answers: 29

  1. koba
    11.05.2021

    According to the given photos, I personally really like this lens. It somewhat resembles pictures from CCTV lenses, only several times better for the full format. I wonder how much such a lens can cost if you find it and remake it for Nikon, for example?

    Reply

    • Rodion
      11.05.2021

      You asked me the same thing about 100 / 1.7, but it remained at the level of conversations. This lens is compatible with Nikon anyway. The lens costs $ 300.

      Reply

      • koba
        11.05.2021

        Yes, I asked and planned to buy, but at that time there were a lot of unforeseen expenses, I still pay, and I really put this lens in the first place for purchase, as soon as I can immediately order it. I just revisited the pictures from that lens too, they are both great, but I really liked this one. I often use CCTV 25mm / 1.4 on crop and always looked for something similar, but without its flaws on Nikon, now I know that this one is what I was looking for, I did not even hope that this could exist on a full frame, usually revised normal photo lenses, but there are no such explosive bokeh, or there are absolutely correct and excellent bokeh (for example, on the modern Sigma 135 / 1.8), but still without emotion, and it costs like a used car. So, I'm starting to save $ 300.

        Reply

      • Andrei
        11.05.2021

        Are there any unexpected expenses in China? Well, that can't be.

        Reply

      • koba
        12.05.2021

        Not in China, outside of China. As you probably understand, all people who work outside their country, especially if this country is Georgia and the like, then not only most, but almost all of their salaries and other incomes are sent home to support their families, relatives, etc. In China, there are very few unforeseen expenses.

        Reply

      • koba
        02.06.2021

        Rodion, hello! You emailed me today, right?

        Reply

      • Rodion
        02.06.2021

        Yes, right.

        Reply

      • koba
        02.06.2021

        Thank you!

        Reply

      • koba
        03.06.2021

        By the way, I didn't make out from the photos, can I screw a protective filter to it? If so, what size?

        Reply

      • Rodion
        03.06.2021

        I didn’t foresee such a possibility in this version. There the lens is not too vulnerable - it doesn’t stick out.

        Reply

  2. Max kotov
    11.05.2021

    Nice and artistic, I'm impressed

    Reply

  3. enlilA
    11.05.2021

    I didn't speak it.

    Reply

  4. Rodion Eshmakov
    13.05.2021

    Out of interest, I looked at the product catalog of the Izyum Instrument-Making Plant today. In fact, the glass catalog is almost the same as that of LZOS. Except for OK-4 low-dispersion glass. Products include levels, scopes, optics for armored night vision devices. Too bad they don't even try into civilian products, with the exception of microscopes.
    Website: http://www.ipz.com.ua/index.php?option=com_content&view=section&layout=blog&id=5&Itemid=86

    Reply

    • Jea reth
      16.05.2021

      And we, as always, everything sensible to the defense industry goes ... What rockets! Hmm ...
      By the way, you reminded me of one question that I somehow wanted to ask. Actually, recently they were picking a four-wheeled trash in the garage of my friend, who he proudly calls, as it is fashionable now, a “project”. Well, I - just for the company to twist the nuts. During the next smoke break, on the rack I came across such an interesting suitcase among all other trash - khaki color, all military, with the mysterious inscription "PNV-57E". Well, it's clear that somewhere a military night vision device was slammed from somewhere. That one, as it turned out, was intended for mechanized drivers, and in general, in the opinion of people from the network, the device, as it turned out, was not useless (completely useless). In the briefcase lay a completely stunned copy, already without a headset and a hint of live wiring. But I was very interested in the lenses before the image intensifier tubes. On that glass they were killed by some kind of dregs, as if by mold, which is very sad. But then there was an instruction for this wonderful unit. And there, among other things, there was a sketch with an eyepiece cut. A very interesting lens: 9 lenses, the focal point is 37mm ... And what is most interesting - it can be twisted from the eyepiece, sits on the thread.
      That's the question, actually. Have you come across such optics for an hour? There is something for a good resolution in the passport indicated, and in general, the optical scheme is interesting and heaped up some ...

      Reply

      • Rodion
        16.05.2021

        There is such a thing. It will not stand on the camera because of the segment, even on the A7. But these are the damn nine-lens 37 / 1.0 Zonnars ...

        Reply

      • Jea reth
        16.05.2021

        So that's right, I saw something like a zonnaropod in the first groups of lenses ... I had a feeling that it needed to be shoved right next to the matrix, if it was sitting almost on the image intensifier. Is it really possible not to directly drown in any way like a lens block Yu-12? Or the frame will not fit there? I just didn't unscrew it, didn't check it. And I have nowhere to go with such ROs.
        It is better not to develop this topic though Otherwise, all mirrorless people will start chasing binocular night vision devices like the same cyclops. Avito's price tags will jump up, but airsoft players will not forgive us for this.

        Reply

      • Rodion
        16.05.2021

        He will touch the shutter anyway. Even if you drown.

        Reply

      • Rodion
        16.05.2021

        Cyclops, by the way, will also be))))

        Reply

      • Jea reth
        16.05.2021

        It just would sound powerful - "Lens from NVG, adapted for UPC"!

        Reply

      • Rodion
        16.05.2021

        And you don’t spoil, soon you will see everything for yourself)))) I have been dealing with this topic for six months already.

        Reply

      • Rodion
        28.03.2022

        Yes, almost a year has passed, however. They say they have been waiting for the promised three years. It got a little faster.

        Reply

    • B. R. P.
      16.05.2021

      Once upon a time, glasses were made.

      Reply

  5. Novel
    07.07.2021

    Rodion, such a question. I bought myself two lenses, 35KP 75 / 1.8 and OKP-1-100-1 100 / 1.8 I want to put both of them on Canon with little blood, the Chinese have an adapter m65 - m42 and LOMO (62.5 mm) - m65. In the middle is the factory helicoid. Which helicoid would you recommend, do they have 17-31, 25-55, 35-90, so that you can use both at once? They are expensive, I don't want to take two.

    Reply

    • Rodion
      08.07.2021

      I think 25-55 is better, oddly enough. It seemed to me that he had a larger step.

      Reply

      • Novel
        08.07.2021

        Thank you!

        And what about the distance for infinity? It's hard for me to calculate. If we take the minimum of 25 + 3-4 millimeters for other washers, is this enough, a little, a lot? I can drown the tail of the lens into the helicoid, in principle, that is, the distance will be reduced, but I will have to increase it with macro rings on the M42.

        Reply

      • Rodion
        08.07.2021

        I think you will find it empirically without any problems when you mount the lens unit in the focuser.

        Reply

      • Novel
        08.07.2021

        Thank. I'll try.

        Reply

  6. Rodion
    28.09.2021

    Added sample photos on EOS 5d.
    By the way, the lens can be purchased from me - ask.

    Reply

  7. Rodion
    27.12.2022

    Still a very strange series of lenses 35kp 65-75 mm. All of them are made either by IPM (more often) or LOMO (rarely), and almost all of them, to a greater or lesser extent, have the same problem - misalignment. The problem applies even to completely new lenses taken from a sealed box. A coma on the axis, the size is about 1-2 of the smallest diameters of the scattering spot - that is, it is very noticeable even on cameras with a bold pixel. In search of a good copy, as stated in the review, you can spend a lot of time, but the ideal one is more likely not to be found. Something completely in the scoop was a useless acceptance system, and despite the fact that these lenses were very expensive.
    But the impressions about the RO and Zh series are very positive. Also, 35kp 85 and 100 1.8 Minsk with a bulk structure are generally not bad. And OKP4-80-1 turned out to be very good, despite the complexity of the circuit - no misalignments!

    Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer