answers: 30

  1. Oleg
    11.07.2020

    Only animals from a tripod to shoot somewhere in Africa at a watering place

    Reply

    • Neo
      11.07.2020

      With 2x 1600/22 converter, with f / 22 and 1600 mm nothing will help, only shoot the sun

      Reply

      • Roman
        11.07.2020

        Check out the reviews at 1000/11. Now add two stabilization levels to it, is it better? In the end, no one canceled 600/4, buy and use.

        Reply

      • Ivan Shikhalev
        11.07.2020

        And does someone make the converter wind up?

        Reply

  2. Konstantin
    11.07.2020

    Why is there a stub? Who will take it off their hands?

    Reply

    • Roman
      11.07.2020

      4-5 steps on the matrix, 4-5 steps on the carcass, high working ISO.

      Reply

      • Neo
        11.07.2020

        They cannot be summed up, there will be a maximum of 8 steps, which is what Canon says

        Reply

      • Roman
        11.07.2020

        Well, if 5 + 5> 5, then they are already summed up. And 8 steps with ISO 6400 are better than MTO without a stub with a film in ISO 800 (which you should try to find).

        Reply

      • Roman
        11.07.2020

        And more recently, I was glad that I have autofocus at least at the center point at aperture 8. Now we have autofocus over the central region at aperture 22.

        Reply

    • Ivan Shikhalev
      11.07.2020

      Spotters, birdwatchers ... Will be, if the ISO carcass pulls.

      Reply

      • Ivan Shikhalev
        11.07.2020

        Yes, and at the same time, a stub on such focal points is still needed to shoot at 1 / 400-1 / 500, and not at 1/800 or shorter.

        Reply

    • vvs
      12.07.2020

      Good question. Is the matrix on the Kenon bzk not stabilized?

      Reply

      • Roman
        12.07.2020

        On two just announced for the first time.

        Reply

  3. Ivan + Shikhalev
    11.07.2020

    And now it's very interesting what the working ISOs of R6 will be ... Because it is a stub by a stub, but short exposures are still needed for wildlife.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      11.07.2020

      I think a little lower than the Canon 1DX Mark III, the sensor is most likely from it, after all.

      Reply

      • Ivan Shikhalev
        11.07.2020

        Well, here it is necessary exactly what ultimately turns out to look. I hope soon reviews with examples will appear.

        Reply

      • koba
        12.07.2020

        No matter how I twist it in my mind, I still do not understand what this lens is for? For example, would someone give it to you, and what next? This is some great metering for SLR lenses with an aperture of 11 (and they also had 8). Marketers have figured out that there is a buyer, otherwise they would not have let out, but it is surprising that before such rarely used things in the new line from kenon, it would be worth releasing some other lenses. While there is no native 24mm lens, and produce 800/11. They also released 600/11!

        Reply

      • Oleg
        12.07.2020

        You can release a separate eyepiece for aiming at the stars and you can shoot an astrophoto. I think this is also an advertising lens that attracts attention with its incomprehensibility, but we constantly say the word canon, and whoever owns the attention owns the sales, and narrowly focused enthusiasts will still be found

        Reply

      • Oleg
        12.07.2020

        Where is this nikon of what it costs without 800/11, now it’s definitely in the back of history. In general, the lens attracts attention with its exoticism not only to itself but also to the company itself. We can release the maximum open zoom 28-70 / 2 but we can release the maximum closed telephoto regardless of diffraction. And the word can here is key

        Reply

      • Eugene
        12.07.2020

        And what does this Nikon not like?
        AF-S NIKKOR 800MM F / 5.6E FL ED VR
        It's too early to bury Nikon ...

        Reply

      • Oleg
        12.07.2020

        And the fact that the lenses come out with new cameras with a new autofocus just complements: we can challenge diffraction, our autofocus is able to digest f11. I apologize for the long opus wrote from the phone

        Reply

      • Oleg
        12.07.2020

        This is humor. Hopefully too early. The practical use of this subject is a mystery to me, but very exotic

        Reply

      • Kirill
        12.07.2020

        Look at the price. By pre-order 600mm - $ 699, 800mm - $ 899. Those who previously had no access to full-frame TV sets for financial reasons will now finally buy them.

        Reply

      • Maximum
        13.07.2020

        Spin another

        Reply

      • Ivan Shikhalev
        13.07.2020

        If someone had given it to me along with the R6 carcass, I would have gone with him for a bird. But with other carcasses it is really not very clear what to do with it.

        Reply

      • Ivan
        02.12.2020
  4. Sergei
    13.07.2020

    For some reason they kept silent about the length of the lens (and it’s folding!).
    So, we have two lengths (in the folded and unfolded position).
    Focusing is probably internal (by moving the optical component).
    The tripod mount is curious (it is almost invisible in the photo).
    Obviously without the ability to shoot in a vertical frame format.
    (Yes, and today this is an unclaimed option).
    For the purpose of photo safari and sports shooting, equipment like a photo gun would be interesting.
    The main question is what quality photos will be obtained when shooting from the approach in the shadow of the forest.
    Will the matrix with two stubs pull out a decent picture.
    Or is it a lens just for the bright sun

    Reply

  5. Victor
    29.07.2020

    You can discuss the advantages of the lens for a long time, how foldable it is, what a cool stub at xxx steps it has, but just look at the picture once, what it gives out, how it all fades into the background.
    https://3.img-dpreview.com/files/p/sample_galleries/7757595702/2639207001.jpg

    A typical, with no colors and micro-contrast BUDGET picture of new unpretentious STM-ok from the canon, only for $ 1000. But - 800mm. Yes - supporters may argue - “but there’s nothing more to buy an autofocus 800mm for this money” - yes, it is. But here you can only answer with the phrase of the hero Yevgeny Leonov from “Zigzag of Fortune” - “Such rubbish is not needed for nothing” (c)

    Reply

  6. Tatyana
    16.02.2023

    Hello! Will such a lens be compatible with a cropped r10 with an rf mount?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      16.02.2023

      yes it will

      Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer