answers: 23

  1. notapic
    28.07.2020

    Everywhere it is written Nanon instead of Nano, in "History" it would be more appropriate to write not increased characteristics, but improved. And before the start of the photo from the D700 it says "vignetting",

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      28.07.2020

      Fixed (crop watermark in the photo with the lens view)

      Reply

    • Nanon
      29.07.2020

      You're just outrageously smart. Another would not even pay attention and quietly walked by ... You probably work as a Russian language teacher? Or just a bore ???

      Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        29.07.2020

        It's not very difficult for me to fix it. Find more - write.

        Reply

      • alex
        29.07.2020

        “Is almost a complete copy of the more strictly Nikon AF Nikkor 20mm 1: 2.8 [NON-D]” - I think it should be “old” instead of “strict”.
        To Nanon.
        Someone does not give a damn about what kind of poyardke bkuvy are most dangerous, and someone the slightest mistake cuts the eye, makes you stop, think, interferes with calm reading. This article is public information, and therefore, it seems to me, should comply with the rules of the language in which it is written. It is not only dry information that is important, but also how it is presented. Among other things, it depends on the correct spelling. In general, there are many reasons to write correctly. Nobody blames the author, people just point to typos.

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        29.07.2020

        Fixed

        Reply

      • Ivan
        29.07.2020

        “Not difficult” is written together.

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        29.07.2020

        Fixed

        Reply

  2. notapic
    28.07.2020

    In general, the lens seems to be not bad, I'm thinking of taking it as a full-frame width. Or are there more balanced solutions like 14mm fixes or some kind of wide-angle zoom?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      28.07.2020

      14 mm is a different heaven.
      The native 16-35 / 4 is praised, as is the native 14-24 / 2.8. It depends on what exactly is needed, that should be looked at.

      Reply

  3. Dmitriy
    28.07.2020

    One of the options for using this lens is for shooting night landscapes (the aperture allows), for which one of the most important criteria is the absence of a serious coma near open apertures. Unfortunately, I did not find information about this parameter in the review.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      28.07.2020

      I add: coma in the full frame in the far corners is significant at F / 1.8, noticeably reduced at F / 2.8 and beyond.

      Reply

      • Dmitriy
        28.07.2020

        Thank you!

        Reply

  4. koba
    28.07.2020

    “The lens has a scale with a focusing distance in meters and feet in the form of a window. Values ​​are available only for the infinity mark, 0.4, 0.25, 0.2 meters. In fact, this scale is useless ”- here it is. So it is with another optically excellent lens - 24 / 1.8G. Due to the autofocus speed, the rotation distance was reduced to almost zero, I wonder how to work with this lens in manual mode now? And the good thing about the widths is that you can work in manual mode, use zone focus, hyperfocal ... For me personally, this lens, as well as its new ones, are completely useless, since in 99% of cases I work in manual mode at 24mm. A pity, a pity! The last suitable lens in this respect Nikon made 24 / 2.8 Ai, but soon, in the Ai-s version, it “corrected” the situation and never again set 3 meters markings on the distance scale, without which they turn into little useful toys. Interestingly, in the company of Nikon at least once you saw the shirikas from Lake?

    Reply

    • R-nOleg
      28.07.2020

      Good lens. Bokeh interesting as for shirik

      Reply

      • koba
        29.07.2020

        In my opinion, this is just an excellent lens, and also lightweight, etc. Those who work only with autofocus are just a godsend for them. We would have made him a distance scale with a mark of 3 meters, he would have bought it himself today.

        Reply

    • Victor
      29.07.2020

      Now, my gut tells me that the manufacturers have long ago “hammered” the distance scale and the markings there are conditional. 3 meter problem COBA is not a problem, you can mark it yourself on your lens. What's in the way? And, here, the reduction of the general distance scale for the sake of autofocus is, forgive me for the non-literary syllable, AWESOME! Especially for those for whom manual focus is important! Here, I completely agree with COBOY.

      Reply

  5. Michael K.
    28.07.2020

    The D40 has a nice, calm soft picture.

    Reply

  6. Victor
    28.07.2020

    On d40 the picture is nicer than on d3200, and on the “outdated” 2.8D the picture is nicer than on the new, all-better 1.8G Sad but true.

    Reply

  7. Romance
    29.07.2020

    The question about focusing is open, is it aiming at infinity if you turn it all the way to (stop)? Or jumps? Interested in stars and northern lights. Lack of night photos in the review, what the lights of the night city look like 😁
    Are there owners of Tamroshi 15-30?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      29.07.2020

      In the sense of open, I pointed out in the review: Nikon 20 / 1.8G does not have a hard stop (hard infinity mechanical stop) for fast and accurate aiming at infinity under any temperature operating conditions.

      Reply

  8. July
    29.07.2020

    Probably a really good lens) Beginner amateur, it's a pity to buy a new one, at the moment there is not a single valid proposal for Russia on Avito.

    Reply

    • Boris
      30.07.2020

      Yes, on the secondary housing this is rare, much less often than 14-24, for example. When I bought my own, no one put it up for sale either. I had to search on the Polish OLX website and ask my friends to buy it there. The Polish seller agreed to shoot test footage, so he saw that I was buying. Now I constantly shoot 35 along with 85 and 1,8, all from the XNUMXG series. And most importantly, I bought a third cheaper than a new one!

      Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer