answers: 22

  1. Rodion
    26.05.2021

    Unlike the Chinese, Nikon did not make another planar + booster. Here, rather, the opposite is true. A wide-angle attachment and a field corrector were attached to a well-visible planar (most likely, it is negative). In principle, a similar approach was used by many other manufacturers in order to squeeze everything out of the old scheme.

    Reply

  2. Vlad
    26.05.2021

    A question about autofocus: is it SWM or STM? The plate says both. Tested a similar 35 / 1.8Z in a store, it feels more like a ring ultrasonic motor

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      26.05.2021

      STM only

      Reply

  3. The
    26.05.2021

    When comparing forehead to forehead, the Zeta fifty dollar gives out the picture lighter
    their colleagues. This gives grounds to assert that poltos is closer to 1.4,
    than to 1.8. Based on the situation that the line of fixes from Nikon is marked as
    f1.2 f1.8 f2.8 (well, exotic in the style of “look as you can” f0.95), choose
    not much of anything. Personally, I am very pleased with both this polto and his
    35mm and 85mm brothers. I'm only missing 20mm, but it's not time yet ...

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      26.05.2021

      It's still a fair 1.8 in exposure.

      Reply

      • Alex
        26.05.2021

        with such a wild vignette, he cannot be honest about the exposure in the open))

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        26.05.2021

        And yet it is 1.8

        Reply

  4. UstasFritZZZ
    26.05.2021

    After watching the examples, I wanted to write that the picture reminded me very much of the Carl Zeiss Sonnar FE 1.8 / 55 ZA T *, and you already indicated this in the review. Nikon was able to make a worthy fifty kopeck piece of the new generation!

    Reply

  5. varezhkin
    26.05.2021

    Finally, the Z-ki got to the review! Thank you!

    Reply

  6. B. R. P.
    26.05.2021

    What about the Z7 review?)

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      27.05.2021

      I will make a note with personal impressions

      Reply

      • Nicholas
        28.05.2021

        Now a note about Nikon Z7 II is better. :)

        Reply

      • B. R. P.
        28.05.2021

        Nikon Z9 :)

        Reply

  7. Levite
    27.05.2021

    Compared to the Tokina Opera 50 mm f / 1.4, what would you take on the Nikon z7?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      27.05.2021

      I would prefer 1.4, albeit with chromatic. Dimensions don't really bother me. But the question of how Tokina will work with FTZ is unknown to me. Personally, I would try the Sigma Art 50 / 1.4 in a used condition. with FTZ.

      Reply

      • Dim
        28.05.2021

        Do you think that the likelihood that Tokina or Sigma - Nikon will block autofocus with the next firmware of the carcass or in the next model is vanishingly small?

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        28.05.2021

        I'm not talking about the likelihood of blocking, but about the quality of autofocus with the native FTZ adapter. Some lenses do not work with it at all, some do not give af, and some do not allow aperture control, with some af is lost. How well Tokina will work with him - I don't know, you need to look, look for information.

        Reply

  8. Roman D
    28.05.2021

    In fact, there is exactly one stop between 0.95, 1.2 and 1.8. So there is nothing to be surprised at. It used to be clumsy, but now it's okay.

    Reply

    • Victor
      28.05.2021

      "Actually, there is exactly one stop between 0.95, 1.2 and 1.8."

      Actually no))

      Reply

    • Alexey
      28.05.2021

      one stop is sqrt (2)

      Reply

  9. ztgarry
    28.07.2022

    I can say that wine can be smartly sharp at 1.8, and it doesn’t change much, even if it’s ugly..
    I’ll say this - even earlier, you troch nailed 1.8G to increase the sharpness - then it’s not necessary. 1.8 here already sharp here like G version here on f4.
    ale…
    The new Z lens has introduced a handwriting .. character .. xs yak nazivatitse. Vіn too technically perfect.
    And that sharpness is not always necessary, in a portrait it’s a bit too much. The picture became more dry.
    Maybe I haven’t dealt with him enough yet, but first of all, I didn’t have a wow. As soon as you win 1.8G (or 1.4G) via the ftz adapter, and you take photos exclusively .. then I would say that there is no great sensation to replace the Z version with the Z version. And if you really want to - it would be great to take yoga on the cob for a test. I think the focus is metal here, and the bayonet part is also metal. The autofocus motor is a little cold in a quiet environment, the sound of the motor is not lost on the video recording. Maybe someday I'll die in Z 50mm 1.8S, but for now the chemistry has not become)

    Reply

  10. Vlad
    03.07.2023

    the aperture can be curved and curved smoothly on the video, so it can be programmed on the ring

    Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer