answers: 233

  1. Maria
    08.09.2019

    Thanks for the review, a lot.
    In many respects, because of them, although it is difficult for me to evaluate technical informativeness, I chose lenses for my tasks. I am a green newbie. Probably an artist by nature, I do not pursue the universality of skills, I photograph for my pleasure. In fact, she took up this matter mainly because of her son’s photos. Surprisingly, of all that I managed to try the 85th I liked the most for what kind of facial (sometimes even half-face) portraits on it going out. The effect of the movie in the frame.
    And at 1.8-2 aperture, with good diffused light, it is interesting to photograph vegetation, it turns out somehow fantastically interesting.

    Reply

  2. Maria
    14.09.2019

    By the way, in the piggy bank of comparisons. if it is important for someone to understand whether to have this lens and fifty dollars at the same time, then, rather, from the experience of viewing other people's photographs, I can say that fifty dollars somehow suppresses the natural look of the picture, mutes naturalness, this is not bad, this is his originality, the photos he took are self-sufficient. 85th on the contrary, more realistically conveys tones and sunlight, IMHO, of course

    Reply

  3. Maria
    29.09.2019

    I tried to shoot animals, portraits and nature from 800d.
    Double sensation.
    Detailing and other points are, of course, better.
    But something elusive that was in conjunction with the d90 is missing.
    This full-frame gives some kind of plasticity to faces, or something, as if they were retouched.
    Maybe it’s about the settings, but as I usually shoot in the afternoon, I don’t apply any special additional settings.
    But nature and animals are both easier and more enjoyable to film.
    https://500px.com/photo/1003622773/Curiosity-by-Maria-Bardina?ctx_page=1&from=user&user_id=1000371731

    Reply

    • Anonymous
      29.09.2019

      Maybe the plasticity of the lack of resolution, the lens is washing the texture.

      Reply

    • Pokemon
      29.09.2019

      It seems that AF did not hold out.
      It’s not clear where the AF went, on f / 2.5 if the AF module worked correctly, this could be determined.
      There is also a feeling that the subject was moving during the shooting ...

      Reply

      • Maria
        29.09.2019

        Pokemon, Vitali, Anonymous - Thanks for the tips. The object was moving. Yes, the picture is closer to 50, although I thought that there was a connection only in the viewing angle, but not in the nature of the picture, but not. it turns out that the "drawing" of the lens is highly dependent on the matrix. I have no experience in focusing, all summer I have been dealing with static, so I try to learn it manually first.

        Reply

      • Pokemon
        29.09.2019

        And when shooting, AF-C mode was set?
        Maria, don’t worry and try on static.
        If it is possible to borrow or rent Nikkor 85 / 1.4D - see how it will work for you.
        The D800 has a pretty good AF module, it's a matter of practice, and everything will turn out.

        Reply

      • Maria
        29.09.2019

        AF-S, but I shot in manual mode.
        Thank you)

        Reply

      • Pokemon
        29.09.2019

        Moving / unpredictable objects are better on AF-C :-)
        Oddly enough, even when shooting static AF-C gives a more accurate result than AF-S. But apparently it depends on the camera and lens (or rather, on a combination of them, especially if the lens is non-native).

        Reply

      • Alex
        23.01.2020

        In general, fixes in AF speed are inferior to reportable zooms; therefore, the tracking mode if the object moves fast will help little on fix optics.

        Reply

      • Maria
        29.09.2019

        In AF, I’m even shooting with lamps now, and of course, everything is sharp. I am extreme, apparently.

        Reply

    • Pokemon
      29.09.2019

      Try to test on static objects in even light.
      For example - take a vase of flowers and see how the AF works. At 2,5 on this glass, sharpness at 800 should be sufficient (at least in the place where the AF hit).

      Reply

    • Denis
      13.10.2019

      for the first time I see a photo of a bird when the head is in focus, and everything else is blurry)))
      usually the whole bird is in focus and it’s entirely in the frame
      In general, here the whale is more appropriate than the portrait IMHO

      Reply

      • Michael
        13.10.2019

        Strange that for the first time) This is easily achieved by the open aperture of the dark 70-300 at the long end. A dove-crow without cover no longer breaks

        Reply

      • Maria
        06.08.2020

        Yes, I still have such pigeons in the collection, shot at 300 mm in poor lighting in St. Petersburg.
        It's just that the birds are more common in profile.
        And here, in general, an unsuccessful shot in itself, and framing is natural creepy. There was no telephoto, and the birds were not allowed close.

        Reply

      • Denis
        06.08.2020

        Now I don't see where the photo of the birds was and I don't remember…. I had 70-300, I can imagine how it will be blurry there - everything is not so strong. and the further you shoot, the greater the depth of field (as opposed to macro)

        Reply

  4. Vitaly N
    29.09.2019

    Increasing the matrix subjectively reduces the depth of field. And, as it were, "the volume increases." If you want shots similar to the D90, lower the aperture. Well, considering the perspective, from 85 to D800 the photos will look more like 50s from D90.

    Reply

  5. Maria
    13.10.2019

    For some reason, autofocus does not work with the D800 (there is a car everywhere, on the camera and on the lens ...

    Reply

  6. Maria
    13.10.2019

    Doesn't work on any carcass, I checked other lenses right after him - it works everywhere. Either a rare disease or tambourines

    Reply

  7. Maria
    18.10.2019

    It is necessary to destroy the makings of a blonde.
    How my grief was resolved.
    The fact is that the zoom (with which I compared) is old and was set by a simple turn of the thread in the socket.

    And 85mm - turns all the way, then until it clicks a couple of mm in the opposite direction.
    If you do not make this elegant movement, then the lens is literally inaccessible to the camera, it does not see the chip. Although, surprisingly, shooting is available.

    Reply

    • vadim
      02.02.2020

      no wonder

      Reply

  8. Nicholas
    16.03.2020

    Should I buy 85mm on the D7500? What could be the nuances of except?

    Reply

    • Michael
      16.03.2020

      None. If 85 mm is needed, buy it

      Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      16.03.2020

      It will be like 85mm on the crop. The glider will be a good combination.

      Reply

    • us6ibd
      17.03.2020

      There is only one Newans - it is necessary to move further from the subject than when using FF.

      Reply

  9. Nicholas
    16.03.2020

    On crop

    Reply

  10. Natalia
    07.04.2020

    Who has experience, tell me. Is it possible to use this lens with kenko macro rings on a crop camera for shooting macro objects ???

    Reply

    • B. R. P.
      08.04.2020

      Why not? Crop is not a crop, it doesn't matter. The macro rings must support electronics, otherwise there will be no aperture control, as well as exposure metering on the younger Nikons. If the rings are for a screwdriver, af will be on the corresponding cameras.

      Reply

      • B. R. P.
        08.04.2020

        Sorry, mistake. There will be no af on screwdriver rings with this lens.

        Reply

  11. y.perov
    08.04.2020

    The dilemma of the last month - 85 1.4d or 85 1.8g ...

    Reply

    • B. R. P.
      08.04.2020

      From af, the 85d current in 1.4d is the most beautiful drawing, in my opinion.

      Reply

  12. Vika
    21.02.2021

    Nikon AF Nikkor 85mm 1: 1.8D and Nikon AF-S Nikkor 85mm 1: 1.8G IF SWM please tell me which one is better on Nikon d800? I am recently in this thread, I will be glad to advice.

    Reply

    • Jury
      21.02.2021

      Nikon AF-S Nikkor 85mm 1: 1.8G better

      Reply

      • Vika
        22.02.2021

        Thank you

        Reply

  13. Kate
    02.06.2021

    Good afternoon!
    Thanks for the review.
    I have a full frame Nikon, I shoot at 50 1,4. Not so long ago I tried Nikon 35 1,4 and was delighted, but due to its cost I plan to buy Sigma Art 35.
    And so I think that it may be worth replacing, among other things, my 50ku with 85, let it be 1,8. At the moment I shoot more often in the studio. Tell me, pliz, will a pair of 35 and 85 replace my fifty dollars?
    Thank you)

    Reply

    • Victor
      02.06.2021

      A pair of 35-85, of course, will give more interesting pictures with its diversity than one half. Both (which is logical) also give a completely different perspective. In general, this is a classic pair of a portrait painter - 35 are general plans, 85 are larger.

      Of course, you need to try it yourself, and decide personally, although, kmk, you will not remain unsatisfied :)

      Reply

      • Kate
        02.06.2021

        Thank you so much!))

        Reply

  14. Dmitriy
    06.11.2021

    Raw files are not available in RAW format. Can I overfill somewhere?

    Reply

  15. Victor
    14.12.2021

    Arkady, how 85mm 1,8G will work on the latest generation film cameras (f80?

    Reply

    • Ivan
      14.12.2021

      Excellent, with full compatibility.

      Reply

      • Victor
        14.12.2021

        Ivan, thank you very much!

        Reply

  16. John
    15.01.2022

    Please tell me, did someone put 85ku on D40? Does autofocus miss?
    There is 7100, but there is another glass, and I don’t want to do juggling. 85ka is needed for rare, but well-aimed shots.
    Thank you.

    Reply

    • B. R. P.
      15.01.2022

      Arkady set)

      Reply

      • John
        15.01.2022

        Too bad :)

        Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      15.01.2022

      I did, everything is ok

      Reply

      • John
        15.01.2022

        There was nonsense when I was more stupid than now: 35mm 1.8G - new from the box, smeared autofocus on 7 out of 10 frames. This was not the case with the whale. Only I don't remember if it was 3100 or 5100.

        I thought that either the trouble was with the camera or with the lens. I turned to the workshop, they said that everything was ok with the carcass and glass, they advised me to change the carcass to a higher level and where the focus sensors are better. :)

        Maybe someone will come in handy.

        Reply

  17. Novel
    09.09.2022

    Tell me, I heard from the owner of this lens that at 1.8 this lens is sharp at full frame, but on crop it is only sharp with 2-2.2, is that so?

    Reply

    • Dmitry
      09.09.2022

      It happens that on one camera the lens is sharp, on the other - not so much. It does not depend on crop or not crop. Each instance of the camera has its own tolerances and inaccuracies in setting the focus, and each instance of the lens has its own. If on the camera + lens these tolerances in total do not exceed a certain permissible limit, everything is sharp. If they exceed in one direction or another, then there may be a front or back focus. On older bodies, you can make adjustments if a particular lens is inaccurately focused. On the younger ones - only to the service for adjustment.

      Reply

  18. Load more comments ...

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer