answers: 32

  1. Sergei
    20.04.2021

    It is interesting to compare this subject with a similar Samyang 8 mm / 2,8 for Sony E.
    This fisheye costs about $ 260 on Amazon.
    And has good reviews on specialized sites.

    Reply

    • Michael
      20.04.2021

      The site has a review of it. Didn't dig much, but Samyang seems to be better

      Reply

      • Victor
        20.04.2021

        For a long time (maybe even now anyone has) this samyang could be taken on Avito, new, for 8,5k rubles, and there are enough used offers for 9-10tyr, ideally, in this 7artisan, taking this into account, it makes sense Little.

        Reply

      • in
        20.04.2021

        Dimensions, and a new partisan, not a used samyang

        Reply

      • Victor
        20.04.2021

        Firstly, the samyang on the NEW link, and it is even CHEAPER (even though it is better) than the new artisan in Ali. Secondly, even if he was used, what would he be? A manual fish without any electronics. The optics are clean and gut.

        Third, what are the “sizes”? Samyang - 60x56, 7artisan - 63x55.

        Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      20.04.2021

      It's from a DSLR camera, just transplanted under the Sony E. Much larger, better overall.

      Reply

      • Rodion Eshmakov
        20.04.2021

        Nooo, you are confusing it with 8 / 3.5, it seems)

        Reply

      • Victor
        20.04.2021

        100%

        8 / 2.8 is completely different, for sure in dimensions.

        Reply

  2. Vadim
    20.04.2021

    I bought myself the first version for $ 130, as a compact alternative to 12mm samyang, which I use on ff. Of course, the difference in quality is huge. But it's worth the money, especially if you do not consider the angles under magnification. If quality is required, you will spit from the lens. For mountain hikes, where size and weight are most important to me, I am more than satisfied. Well, for the video in general, it's super, there are not so noticeable corners with HA and soap

    Reply

    • Michael
      20.04.2021

      Well, in terms of size, weight, nothing special. The same nikkor weighs also and is similar in size

      Reply

      • Victor
        20.04.2021

        What is this Nikkor with an 8mm focal length and the same size? o_O

        Reply

      • in
        20.04.2021

        Add here also an adapter from Nikon to Sony ... And it will not be fun. Moreover, autofocus will be lost

        Reply

      • Victor
        20.04.2021

        It's hard to lose autofocus that wasn't there in the first place :)

        Reply

      • Michael
        20.04.2021

        I'm not talking about the Sony system, but about the lens. There, not only autofocus, but also the diaphragm will be lost.

        Reply

  3. Victor
    20.04.2021

    Thanks for your review. Yes, the lens is not optically perfect, but it is compact.

    I personally like the idea of ​​using such (or similar) compact fisheye, as a travel landscape with a compact mirrorless camera)) For now, I use an 8 / 3.5 SLR, but I have thoughts on the prospect of moving to a more compact version.

    Reply

  4. Paul
    20.04.2021

    It is a pity that the author did not mention Samyang 8 2,8 as an alternative to this lens. I had a partisan 12mm 2,8. I didn't really like it, the sharpness is somehow ugly, even on a covered one. I bought Samyang 8mm. and 12 immediately sold, much cooler!

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      20.04.2021

      Added, for some reason I was sure that 8mm 2.8 is only for SLR cameras.

      Reply

  5. Jankowsky
    20.04.2021

    Nikon 10.5 DX delivered to Sony E buries them all in place, all this poor China (forgot to mention the LAOWA brand, maybe they are better than others). Never seen a fish like this

    Record small MDF -2cm from the front of the lens. At the same time, a full-fledged macro-fish ringing almost all over the field at 2.8. Now I do not understand how I used to shoot on poor Samyanga with their terrible coma in the center, a general marriage. Nikon has only two drawbacks - strong chromaticity in contrast and the nature of distortion for an amateur - strongly knocks down and bends the periphery

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      20.04.2021

      He has 14 cm MDF.Don't confuse MDF with the working distance to the front lens.
      And don't forget that the new Nikon 10.5 / 2.8 costs $ 800, but not $ 140 like this 7Artisans.

      Reply

  6. R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
    19.10.2021

    In the description and on the MDF camera itself, 12 cm is indicated. In fact, it seems that no one has measured or checked it. Here is a picture taken with a Sony A5100 camera at 3,5 cm f 2,8. As you can see, sharp despite the open aperture and the minimum distance. Photo without processing, only converted RAW to JPG, not cropped. I liked the lens. Of course, it will not be in demand as much as the regular 16-50, but I will not part with it for sure.

    Reply

    • R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
      19.10.2021

      Sorry, confused MDF and working distance.

      Reply

      • R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
        19.10.2021

        Photo

        Reply

  7. R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
    27.12.2021

    I liked the lens. You can get an unusual angle - the first photo. The second photo shows that the vertical lines, even near the center, but not in the center, have deviations. I tried to make the next three photos almost according to the level. Good panoramic shots are obtained.

    Reply

    • R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
      27.12.2021

      Photo 2

      Reply

      • R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
        27.12.2021

        Photo 3

        Reply

      • R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
        27.12.2021

        Photo4

        Reply

      • R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
        27.12.2021

        Photo 5

        Reply

    • R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
      19.02.2022

      I would like to add to the advantages of the lens that in January I managed to make spherical panoramas in the gorges near the city of Dahab in Egypt. This is my first experience and I liked it. For panoramas, 7 vertical frames were enough. Open full screen mode.
      http://www.360cities.net/image/mountain-panorama-1#0.00,0.00,70.0
      https://www.360cities.net/image/panorama-of-the-mountain-gorge
      In addition, in the same place I took a macro shot without rings, only from a close distance of a small fossil with a diameter of 2 centimeters. Photo without cropping.
      I think there are still interesting opportunities for this lens. Now I won't part with it!

      Reply

      • R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
        20.02.2022

        More precisely, not spherical, but cylindrical.
        You should be able to edit your posts.

        Reply

  8. Victor
    27.12.2021

    M-yes ... Zaytselov is still. Frames with the sun-moon-lanterns are contraindicated for him (((

    Reply

    • R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
      03.01.2022

      Not all glare will spoil the frame. A matter of taste. Personally, everything suits me.

      Reply

      • Victor
        03.01.2022

        Glare is in most cases a defect, the result of an optical imperfection of the optics. Rarely are they appropriate, but not in these cases.

        However, it suits, and this is the main thing.

        Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer