What is it for?
What is it for? Write your guesses in the comments.
First one precisely indicate the model of technologyon which these pictures were taken, as well as will state his thoughts, because of which he came to this conclusion, will receive a lens as a gift HELIOS-44M 2/58 (with delivery).
The answer will be indicated on the same page 3.01.2020. Good luck.
UPDATE / Hint
Photo of the original size with a worn EXIF here.
UPDATE 2 / Reply
Pictures were taken on ZTE NUBIA M2 4/64, with a main sensor of 13 MP, Sony IMX258. Photos were prepared by my mom (!), Her Instagram https://www.instagram.com/tatyana_tatjyana/
About the winner.
More qualitative than all, IMHO, the analysis was conducted by the author Neustrdm (Comment from 23.12.2019/10/04 at XNUMX:XNUMX) and came to the most correct conclusions, his comment:
I’m sure that they shot on a good smart, although not the newest one.
1. The first photo with palm trees is distortion, where palm trees and cypress trees are tilted to the center of the frame.
Smart kept a little at an angle to the horizon with a slope slightly down, so such distortion.
I have the same distortions on the Galaxy s7, where the lens is equivalent to 28mm.
2. Low DD, in the photo with a yacht in the bay, a broken sky. This is a quality smart year that way 2013-2015. At later, DD has grown. I got such a DD Samsung Galaxy s4.
3. There is no blur, which also speaks of smart with a small aperture, which sends us back to the same 2013-2015.
4. Good background detail means smart is not the most budgetary.IMHO, I could completely repeat all these pictures on my old Samsung Galaxy s4.
The lens has already been sent to the winner.
Thank you all for your participation and interesting and informative comments.
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval. Training/Consultations | Youtube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Telegram
The first impression is weaving, especially when looking at a photo of pomegranates. Sotka should not be new or with disabled AI. But in general so - the colors are dull. I think this is also possible on a DSLR, especially at 18-55 and without experience. When my wife and I tormented only the purchased D40, this also happened. I remember setting pictures from a Kodak soap dish as an example to my wife, since it was she who wanted Nikon. As soon as we bought 40 / 2,8 and 55-300, Kodak retired ... Straight from nostalgia. * It is not clear either vignetting in some photos, or the photographer in certain scenes applied his finger / s to the lens.
I’m sure that they shot on a good smart, although not the newest one.
1. The first photo with palm trees is distortion, where palm trees and cypress trees are tilted to the center of the frame.
Smart kept a little at an angle to the horizon with a slope slightly down, so such distortion.
I have the same distortions on the Galaxy s7, where the lens is equivalent to 28mm.
2. Low DD, in the photo with a yacht in the bay there is a broken sky. This is a quality smart of the year that way 2013–2015. Later, DD grew up. I got such DD from Samsung Galaxy s4.
3. There is no blur, which also speaks of smart with a small aperture, which sends us back to the same 2013-2015.
4. Good background detail means smart is not the most budgetary.
IMHO, I could completely repeat all these pictures on my old Samsung Galaxy s4.
Well, I won’t be the first :), I agree that it looks like a smartphone. In any case, by dd and flu the picture is similar to a telephone.
Judging by the viewing angle, it looks like something new, where the viewing angle is wider than 30 mm in equivalent.
For example, iPhone 8.
Panasonic Lumix G95
My suggestion is that these are made on micro 4/3 camera most likely Olympus Pen E-P5 with it's zuiko 14-42mm lens.I'm not a pro nor a specialist but i've made some comparisons, also you named the images as “m43” the acronym for the four thirds system (of course it can be misleading but whatever: D).
What are you guys, how smart? Could any phone draw such sharpness in the background? This is in any way Olik or Panas mirrorless, and the lens is an old manual, so the camera lens did not correct the distortion, since it is attached through an adapter. And the color is clearly of the Panasovsky type. I do not pretend to be true, but in my opinion this is an old micra camera - well, let's say Olimpus E-PL1 or similar. And the lens should be wider - say 20mm or wider (let's say MIR 20mm or Nikkor), I wouldn't be surprised if I made a mistake and this is a whale 14-XX, but this is not accurate)
So the resolution of the pictures is reduced, respectively, the sharpness has grown. At the same time, you can still see that the camera artificially sharpened with double contours of the contours of objects, though many suffer from this.
Sharpness in the background? - yes easily! You just need a good smart.
Yes, on any smart in the background there will be a daub, or an unnatural picture from AI. Navryatli Arkady bought the last iPhone for 130 TR or Google Pixel which you need to buy in Europe. we’ll wait for the results, and the noise floor was everywhere similar
Ahahah, now look at the correct answer))
I poke my finger in the sky
Nikon coolpix
Nikon coolpix 4200
PS m43 in the file name and portrait orientation of the photo - a way to lead astray ...
Okay, joke and that's enough.
I think this is Xiaomi Mi A2.
Arguments why the phone:
- vertical orientation of frames, typical for shooting with a phone;
- photo, apparently, vacation, phone for carrying light is the most convenient;
- attempts of automatic toning / stretching of shadows / sharpening are recognized by eye, i.e. attributes of computational mathematics;
- large grip, wide angle;
- at a wide angle, there is no drop in sharpness at the corners and chromaticity, which can be found in abundance at a wide angle in inexpensive ZK / UZK.
Why Xiaomi Mi A2:
- relatively affordable (I don't think that on a site aimed at a wide audience, the owner will “brag” about a premium photo toy);
- removes well at night;
- I heard about such a model from some amateur photographers.
It seems to me that this is Fujifilm s5pro, the color rendering is similar, now DSLRs / BZK do not remove it (I mean newer ones). I think I'm right, but not because of the lens, such a Helios already exists!
ABOUT! and I said, the colors are ... hinting ... :) like bae :)
although, since there is a dispute, it means that it is not :)
In general, for the idea of competition 5!
PS If you've guessed right - present the lens to a more worthy one, because for now I have no place to wear it. camera kaput :)
Due to the fact that everything is vertical and with the same distortions, I am also for a smartphone.
A detail and on it you can get
Here
Taken by me on a Kodak soap dish 15 years ago.
The same camera, same time
Exactly. A little sun and an old soap box knock out the sky and water. HRD face gluing
No gluing. I think that the broken sky and water are my jamb, while in the mountains the sun is quite aggressive - in principle, the knocked-out surfaces convey the "heat" state well. Nevertheless, the "detail" is quite enough, and the palette of colors, in my opinion, is much wider. At least there is no impression that the painter avoids pure colors due to some kind of mental trauma.
Here is a shot against the sun.
Yes, and the river is mountainous, the water in it is very clear and noisy boils, this is far from the Neva, where the flow is smooth.
Yes, that’s understandable. In the mountains, the sun is harsh. I'm talking about gluing in the photo of Arkady, it very much looks like the camera was gluing
daub, unlike topstarter
Nobody argues. The question was different.
Well, or here
Very similar to a smartphone. Yesterday I practiced with my note9 and that's what happened.
Olympus tough is twisted with contrast and colors.
Guessing Next! See what kind of cutie you can take off at the prize Gelik https://radojuva.com/2019/12/helios-44m-25-8-macro-shots/
such a cutie can be removed for any helix, the question is in the hands, growing from where you need :)
and the pictures can be enlarged, it turns out ... I'm an oak tree ... :(
I take my words back - not that ... not soap-fudzhik ...
either Olympus Pen 1
either panfloor gf 2 or whatever they were called, first ...
Fujifilm FinePix S1-5 Pro
Kodak DCS PRO
here I am also for the first option (olik, panas), before you change your shoes)
Yes, and especially did not change shoes,
either Olympus Pen 1
either panfloor gf 2 or whatever they were called, first ...
Fujifilm FinePix S1-5 Pro
Kodak DCS PRO
some of this, it seems to me ...
I don’t know cameras with strange colors anymore :) well, sigma still ... but this is a completely different story, a completely different picture will be :)
“Pereobulsya” - it enlarged the picture and saw the resolution ... obviously not a soap dish, but I think the matrix is still the same - interesting and not fashionable ...
accordingly, these options remain ...
Panasonic is much less likely ... :)
more, of course, I tend to fujik :) or to kodak ...
This is definitely not S3Pro or S5Pro.
And not like Kodak.
Yes, and Olympus colors more accurately convey.
It feels like everything is spanked on ordinary smartphones.
The pictures were taken with a smartphone - an iPhone, maybe the 6th model.
I have not seen such colors on iPhones ... especially in the sun ...
why such thoughts? :)
There was no iPhone, as it is not known, it means)
So you can forever guess.
Panasonic LX100?
Maybe it's Sony H1 which nito. The camera is clearly ancient, and the BB is terribly jumping in violet.
Samsung s4 was better in BB, and there is clearly a wide angle.
I think Panasonic G3 \ GF3, a whale lens or some kind of wide-manual
I can’t understand why someone suggests that this is shot on the apparatus of firms that know how to color? Like Kodak, Sony, Panasonic or Apple, etc. If this is them, then for me there should be something really budgetary. I rather believe that this is some kind of budget smart from Samsung.
Well, since the theme of smartphones has been lately lately, then most likely on a smartphone. Whale 18-55 will also remove it. It’s hard to say for sure that there’s no pebble, a pebble could tell a lot about
There is no glomerulus because the matrix is small and the angle is wide. In principle, it does not exist, which narrows the circle of searches.
A smartphone and their name is Legion, anyone can be. At this focal point, you can only guess at random
I have no concrete confidence about the smartphone. Modern smarts with processing shoot much better, and even at the expense of close focusing, you can achieve at least some kind of hardware bokeh.
Here's another option - this canon keychain camera, which was recently announced, in the form of a keychain. IVY REC.
All photos are in an upright position that gives out a smartphone. In general, Arkady, let’s give something with a golden ring as a prize for the Nikonists, and guess for the canonists with a red ring.
Helios with a golden ring, but what?))) Or with red)
Hmmm ... was the Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro already an option?
It was. But if you already had this camera, you would not ask such questions. The S5Pro has a fairly accurate reproduction of colors and shades.
Everything is haunted by the moire in the photo, well, it looks like a film ... something looks like a grid on the N8008s
No, this is definitely a figure. Even the best film samples have a characteristic grain and a characteristic color rendition-contrast. But this departure of the sky in purple is only a figure.
Mobile Nokia lumia - gave a similar result.