Minsk for an adequate price, as I understand it is very rare glass or very good that no one sells it. found one in the whole of Belarus and then 300 ye wants, you bastard.
        at 18-70 some kind of faded picture or something or it seemed to me like that ..

        Reply

  3. Vladislav
    19.04.2014

    And what is this tree with yellow shaggy flowers?

    Reply

    • Do_Oraemon
      01.06.2014

      Willow is.

      Reply

  4. anonym
    11.09.2015

    I bought minolta md 35-105 redid it to Sonya and 57 using a shank from Helios 44 m4 and an M42 adapter of such a sharp glass I still haven’t had. On aperture 4 at all focal lengths in the field is better than minolta 1.7. Pentacon 1.8 and others. accurate Minoltian colors. 105mm like a razor. you need to take the first version of the 16 lens.

    Reply

  5. Oleg 1
    13.03.2016

    I have several Minolt, light-sensing fixes, zooms, compared them with various lenses (I have an epic instance of Helios, which in sharpness reaches Sonya) now everyone is chasing sharpness. Minolta is not the sharpest lenses, their advantage is different, it’s
    color rendering, contrast, a soft transition from the sun to shadow, the camera doesn’t be naughty with them in BB, unlike Helios. I do a simple experiment, I shoot a flower bed next to the house, Minolot and then Helios, Zenitar. Industar, Tamron, Sigma, then show
    I’m taking pictures of the house and asking which one is better, and everyone shows on Minolta, here the colors are better. And you
    say harshness. And another advantage of Minolt is the price, for the price of Helios 77 (which is not yet known how it will be removed) I found 28-105 in a new state, I will take it.

    Reply

  6. Andrei
    12.06.2018

    Thanks for the information. And the test.

    Reply

  7. R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
    17.02.2020

    I heard good reviews about their last (in film time) lens 24-105 / 3.5-4.5, so it’s kind of like to cut these zooms. He came out with their Dunax 7 camera. And the fact that visually Minolt lenses do not give good sharpness is yes. I once tested MD 20mm / 2.8, and even with Pentax zoom it isn’t. Although they offered it for $ 100, instead of its real value on the secondary then $ 300-400 (it was 2001), I refused. In reality, it didn’t differ in sharpness from our regular Gelios lousy sample. Maybe I was wrong, because I tried it mainly on apertures 2.8-5.6 and 8. although maybe it would give something on aperture 11, it didn’t get to that .

    Reply

    • Alexander
      14.10.2020

      Henri Cartier-Bresson: Sharpness in photography is a bourgeois prejudice.

      Reply

      • Michael
        14.10.2020

        It's not the same for everybody

        Reply

  8. Victor
    31.03.2020

    When you change the focal length, the front lens does not rotate.
    When focusing, the front lens rotates and the trunk exits.
    Which description is correct

    Reply

    • B. R. P.
      31.03.2020

      Both are correct. Changing the focal length is zooming. Focusing - focusing.

      Reply

  9. Alexander
    14.10.2020

    Nice reliable staff.

    Reply

  10. Human
    16.07.2023

    in macro mode:

    Reply

  11. Human
    16.07.2023

    at the wide end

    Reply

    • Human
      16.07.2023

      wrong topic(

      Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer