answers: 8

  1. Rodion
    15.09.2022

    Here, as usual: if this is 300 / 4.5 and not ED, then there is hardly anything better than Tair-3. More compact, lighter, maybe more convenient (than FS) - but not optically better.

    Reply

    • Sergei
      16.09.2022

      If there is no urgent need for shooting in the open (F4.5), then the Mamiya-Sekor C 300 mm f/ 5.6 ULD N is also highly praised - http://forum.mflenses.com/tair-33-vs-nikkor-ed-if-4-5-300mm-vs-mamyia-sekor-5-6-300mm-t80908.html , ED-IF Nikkor 300mm / 4.5 completely drains him in terms of XA.

      Reply

    • after all
      16.09.2022

      Maybe something from 70-300 is better?
      They seem to be inexpensive and lightweight for all systems. If on crop, then on Canon definitely
      55-250 is better.

      Reply

      • Rodion
        17.09.2022

        Inexpensive and light, although some (maybe not all) of them Tair is also enhanced by optical quality))

        Reply

      • vagant1221
        17.09.2022

        on Sony E, for example, all 70-300 are decent. And the more affordable cropped 55-210 is short.

        Reply

      • after all
        18.09.2022

        Sigma 70-300 costs 3000-5000, you can even find APO. In general, Sony is almost always cheaper.

        Reply

  2. Natalia
    15.09.2022

    Rokkor is one of the coolest objects that fell into my hands)) Probably photographing the moon was one of my cherished desires) And of course my interest in experiments: what will something look like if you shoot something at a short distance with such a lens . By the way, the photo of the circle is just a tree and the sun through it. It turned out surreal)) Well, and the desire to consider parts of the landscape, if you can’t reach it with your feet) I examined the quarry from all sides) And the tree. For certain reasons, it was not convenient to go to him, and now, admiring him for a year, I photographed him)

    Reply

  3. Sergei
    15.09.2022

    The lens has a good built-in hood, which allows you to work in partial backlight. Unfortunately, MDF is too big for shooting small birds. But the weight of the lens is quite comfortable.
    It's a pity that this mount makes it difficult to use with most DSLRs due to the working distance.

    Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer