answers: 8

  1. Ledogor
    18.09.2020

    Great camera. And then SONY made their first-born A-100 based on it. In any case, the cameras are identical, even the “menu” is the same, apart from the 10 megapixel matrix. in A-100.

    Many thanks to the author for the review!

    Reply

  2. Michael K.
    18.09.2020

    Nice picture, but lacking in warm colors.

    Reply

    • Roman
      19.09.2020

      Half of the frames were taken at ISO 800+ in low light conditions (evening, cloudy weather). On three wild overexposures. The lens is a lame old whale. The only more or less decent photo - a horny-busty model was shot in the light of a mercury housekeeper, which gives a green tint and dips along the spectrum. What warm shades can we talk about in such a set of photos? The camera gives the shades that it sees. If you are shooting not a beach in Morocco, but Ust-Zazhopinsk in cloudy weather, I doubt that you will find warm colors. Photography is light, not a magic camera transfer function or beautiful analog transistors with warm tube photon storage.

      Reply

      • Mr. Boggy
        28.06.2021

        I agree that the conditions and the right light, the skill of the photographer, in many respects decide. But the peculiarities of the drawings of different matrices are like different films, and alas, they cannot be replaced in the camera, and sooner or later it becomes boring and predictable from one camera ... So often they chase after ff, then ff, then films and plates ... Perhaps there is a photo component ... It’s a pity that the film is now the lot of non-poor enthusiasts living in capitals and large cities, each picture from the film was unique, and predictably from numbers, it’s like a drawing on graph paper, because the pixels of the matrix are fixed like cells, and the grain of the films is different in size and is located in a scatter, and on each frame, plus the nuances of development ...

        Reply

  3. SashOK
    28.09.2020

    Thanks for reviewing the retro camera. Even though I am from another camp and do not use Konica Minolta, it is still nice to read reviews of all these "soulful" oldies.
    Much more interesting than the announcement of some new super mega device at a space price.

    Reply

  4. Michael
    15.03.2021

    As for the weight of the camera: in other sources I see that 590g is the weight without the battery, and with the battery it is already 670g. Generally a very nice camera; as you know, there is the same matrix as on the Nikon D40, everyone's favorite, but I like camjpeg even more, more calm, of course, than in Mode IIIa D40, but not boring; however, what is a little lacking is the ability to load your own curve, as in the D40 (I once loaded a Portre-style curve into the D40 and turn it on for portraits). I got the D5D just in addition to the D40 for indoor shooting without flash thanks to the stabilizer on the sensor, and with the Sony 50 / 1.4 I got what I wanted, ISO 200 without any problems. Returning to the topic of weight, a little more weight compared to the D40 makes it subjectively uncomfortable to wear the D5D + SAL-50F14 (670 + 220 = 890g) on ​​a photo walk for a long time just in the hand, without belts, as I do with D40 + 35 / 1.8DX (522 + 200 = 722g). Although I'm thinking about getting a light (175g) and cheap Sony 85 / 2.8, their combination with the D5D would be a lightweight help to me with Nikkor-P 105 / 2.5 ... Thanks a lot to the author for the review, before choosing the D5D I read it carefully. I thought about taking D7D, but the weight and the ability to customize camjpeg were important.

    Reply

  5. Paul
    04.08.2021

    There were both cameras, 7d and 5d, the color in the jeep for 5d is a little smoother, 7d is more “colorful”, both have no dynamic range, but the color rendition is better than that of similar Nikon / Kenon, although Fujik still falls short. display backlight is weak, set from nikon d40, quite another matter. In 5d, in addition to the black frame, there is another glitch_ the shutter starts to work only through the "sleep mode", but it does not work like that. If you turn off, or get the battery, then you need to turn it on again through sleep mode. This is not for all cameras, but I got it. The menu is very convenient, everything is laid out on the shelves, no mess like Nikon's. The kit lens 18-70 is very decent, the picture with depth, volume and sharpness is good. In general, the camera is for those who have already played enough with kenons, nikons and olympus and want something else, for a change.

    Reply

  6. Andrei
    05.02.2022

    And how to run through the "sleep mode". Teach. Or it's hard to do it yourself. Just when the stabilizer breaks, the camera does not work. They say you need to run in sleep mode, but how?

    Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer