On June 4.06.2019, 50, the KamLan 1.1mm F250 II lens was announced, costing only $ XNUMX.
KamLan 50mm F1.1 II. The lens is shown on the camera. Canon EOS M6
Key features include:
- Focal Length: 50mm
- EGF for Sony E and Fuji Film X is 75mm, for Canon EF-M is 80mm, for M4/3 is 100mm
- Aperture: F / 1.1-F / 16
- Optical design: 8 elements in 6 groups
- MDF: 0.4m
- Filter Diameter: 62 mm
- Mount options: Sony E, Canon EF-M, Fuji Film X, Micro 4/3
- Weight: 563 g
KamLan 50mm F1.1II
KamLan 50mm F1.1II
KamLan also produces other inexpensive lenses:
- KamLan 7.5mm 1: 3.2 FISH-EYE
- KamLan 8mm 1: 3 FISH-EYE
- KamLan 21mm F1.8
- KamLan 28mm F1.4
- KamLan 50mm F1.1
- KamLan 50mm F1.1II
- KamLan 55mm F1.2 (full frame)
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval. Training/Consultations | Youtube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Telegram
Filter diameter 62 and not 52
Fixed
Question price?
This $ 250 is old KamLan 50mm F1.1 (scheme 5/5) only 150 $
Arkady, thanks!
On dpreview there are examples of pictures from it; even on f1.1 it’s surprisingly good, and even more so on the covered one.
Samples here.
The contrast is very weak on near open, and the closer you get, the worse the result.
Ay something I, it's a short-range lens. Then everything is right opportunities / picture / quality.
Yes, a normal contrast, even on a poor TN-monitor.
The lenses in the photo look as if they have no enlightenment at all
The photos are black and white. By the link Arkady in color photos it is visible.
I have the first version of this glass - more precisely, it has already been sold, but then I will buy another one. The glass is interesting and of high quality, especially for 6000r that I gave for it - it's just a brain removal - a very high-quality video picture, cinematic - especially on fat-pixel NEX. In terms of light transmission, it is better than Zenitar 50 \ 1.2. Of the shortcomings, I note only indistinct color reproduction, cheap in some cases and bad angles on all diaphragms
I wonder what is the difference with zenithar numerically in light transmission? And is it possible to see some comparison of them?
So what is the difference between the second version and the first? For what extra. $ 100?
Old 5/5 and 52mm, new 8/6 and 62 mm. That is, these are completely different lenses
The other day I received Kamlan 50 F1.1 Mark II! One of the first in Russia BU in a new state.
Tested on cameras A3500, a5000, NEX 3N. What I want to say - the lens is outstanding, especially for this money! In terms of the picture and design, this product is close (comparable in quality) to Zeiss (not a poor Sony FE with a blue Zeiss sticker). The assembly is just perfect - there are no backlashes and gaps. Lenses are the cleanest inside - the rear lens is fixed. Picture and drawing at F1.1 level Canon FD 85 1.2L - no fools. Absolutely perfect lens centering, homogeneous symmetrical coma from center to corners. The star is centered on the dot. Extremely low chromatic level - at 1.1, which disappears at F2.8. Sharpness at 5.6-8 becomes even across the entire crop matrix. The lens is not tinkling - sharpness is not rough or crisp like the Sigma or Samyang. As for light transmission, it is lighter than Zenitar 50 \ 1.2 at equal apertures. But the Zenitar on the 5.6 -11 hole is noticeably rougher and more ringing. Kamklan MII produces an incredibly cinematic and beautiful video picture with a creamy unobtrusive bokeh. In short, this is the best 50mm lens I've ever owned.
Nexus, log in.
Or you can pair, head to head with a poor Sony Zeiss planar 50 1.4))
If we are talking about C / Y CZ 50 / 1.4, then he has practically no chances on the technical side, and this is a harsh truth: 7 lenses at the Western Federal District for DSLRs in the 80s cannot be done better than for an UPC with 8 lenses in 2010- x. On the artistic side - maybe, maybe.
I was touched by the characteristic about "the cleanest lenses". And what, in the new lens of 2020, can be cloudy, with fungus and defects?
May have air bubbles
Pts. That is, this is already a reason for pride that in the purchased squalor they did not slip a lens with air bubbles in the glass? Hmmm ...
https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0064/8714/6547/files/50mk2-color_richness.jpg?11204 - rich color, as the manufacturer tells us on the website, who has driven all the colors along the cyan / magenta axes and increased the saturation.
uniformly uniform symmetrical coma from the center to the corners
: D mega lens
another aperture ratio with a boring bokeshka.
another irrelevant comment
Is it only for crop?
Yes