According provided by Tele-Takumar 1: 6.3 / 300 Asahi Opt. Co., huge thanks to the store FOCUSFILM (subscribe to INSTAGRAM)... There are many iconic film cameras and lenses to be found there.
In short
Tele-Takumar 1: 6.3 / 300 Asahi Opt. Co., is an old telephoto prime lens for film cameras with an M42 thread.
For our time, it is interesting only for the multi-petal diaphragm and the presence of a removable tripod foot. In general, the image quality is poor.
Main technical characteristics of Tele-Takumar 1: 6.3 / 300 Asahi Opt. Co.,:
Review Instance Name | Tele-Takumar 1: 6.3 / 300 Asahi Opt. Co., Lens made in Japan 1471310 |
Basic properties |
|
Front Filter Diameter | 58 mm, metal thread for filters |
Focal length | 300 mm |
Zoom ratio | 1 x |
Designed by | for film cameras with a frame size of 24 x 36 |
MDF | 5.5 meters, maximum magnification ratio of about 1:17 |
Number of aperture blades | 12 petals. Petals are dull black. The petals form a regular polygon hole |
Tags |
|
Diaphragm | from F / 6.3 to F / 22. The lens has two aperture control rings (settings and presets)
The rings have labels for F / 6.3, 8, 10 (dot), 11, 13 (dot), 16, 22. The preset ring has only a fixed set of values, it switches with clicks. Setting ring rotates smoothly without fixed values |
The weight |
|
Optical design | 5 elements in 5 groups
The lens does not use special optical elements in its optical design. |
Hood / Covers | ASAHI OPT. Co., JAPAN 58Ø Takumar 1: 6.3 300mm. The hood is threaded, metal, screwed into the thread of the front light filter. Can be installed in the opposite direction. |
Manufacturer country | LENS MADE IN JAPAN (lens made in Japan). |
Period | With 1965 year |
Price | About 100 cu for used option. View on EBAY
Prices for modern Pentax lenses can be viewed here. |
The maximum aperture ratio of 1: 6.3 is quite small for a fixed object. Such a maximum relative aperture is now used not by a prime, but by zoom lenses, of the type Nikon DX AF-P Nikkor VR 70-300mm 1: 4.5-6.3G.
Assembling, focusing
Tele-Takumar 1: 6.3 / 300 Asahi Opt. Co., is assembled well, but there are still slight backlash in the body parts. The tripod foot is detachable; to remove it, you need to completely unscrew the clamping screw and manually release the clamp. The tripod foot can rotate 360 degrees freely around the lens barrel.
The hood is long (large), threaded, metal, screwed into the thread of the front light filter. Can be installed (not screwed in) in the opposite direction. There is a fabric seal inside the hood for a tight fit in the opposite direction. In the opposite direction, access to the focusing ring is practically not lost.
The focusing ring is metal, large, with ribbed edges, rotates approximately 315 degrees (7/8 of a full turn). The movement of the ring is smooth. The front extension body does not rotate during focusing. Focusing occurs by moving the entire lens unit. During focusing, the focus ring moves forward.
It's important: The minimum focusing distance (MDF) is as much as 5.5 meters, which is a lot for a lens with a focal length of 300 mm. Such MDF introduces certain inconveniences.
The front original cover must be screwed into the thread of the front light filter (not always convenient).
Tele-Takumar 1: 6.3 / 300 Asahi Opt. Co., has a ring presets diaphragm. It can be used to select one of the fixed values between F / 6.3 and F / 22. Unlike the presetting ring, the aperture setting ring rotates smoothly, with its help you can set any intermediate value. The smooth movement of the aperture ring is useful when shooting movies. The diaphragm consists of 12 petals, which always form a hole in the form of regular polyhedrons with rounded edges.
Image quality and sample photos
The lens is very afraid of backlight, the hood helps a little in the fight against flares and helps in some cases to significantly increase the contrast of the image. In general, the image quality is poor. Strong chromatic aberration (+ very strong frigging, example) and poor resolution at F / 6.3. To achieve good resolution, you should aperture down to f / 11.
Pictures in the gallery below were obtained using Nikon D4 and adapter M42-Nikon F (without a lens and a chip, without the possibility of focusing to infinity, the far focusing limit is about 30 meters, the near one is about 3 meters). Converting original RAW files with the original Nikon Capture NX-D v 1.4.6 utility. On camera Nikon D4 the optical viewfinder is quite dark at f / 6.3, it seems that the lens actually has a maximum aperture of 1: 8.
You can download / view the original photos in RAW format ('.NEF') at this link (13 files, Yandex.Disk gallery).
How to use with modern cameras?
Lenses with mounting thread M42 (M42 X 1 / 45.5), such as the lens from this review, are very easy to use on almost any modern digital camera (both SLR and mirrorless), for this it is enough to choose the right adapter (adapter). You do not need to carry out any additional steps to modify the lens.
The cheapest adapters can be found at Aliexpress.com... There are adapters (adapters) with a chip that provide more convenience during shooting, usually chips are used to confirm focus and / or metering exposure, and form the correct EXIF. The chip does not affect the image quality in any way.
For some SLR cameras (for example, with the Nikon F-mount), you need to use adapters with a corrective lens, which allows you to focus correctly at all focusing distances. For any mirrorless cameras, such a lens is not needed, and the adapter is a simple decorated hollow metal tube with an appropriate mount.
For SLR cameras
- Canon: For cameras Canon EOS with bayonet mount EF / EF-S need an M42-Canon EOS adapter, such an adapter with a chip can be found herewithout chip here.
- NIKON: For cameras Nikon DX / FXas well as for cameras Fujifilm и Kodak with a Nikon F mount, you need an M42-Nikon F adapter, you can buy such an adapter without a lens and a chip here, with a lens without a chip herewith chip without lens here, with lens and chip here. Why a lens? Why chip?
- PENTAX: For Pentax cameras with K mount, you need an M42-Pentax K adapter, you can buy such an adapter here.
- SONY/MINOLTA: For cameras with a Sony / Minolta A mount, you need the M42-Sony A adapter, you can find such an adapter without a chip at this linkwith a chip at this link.
- OLYMPUS/PANASONIC/LEICA: For cameras with a 4/3 bayonet mount (not to be confused with Micro 4/3!) You need an M42-4 / 3 adapter, you can buy such an adapter here.
For mirrorless cameras
- SONY: For cameras with 'E'/'FE' mount series SonyNEX и Sony Alpha you need an adapter M42-Sony E (aka M42-Sony Nex), you can find it at this link. An autofocus adapter is also available for these cameras. Techart PRO Leica M - Sony E Autofocus Adapterwhich can be found at this link.
- OLYMPUS / PANASONIC / KODAK / XIAOMI: For cameras with a bayonet mount Micro 4/3 (Micro 4:3) you need an adapter M42-Micro 4/3, you can find it at this link.
- CANON M: For cameras with Canon EF-M mount need adapter M42-Canon M, it can be found at this link.
- CANON R and RF-S: For cameras with Canon RF mount need adapter M42-Canon R, it can be found at this link.
- Nikon 1: For cameras Nikon 1 Series need adapter M42-Nikon 1, you can find it at this link.
- Nikon Z: For cameras Nikon Z series (FX/DX) need an adapter M42-Nikon Z, it can be found at this link.
- FUJIFILM X: For cameras with mount X need an M42-Fuji X adapter, you can find it at this link.
- FUJIFILM GFX: For medium format cameras G-mount need M42-Fuji GFX adapter, you can find it at this link.
- SAMSUNG: For cameras with NX mount, you need an M42-Samsung NX adapter, you can find it at this link. There are no adapters for the NX mini camera yet.
- PENTAX: For Q-mount cameras, you need an M42-Pentax Q adapter, you can find it at this link.
- SIGMA / PANASONIC / LEICA: For cameras with L mount you need an M42-Leica L adapter, you can find it at this link.
- LEICA: For cameras with a bayonet mount Leica M need adapter M42-L / M, you can find it at this link.
If you have any questions on compatibility and adapters - ask in the comments (comments do not require any registration at all).
Comments on this post do not require registration. Anyone can leave a comment.
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval.
Let me remind you that at that time in the USSR there was a three-lens Tair-3, which was very primitive in terms of the scheme and excellent in parameters, which was also twice as lighter.
Tahir, in this case, a particularly successful version, will be significantly better than this Takumar
Unkilled and not curved Tair-3 will be noticeably better optically even of many lenses, especially old pre-ED and pre-ASPH zooms, as well as Asian fixes of the 300 / 5.6 class from the 1970s.
https://radojuva.com/2011/10/obzor-nikon-70-300mm-f-4-5-5-6g-ed-if-af-s-vr-zoom-nikkor/
Stab
Zoom
Lighter
Auto focus
Price from hands 12-15 sput, new 25 sput.
And there was also an older screwdriver, which from the hands of about 7 sput.
The meaning of this asahi is to take it for change))
There were several screwdrivers:
Nikon AF Nikkor 75-240mm 1: 4.5-5.6D, 1999
Nikon AF Nikkor 70-300mm 1: 4-5.6D ED, 1998
Nikon AF Nikkor 70-300mm 1: 4-5.6G, since 2000
For our time, it is interesting only for the multi-petal diaphragm and the presence of a removable tripod foot. In general, the image quality is quite low.
Brilliant !! :-)))
What is considered not low enough in this case? :-))
Fixed
I have a similar lens - Telemar-22 5.6 / 200. I thought that I would get something catastrophic in the end, but it turned out that the lens is quite suitable for myself. If you are interested in the details, then they are available here -
https://o-avgust.livejournal.com/245017.html
Vutya super
Sorry if the question is off topic, but I would like to ask for advice.
Which of the old manual f / 300 to f / 4 manual fixes would you recommend for a modern full frame camera?
Nikon NIKKOR ED 300 / 4.5 IF, the AIS version, has been in production since 1981.
Canon FD 300/4 (better than the one that is NFD)
Even the same old Takumar 300/4
Arkady, thanks!
I would also add to the list Minolta Md 300mm f / 4.5
Leitz Telyt-V 280/4.8, better than latest versions
this is if the drawing is in the first place AND the resolution (but there is XA)
I also liked the OM Zuiko 300 / 4.5, but the lens is simpler.
Konica Hexanon 300/4.5 are more average (theirs 200/3.5 is better).
It seems a somehow unfair review concerning the image quality, considering that the lens is made in 1965. As a matter of fact the images you posted seems to state the exact opposite, with great sharpness and colors. And considering also the unorthodox way of testing a M42 lens on a Nikon camera – which does not allow even infinite (every lens has ranges of excellence and weakness). I'd challenge you to find a '60s lens (not MC or Multicoated) that in strong contrast on whites has no or not visible CA. You can find it even now in the most modern ones, if you look carefully. ;-)
Oh, it is fair at all to consider this lens as poor-quality telephoto. For example, even the soviet Tair-3A 300/4.5 based on lens design which was patented in the 1940s and manufactured in ~1960-1980s has much better performance and larger aperture.