answers: 21

  1. Vladimir
    11.04.2020

    Thanks for the review. Is the optical design of the Nikkor AF 70-210mm F / 4.0 apparently different? MDF is definitely different.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      11.04.2020

      The scheme is exactly the same, I mentioned it several times in the review. MDF changed, since af.

      Reply

      • Vladimir
        11.04.2020

        I am sorry, I usually do not look at the table, since the most important thing in the review is your opinion, Arkady, about the lens.
        I have a Nikkor AF 70-210mm F / 4.0 in my collection, I bought it according to your advice, and it seems to me optically more interesting than the glass from the review.

        Reply

      • koba
        12.04.2020

        Optically, they are completely identical, the af version does not have a macro mode, unfortunately. I have an af version and consider it to be just a great lens, even on an open aperture. It is actually even better than many people can imagine, the bokeh is simply excellent, it isolates the object tightly, the colors are beautiful, the distortion is essentially absent, not heavy, it works fine on my camera, but there are frequent refocusings, made for centuries. This manual version costs up to $ 100, although the af version is already not so expensive, I took $ 130 in state 98.

        Reply

      • Pineapple
        12.04.2020

        I confirm. The AF version is beautiful. The colors are sometimes even too bright, on f4 sharp so that you can see all the smallest imperfections of the skin on the faces, you have to tinker with their removal. For telephoto is easy. I have 80-200 2.8, but you can’t take it especially. 210 soap.

        Reply

      • koba
        12.04.2020

        Mine does not even wash at 210 ... I myself am surprised. I already wrote somewhere that despite the fact that this is not the B version, last year I shot indoor models, about 1000 frames, all with a flash, and even on one I did not get an exposure error, after that I personally lost everyone meaning to pay attention to this function.

        Reply

  2. Rodion
    11.04.2020

    It seems that this lens will be noticeably inferior to the Vivitar S1 70-210 / 3.5, even the one I used to be in.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      11.04.2020

      The s1 is still great optics, and the Series E is the 'simplest' Nikon lens.

      Reply

    • York
      11.04.2020

      Well, S1 - after all, the top was at its time, and they cost money, and the picture was quite recognizable.

      And this nikkor is just a good inexpensive dark zoom.

      Reply

    • Igor-K
      24.08.2020

      Vivitar is more interesting. Friging is smaller [except for Komine], the dermatology on the open is clearly less. But Nikon is easier and easier to implement macro. Nikon's 75-150 from the E-series is bright, though Kiron did it. I compared this lens with the AF version, AF 70-210 \ 4 draws noticeably better! I think it's due to enlightenment.

      Reply

  3. Basil
    11.04.2020

    Series E was produced in pieces of 5 species. Photographers bypassed them, although much cheaper than Nikkorov. There was an opinion that there was some kind of plastic lens inside. Which gets cloudy over time. They were released to the pioneer EM. Optics are not so razor-like niccor, they were sold at 100 bucks was cheap, while 1.4 fifty was 550, and 1.2 650. I mean the 90s

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      11.04.2020

      There were 5 different focal fixes and 3 different focal zooms, as indicated in this review. In addition to EM, there were 2 more of his heirs - FG, FG20, which were also equipped with Series E. As time has shown - everything works with a bang :)

      Reply

  4. Maximum
    11.04.2020

    I would not say that this lens is much inferior to the Vivitar Series 1 70-210 f / 3.5. I have both of these glasses, and the Nikon Series E seemed a little more correct in terms of color reproduction and generally liked it very much. But even more of these focal length lenses I liked the Canon 70-210 f / 4 with FD mount. By the way, I will sell my copy of Nikon Series E 70-210 f / 4, exactly the same as in the test of the respected Arkady, but in a slightly better condition. If interested - by e-mail mmaxxic@gmail.com

    Reply

  5. Ivan
    11.04.2020

    The hood for this lens is “HN-23”

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      11.04.2020

      Thank you

      Reply

  6. Alex
    29.04.2022

    Tell me how to attach this lens to a tripod, without a tripod there is constant blur when shooting in low light, and I also wanted to try to shoot a video. In the picture: the colors are better than those of any whale and my MS Jupiter 37A, but the back one does not hold

    Reply

    • B. R. P.
      29.04.2022

      Based on the design, it is unlikely to work. Put the camera on a tripod.

      Reply

      • Alex
        25.05.2022

        the lens is very heavy, I'm afraid the mount will break off

        Reply

      • B. R. P.
        25.05.2022

        Well, this one is not the heaviest yet) is unlikely to break off.

        Reply

  7. Alex
    29.04.2022

    back-to-back

    Reply

  8. Alex
    29.04.2022

    ducks

    Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer