On June 19, 2019 the Hasselblad X1D II 50C camera and the new XCD 35-75mm f / 3.5-4.5 lens were introduced
Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Basic properties
- 50 MP, 8.272 X 6.200, sensor size 43.8 X 32.9 mm
- crop factor Kf = 0.79
- 16-bit color depth
- EVI by 3.69 million points (1280 X 960) and with an increase of 0.87 X
- 3.6-inch 2.36 million-dot touch screen display (1024 X 768, 60 fps)
- excerpt 68 minutes to 1/2000 s (lens dependent)
- Minimal excerpt flash sync 1/2000 s
- lobe shutter (this is a central shutter built into the lens)
- ISO 100-25.600
- burst speed up to 2.7 fps
- two slots for memory cards SD UHS-II
- Wi-Fi, USB 3.0 Type-C, GPS
- Price: about 6.000 dollars
Appearance
All Hasselblad X Series Cameras
- Hasselblad X1D 50C [January 2016, BHphotovideo]
- Hasselblad X1D II 50C [June 2019, BHphotovideo]
- Hasselblad X2D100C [September 2022, BHphotovideo]
All Hasselblad XCD Lenses
- XCD 21 mm F / 4
- XCD 24 mm F / 2.5
- XCD 25 mm F / 2.5 V
- XCD 28 mm F / 4 P
- XCD 30 mm F / 3.5
- XCD 38 mm F / 2.5 V
- XCD 45 mm F / 3.5
- XCD 45 mm F / 4 P
- XCD 55 mm F / 2.5 V
- XCD 65 mm F / 2.8
- XCD 75 mm F / 3.4 P
- XCD 80 mm F / 1.9
- XCD 90 mm F / 3.2
- XCD 90 mm F / 2.5 V
- XCD 120 mm F / 3.5
- XCD 135 mm F / 2.8
- XCD 20-35mm F / 3.2-4.5 E
- XCD 35-75mm F / 3.5-4.5
Third Party Lenses:
- laowa: 15/4.5 Shift, 19/2.8, 20/4 Shift, 50/2.8 T/S 1X II, 100/2.8 T/S 1X II
- Mitakon: 65/1.4, 80/1.6, 200 / 4 Macro
- TTArtisan: 90/1.25
- autofocus adapter TechArt Canon EF->XCD
- manual adapters: Canon EF->XCD, Leica M ->XCD, Nikon F->XCD
Materials on the topic
- Full frame mirrorless systems... Discussion, choice, recommendations.
- Cropped mirrorless systems... Discussion, choice, recommendations.
- Cropped mirrorless systems that have stopped or are no longer developing
- Digital SLR systems that have stopped or are no longer developing
- JVI or EVI (an important article that answers the question 'DSLR or mirrorless')
- About mirrorless batteries
- Simple and clear medium format
- High-speed solutions from Chinese brands
- All fastest autofocus zoom lenses
- All fastest AF prime lenses
- Mirrored full frame on mirrorless medium format
- Autofocus Speed Boosters
- One lens to rule the world
- The impact of smartphones on the photography market
- What's next (smartphone supremacy)?
- All announcements and novelties of lenses and cameras
All Hasselblad XCD Lenses
- XCD 21 mm F / 4
- XCD 30 mm F / 3.5
- XCD 45 mm F / 3.5
- XCD 45 mm F / 4 p
- XCD 65 mm F / 2.8
- XCD 80 mm F / 1.9
- XCD 90 mm F / 3.2
- XCD 120 mm F / 3.5
- XCD 135 mm F / 2.8
- XCD 35-75mm F / 3.5-4.5
Comments on this post do not require registration. Anyone can leave a comment.
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval.
1024x768 = 786432 is not 2.36 million points, please correct
2.36 pixels, not pixels
This is marketing, the points are really 2.36M, and the resolution is 1024 * 768. Here dots are subpixels, so 1024 * 768 * 3 (RGB) will just give 2.36M
shutter built into the lens. How should old lenses be used? In the old fashioned way, do the passes with a lid ...?
And what are the old ones? HC-HCD lenses also have a central shutter. It is unlikely that someone will be clinging to a third-party camera for such a price.
Helios 40 ...
Yeah. On medium format. Rather, Industar-29: D
Gelik this type "medium" type "format" will easily cover
will not cover even once .. well, except maybe on a 32 hole))
If you unscrew the mdf, then it may well
Oh, yes, right now, I would buy a digital SF for 5750 American for the sake of this deshman for bokeshlyushki)
The funny thing is that because of the dark lenses the bokslyushki will remain uncropped. Bokeshlyushek currently have only one solution - fullframe. Better mirrorless, 50 / 0,95 and other exotics climb there.
Hass generally well done.
Especially in terms of ergonomics.
(only lenses look ugly)
Um .. two buttons on top, five in the back ... and I'm not sure if these five buttons are easy to reach. ergonomics?
and this is a studio and art camera.
Two programmable on top, two programmable on the back + 2 circles = 10 changeable parameters, what kind of eyes for studio shooting.
plus HEATED selector at the top
and on-screen ones - they are purely for working with already filmed.
Yes, ergonomically it is very effective.
oh yes, plus a touch screen, including focus point selection, instead of a joystick
Read you, so the more buttons the better)
The device is good for students, but valuable !!! Few people will be able to pay off before the release of the next model, with updated iron. :)
Have you forgotten about the price of Nikon D5?
So the story is the same with him, with the difference that he is a newsreader, it pays off just as long. Spend more than the D850, few people make sense ..
Well, this is Hassel! How can it be cheaper than some kind of consumer goods such as Nikon D5?)
The price of such equipment includes an additional payment for the brand, and the additional payment is substantial.
Speaking of the price tag.
s1R costs $ 4200 in Russian realities.
50 1.4 L-mount for it costs about $ 3100 in our market.
And what is wrong with Hasselblad in this case with the price?
Reviews were not about anything. Review for the sake of review. Should I put it on public display?
What nafig review, go wash your eyes. It says the announcement, do not want to know about the new product just do not go here. In general, it became cool that you can follow the news here in Radozhiv
Write, at least, "NO about what" ...
If you want a review = then check here:https://photar.ru/hasselblad-predstavil-sredneformatnuyu-kameru-x1d-ii-50c-i-obektiv-xcd-f3-5-4-5-35-75mm/?utm_source=newsmail&utm_campaign=24.06.2019
1dx, x1d, d1x, no fancy names
The recessed mode dial is great. After that, all the wheels with the lock button look like some kind of design misunderstanding. In the photo industry there is a strong lack of its own Apple, which would force everyone to make a normal design, without wretched rubber plugs and chaotic scatter of buttons on the principle of “where the place was found”.
Human hands are not robots of a robot. A left-hander may be inconvenient (I did not see cameras with a mirror arrangement for left-handed people, it would be interesting), but on the whole everything is pretty anatomical for working blindly.
Hassel’s is just beautiful at this, but I don’t really imagine how convenient it is to twist the front and rear wheels. The hand does not lie down. It is interesting to try.
On Nikon, I just looked at the carcass and you can immediately see how it is configured. To spend invaluable time drowning / pulling out beautiful fintiflyushki incredibly nicely placed on the camera is the prerogative of those who like to poke around, and not take pictures.
This camera is clearly for a very leisurely thoughtful shooting.
There’s nowhere to rush. Absolutely.
That is, clamping the locker on the mode wheel is faster and more convenient than just pushing the wheel? Yes, even if the lock button is just there: is it visible in what position it is? Is the ring blocked or not? And then everything is immediately visible to the naked eye.
I wonder how much this miracle of technology costs?
After all, I indicated in the announcement Price: about $ 6.000
Camera for the oligarchs!
If a good working tool costing only $ 6000 is recognized by the population as “for oligarchs”, then this can indicate only and only one thing: the TOTAL impoverishment of the population and nothing more. Understand 6k for a high-quality camera - although it is not a penny, of course, it is far from cosmic sums, at least only 5-6 years ago that was exactly what it was, they have already forgotten ...
