On May 31.05.2019, 35, the Tamron SP 1.4mm F / XNUMX Di USD lens was announced for Nikon and Canon full-frame SLR cameras.
Tamron SP 35mm F / 1.4 Di USD
Full technical data is still not available.
Tamron SP 35mm F / 1.4 Di USD is dedicated to the fortieth anniversary of the Tamron SP (Super Pperformance).
There are very few similar autofocus 35-currents for Nikon / Canon SLR cameras:
- Canon LENS EF 35mm 1: 1.4L USM
- Canon LENS EF 35mm 1: 1.4L II USM
- Sigma 35mm 1: 1.4 DG HSM | A (for Nikon / Canon / Sigma / Sony A / Sone E / Pentax / L-mount)
- Yongnuo YN35mm 1: 1.4 (Canon only)
- Nikon N AF-S Nikkor 35mm 1: 1.4G
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval. Training/Consultations | Youtube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Telegram
Strange positioning. Canon is easier - 35 / 2IS vs 35 / 1.4L. On the one hand, small dimensions + stub, on the other - all-weather performance and aperture ratio Well, the difference in price. Based on the combination of qualities, I choose the first option for myself (I prefer small and light fixes).
Tamron already has 35 / 1.8 with a stub. The difference in aperture is half a stop, a minimum of three wins back the stub. Weatherproof both there and there. The difference in the image? At the price of even more weight and for an even larger amount that you need to pay?
As if all kinds of lenses are needed, all kinds of lenses are important, but here they are already starting to compete with themselves.
At aperture 2/3 stop.
1.4 it is prestigious, it is the best of the best. Whoever doesn’t need a stub will now be able to choose 1.4 between his native, Sigma and Tamron. And who will say for sure what exactly is on the mind of the company itself?
He himself has Tamron 35, and he took to use sigma 35-1,4, it seemed harder.
It seemed to me 1,4 is much sharper than 1,8.
Bliiin .. would make 1.6 and with a stub so that)
Tamron F012 is F / 1.6 with a stub. By EXIF, not by the inscription on the case.
Tamron said that this lens is not just released in honor of the 40th anniversary of the series.
He will be the face of the company. This thirty-five is the best Tamron has to offer,
This is the quintessence of all the technological achievements of the manufacturer.
After such statements, the lens simply must be magnificent.
It is not long left, it will appear in August, about 1100 evergreens.
$899.00
I like to shoot city streets at night, especially on vacation.
There is 35 / 2d, I want to cut it, but in the same weight category. I have been thinking about replacing it with 35 / 1.8G fx, Tamron 35 / 1.8 with a stub, or Sigma 35 / 1.4, but the hand does not rise to buy and it does not matter in price. And in weight and weight distribution. Recently I changed Sigma 28 / 1.8 high speed wide to the extreme 28 / 1.8 ex dg. I got everything I wanted, except for changing the weight distribution of the camera + lens. I use 28 / 1.8 at car shows in indoor dark pavilions. In general, I want a small, light fast sharp fix, but these do not happen)
Hello everybody! I had a CANON EF 35mm f2.0, used it on a 5D Mark III and always wondered why photographers buy themselves a 35mm L-ku if they have such a cool lens. I couldn't find the answer for myself ... Ponty, apparently, is more important ...) If anything, L-ki also do not give 100% protection from moisture. ;)
I use 35 1.4 The whole difference in Bokeh and in whole in development. At 35 1.4 Bokeh Fat, in clubs that creates additional volume)) 35 2.0 the development is smooth.
Slammed Reptile 72mm
What's the problem? Actually, the UV filter is usually one on the lens, bought and not removed. The Polyarik is rarely used on specific scenes and for them you can buy some 77 and 58 mm chassis with a set of adapter rings and a cover.
The hood won't get up
It’s still not convenient to twist a polarik with a hood, I usually shoot. And once removed, then for a few rare shots you can tolerate 77mm. You won’t wear it constantly either, only during the daytime under bright sunshine or for specific purposes such as greenery, foliage-water-glass-reflection.
When shooting a reportage of a city at night, the difference between f / 1.4 - f / 1.8 will be noticeable. Well, if the dynamics, with hands and without tripods and self-propelled softboxes.
At least with fifty dollars it’s just heaven and earth.
today Ken Weller named this lens the best 35mm lens on the planet and one of the 6 best (in his opinion) in history. Also with the fastest auto focusing motor among analogs. Tamron started making amazing lenses lately ... And he just doesn't say such things.
The other day, Sigma rolls out 35 1.2, I wonder what there
Manufacturers broke loose. Announcements every day)
Well, without a mirror, now you can repeat everything that was done 20 years ago with a mirror, only with smaller focal lengths and with the best technologies in terms of glass coatings. Now Canon will ponder and do RF 35 / 1.0 for crazy money.
I bought it like that! Very happy)
Hello) Very interesting !!! I’m eyeing this one. Can I ask you for a RAV with a picture of a person? I want to see the color, I use Kenon 35 1.4. Sharpness is weak, I am looking for a replacement. Thanks in advance)) maksroma78@gmail.com
Great lens! I am glad to see very fast focusing, excellent sharpness at 1.4. great bokeh. Perfectly holds back.
Examples for 1.4
1.4
1.4 is also back
1.4 contoured specially