On September 3, 2020, the FUJINON ASPHERICAL LENS SUPER EBC XF 50mm 1: 1 R WR lens was announced.
FUJINON ASPHERICAL LENS SUPER EBC XF 50mm 1: 1 R WR
Basic properties
- For Fujifilm Mirrorless APS-C Cameras with X Mount
- Fastest autofocus lens for mirrorless cameras
- Relative aperture: 1:1.0-1: 16
- Focal Length: 50mm (EGF 75 mm)
- Minimum Focus Distance: 70 centimeters
- Maximum magnification ratio 1: 12.5
- Optical design: 12 elements in 9 groups, includes 1 aspherical element and 2 ED elements
- Enlightenment Super EBC
- DC motor (direct current)
- Aperture: 9 rounded blades
- Filter Diameter: 77 mm
- Weight: 845 gram
- Protected enclosure
- Price: about 1500 dollars. All prices for modern Fujifilm lenses can be viewed here.
- Take a look at the sections'Autofocus fixes with the highest aperture','The fastest zoom lenses'
and 'One lens to control the world'
Appearance
All Fujinon X-mount Lenses
Fixes:
- 14 mm 1: 2.8 XF R
- 16 mm 1: 1.4 XF R WR Nano-gi
- 16 mm 1: 2.8 XF R WR
- 18 mm 1: 1.4 XF R WR LM
- 18 mm 1: 2 XF R
- 23 mm 1: 1.4 XF R
- 23 mm 1: 1.4 XF R WR LM
- 23 mm 1: 2 XF R WR
- 27 mm 1: 2.8 XF
- 27 mm 1: 2.8 XF R WR
- 30 mm 1: 2.8 XF R WR LM
- 33 mm 1: 1.4 XF R WR LM
- 35 mm 1:2 XC
- 35 mm 1: 2 XF R WR
- 35 mm 1: 1.4 XF R
- 50 mm 1: 2 XF R WR
- 50 mm 1: 1 XF R WR
- 56 mm 1: 1.2 XF R .
- 56 mm 1: 1.2 XF R APD (11/8)
- 56 mm 1: 1.2 XF R WR .
- 60 mm 1: 2.4 XF Macro R
- 80 mm 1: 2.8 XF R LM OIS WR MACRO
- 90 mm 1: 2 XF R LM WR
- 200 mm 1: 2 XF R LM OIS WR
Zuma:
- 8-16 mm 1: 2.8 XF R LM WR Nano-gi
- 10-24 mm 1: 4 XF R OIS
- 10-24 mm 1: 4 XF R OIS WR
- 15-45 mm 1: 3.5-5.6 XC OIS PZ
- 16-50 1: 3.5-5.6 XC OIS
- 16-50 1: 3.5-5.6 XC OIS II
- 16-55 mm 1: 2.8 XF R LM WR Nano-gi
- 16-80 mm 1: 4 XF R OIS WR
- 18-55 mm 1: 2.8-4 XF R LM OIS
- 18-55 mm T2.9 MKX Cinema
- 18-120 mm 1: 4 XF LM PZ WR
- 18-135 mm 1: 3.5-5.6 XF R LM OIS WR
- 50-140 mm 1: 2.8 XF R LM OIS WR Nano-gi
- 50-135 mm T2.9 MKX Cinema
- 50-230 mm 1: 4.5-6.7 XC OIS
- 50-230 mm 1: 4.5-6.7 XC OIS II
- 55-200 mm 1: 3.5-4.8 XF R LM OIS
- 70-300 mm 1: 4-5.6 XF R LM OIS WR
- 100-400 mm 1: 4.5-5.6 XF R LM OIS WR
- 150-600 mm 1: 5.6-8 XF R LM OIS WR
Legend:
- XF - Advanced Fujifilm X Lenses
- XC - budget, lightweight and compact lenses for Fujifilm X mount
- SUPER EBC (Electron Beam Coating) - Electron Beam Coating Optics
- Nano-GI (Nano Gradient Index) - a special nano-enlightenment optics that changes the refractive index at the junction of glass and air
- OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) - built-in optical image stabilization
- R (Ring) - a separate ring for iris control
- LM (Linear Motor) - linear focusing motor
- WR (Weather Resistant) - all-weather lens type
- Ashperical - aspherical elements in the optical scheme of the lens
- Macro - Macro Lenses
- APD(Apodization) - lens with internal non-removable gradient filter
- PZ (Power Zoom) - electronic zoom
- Cinema - lenses designed for movie shooting
- II - the second version of the lens
For Fujifilm X there are also autofocus lenses from third-party manufacturers:
- Zeiss Touit 12 / 2.8 | Zeiss Touit 32 / 1.8 | Zeiss Touit 50 / 2.8 Macro
- Viltrox 13 / 1.4 | Viltrox 23/1.4 | Viltrox 33/1.4 | Viltrox 56 / 1.4 | Viltrox 75 / 1.2 | Viltrox 85/1.8 | Viltrox 85 / 1.8 Mark II
- Tokina 23 / 1.4 | Tokina 33 / 1.4 | Tokina 56 / 1.4
- Sigma C 16/1.4| Sigma C 30 / 1.4 | Sigma C 56/1.4 | Sigma C 18-50 / 2.8
- Tamron 11-20 / 2.8 | Tamron 17-70 / 2.8 VC | Tamron 18-300 / 3.5-6.3 VC | Tamron 150-500 / 5-6.7 VC
- Samyang 12 / 2, Samyang 75/1.8
- TTArtisan 27 / 2.8, TTArtisan 32 / 2.8
- Meike 85 / 1.8
All Fujifilm X APS-C Interchangeable Lens Digital Mirrorless Cameras
- X-Pro1, X-Pro2, X-Pro3
- X-T1, X-T2, X-T3, X-T4, X-T5
- X-T10, X-T20, X-T30, X-T30II
- X-S10
- X-T100, X-T200
- X-E1, X-E2, X-E2s, X-E3, X-E4
- X-M1
- X-A1, X-A2, X-A3, X-A5, X-A7
- X-A20
- X-H1, X-H2S, X-H2
Materials on the topic
- Full frame mirrorless systems... Discussion, choice, recommendations.
- Cropped mirrorless systems... Discussion, choice, recommendations.
- Cropped mirrorless systems that have stopped or are no longer developing
- Digital SLR systems that have stopped or are no longer developing
- JVI or EVI (an important article that answers the question 'DSLR or mirrorless')
- About mirrorless batteries
- Simple and clear medium format
- High-speed solutions from Chinese brands
- All fastest autofocus zoom lenses
- All fastest AF prime lenses
- Mirrored full frame on mirrorless medium format
- Autofocus Speed Boosters
- One lens to rule the world
- The impact of smartphones on the photography market
- What's next (smartphone supremacy)?
- All announcements and novelties of lenses and cameras
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval. Training/Consultations | Youtube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Telegram.
Have given birth to the same.
without the release of image products, companies cannot maintain sales of their core products.
I will join the commentator above, image goods.
maybe 50mm f1 and f1.2 are not so far in blur, plus the additional 6mm in 56mm f1.2 neutralize the difference in bokeh.
wait for the tests, wait and see.
And count the blur as in the budget Viltrox 85mm 1.8 (1.6 with firmware) on FF.
And here is the comparison.
More examples of photos with this lens:
https://photar.ru/primery-fotografij-na-fujifilm-xf-50mm-f1-0-r-wr/
No, just look at the lens diagram) This is the first time I've ever seen a 4-lens stitching! It's just awesome)
Probably, it's all about the glue, and the lenses - so that there is something to smear on: D
I would look at the reviews with great interest :) Not that I'm going to buy = D
Reviews will no doubt be enthusiastic, as Fuji and Sony, and others under duress, pay at least the top 50 reviewers for all reviews. Really objective reviews almost always disappear among them, and their authors end up abandoning the profession of a columnist, even strangely, there are amazing reviews, but the number of views they have does not even reach 1000, and paid reviews are viewed by hundreds of thousands of people. On the other hand, all companies, including Chinese, can now make a top-end lens, but it's all about the price of it.
"Fuji and Sony, and others also under duress, pay for all reviews, at least top 50 observers."
I even wonder how much.
Readers (and those who watch videos) are not idiots for a long time. And many recheck the info. Information is spreading quickly now and it is difficult to hide it. You can hide the design flaws, as in d600, d750, d800. But this also became known.
Please share the links to the Fuji paid observers. And then I somehow do not come across.
I don't remember where I read that they say human psychology is such that reviews in most cases look at those goods that have already been bought. Like to justify your purchase. No one wants to watch a review in which they will beat what you gave your money for, your choice. Hence the difference in the number of views.
Why focus on someone. If you buy such a rather expensive product as a camera, then you have obviously thought it over. What's the matter with some kind of a different opinion
There really is a stick in the spirit of the ends.
On the one hand, enthusiastic reviews of lured reviewers, on the other hand, revolting out of the blue, just in order to raise traffic to the topic, ordinary viewers and those interested are very fond of overcritical reviews.
But try to look for adequate and calm ones.
There is enough excitement from the PR service.
But I must admit that Nikon and Sonya, as well as Pentax, do not have 50 / 1.0.
Sigma and Tamron do not.
Canon has - 50 / 1.2L two pieces. 50 / 1L is almost impossible to buy.
Those. in general, the enthusiasm is understandable. Wanted-did - could release.
It should be noted here that this is 50/1 for APS-C and UPC. For crop, and even mirrorless, it is much easier to make such a high-quality lens.
However, in any case, this lens, apparently, is noticeably better optically than the previous 56 / 1.2, and can be a good upgrade.
"Stick in the spirit of the ends".
It's a bad idea to sit at photo forums instead of school.
Are you seriously?
Minimum focusing distance: 70 centimeters - Why so many? Such glasses like to take a closer look at everything for a stronger blur.
Not. Essentially on the crop it is a portrait lens and 70cm will allow you to take a face portrait. For a closer distance, the grip will be very small, especially at such a diaphragm.
On such a diaphragm, the depth of field is 1 cm by 1 meter. At 70 cm, these are millimeters of sharp space. What are you planning to shoot in such conditions? A sharp edge of a mushroom?
No one excludes that the diaphragm will be compressed, for example. And I didn't like 70 cm for me and for 58 mm Piimoplan, even on a crop.
There are tons of other lenses for a tight aperture. Smaller MDF - greater helicoid travel - longer focusing or a special switch - unnecessary complication of the design. You yourself understand everything. The challenge here was 1.0 aperture. We solved it first of all. Everything else was compromised.
You also understand everything - the increase in the stroke is insignificant in order for the MDF to make 0.5 m. Doubtful savings. F / 1.0 lenses don't have to be a compromise.
And how much does the course of the helicoid actually increase, are there calculations? I remember that on MDF every centimeter is given with more and more difficulty. And then you will have to pull quite a lot of glass.
For a 50mm lens - 5mm for 1m, 10mm for 0.5m.
Large MDF is associated with the optical difficulty of getting good results at different focusing distances. Here they donated MDF so as not to complicate focusing with floating elements. Perhaps also because of the complexity for automation to focus at such distances with a small depth of field (but this is rather an indirect problem).
Oh, yes - floating elements. I believe.
this is some kind of photojacking
Well ... As an achievement - not bad. As a working tool for an amateur, in fact, a line of cameras is doubtful.
People make money on X-T3 / X-T4, X-Pro3, X-H1.
Everything below is really amateur.
There is still such a moment, no one has 50/1 with AF on the crop.
The main nitpick is the price.
But at the start it is now really expensive and it makes sense to take 56 / 1.2, if you need it now for this system.
Over time, the price will fall. Fuji (and not only) is always like this.
Alternatively, if there is an adapter (not interested) Canon EF-Fuji, then you can buy it for $ 800 50 / 1.2L used.
I agree with Mikhail, the bokeh is somehow not impressive, although this, of course, is not for everybody!
some publications have recognized this lens as “lens of the year”