answers: 18

  1. zengarden
    24.09.2019

    The usual update of the cropped Kenon. Someone will buy. But, as you already wrote, updating from old amateur cameras makes little sense.
    PS. And Little Red Riding Hood herself ate all the pies ...

    Reply

    • Alexey
      24.09.2019

      She ate the wolf. Arkady miraculously escaped.

      Reply

  2. koba
    25.09.2019

    Please note that this Youngnuo 35mm easily resolves high megapixels of the matrix, and also provides high micro-contrast (that is, the number of gradations of one or nearby colors), and indeed a nice picture. And the camera itself produces pictures of very good quality. Maybe it seemed to me, but Sigma can’t resolve this matrix and gives a picture a head lower in terms of resolution, which is strange, usually lenses from this company in the art series are famous for high resolution along with a poor-looking picture with medium micro contrast, which is not very suitable for black and white photography.

    Reply

  3. Ivan Wolverine
    25.09.2019

    this is a DSC of the CANON 500D type, but only with a 24 Mp matrix instead of 15 MP, and therefore the diffraction limitation of the aperture is not 7,9-7,5 as in the 500D, which is still tolerable and already 6,3 on the approaches to 5,6 ... progress, but!

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      25.09.2019

      Amateurs don't know anything about diffraction limiting and will never see it. And most importantly, unlike us, they will sleep peacefully and will not bother with the questions “should the aperture be clamped to F / 16 or not?”.

      Reply

    • koba
      25.09.2019

      now, in order to keep up with the pursuit of megapixels, Kenon began to install 32,5 megapixel matrices in new cameras, probably everyone will now switch to this to somehow say that they have crossed the border of 30 megapixels, and everyone doesn’t care that 90 % of lenses are simply not able to resolve such matrices, and those that will be able and will cost like cars. And their diffraction limit will start from F5.6. Samsung today announced that it has started selling 48MP LCDs for mobile phones with a cell size of 0.7! What else can I say ... The wonderful 6MP sensor in the Nikon D40 has a pixel size of 7,8 microns and is almost equal to that of the Nikon D700 (8,4 microns), while in the D90 its size has decreased to 5.4 with a still tolerable diffraction limit of F9 , and now 0,7 ...

      Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        25.09.2019

        Canon 1D's largest pixel, Nikon D1 / D1H

        Reply

  4. Stanislas
    25.09.2019

    To be honest, I had never uploaded archives with photos to see them in full size from one or another CZK. But here, I think, I'll take a look. And honestly - I didn’t think that cameras are filming “like that” now. I don’t know - maybe this quality can only be found in the Canon XXXXD and XXXD lines (I don’t know how the new XXD is doing, but I hope it’s better), so don’t judge strictly if I’m wrong. I want to show the difference in photo processing using the example of a bearded Canon EOS 10D (yes, I didn't make a seal :)). What caught my eye was the artifacts and noticeable noise even on the ISo 100 on the 750D. If you look at the photo without increasing it, then there is excellent sharpness, and there is no noise at all, and no artifacts are visible. But you can't increase it yet ... Here, for example, the first two 100% crops (750D, ISO100 | 10D, ISO400):

    Reply

  5. Stanislas
    25.09.2019

    Here's another crop comparison (750D, ISO100 | 10D, ISO100). The first photo looks like it was taken on a smartphone with a gigapixel matrix: artifacts around the edges of contrasting details, noise. HA also send “hello” (but this is the lens jamb). Yes, if the photo from 750D is reduced to 6MP, which is produced by 10D, then some of the artifacts will go away. But then what's the point in those 24MP? I personally don't see the point. Not that I'm trying to criticize this camera, no. It's just that with each new CZK, the manufacturer confidently repeats that he “worked on the noise level, DD and blah-blah-blah”. Indeed, at such a rate, the crop should have been filming no worse than the FF, or even the SF, but alas ...

    Reply

  6. Stanislas
    25.09.2019

    And here is a photo in full size. The first was done on Canon EF 35-105mm 1: 3.5-4.5, and the second and third - on MC Helios-81H.

    IMG-0567
    IMG-8899
    IMG-9817

    Reply

  7. Ivan Wolverine
    25.09.2019

    on a laptop monitor a maximum of 2 megapixels, it really is not noticeable - when the aperture is 5,6 or when 11 ... but when printing on a large format, all the "soap" comes out :-)))))

    Reply

    • Michael
      25.09.2019

      It must be a very large format)

      Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        25.09.2019

        You also need to remember that you need to watch a large format from an appropriate distance, which eliminates the loss of detail for human vision.

        Reply

  8. dudonka0
    12.01.2020

    Maybe someone knows how to check the mileage on this model?

    Reply

    • Oleg
      12.01.2020

      Upload a fresh photo from the camera to the Camera Shutter Count resource.

      Reply

      • Oleg
        12.01.2020

        Although, sorry, they say that for Canon it does not show correctly. At first I thought it was a Nikon 750.

        Reply

    • Michael
      12.01.2020

      There is EOSinfo for checking Boots. Launch the program, connect the camera down and voila.

      Reply

  9. Dima
    18.09.2023

    Interesting things are happening, the 760d has a new case, an additional display and a second control wheel. It would seem that the amateur line is developing. But 800d is again in the old case and without additional ones. screen 850 already in a new case but also without a screen. Then 760d what was it? And the model is cool, if not for 24 megapixels but up to 20. Extras. A small screen is a rarity in the amateur lineup.
    And this same wheel on the 850D is absolutely the same as on the already ancient EOS M. I, of course, love Canon, but there are some strange things here even more than those of Nikons)

    And then where should we put the 77d?

    Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer