Material specially prepared for Radozhiva by Rodion Eshmakov.
The LOMO Epi 9×0.2 OE-9 objective lens is a low-magnification achromat with an M27 mounting thread. It is designed for "large" research microscopes and is intended for observing objects in reflected light using illumination via a special mirror condenser located coaxially with the objective lens. This objective lens cannot be attached to a standard RMS microscope, but whether this is necessary is discussed in this article. Most questions about microscope design, objective lens types, and their practical use are discussed here.
Specifications:
Optical design – 4 lenses in 2 groups, Richter aplanat , does not use special optical glasses;
Type of correction – achromat;
Tube distance – 190 mm (factory version);
Magnification factor – 9x (with tube distance 190 mm);
Numerical aperture (NA) – 0.2;
Focal length - 18.4 mm;
Working distance – 5.4 mm with a tube distance of 190 mm;
Cover glass thickness – 0 mm;
Immersion required - no;
Mounting type – M27 thread;
Features - microscopic lens, does not have an iris diaphragm and a focusing mechanism.
Design and adaptation of LOMO Epi 9×0.2
Due to the presence of a built-in condenser for observing opaque objects, LOMO Epi 9×0.2 has an increased body diameter and a larger thread compared to the RMS standard. The body can be easily disassembled using a clock screwdriver; it is possible to completely separate the small-sized lens block for subsequent transplantation into a new body.
There are two options for adapting this lens: 1) with a new tube distance of 160 mm; 2) while maintaining the tube distance of 190 mm.
In the first case, the lens will work with conventional biological and teaching microscopes in the same way as it would work on its original microscope. To do this, an extension ring 30 mm thick will be required between the previous lens mounting plane and the microscope turret to compensate for the difference in tube distances, which will lead to an increase in the parfocal distance of the lens. For such an adaptation, installing a lens block into a gutted, illicit LOMO 40×0.65 lens (spring-loaded version) is well suited. To improve image contrast, it is preferable to install a light-protective sleeve in the space between the rear lens of the lens and the mounting thread, and to protect the front lens, I made a short, dense tube for it. Photo of the adapted lens below.
The second modification option is significantly smaller in size and easier to manufacture, but entails a reduction in the tube distance by 30 mm, which means a reduction in magnification to ~8x and a likely increase in field aberrations. The lens block of the lens is easily screwed into the thread of the rear nut of the LOMO 40×0.65 lens (option without a spring) - you just need to carefully cut off the nose part of the faulty donor. A lens adapted in this way is shown in the photo below in comparison with the “long” version.
In general, the LOMO Epi 9×0.2 is a more advanced version of the very inexpensive and common standard objective of older 8×0.2 educational microscopes. It differs from its predecessor, the Epi 9×0.2, in that it has a longer working distance, a higher level of manufacturing quality, and a coated lens surface—my specimens have all but the first surface coated. However, there are reports of lenses with a coated first surface as well. Clearly, this doesn't sound like a convincing justification for converting a $5 objective into a $5 equivalent, but we'll discuss this in more detail when we discuss the optical properties. Aside from the nuances of adaptation, the LOMO Epi 9×0.2 is a very convenient and quite versatile objective for microscopy, allowing you to immerse yourself in a true microcosm, a scale significantly different from that typically achieved with photographic objectives and special attachments. A fairly large working distance makes it easier to work with light, which makes the lens preferable to the modern Chinese Plan 10×0.25 , for example.
Optical properties
The LOMO Epi 9×0.2 lens offers good sharpness in the center of the frame, but suffers from pronounced spherochromatic aberrations (bright purple or yellow fringing). In terms of on-axis image quality, the lens is inferior to the Chinese Plan 10×0.25.
When observing flat objects, sharpness drops sharply towards the edge of the frame due to the strong field curvature. At the same time, the astigmatism of the lens is corrected very well - when refocusing along the edge of the frame and using stacking, getting a sharp image is not a problem.

Image of the LOMO OMO-U4.2 reflected light object micrometer, taken on a Sony A7s and the “long” version (tube distance 160 mm) of the lens with a tube length of ~160 mm. The length of the mark is 1 mm, the division value is 0.01 mm.
The “short” version (tube distance 190 mm) compared to the “long” version (tube distance 160 mm) is distinguished by a visually larger field, which is consistent with its calculated magnification of 8x. There was no significant difference in image quality between the two versions of the adapted lens.

Image of the LOMO OMO-U4.2 reflected light object micrometer, taken on a Sony A7s with “short” and “long” lens options with a tube length of ~160 mm. The length of the mark is 1 mm, the division value is 0.01 mm.
The main advantage of the LOMO Epi 9×0.2 objective (and its predecessor, the LOMO 8×0.2) is the complete absence of lateral chromatic aberrations, allowing it to be used without compensating systems (eyepieces or other accessories). By comparison, the standard objective of the Biolam microscope, the LOMO Plan 9×0.2, exhibits noticeable red-blue chromatic aberrations , despite boasting a virtually perfectly flat field. Similarly, the Chinese Plan 10×0.25 is significantly inferior in image quality to the old Soviet achromatic objective precisely because of its indecently high level of lateral chromatic aberration.

