answers: 12

  1. Eugene o
    02.06.2021

    The layout is very similar to the old 105 2.8G, with the only rear lens assembly redesigned. Well, there must be great glass.

    Reply

  2. Not a bot
    03.06.2021

    here you go! glass norms have arrived, it's not a shame for this and give 1000, which of course I will not do)))

    Reply

  3. Nicholas
    30.06.2021

    I bought this lens yesterday. Having chased him to the pedmet of ants and bees, he remained, not just, but very happy and in the evening he made a comparative test with the old AF-S 105 f / 2.8. (I wrote somewhere that on the Z7 II camera, he disappointed me). I tested it on the Z7 II camera, the distance to the target is about 5 meters, the ReFocal program. Well, in general, the pictures speak for themselves.
    The first is the AFS lens

    Reply

  4. Nicholas
    30.06.2021

    And the second - Z series

    Reply

    • Aleksey68
      30.06.2021

      What does AF accuracy have to do with macrique quality? which is shot with manual focus.

      Reply

      • Nicholas
        30.06.2021

        Well, I’m not that one has -3 and the other has 0 or + 1. The vertical scale is directly related to the resolution of the lens. I'm talking about that.

        Reply

      • Novel
        30.06.2021

        Makrik is also good as a portrait lens - 105 / 2.8 - very portrait parameters. And I don’t know about Nikon, but Canon has the auto-stacking option for some lenses, when the camera focuses instead of using the rail, so the AF quality there will be a rather important parameter.

        Reply

      • Nicholas
        30.06.2021

        Yes, and I do not strongly agree with the fact that, once a macro, then only manually. Maybe this goes back to the days of the AF screwdriver. Pixel autofocus for Nikons Z (and this lens can only be used with them) works very accurately and quickly. So manually is great, but is it necessary?

        Reply

      • Aleksey68
        01.07.2021

        I have a Nikkor 105 2.8D on a kenon and focus with my hands, both in macro and in a portrait. although there is also an electronic follow focus, I rarely use it.

        Reply

      • Nicholas
        01.07.2021

        Perhaps this is a matter of habit. But if you tried THIS lens on a good camera (not theoretically, but live) - all doubts would go away at once. Or an analogue from a canon (if any). And once again - all that I was trying to convey here is my feelings and My little experiment. And about the macro - here everyone decides what, what and how. Sometimes and why.

        Reply

      • Aleksey68
        01.07.2021

        stacking to AF is not very relevant. for stacking is relative, not absolute. I sometimes shoot like this on kenon for nikkor. external drive and motor control controller.

        Reply

  5. Nicholas
    30.06.2021

    I want to note right away that everything above is not laboratory research, but exclusively my impressions and some kind of objective proof that the new line of Nikon's S lenses is “just a miracle”
    :)

    Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer