What is it for?
What is it for? Write your guesses in the comments.
First one precisely indicate the model of technologyon which these pictures were taken, as well as will state his thoughts, because of which he came to this conclusion, will receive a lens as a gift HELIOS-44M 2/58 (with delivery).
The answer will be indicated on the same page 3.01.2020. Good luck.
UPDATE / Hint
Photo of the original size with a worn EXIF here.
UPDATE 2 / Reply
Pictures were taken on ZTE NUBIA M2 4/64, with a main sensor of 13 MP, Sony IMX258. Photos were prepared by my mom (!), Her Instagram https://www.instagram.com/tatyana_tatjyana/
About the winner.
More qualitative than all, IMHO, the analysis was conducted by the author Neustrdm (Comment from 23.12.2019/10/04 at XNUMX:XNUMX) and came to the most correct conclusions, his comment:
I’m sure that they shot on a good smart, although not the newest one.
1. The first photo with palm trees is distortion, where palm trees and cypress trees are tilted to the center of the frame.
Smart kept a little at an angle to the horizon with a slope slightly down, so such distortion.
I have the same distortions on the Galaxy s7, where the lens is equivalent to 28mm.
2. Low DD, in the photo with a yacht in the bay, a broken sky. This is a quality smart year that way 2013-2015. At later, DD has grown. I got such a DD Samsung Galaxy s4.
3. There is no blur, which also speaks of smart with a small aperture, which sends us back to the same 2013-2015.
4. Good background detail means smart is not the most budgetary.IMHO, I could completely repeat all these pictures on my old Samsung Galaxy s4.
The lens has already been sent to the winner.
Thank you all for your participation and interesting and informative comments.
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval. Training/Consultations | Youtube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Telegram
suppose Xiaomi Yi M1
world 1v 37mm. + sony 7
In the order of delirium. Maybe it's a pinhole? Jar with a hole?
No. The pinhole does not give bokeh, in principle, there is sharpness like f / 256 :) Well, the picture quality is much worse.
Another option is that these are all iPhone models in order of appearance. From iPhone 1 to iPhone 15, if I counted the pictures correctly
Action camera?
Is it Sony Ericsson Z800? There was such a clamshell in 2005. Very similar ...
Old man. N, D80. He gives a similar depth.
I think this is some kind of phone. Since there is a very large depth of field, incorrect color reproduction, high contrast and clearly digital expansion of the DD, which worked fine in some places, and in some places too much.
A photo with a wave on a film is very similar
Nikon D40+18-55 :)
I bow to Nikon 18-55 + D90 (the old camera of Arcadia).
Very digestible quality with adequate lighting.
18 mm in this whale is very sane figure, with details but without unnecessary sharpness.
Photos not processed
I drown for D90
People, what do you have with your eyes? D90 with excellent color rendition confused with this? This is Something with a very small matrix.
4: 3 ratio, image character and color reproduction characteristic of small matrices, yes. Plus, the nature of the blur characteristic of low-aperture lenses. Here or one of the more or less new wearable devices - a camera that is built somewhere, or a smartphone.
Moreover, judging by the composition of the frames, it was necessary to focus not even by the EVI, but by the device screen (or, like Canon Rec IVY, with or without a frame). A person who has been accustomed to looking through an eyepiece for years frames differently, already on the machine you know how to move, how to compose. And then there is an obvious straining, I shoot something like this on the phone - you need to move the whole body, twist your arms, everything is very unnatural, so you rejoice at any more or less successful shot. Therefore, the remarks: “these are not pictures of Arkady”.
There are also modes where the color rendition is extinguished, the Neutral is the same, and there is usually lower Konarst.
But maybe on the phone.
This is just an assumption)
Of course, it is extinguished, but not distorted. And in general, leaving in purple for Nikon is not characteristic
For Nikon at 6mp ssd is characteristic)
D90 from another opera)
Nikon sky combined with short focal lengths. And then you can guess as much as you like. Therefore, let's go from simple :)
Perhaps GoPro of the first series. Also 4/3, wide angle and old distortion
Hi, I never guess. But judging by the pictures, on an older camera. For example, Canon EOS 30 D.
Look how many fans of Damrovism ...
That's not at all, honestly, I’m the next Gelik and do not need a gift. Just wondering.
And I need gelik. True, not 44M 2/58.
And some sort of AMG G63, or at worst G Grabus 800
Jedem das Seine, as they say. I Lanos with a driver prefer my own car. Because "not a luxury, but a means of transportation." Get there quickly without a grandmother in a minibus.
And what to feed 800 horses?
oh ... but it's interesting :) what will turn out in the end :)
Nikon d40 + Nikkor 18-105
Gentlemen, this picture and colors remind me of the old iPhone 5.
I am sure that all the photos were taken on a mobile phone, I can’t predict the model, it can be seen from the geometric distortions in all the photos, weak color reproduction, wide viewing angle, large flu, soapiness of most pictures
Support.
Taken on the phone
It’s possible to use the photo on the nikon d40 in such a way, so on the photo itself (try your best.) For the most important photos from the sea from D40, jpeg.
Another Gelik (autofocus) can be won here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KONRaqmII2s&feature=youtu.be
It seems to me that it was shot on some old soap dish, of course, I will not say, but it can be anything, such as Fuji or Olympus myuha or maybe Kenon ixus ... in general, something like that with a small matrix, and a low-contrast lens.
By the way, yes, I also thought. Color and contrast are similar.
But here the wide angle in the bottom photo destroys this theory, it seems to me. How could Olympus have such a viewing angle.
Why not? I have an Olik ultrazoom SP-510, I don’t take them off now, but I used to shoot a lot, because it was considered a good device. Yes, then of course not a super-wide angle (approx 35 mm at a wide angle), but the landscapes turned out well ...
For example, I found it quickly.
And in general, those pictures could have been taken by another model and, in general, maybe by a different camera;)
Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9
Perhaps this is a compact with the ability to change the frame format (aspect ratio) type Leica D-Lux 3
All a Happy New Year 2020!
Shot most likely on a smartphone.
Find out tomorrow)
UPDATE / Hint: Original size photo with EXIF worn here.
Canon Powershot G1 X Mark II
permission did not go
although no, came out
146% on a smartphone, and on Android. Suppose this is OnePlus X, judging by the samples: the picture is similar. However, I do not understand the grades of the mobile Mr.. But the best soap holders (in color and DD) were at Panasonic. )))