What is it for?
What is it for? Write your guesses in the comments.
First one precisely indicate the model of technologyon which these pictures were taken, as well as will state his thoughts, because of which he came to this conclusion, will receive a lens as a gift HELIOS-44M 2/58 (with delivery).
The answer will be indicated on the same page 3.01.2020. Good luck.
UPDATE / Hint
Photo of the original size with a worn EXIF here.
UPDATE 2 / Reply
Pictures were taken on ZTE NUBIA M2 4/64, with a main sensor of 13 MP, Sony IMX258. Photos were prepared by my mom (!), Her Instagram https://www.instagram.com/tatyana_tatjyana/
About the winner.
More qualitative than all, IMHO, the analysis was conducted by the author Neustrdm (Comment from 23.12.2019/10/04 at XNUMX:XNUMX) and came to the most correct conclusions, his comment:
I’m sure that they shot on a good smart, although not the newest one.
1. The first photo with palm trees is distortion, where palm trees and cypress trees are tilted to the center of the frame.
Smart kept a little at an angle to the horizon with a slope slightly down, so such distortion.
I have the same distortions on the Galaxy s7, where the lens is equivalent to 28mm.
2. Low DD, in the photo with a yacht in the bay, a broken sky. This is a quality smart year that way 2013-2015. At later, DD has grown. I got such a DD Samsung Galaxy s4.
3. There is no blur, which also speaks of smart with a small aperture, which sends us back to the same 2013-2015.
4. Good background detail means smart is not the most budgetary.IMHO, I could completely repeat all these pictures on my old Samsung Galaxy s4.
The lens has already been sent to the winner.
Thank you all for your participation and interesting and informative comments.
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval. Training/Consultations | Youtube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Telegram
The site has moved to https (ssl connected). Therefore, this record also serves as a test for the health of the site as a whole. If you notice any problems in the work, write.
Waiting for your guesses!
On Nikon DSLR)
and what kind of artifacts in the photo or other reasons served similar conclusions?
all photos on the site were taken with Nikon DSLR cameras. Although ... the color looks more like Kenon's - from simple DSLRs.
Well, and the lens ... forgot to wipe)
For some reason, the notification of the answer did not come to the mail.
Not all. There are both Canon and Sony
Rather, an old Canon DSLR (judging by the colors) and HELIOS-44M 2/58 (judging by the picture). "I said everything!" )
Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9
On iphone 7. I don’t know why, it just looks like)) Well, it's definitely a smartphone)
Most likely filmed on Olympus - this is indicated by the 3: 4 format, mediocre color from jpg, dips in the highlights. It is difficult to name a specific model,
in principle, it can be any micra at all, for simplicity I’ll assume something fresh, for example OM-D 5 III
I would say that this is a smartphone
but the names of the files seem to hint that this is Micro 4 × 3 (m43-samples-2019… .jpg)
the focal length is not the same everywhere, which means that the lens is a zoom, and this is not a phone
more difficult to say
Sadness is sad then. Especially if it's the best samples.
I would say that everything is shot on a mobile phone, say iphone
Why - depth of field, detail, everything points to a matrix the size of a nail
Although it is not a smartphone. Gripp is narrowish. Probably Samyang 16 mm f / 2.0. And the camera here can be absolutely any)
Filmed either on a soap dish or, most likely, on a phone.
This is 100 percent Micra, maybe 5 of the 20 / 1.7 review?
Olympus Camedia C-3000 Zoom
YN450 gave a test?
It looks like a soap box or a phone. Large depth of field, in bright sunlight, the colors are distorted towards purple, in the backlight, detail falls, which I noticed with cheap optics. There is little experience with different equipment, but even in the old soap box from the canon, there were no shoals of color in the sunlight. But I met it on old phones. So my guess is: the phone, but not fresh, let it be a motorolla, my wife just liked this kind of phone to take purple pictures :-)
What is it for? On the camera, of course! 🤣
This is a film. Nikon AF N8008S
It seems to me that it was filmed not even on a smartphone, but on an ancient mobile phone with a camera. Somewhere by 2 megapixels. Noises on a bright sunny day. Veil in the picture. Distortion of colors. Everything is present.
Let there be Sony Ericsson K750i released in 2005. Or some kind of similar mobile phone from that time.
No, not SE k750i for sure, I had this phone, it did not give such detail ...
Now it seems that at that time the k750i was just a miracle of engineering, but in fact it was shooting like this :)
what a tin) I really wanted it for myself as the coolest camera phone! But did the rest of the phones shoot better?
This is a vacation, which means it’s either a phone (the iPhone is old or something else but definitely not Huawei (because I have it and I know how it draws 😁)) or digital Fuji (the colors seem to me like Fuji, I can’t answer why). Well, or to the extreme DSLR Canon with the same Helios but with a strongly clamped aperture.
This is my personal opinion.
This is D40 / D40x - because this is Arkady's favorite device :)))))
40x i don't like
This is definitely a micra, so it is definitely not a smartphone. Something old enough - no later than 2012, judging by the picture.
Let the Olympus Pen E-PM1 with a whale 14-42. Or Lumix DMC-G1.
It’s hard to say for sure.
Because the picture is sharp, 4: 3, the picture has traces of some kind of software sharpness, as phones happen before with micro cameras, but not so much. The angle is wide enough, maybe it's just 28 equivalents, but on 6 photos - not so wide. Therefore, I assume that 14-42.
There is another option that et d200 :)
But what if it's Zenith? Are the photos digitized ????
Zenith is even logical because they give Helios :)
It’s definitely not a film, it’s too sterile
Olympus or Panasonic + HELIOS-44M
Oh - Everything!
Wanguyu, this is a smartphone with a dual camera of the ether 28 + 50 type - some kind of huavei or yapon :) Format 4/3 - Not only micra.
I have every reason to believe that this is still a micra. :)
There is a gradient on a couple of frames - it confuses me in terms of the fact that this is a smartphone. Didn't see such specifics on them
The photos are good as well as a good sense of humor
The collection does not contain photographs of cats, so the samples given cannot fully characterize the equipment used during shooting.