answers: 9

  1. Molchanov + Yuri
    16.10.2020

    Thank you for the article. I myself was surprised at the size of many lenses, but I didn't think about cinema at all. Now everything fell into place, thanks!

    Reply

  2. Onotole
    16.10.2020

    But I'm interested in this: is it that the lenses were originally developed for the film industry and therefore have such huge dimensions can serve as at least some kind of excuse in the eyes of an ordinary average static photographer / videographer, who then carries all this on himself for days on end?
    Well, like his hands are already falling off by the evening, but the thought warms up - “but this lens, on the other hand, wasn’t huhry-muhry, it was made for cinema, there are sharp edges and corners I have, clients will certainly thank me for that. Or maybe even money will be thrown on top, for such and such corners ... "

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      16.10.2020

      someone needs this, for example, those who do not want to mess with the medium format and are not afraid of the size at all, but they want to get the maximum quality

      Reply

    • Victor
      16.10.2020

      With what, and with 40mm sigma really surpassed itself.

      Who is in the subject, tell us why you should choose 40 and not 35, say?

      Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        16.10.2020

        Perspective distortion, especially in medium and close-up shots, especially of people. But in 99% I would not be able to determine the difference. And, of course, in some ways it is optically better than 35 and 50.

        Reply

      • Victor
        17.10.2020

        I, too, would not have caught the difference in perspective distortion, if the paired images were not closely examined, which of course no one does.

        And so 40 may be better (slightly), but whether it is worth a two-fold increase in weight and price is another question.

        Reply

  3. Sergei
    17.10.2020

    I have been using the Sigma 18-35 f1.8 Art lens for several months. Yes, it is quite heavy, but due to its large size it is convenient to hold it. Sometimes it feels like it's not the lens on the camera, but vice versa (Nikon 7500). Well, I also had to change the bag, since the assembly is quite large. And still I do not regret this choice.

    Reply

    • Neo
      17.10.2020

      Any 24-70 / 2.8 will be heavier, 18-35 is like a whopper, but you get used to it quickly. Whopper 50-100 / 1.8

      Reply

      • Victor
        17.10.2020

        Canon 24-70 II is not that not heavier, but even lighter by a few grams :)

        Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer