Announcement: FUJINON ASPHERICAL LENS SUPER EBC XF 10-24mm 1: 4 R OIS WR

On October 15, 2020 the FUJINON ASPHERICAL LENS SUPER EBC XF 10-24mm 1: 4 R OIS WR lens was officially presented.

FUJINON ASPHERICAL LENS SUPER EBC XF 10-24mm 1: 4 R OIS WR

FUJINON ASPHERICAL LENS SUPER EBC XF 10-24mm 1: 4 R OIS WR

Basic properties

  • For Fujifilm Mirrorless APS-C Cameras with X Mount
  • 3.5 steps integrated image stabilizer
  • Relative Hole: 1: 4-1: 22
  • Focal length: 10-24 mm (EGF 15-36 mm)
  • MDF: 0.24 m
  • Maximum magnification ratio 1: 6.25
  • Optical design: 14 elements in 10 groups, includes four aspherical elements and 4 ED elements. Most likely the optical design is identical to the version 10-24mm 1: 4 XF R OIS
  • Aperture: 7 rounded blades
  • Focusing step motor, internal focusing
  • Filter Diameter: 72 mm
  • Weight: 385 gram
  • Protected enclosure
  • Price: about 1000 dollars. All prices for modern Fujifilm lenses can be viewed here.

Appearance

All Fujinon X-mount Lenses

Fixes:

  1. 14 mm 1: 2.8 XF R
  2. 16 mm 1: 1.4 XF R WR Nano-gi
  3. 16 mm 1: 2.8 XF R WR
  4. 18 mm 1: 2 XF R
  5. 23 mm 1: 1.4 XF R
  6. 23 mm 1: 2 XF R WR
  7. 27 mm 1: 2.8 XF
  8. 35 mm 1:2 XC
  9. 35 mm 1: 2 XF R WR
  10. 35 mm 1: 1.4 XF R
  11. 50 mm 1: 2 XF R WR
  12. 50 mm 1: 1 XF R WR
  13. 56 mm 1: 1.2 XF R
  14. 56 mm 1: 1.2 XF R APD
  15. 60 mm 1: 2.4 XF Macro R
  16. 80 mm 1: 2.8 XF R LM OIS WR MACRO
  17. 90 mm 1: 2 XF R LM WR
  18. 200 mm 1: 2 XF R LM OIS WR

Zuma:

  1. 8-16 mm 1: 2.8 XF R LM WR Nano-gi
  2. 10-24 mm 1: 4 XF R OIS
  3. 10-24 mm 1: 4 XF R OIS WR
  4. 15-45 mm 1: 3.5-5.6 XC OIS PZ
  5. +16 1: 3.5-5.6 XC OIS
  6. +16 1: 3.5-5.6 XC OIS II
  7. 16-55 mm 1: 2.8 XF R LM WR Nano-gi
  8. 16-80 mm 1: 4 XF R OIS WR
  9. 18-55 mm 1: 2.8-4 XF R LM OIS
  10. 18-55 mm T2.9 MKX Cinema
  11. 18-135 mm 1: 3.5-5.6 XF R LM OIS WR
  12. 50-140 mm 1: 2.8 XF R LM OIS WR Nano-gi
  13. 50-135 mm T2.9 MKX Cinema
  14. 50-230 mm 1: 4.5-6.7 XC OIS
  15. 50-230 mm 1: 4.5-6.7 XC OIS II
  16. 55-200 mm 1: 3.5-4.8 XF R LM OIS
  17. 100-400 mm 1: 4.5-5.6 XF R LM OIS WR

Legend:

  • XF - Advanced Fujifilm X Lenses
  • XC - budget, lightweight and compact lenses for Fujifilm X mount
  • SUPER EBC (Electron Beam Coating) - Electron Beam Coating Optics
  • Nano-GI (Nano Gradient Index) - a special nano-enlightenment optics that changes the refractive index at the junction of glass and air
  • OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) - built-in optical image stabilization
  • R (Ring) - a separate ring for iris control
  • LM (Linear Motor) - linear focusing motor
  • WR (Weather Resistant) - all-weather lens type
  • Ashperical - aspherical elements in the optical scheme of the lens
  • Macro - Macro Lenses
  • APD (Apodization) - a lens with an internal non-removable gradient filter
  • PZ (Power Zoom) - electronic zoom
  • Cinema - lenses designed for movie shooting
  • II - the second version of the lens

For Fujifilm X there are also autofocus lenses from third-party manufacturers:

All Fujifilm X interchangeable lens digital cameras

Materials on the topic

  1. System selection, polling
  2. Full-frame mirrorless systems. List of all cameras and lenses to them. Mirrorless fever, discussion, choice and more
  3. All cropped mirrorless cameras, discussion of systems
  4. Mirrorless crop that has stopped or is stopping its development
  5. Fallen Digital Mirror Systems
  6. JVI or EVI
  7. About mirrorless batteries
  8. Simple and clear medium format
  9. Smartphone Impact
  10. All announcements and news
  11. What's next?

Here on the site, comments do not require any registration. In the comments, you can ask a question on the topic and you will definitely be answered, and you can also express your opinion, leave your feedback or describe your experience. For the selection of photographic equipment, I recommend E-Catalog. Many little things for the photo can be found on AliExpress.

The material was prepared by Arkady Shapoval. Take a look to the Radozhiva group on Facebook.

Add a comment:

Comments: 48, on the topic: Announcement: FUJINON ASPHERICAL LENS SUPER EBC XF 10-24mm 1: 4 R OIS WR

  • Eugene

    For half the price there is a trained tamron 10-24 g2, though for dslr. But no one has canceled the adapters yet.

    • Arkady Shapoval

      Remind me, how much does an autofocus adapter cost, for example, with Canon EF -> Fuji X?

      • Eugene

        HZ. I have a canon)))
        The first post is to the fact that the price is not quite adequate, and fujik will eventually have problems like an olik. IMHO of course.

      • Eugene

        Answering the question:

        • Eugene

          +:

        • Arkady Shapoval

          $ 200 + $ 500 for Tamron 10-24. At the same time, it is not a fact that it will always work adequately and work with certain cameras. It's easier to add another 300 and take a native one, while the native Fujinon will also have a stub and all-weather protection.

          • Victor

            In addition, this whole city with not weak dimensions (the adapter is the same) will be deprived of all dust and dust, of course.
            Not to mention the fact that it would be good to first compare the quality of the picture on these lenses, maybe there is nothing to discuss here.

            However, to each his own.

            • Eugene

              Someone may think that I am drowning for tamron, or even worse against fuj - this is not so. I am depressed that all producers “tasted apples” and decided that prices can be driven to the sky. Especially hearing their complaints about the stagnation of the photographic equipment market. And do not talk about the dollar rate - a thousand bucks is a thousand bucks, and f4 on a crop is f4 on a crop. Canon 16-35 f4 for the same thousand and this fuj is not an equivalent exchange. And considering the prices for fuja carcasses, questions arise. No need to go for examples, hello olik.

              • B. R. P.

                Agree.

              • twm

                The “regular” (without WR) XF 10-24 f / 4 has been selling for the same 1k USD for five years already. And those who have chosen Fuj - they are unlikely to switch to the Canon mirror.

                Well, yes, yes: either the Canon L series or the XF Fuji - everything costs a lot of money. And this policy of bullying prices - it was not invented today, alas.

              • Victor

                Explain this “taking into account the prices for fuji carcasses”, but rather let's compare.

                Let's take a pre-top crop cannon carcass and a pre-top top fuji carcass.

                90d - 82990r
                X-T3 - 81990 rubles.

                At the same time: the second has a less noisy matrix, better AF, 4k 60 FPS (versus 30), higher burst speed and buffer volume, as well as a developed system of high-quality optics for crop (which cannot be said about the Canon).

                Now what? Not everything is so unambiguous in the prices of carcasses?))

              • Eugene

                Well, let's tweak together:
                Compare the prices of white and gray equipment, well, this is ... white fuj is the price per weave of wooden ones, which is closer to 6D mII (RP is like 90d). And here is the choice between top crop or the initial FF. And in such a situation, when the price of optics is the same, but whatever one may say about it, the choice is really ambiguous.
                Does x-t3 remove 60 fps without a crop? Yes, yes, where is the dualpixel to Fuj.
                10 and 11 frames per second is a huge difference.
                XT4 how much does it cost ??? Maybe you don't need to add 30% on the advice of Arkady, but it is better to add only 25% and take R6 right away?

              • Victor

                Well, let's cross ... it's .. well, somehow yourself, in general, but here it is better to compare.

                I have quoted the prices for carcasses of white supplies in ONE store, with an official guarantee for both for 2 years.

                What other arguments will there be against the “price of fuji carcasses”?

              • Eugene

                Or not add anything at all and take the Z6?
                Fuj followed in the footsteps of Olik, good luck to him.

              • Eugene

                In which shop? Well buy there, take a chance.
                Off price on the Fuja website is 100000 without a ruble. And this with skidons on the occasion of the release of the new XT4. That is, the leftovers will be sold, so what? And how much does the XT4 cost?
                And in general, initially it was about the prices of optics for crop and FF, and you stuck into a body that is no longer released, but give out the rest.

              • Victor

                Explain why you posted a picture with the cost of xt4, when even a 2018 camera from fuji (obviously, I'm talking about an HT3) surpasses the photo-video capabilities of a 19-year camera from canon?

                Initially, I “stuck” (rested?) Into a baseless phrase that they say “fuji carcasses price tag ogogo”, so I gave an example of even a lagging Canon, which (omaygat) costs as much as fuj, but does NOT have on the crop of a developed optics system.

                By the way. Canon then you have a mirror, I suppose? Google the statistics for DSLR / mirrorless camera sales for 2020 for fun.

              • Eugene

                And Canon never tried to crop, and I gave you an example of the price of a crop for fudge and ff canon, and I was outraged by the crop optics at the price of ff optics, and the crop of a carcass at the price of ff carcasses. I do not like the canon, look at Sonya Mark3 or Nikon Zet6. I tell you what now, you tell me about yesterday. Let's then remember about xt10, xt1, let's compare them.

              • Victor

                And we can be indignant with anything, but it is obvious that if no one took the Fuj, it would not be in the place where it is now. Do not forget that NOT ALL photographers need a full frame with its bulkiness (yes, lenses, especially zoom lenses for a full frame have not yet learned how to make small due to physical limitations)

                What's up with xt1 kosyachny? Elastic bands lag behind from time?)) You can then remember about a jamb penny with a flying off mirror, that's where the jamb is so jamb)))

          • Novel

            The new Tamron 10-24 also has a stub and moisture protection, although it costs more than the old one, not $ 500 for sure.

            In any case, if you have pro-optics on Fuji, it makes sense to take pro-optics for Fuji, crop their main direction, and not the dying (alas), like Canon's.

            • Victor

              I looked closely at the samples of the Tamron 10-24mm f / 3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD (I think that it was mentioned by the opponent above), in comparison with the previous Fuj 10-24, nmv, Fuj is a cut above the open, at least here such is the subjective conclusion. In light of this, it makes no sense to compare their cost.

              • Eugene

                I’m sure that you don’t have fuja, you’re caught out of boredom. It is boring to explain everything to you, to argue with you is stupid. There was a Temka about a whale shit nikon z for an overpricing, too lazy to look, but weren't you protecting that craft for an hour? Painfully similar style.

              • Victor

                In general, yes, you are right, it is stupid to argue, because initially thin arguments ended altogether, as we can see)))

              • Novel

                Eugene, the criterion “I have no money for this” is not a criterion at all when evaluating equipment. Try to abstract from this, you will never have money for everything. This is not a reason to turn into a fox from the fable of Krylov (or rather Aesop), but in the modern interpretation - Rogzin and a reusable spacecraft, and think that "well, you don't need to."

                If I had some extra money, I would have got myself a fudge and a few fixes. Actually, it was conceived just like that - an advanced amateur travel phone with compact high-quality high-aperture fixes, making full use of the capabilities of a reduced (but at the same time quite sufficient) matrix. Considering the price and the chosen bar, high-quality zooms came up. It's good. Is there a buyer? There is. This buyer isn't you? Well, they won't be able to please everyone.

              • Victor

                I will say this, now the compact rangefinder-style x-e3 is on sale complete with a pretty good 18-55 for 57k rubles. If you think that you can take a similar in capabilities (new, of course) from a mirror, and even a mirrorless of the same Canon, it turns out that absolutely nothing)))

  • Victor

    Those couch analyst theorists.

    • Eugene

      Fans of mikra also shouted about sofas, about technology, about teach physics ...

      • Victor

        Micra has not gone anywhere, Panasonic is alive and well, Olympus SOLD the photo business to another company that does NOT plan to wind down production.

        Negative dynamics is now in all branches of photographic equipment, all "thanks" to smartphones, but sales of SLR cameras are falling faster.

        • Novel

          Plus covid. Pros are not up to filming, and even more so for tourists.

        • Michael

          Sold for a reason. Olik has business, really not very much - I can smell another Pentax. It's a pity, I liked the olik

          • Alexey

            Anyway, we say “Thank you” to Yoshihisa Maitani for the excellent optics, which hundreds of thousands of people around the world continue to use today.

          • Arkady Shapoval

            Panasonic has a full frame, Fuji has a medium format (there is room to grow, there is room to go). Olik has only micra. Pentax does not have mirrorless cameras (hello from Pentax K-01 APS-C Kf = 1.5x, which was nerfed, and all sorts of Pentax Q10, Pentax Q7 and Pentax Qs with crop from 4 to 6).

            • Victor

              Strictly speaking, Panasonic da Fuji will only be able to “grow” with the full sale of the “junior” system, and existing lenses, telephoto cameras, and portrait painters, for example, may well remain on the canyon.

              • Arkady Shapoval

                More or less like this. But it's not a fact that FF lenses were or will be used on the crop and the transition is not always easy. But photographers are like cacti - they “grow” slowly.

            • Michael

              Well, you can grow with a different system, especially since you can change the same Fudge crop to SF, the same as Olik to SF) And to grow is also a loose concept. As the main camera, especially for the pros, using the ITF may not be justified. As a "pocket" very much (I bought myself Olik for these purposes). About Pentax it meant that “the best DSLR on the planet Earth” was sold and resold many times, and he drags on a rather miserable existence.

              • Arkady Shapoval

                Nothing, you need to wait a little more, for 2 years now he has been developing the TOP cropped camera (I don't even know if this is sarcasm or not)

              • Michael

                Yes, I really want to cry ...

        • Eugene

          Nikon did not plan to do ff, canon did not plan to switch to bzk, olik did not plan to get rid of photoseparating. And only Kodak, as he planned not to switch to digital, did not switch.

          • Michael

            Only it was developed and developed))

            • Eugene

              And he accepted death from his horse ...

          • Victor

            Kodak has generally released a number of full-frame carcasses.

            • Eugene

              More precisely one, even more precisely a digital back for Nikon f3, with a crop of 1,8.

              • Victor

                I advise you to familiarize yourself with the DSC pro 14n models, and the DSC pro SLR, which came out on both Nikon and Canon mounts, this as for the full-frame ones, there was also a 560 model with a 1.3 crop, and the well-known sphere of the digital rear probe. Maybe there were some more, in any case it is more than one.

                It is useful to know history, especially when you start to talk about it)))

              • Victor

                Wowow, this is not even counting a whole bunch of digital backs for Nikons, series 100,200,300, 400 (with corresponding crops, where there were 1,8, 1,3 and so on), it's just that all these cameras are not very useful today, but full-frame DCS pro and software this day, amateurs live and use.

                Such is Kodak's “one” camera, yes.

            • Arkady Shapoval

              actually only 3, and then almost the same thing. But here he was making just an insane number of backs, and all sorts of the first quasi-full-frame digital SLR cameras: Nikon E2, E2S, E2N, E2NS, E3, E3S, Fujifilm Fujix DS-505, DS-515, DS-505A, DS-515A, DS-560, DS-565 are all based on Kodak sensors. And how many backdrops there were is difficult to count.

          • Arkady Shapoval

            Kodak was just the pioneer of digital and developed the whole digital architecture of the PRO 14 Digital Camera Architecture, but it didn’t work, it just didn’t work for him and Micro 4/3 with the only Pixpro S-1.

            • Victor

              Well, pikspro C1 was a device from a completely different company, only with a “kodak” nameplate on the panel.

              In any case, there were not so few cameras from “that very” Kodak, considering the various formats including digital backs for Nikonov. And matrices from this company were found in Olympus, for example (4/3, not micro).

        • Pokemon

          TwiceCrop is coming soon Everything.
          Sony sold its successful laptop division to the same office.
          Where is Vaio now?
          In complete nowhere.
          I noticed the people filming the video began to get rid of Olympus, and someone from the Panasonic double-crop. Some go to Sony, others to Panasonic. Until recently, a video was shot on double-crop. People are leaving either to Fuji (earlier on a6300-6500, but now it is not entirely profitable, and there is no development of the line (not everyone appreciated the a6600), or to ff.
          Physics (sensor size) and prices decide.

  • Eugene

    Arkady tries, longreads scribbles about bzk vs zk, ovi vs evi, prospects and so on, and then a simple announcement was bombed, even the pentax got it.)))

Add a comment

Copyright © Radojuva.com. Blog Author - Photographer in Kiev Arkady Shapoval. 2009-2020

English-version of this article https://radojuva.com/en/2020/10/fujinon-aspherical-lens-super-ebc-xf-10-24mm-14-r-ois-wr/