The couple have never seen in real life how someone works with Hasel. In cinema, yes, in life, no. The canons and Nikons were different, I saw even D4 at a wedding in Italy. Maybe once upon a time it was that all the pros were straight with them, but then we were not allowed out of the USSR.
The presence of sales and new models indicates the presence of a market.
Maybe you're right, I never saw them on sale. Maybe he didn’t go there.
Everything is correct or logical - for the oligarchs. They shoot oligarchs, at expensive resorts, receptions, which can be said in a parallel universe relative to our habitat.
Why the oligarch Hassel? The paparazzi who is trying to catch the oligarch does not use Hassel. There is either Canon or Nikon with a large telephoto. The oligarch in the resort itself maximum click on the iPhone. Well, or if the showman, like Dimon, is on the Watering Can. Everything.
You have some strange ideas about everything. About medium format cameras and requests — the interests of rich people. This Hassel is not for the rich. This is an attempt of medium format to get out of the studio.
Roman, I agree with you.
The oligarch will not hang around with Hasel, he will hire a photographer with Hasel if necessary.
Interestingly, but for the Americans and other non-poor, it is easy to pay off $ 6000 for a fotik?
Even if you look at some movie of them, there they strangle themselves for $ 1.
No, not easy. But if you are a natural professional, your hands are at least below average curvature and not lazy, and most importantly, you know exactly what you need the medium format for, then I guarantee that the loan taken for such Hassel (with a set of necessary optics) will be repaid in six months or a year maximum. To realize this, find a couple of websites of their weddings, look at the portfolio and estimate how much you would charge with this quality of the material given. And then - go to the page with prices and get crazy with how much they fight there.
Well it is more like Yes. Camera for professionals. For the studio. Huge lenses, huge matrix. If outdoor shooting, then with a bunch of assistants and expensive light. But the monthly salary in the US is already for the oligarchs.
Gee, straight to the US all the rich-rich. I wasn’t there, maybe EVERYONE has 6000 a month there. But in Europe, definitely not, even in Germany. There was. Although who knows, maybe in the USA a kind of communism built their citizens for everyone. I didn’t see it myself. Here are some sketches from modern Detroit that I somehow had to see, I can’t believe that everyone has 6000 or more. Maybe I just envy?
Well, 20-25k per year is the norm there. I think you can buy a good tool for three monthly salaries (if needed).
20-25 these lower layers. An old (10+ year old) typewriter, a shabby apartment in the neighborhood of the ghetto. Boring and monotonous work that does not require the involvement of the brain and / or dedication of all of yourself.
If you have the ability and desire to work 10 hours a day, you can easily earn 50-60, but let's say that not everyone can do it, it is exhausting. Well, if you really stand out for something and can score on your family, personal life, etc. - then there is no ceiling, but this is essentially the case in almost any country.
Those who live there, of course, know better. Utility prices, on the other hand, also matter. I shot the apartment in Berlin, so in the winter there, if you do not want to freeze, it is not weak that you need to be rolled off. Plus, not all of us have lawyers and dentists.
That's right, relatively large incomes and expenses, the same electricity at 50-120 rubles per kilowatt, etc. (except that gasoline +/- is the same) make the price of this camera even more insignificant against their background. I mean - look how much you pay for utilities for six months or a year and imagine that for the same money you can buy a medium format camera - it's almost a freebie!
You do not understand a bit how this works in developed countries.
Such equipment is either rented or bought for a business. In both cases, it is expensed.
And for an amateur, it simply is not needed, such an instrument has its own specific goals and objectives.
https://vas3k.ru/blog/computational_photography/
Computing Photography
The future of photography is code.
Great article. I learned a lot of new things, although this topic has long been attracting.
First-class color reproduction, 14 steps of dynamic range and integrated Hasselblad Natural Color Solution (HNCS) technology together allow the X1D II 50C to reproduce rich and realistic tones in photographs - the way the human eye sees them.
I remember that Hassel once, and more recently, released medium format digital SLRs. And the prices there were hoo, much higher than that. Apparently turned this line?