answers: 19

  1. Yarkiya
    24.02.2015

    Thanks, as always, after the Zeiss reviews, it is tempting to buy one for the sample.

    Reply

    • anonym
      24.02.2015

      Just not this one. (

      Reply

      • Ivan
        24.02.2015

        I look at examples of pictures - and I definitely don't understand what I don't like? Awesome Tessar.

        Reply

      • anonym
        24.02.2015

        Today I ate French cheese, and tomorrow I betrayed the Russian world!

        Reply

      • Alexander
        24.02.2015

        "Awesome" - you overdid it a little :)
        Who needs this kind of retrovism? This is a real perversion!

        Reply

      • Ivan
        24.02.2015

        I wonder if I hear at least one argument?

        Reply

      • Alexander
        24.02.2015

        In part, I agree with you. As for such a grandfather, very much so. But who needs this today? Unless for general development to read, no more.

        Reply

      • Ivan
        25.02.2015

        I would love to shoot with such a lens. There were no arguments against him either.

        Reply

    • Artem
      01.11.2019

      Where to find one for a photo review.))) The picture was taken at the time of the shot ...

      Reply

  2. anonym
    24.02.2015

    But where is it to buy them, such a rarity, even in museums there are none.

    Reply

  3. Oleg
    24.02.2015

    Good review. Although in the manner of presentation, it is felt that Arkady did not like the lens.

    Reply

    • Dim
      24.02.2015

      As far as what? In a certain century, Zeiss DDR, who was not killed, came to the review, it was possible to strain a little, just a little and at least portray something, at least from a feeling of gratitude to Denis. I myself want to take something from the old Zeiss, I have to see at random, as it is.

      Reply

  4. Oleg R
    24.02.2015

    I also think the picture is quite decent. Good lens.

    Reply

  5. Vasili
    26.02.2015

    Great lens. I liked it very much (especially the photo of the sand). I would take this without thinking. The only question is why it was tested on Sonya (on Sonya, by the way, the result was very good), and not on the Canon 5D stamp?
    Because of the adapters?

    Reply

  6. Vasili
    26.02.2015

    Sorry, I read it inattentively :) Because there is no picking in the canon! And it would be interesting to compare the picture of Sonya and Canon on this zeiss :) But thanks anyway for a great review!

    Reply

  7. Ingvard
    12.03.2015

    It is you, Arkady rightly noticed - after getting acquainted with piking on mirrorless or semi-mirrorless cameras, hunting with manual glasses on ordinary DSLRs disappears completely)))).

    Reply

  8. Arkady Shapoval
    02.04.2016

    Actually, where is not compliance with the working interval? Even if the segment is not observed on nikon, then the photographs will be exactly the same at certain focusing distances. The photos are certainly poor, but 1) this is a review, not an art exhibition 2) they give a lens for a day or two when there is time / weather.

    Reply

  9. Sergei
    13.05.2021

    Hello, tell me how to clean the rear lens, maybe there is a fungus on the glass

    Reply

    • Rodion
      13.05.2021

      Unscrew the slotted nut and soak the lens in the pancreatin if the fungus is superficial. If the inner one, remove the lens. And then pancreatin. And then glue. In short, something else to do.

      Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer