A funny addition to my notes about 'The future of amateur photography in one picture'and'Smartphone excellence'. The video, although old, but relevant, I found here.
At the end of the video, if anyone does not understand, comes in Xiaomi Mi 10 with its 108 MP camera.
Materials on the topic
- Full frame mirrorless systems... Discussion, choice, recommendations.
- Cropped mirrorless systems... Discussion, choice, recommendations.
- Cropped mirrorless systems that have stopped or are no longer developing
- Digital SLR systems that have stopped or are no longer developing
- JVI or EVI (an important article that answers the question 'DSLR or mirrorless')
- About mirrorless batteries
- Simple and clear medium format
- High-speed solutions from Chinese brands
- All fastest autofocus zoom lenses
- All fastest AF prime lenses
- Mirrored full frame on mirrorless medium format
- Autofocus Speed Boosters
- One lens to rule the world
- The impact of smartphones on the photography market
- What's next (smartphone supremacy)?
- All announcements and novelties of lenses and cameras
Comments on this post do not require registration. Anyone can leave a comment.
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval.
Kindergarten of some kind! Someone clearly has nothing to do from idleness!
Who?
To the author of the comment at the beginning of the thread.
These capitalisms come up with these authors of the first comments to take money from the working class. Only arrived on their mind.
Those who come up with such stupid videos!
Come up smarter, what's the problem?
Can't be smarter.
“A critic is a person who says how he would do if he could” (folk wisdom) :-)
yes, nothing! just horrible. that's all!
The whole theory of Radozhiva is crossed out by one video!)))
for example, which one?
We urgently need to reorient ourselves to mobile phone camera reviews :-)
Jokes as a joke, but mobile phones are removed now quite well, since the appearance of sensors on "48", "64" (really 12 and 16) and so on MP, in some frames you will not find differences from inch compacts and with a magnifying glass, and this is something that means.
already - https://radojuva.com/2020/08/xiaomi-redmi-note-8-pro-64-mp-osnovnojj-kamery-samsung-isocell-plus/
In confirmation ...
...
To confirm that software bokeh is still far from perfect?)
Don't worry - the processors will become even more powerful, the marketers will be a little more advanced - and you will have bokeh for every taste.
I don’t worry about this at all - there is a smartphone that can do bokeh, but I don’t use this function.
And someday, of course, they will learn (and the power of the processors in general is already enough, but if we resort to online processing, as does the same faceapp ...
Yes, only someday. Not yet, that's what we're talking about.
It's a matter of time, and not particularly spoiled users often no longer see the difference between artificial and natural bokeh.
Enlighten, what's wrong with this boke?
First of all, by its unnaturalness.
But even if the author of the picture cannot understand what the jamb is with bokeh, you can read Arkady's post above and put up with it. :-)
For example, that 12MP is enough for a modern photographer who does not pretend to print posters ...
Add humor:
Damn, was that in The Simpsons too?
No, this is the same collage as in the video for this article. Here's the original:
Thank you for the clarification.
But the funny thing is that Homer comes with a phone (smartphone) in his hands.
“Zenith” no, suspiciously -_-
what is dead cannot die))
Moth
Take pictures with your phone; to measure pressure, pulse, calories for hours ... Cool. What's next?
What would you like?
And then - the direct connection of the device to the brain, saving memories directly to the cloud (this is shown in the 'Black Mirror'), and a bunch of buns.
Yeah, and only thought badly about BB (any coincidences are strictly random) - please, you two :-)
kopeck piece is just for the repost of what someone thought.
Wake up, 2021 is in the yard :)
For a long time they have been taking pictures on the phone, measuring calories (and reading messages) - for hours, in cars - they play video games, speakers, kettles and microwave ovens go online, people burn cell towers, while polls (and most importantly, voluntarily) fill out in detail on yourself an open dossier with photo and video attachments (evidence) ... the world is going crazy)
Yes, each thing should "do its job" well, and not try to replace others.
I doubt that instead of one smartphone, you would agree to shove in your pockets and carry with you all the time: phone, video player, navigator, game console, music player, laptop, electronic notebook, and of course a camera, of course, where without it :-)
There is no need to doubt.
Exactly. I am more than sure that Sergei does not carry all this with him.
Sergey or Victor may not be dragging, but Onotole or someone else is dragging. Why not, everyone's personal choice.
Yes, for God's sake, can someone prevent a person from doing strange and illogical things? :(
Such, for example, how to use expensive universal devices that do not really do well any of the functions that they supposedly can?
There is perhaps the concept of reasonable sufficiency.
And already existing devices do a lot well enough to use it without reservations. I will not list everything again))
But, I repeat, no one can prohibit someone from doing something (if this does not contradict the legislation and other regulations and local rules :))
A family key for the price of a tool cabinet is the analogy I was looking for. Well, it's compact, yes.
I agree with you. But sometimes mediocre work is not needed at all. Well, what's the use of roughly measuring your pressure / temperature? Phones take pictures, but they cannot compete with cameras. I mean, every thing should do WELL what it is meant to do. (this is my opinion).
And the video is cool.
Phones are already quite capable of competing (and it should be noted, they are already doing it) with pocket-sized soap dishes with a small matrix size.
That is why the latter are currently extinct as a class, only an inch is somehow holding on.
They cannot compete! The main thing that has been achieved in phones is an excellent display of a picture taken with your camera on its screen, and under any lighting conditions. As soon as this picture is copied to the computer and opened with a display on the monitor, everything falls into place and it becomes clear - what a garbage it is, compared to a normal photo camera - a picture from a smartphone camera, with any!
Then come up with a reason why the thumbnails died out.
"They cannot compete!"
A complete misunderstanding of the subject is immediately evident.
I can recommend looking at how modern smartphones with 48, 64 and 108MP sensors shoot, so as not to write obvious nonsense in the future.
why look at it? let's print the picture from the camera at least on A3. I just barked with Fujifils. frames from their cameras when printed cause only tears.
This is not a photograph, but a picture completely created using software processing. If it were just an image from the matrix, then it would be scary to look at it (especially in low light)!
I agree. Girlfriend Sansung M51 with 64MP camera. Indoor shots are terrible.
Alexey is recommended to read more carefully what he answers. And it was written above that phones successfully compete with soap dishes (which they have already eaten) and this is a fact that is simply stupid to argue with.
I wish the rest of theorists to straighten their hands if they get worse pictures with normal phones than with a soap dish.
The phone camera is often needed for the application
whatsapp for work.
Well, and so to remove something not very important. On the same vacation, if the subject is not particularly valuable, but it is important to shoot (exchange rate, restaurant or bar menu, etc.)
By the way, at the expense of specialized solutions - I was faced with the fact that the phone for video is often not enough.
Not permissions, but not satisfied with the sound quality and stub work often.
I used to look closely at DJi Osmo Pocket, and now at DJI Pocket 2:
https://www.dji.com/ru/pocket-2
I watch a lot of it being shot in 4K and the quality is good at the output.
Correctly! A phone camera is needed for skype and vatsapov, and also take pictures of ads! She's no good for anything else. But still, in principle, with good lighting, video clips will go to shoot!
I also agree. I often use my phone camera myself. But focus on the camera rather than the phone's ability to call ..? And the dialers have stopped in their development. And the cameras are still progressing.
Dialers (in the photo part) stopped developing ???? Are the fotik progressing? Didn't you confuse anything?)
Dialers in the “dialer” part.
And, well, everything seems to be pretty good there and so. The network coverage is constantly expanding, the battery supply (if you do not use smartphone functions but exclusively make calls) has long jumped the energy supply in the "legendary" black and white Nokia, again please you, all these free Skype vatsap, video communication is free, that's all ...
Where do the dialers go? To degrade those who poke at them? They don't go anywhere else!
Do not try to row everyone with the same brush, alcohol is also sold in any grocery store, but not all who visit them are complete alcoholics.
If you do not find application for progress and technology, ssb, as they say.
Yes, this is not progress - these are methods for the degradation of the population!
Justify your thesis. So far, there is no sense in it to be seen behind the flow of meaningless emotions.
Cool video. A drop of humor, okay
Is that humor? This is commercial moronism!
Have you been waiting for the video with Petrosyan?
I didn't expect anything at all! By the way, today I am reading an article - “many vending machines (such as at gas stations, refills and all that) will not issue receipts, and a QR code will appear on the screen for scanning by a smartphone”! I'm shocked! Which smartphone? What's this? This is a direct imposition that people would buy smartphones. Yes, this is generally some kind of chaos! Why the heck do you need it? Feed the speculators? The phone is needed as a phone and nothing more! And mindless poking at the screen is a path to complete degradation!
Paaaaddd keep it! We are waiting for the Luddites to wake up. So we will win!
I suspect that the comrade still lives in a cave, roasts mammoths at the stake and walks into the bushes with a burdock in his hands. But do you see the damned speculators ... blah blah, and further in the text: D
I don't have a smartphone or a cell phone in general. there are two city numbers and one satellite phone, so as not to be dependent on the whims of the authorities in the territory of my residence. and the satellite operator does not have traffic touchdown points in this territory, this is me so that no questions arise.
Picture - an allegory of KMZ
An old boyish tradition, if there is nothing to do, they are measured with pipettes.
And so a good video, if there was a number with the number of megapixels above the name of the companies, it would be clearer;)
And in my opinion Nikon (on video) merged early. Before the invasion of the BZK, they were still niche.
I do not even consider competition with phones.
It's like the Yakuza in the video. All the humor was about their tattoos.