answers: 13

  1. Koba
    30.05.2020

    Here it is, one of the best lenses not only from Zeiss, but in general. Look at the building - this is how Zeiss differs from the rest, it is the real sharpness in the distant shots, I personally compared many lenses by this indicator. But this lens generally shows all the best - the highest sharpness at any distance, almost the highest tonal range, the parameters fall little to the edges, the lens is made for eyelids, the only negative is why the distance scale ends at 2 meters? Personally, I am saving money to buy a 25mm F2, but if I needed a 28mm it would be out of competition. Thanks for your review!

    Reply

    • Eugen
      31.05.2020

      25mm f2 is a bathis?

      Reply

  2. Boris
    30.05.2020

    An interesting review, especially for those who shot on 28mm lenses from Nikon. Last year I used Nikkor 28 1.8g, so there is something to write. Zeiss’s picture is more real, solid or something, sharpness evenly decreases from the center to the corners, without dips in the middle of the field or on one side of the frame. Moreover, in the center Zeiss confidently produces more than 100 lines / mm, judging by the frames from d3200, there the matrix requires 130 lines / mm for max. quality. And on the d700 you need only 60 lines / mm, you can shoot on open or on 2.8. In short, if you had made him an AF even with a screwdriver, you can definitely take it instead of Nikkor, and on other systems I think it will be the same.

    Reply

  3. Pokemon
    30.05.2020

    Interestingly, is Zeiss AF under the Nikon / Canon lens mount?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      30.05.2020

      No, there are none.

      Reply

    • Rodion
      30.05.2020

      No - and even good: a reliable and durable structure remains. There is no need to lighten the lens for electromechanical work.

      Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        30.05.2020

        manual ZE Zeiss (for Canon EF) has an electromagnetic diaphragm already (without an aperture ring)

        Reply

      • Rodion
        30.05.2020

        Sadness)

        Reply

      • Eugen
        31.05.2020

        Exactly sadness. Zeiss for Nikon can be used on other systems through a simple adapter. And under Kenon - no. This is in addition to durability and reliability.

        Reply

      • Koba
        31.05.2020

        I think that for shirikov, and especially from 24mm and wider, afthofocus is not required, if you do not conduct a report, but for this there should be zooms ... But the presence of a normal marking of the footage at least up to 3 meters, as they did before, was returned to the Milvus series , certainly, as it makes quick work very easy.

        Reply

  4. Oleg
    30.05.2020

    These companies have hidden protocols auto focus therefore probably not

    Reply

  5. Molchanov Yuri
    30.05.2020

    Wonderful lens! Thanks for the review and great photos.

    Reply

  6. Mei Xi
    03.05.2023

    I join the admiring admirers of this glass. I have been a fan of his for 10 years. I have it both in full frame and in crop. I got it with a mount that is not mine, it costs an adapter. This is my most used glass.

    Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer