On September 04.09.2019, 24, the Nikon Nikkor Z 1mm 1.8: XNUMX S. lens was announced.
Nikon Nikkor Z 24mm 1: 1.8 S
Basic properties
- For full-frame mirrorless cameras with Nikon Z mount
- Relative Hole: 1: 1.8-1: 16
- Focal Length: 24mm
- MDF: 0.25 m
- Maximum magnification ratio 1: 6.67
- Optical design: 12 elements in 10 groups, with one ED (Extra Low Dispersion) elements and 4 aspherical elements
- Enlightenment SIC + N (Super Integrated Coating + Nano Crystal Coating)
- Electromagnetic diaphragm with 9 rounded blades. Possibility of smooth adjustment
- Focus with two step STM motors (multi-focus system). Internal with constant manual control
- Electronic focus ring, can be programmed for other functions
- Filter Diameter: 72 mm
- Protected enclosure
- Weight: 450
- Price: about 1000 dollars, Aliexpress Nikon Store
Appearance
Multi-Focus System Operation
List of all 'Nikon Nikkor Z' full-frame lenses for mirrorless cameras with Nikon Z mount
Fixes:
- Nikon Nikkor Z 20 mm 1:1.8 S [February 2020, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 24 mm 1:1.8 S [September 2019, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 26 mm 1:2.8 [January 2023, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 28 mm 1:2.8 [October 2021, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 28 mm 1:2.8 SE [June 2021, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 35 mm 1:1.8 S [August 2018, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 35 mm 1:1.4 [June 2024, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 40 mm 1:2 [September 2021, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 40 mm 1:2 SE [November 2022, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 50 mm 1:1.2 S [September 2020]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 50 mm 1:1.4 [September 2024]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 50 mm 1:1.8 S [August 2018, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 50 mm 1:2.8 MC [June 2021, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 58 mm 1:0.95 S Nod [October 2019, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 85 mm 1:1.2 S [January 2023, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 85 mm 1:1.8 S [July 2019, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 105 mm 1:2.8 S VR MC [June 2021, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 135 mm 1:1.8 S full [September 2023, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 400 mm 1:2.8 S VR TC [January 2022, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 400 mm 1:4.5 S VR [June 2022, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 600 mm 1:4 S VR TC [November 2022, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 600 mm 1:6.3 S VR PF [October 2023, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 800 mm 1:6.3 S VR PF [April 2022, BHphotovideo]
Zuma:
- Nikon Nikkor Z 14-24mm 1:2.8 S [September 2020, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 14-30mm 1:4 S [January 2019, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 17-28mm 1:2.8 [September 2022, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 24-50mm 1: 4-6.3 [July 2020, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 24-70mm 1:4 S [August 2018, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 24-70mm 1:2.8 S [February 2019, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 24-120mm 1:4 S [October 2021, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 24-200mm 1: 4-6.3 VR [February 2020, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 28-75mm 1:2.8 [December 2021, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 28-400mm 1: 4-8 VR [March 2024, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 70-180mm 1:2.8 [June 2023, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 70-200mm 1:2.8 S VR [January 2020, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 100-400mm 1: 4.5-5.6 S VR [October 2021, BHphotovideo]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 180-600mm 1: 5.6-6.3 VR [June 2023, BHphotovideo]
Third party autofocus full-frame lenses for Nikon Z mount
- felttrox: 16/1.8, 20/2.8, 24/1.8, 28/1.8, 35/1.8, 40/2.5, 50/1.8, 85/1.8
- Tamron: 90/2.8, 28-75/2.8G2, 35-150/2-2.8, 50-400/4.5-6.3, 70-300/4.5-6.3, 150-500/5-6.7
- yongnuo: 35/2, 50/1.8, 85/1.8
- Meike: 35/2, 50/1.8, 85/1.8, 85/1.4
- TTArtisan: 32/2.8, 75/2
- 7Artisans: 50/1.8, 85/1.8
- AstrHori: 85/1.8
- laowa: 10/2.8
Materials on the topic
- Full frame mirrorless systems... Discussion, choice, recommendations.
- Cropped mirrorless systems... Discussion, choice, recommendations.
- Cropped mirrorless systems that have stopped or are no longer developing
- Digital SLR systems that have stopped or are no longer developing
- JVI or EVI (an important article that answers the question 'DSLR or mirrorless')
- About mirrorless batteries
- Simple and clear medium format
- High-speed solutions from Chinese brands
- All fastest autofocus zoom lenses
- All fastest AF prime lenses
- Mirrored full frame on mirrorless medium format
- Autofocus Speed Boosters
- One lens to rule the world
- The impact of smartphones on the photography market
- What's next (smartphone supremacy)?
- All announcements and novelties of lenses and cameras
Comments on this post do not require registration. Anyone can leave a comment.
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval.
24-35-50-85, the whole line with 1.8 ((
Apparently, the development dragged on ...
Nikon Nikkor Z 1: 0.95 Noct has been announcing for two years, but in fact it is not there yet.
Along the way, it’s still just a lure, and the production model will not appear soon. So we switched to that simpler
It's manual ... rather just to show the capabilities of the mount.
The question is, which is better? Manual 58/1 or autofocus 50 / 1.2, which Canon already has?
Those who want a super manual, for those who have long had a Zeiss 55 / 1.4 and Leica 50 / 0.95
Of course, better autofocus. Moreover, there are excellent manuals indicated by you for fans. I wonder how AF will behave with such a large aperture? Here is the question)
From 1.2 Canon has everything okay (in the case of the mirrorless version).
And this is ideal, the 1.8 range. These glasses are lighter, sharper, more technologically advanced than would be the same 1.4 and there are 1.4 at the moment. Which perfectly justifies the general concept of the BZK. This is a new optics, and not the old one with an extended trunk, because the old one has not gone anywhere and you can use the entire line through the adapter without discounts. It works perfectly. Why is there no screwdriver in the adapter? Everything is also correct. Because it is an outdated technology, overweight and the cost of the adapter. A line of 1.4 and I did not like the ZK because of the weight, size and cost.
Aperture 1.8 paired with an excellent stabilizing matrix allows you to shoot in any directional lighting conditions. One candle is enough.
Why did 24-70 f4? Because it turned out the perfect super-compact / lightweight / sharp / inexpensive lens with zero distortion for all focal. He has no alternatives. The full-frame AFK camera with universal zoom glass can be worn with you without noticing, just like a soap box. The total weight of about 1 kg, plus glass transforming to reduce the dimensions. This is a new concept. I got caught on the fact that Nikon rolled out after he rolled well into the system. I thought they would die in the conservative agony of snappers and rattles, but got a rebellion from the dead
Why are the lenses under the bzk as big as under the mirrors? After all, the working segments are much smaller, 16mm in this case.
Probably because the distance from the beginning of the lens to the matrix at a given focal length remains approximately the same regardless of how close the rear glass is moved to the matrix and it cannot be shortened due to the physics of light. So the dimensions of the system remain approximately the same. But there appeared convenient transformers like 24-70 and 14-30 f4, partially leveling this property of physics
Canon at one time had diffraction optics, just designed to reduce size
She is now. And with Nikon, too, Fresnel lenses are used in both.
The laws of physics. The smaller the flange distance, the worse. Light will fall on the edges of the matrix at a lower angle - vignetting and distortion increase. You can, of course, bend the matrix, shift the sensor filters. But it is easier to increase the flange distance.
It's time to create a heading: lenses, an overview of which will never appear on the joyful). Sarcasm
Even if they were sent in a pack, I will not have time to review all this :)
It is necessary to give the initiative to the places, who took possession - will describe for joy, show pictures. Then the guy from Paris surveyed the Samsung camera - they slapped his hands, in vain.
I’m just for it, they write a lot in PM, they say Arkady, I’ll do a reviewer of my photo miracle, but in 90% of cases this does not go further :). This is not easy
It's time to introduce a moderator system as in the photo ru. Allow to publish reviews of third-party authors with the right to moderation by authors of relevant topics.
Otherwise, a person will lay out a review of bz ff carcasses for $ 3000 and lenses for $ 2500, as the proud owners of D40 and other rubbish will immediately attack and begin to flood that there is nothing better than a lens kit. And then a crowd of trolls like P, VN and others will come and prove in two ways that there is nothing better than fuja or d7100, everything sucks.
Here there are no normal reviews of new products, alas.
For normal reviews, you need to constantly work with the technique. Do a lot of people in Ukraine work with modern photo news starting at $ 5000 per set?
And those who work, will they want to spend time on trolls who do not need anything (crop of mirrors 10 years ago and a couple of dark mirrors) (there is no money) but who endlessly posts in the comments that nothing is better than the old trash, the full frame is useless and the mirrorless sucks?
They write different things, like on the whole Internet
I don’t think that someone will post their reviews of the new until the trolls including goofan fans for all the news are forever banned in the comments. The man worked, did a review, and trolls envious with a budget of 300 dollars come out of bile and flood. Meaning? There are no new reviews.
Of course, reviews of photographic equipment for $ 5 are not needed by anyone ... And they are not needed because, firstly, none of normal people can buy such a thing, because our both countries have a poor population and it is not clear for whom they appear here at all, so how can you buy this only if you steal, you can't buy salaries for beggars, and secondly, the “pro” who has it got it all for free from the company and it’s not interesting to read “nonsense” in the freeloader's review, because he has a paid task from a company to write such nonsense ... I once saw a wedding photographer (and his photos come out really interesting and everyone likes it, he was even surprised), so he shot with Nikon D80 (and SB900), which no longer has inscriptions on the body it was in general and she ran more than 500 thousand ... And everyone tried to order it, because the reviews were only positive about him ... And this despite the fact that he did not click like a Nutcracker and he had a camera run with a very high and high-quality efficiency ... You always need to think about equipment well, those who got it for free do not think about him, or he tries to fight so much for his art that you can easily buy it often ... But in order to fight more for your work, you need to be a master, not a Nutcracker, otherwise it will not work out expensive tear ...
So that’s the difference with the photo ru.
There, such lovers of flooding in a non-core topic are banned for half a second.
You don't like kenon - don't flood in the topic about kenon.
You don't like bz - do not go into topics about bz.
So it turns out that everyone reads the topic that he likes without flooding and trolls.
In the photo ru selective moderation, their troubles, and even there are terry woodpeckers.
The juice on the Lens Club. Everything is warm and warm for people, and not for majors.
In the photo ru double moderation, by administrators and authors of the topic. The author of the topic bannits himself without admins of trolls and flooders, adding them to the black list. After that, they can only read the topic.
Your remark about majors perfectly shows why the owners of new equipment rarely appear here and do not post their reviews.
How old should a person be to be offended by every “woof-woof”? It’s hard to believe that with such an undeveloped psyche you can make money on a set of "5000 dollars", rather, such a set is begged and the description of its properties will be stupid. IMHO
Those who shoot are shooting and rarely think about the “rising generation” of photographers. If you want to share your experience, they share in their own master classes, workshops, courses. The photo technique itself is interesting mainly for beginners. And a new protector or expensive technique is so good that it is usually described in two words - excellent with minor flaws. This can be said about 90% of everything new.
The question is not offense, but in the logic and proverb about throwing beads.
The point of spending time offended by all losers with the behavior of adolescents who will still never buy equipment at such a price?
Of course, earnings on such equipment go according to another business model and it simply does not exist in Ukraine, only the cheapest equipment can be recaptured there, alas.
Arkady, I completely disagree with you.
I know a lot of pros and amateurs who willingly share their experiences and experiences on forums and blogs.
Just because it's interesting.
But alas, not in Ukraine. Here, there is simply no one to discuss such a technique with.
Hockey Puck Design
You're right to the point! All thought, something reminiscent!
And there would also be a description of the dimensions, that would be fine, and just guess about the sizes.
@hvalsky are you an hour marketer from Nikon? It hurts to be a hypocrite. From the marketing point of view, it looks like this: - let them first buy fixes 1.8, then release 1.4 and buyers will itch that their glasses are not top, and then we will get to 1.2; - you cannot put a screwdriver in the adapter, this will make the use of old glasses more convenient, and reduce the sales of new ones. And the praises from you about 24-70 f4, released instead of 2.8, for the same reason as fixes 1.8, reinforce suspicions of your insincerity. About the mass-dimensional characteristics of the UPC everything is already chewed, yeah try to put the kit “like a soap dish” in your pocket.