Image of the LOMO OMO-U4.2 reflected light object micrometer, taken on a Sony A7s and LOMO Plan 9×0.2, Epi 9×0.2 lenses with a tube length of ~160 mm. The length of the mark is 1 mm, the division value is 0.01 mm.
Due to the presence of an antireflection coating on the optics (~physical, MgF2) and a small number of optical elements, LOMO Epi 9×0.2 is also notable for its high image contrast - just compare it with the above-mentioned LOMO Plan 9×0.2 - an uncoated disgrace. Of course, Epi 9x0.2 will be better than the regular 8x0.2. In addition, LOMO Epi 9×0.2 has high light transmittance (light optical glasses) and, theoretically, can be used for UV photography - the short-wave absorption edge is 340 nm.
The following are examples of photographs (without stacking) taken using an M10 microscope and a Sony A7s camera in direct focus on both lens options. For the most part, I used the lens to photograph crystals of compounds obtained in a training workshop by 1st year students of the Faculty of Chemistry. For those interested, please indicate the objects in the photo:
1 – IPS smartphone display;
2, 3 – unknown ammonium oxorodane tungstate in an ampoule;
4 – luminescent cubane complex of copper(I) iodide with pyridine under illumination with white light and UV 370 nm;
5 – vanadyl sulfate on a copper substrate;
6-8 – hexaamminnickel chloride.
Below are examples of photos using the same link, but with stacking in Photoshop. Specifying objects:
1 – contact pad of the gas sensor chip, which I work with in the laboratory;
2 – place of soldering of the antenna contact of the substrate to the pin contact of the chip;
3 – vanadyl sulfate hydrate on a copper substrate;
4-6 – hexaamminnickel chloride;
7 – cesium-vanadium alum;
8 – cobalt(II) molybdate in two crystalline modifications – pink and gray-green;
9 – chromium(II)-hydrazinium sulfate;
10, 11 – potassium rhodanocobaltate;
12 – potassium dioxalatocuprate dihydrate;
13 – potassium-nickel schenite;
14 – Reinecke salt;
15 – unknown ammonium oxorodane tungstate;
16 – unknown ammonium oxorodane tungstate after oxidation in air.
All reviews of RMS standard microscope objectives with a finite tube distance (160-190 mm):
Modern optics from Chinese manufacturers:
- Review of the low magnification lens 2/0.05 160/- (no-name, China). Problems of constructing low magnification lenses for microscopes
- Microscopic optics on a camera. Review of microscope lens Plan 4x0.1 160/0.17 (China, no-name)
- Plan 20x0.4 160/0.17 (no-name, China)
- 4x0.1 160/0.17 achromat (China, no-name)
- 10x0.25 160/0.17 achromat (China, no-name) - modification and test
- 20/0.40 160/0.17 achromat (China, no-name) - review and comparative test
- 40/0.65 160/0.17 achromat (China, no-name) - review and comparison test
- 100/1.25 160/0.17 achromat (China, no-name) - review and comparison test
- Plan 4/0.10 160/0.17 type "Tair" (concave front lens)
- Plan 10/0.25 160/0.17
- Plan 20/0.40 160/0.17 with increased working distance – review and test
- Plan 40/0.65 160/0.17
- Plan 100/1.25 oil 160/0.17. Thoughts on 100x lenses
- LM Plan 5/0.15 160/0 WD18
- LM Plan 10/0.25 160/0 WD9.2
- LM Plan 20/0.45 160/0 WD4
- Plan 40/0.75 160/0 - A Large Comparison of 40× Lenses
Reviews of Soviet lenses for microscopes:
- LOMO TQA-2.5-1 Plan Achro 2.5 0.08 160/0-2.5 – review, analysis and test
- LOMO OM-3 Plan 3.5/0.10 – comparative review
- Microscope objectives 3.7x0.11 (OM-12), 4.7x0.11 (LOMO, Progress): review and test
- LOMO 4×/0.12 (OX-4-1)
- Review and test of the LOMO M42 8x0.2 achromatic microscope
- Review, analysis and large comparative test of microscope objectives LOMO Plan 9x0.20 and 10x0.20 (OM-2)
- Progress 9×0.20 190-P (OM-13P)
- LOMO Epi 9x0.2 (OE-9, adapted)
- LOMO 10x0.4 L (OM-33L) - modification and test
- Review and test of the OM-27 20x0.4 (Progress) achromatic microscope
- Review of achromat microscope lens LOMO 21×0.4 190-P (OM-8P)
- LOMO 40×/0.65 MS and 40×/0.65 OH-1: comparison, modeling and testing
- LOMO VI 40×/0.75 OM-23: Review and Test
Carl Zeiss lenses:
- Carl Zeiss Jena Semiplan 3.2/0.10 160/- (DIN)
- Carl Zeiss Jena Semiplan 6.3/0.16 160/- (DIN)
- Carl Zeiss Jena 10/0.25 160/- and 10/0.25 160/-A (OF)
- Carl Zeiss Jena 10/0.30 160/-
- Carl Zeiss Jena Planachromat 16/0.32 160/0.17 (DIN)
- Carl Zeiss Jena 40/0.65 160/0.17 (DIN)
Lenses from other manufacturers:
Conclusions
LOMO Epi 9×0.2 is an ultra-budget (~$5-10) low magnification lens, easy to use due to its long working distance and having an acceptable level of quality for photography due to the presence of an anti-reflective coating on the optics, excellent correction of astigmatism and lateral chromaticity. I definitely recommend the lens, despite the need for adaptation and the seeming availability of modern alternatives.
You can find more reviews from Radozhiva readers here and here.




































