answers: 11

  1. Dmitry Kostin
    20.09.2022

    “Most likely based on the Tamron 17-28mm F/2.8 Di III RXD (Model A046) introduced in June 2019”
    To be honest, I couldn't believe my eyes and read it twice.

    Reply

  2. Ivan_Io
    20.09.2022

    $1200 and that's even without the letter S.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      20.09.2022

      Tamron 800 costs (1.5 times cheaper)

      Reply

  3. Alexey
    20.09.2022

    So much for you and a wide mount with unique light optics, which copies the optics from the small Sony mount.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      20.09.2022

      Great comment :)

      Reply

  4. Michael
    26.09.2022

    At these prices, I can definitely live without this lens, as well as without mirrorless cameras.

    Reply

    • Viktre
      26.09.2022

      It is possible that you will live. A person is generally able to live without a camera, this is far from being a necessity.

      However, in fairness, $ 1200 (and even more than 900 for the “original”) is even a little for a high-quality, modern and new warranty full-frame ultra-wide zoom with f / 2.8

      Remind me how much it costs for a MIRROR Canon 16-35 / 2.8 of the third version?

      Reply

  5. Alan
    30.12.2022

    I can’t find something on the site for info, about third-party glasses for Z, all sorts of sigmas and tamrons by?

    Reply

    • Viktre
      30.12.2022

      All information is presented in the relevant sections - Nikon Z and Nikon Z (APS-C)

      Read carefully.

      Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer