answers: 8

  1. Sandro
    07.02.2023

    Something mirrorless compactness does not add much ...

    Reply

    • Nikolay3
      12.05.2023

      This is the first criticism of “lighter” mirrorless cameras from foreign reviewers since the advent of modern full-frame mirrorless systems. That half a hundred, that even 40mm are all monstrous.

      Reply

  2. i is glorious
    07.02.2023

    The optical scheme is very unusual, I can not remember anything similar. It is clear that this is the development of some kind of asymmetric scheme, but which one?

    Reply

    • i is glorious
      08.02.2023

      Although some analogies can be drawn with the Kaleinar scheme, before which and after which a group of lenses was added almost symmetrically to compensate for aberrations

      Reply

      • i is glorious
        08.02.2023

        On the other hand, the front group resembles the same Nokt 58 / 0,95.

        Reply

      • i is glorious
        08.02.2023

        Sigma and Noct

        Reply

      • Nikolay3
        12.05.2023

        There are reviews on the Internet, judging by the size, a fifty dollars should not have tangible defects. And they are. Focus-breezing this time. There is a frigging on the open. And attention is distortion, there is a ready-made profile in the lightroom, but a lens that weighs more than half a kilo! has such flaws.

        Reply

  3. i is glorious
    13.02.2023

    Examples from the pre-production version (with a little back focus):
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/sonyalphablog/sets/72177720305677284/
    The pattern is similar to modern portraits 85-135mm.

    Reply

Answer i is glorious

 

 

Top
mobility. computer