On May 23, 2019, the Fujifilm GFX 100 medium format mirrorless camera was announced.
Fujifilm GFX100
Key features include:
- 102 MP sensor with a physical size of 43.8 x 32.9 mm, BSI CMOS type, crop factor Kf = 0.79
- ISO 100-12.800
- RAW with 16-bit color depth
- Burst speeds up to 5 fps
- Built-in '5-axis' Image Stabilizer, compensating 5.5 stops shutter speed
- OLED EVI 5.76 million dots, 0.86 magnification with 100% frame coverage, 86 fps
- 3.2-inch and 2.36 million-dot folding display, two auxiliary displays
- Video 4K 30p, F-Log, 10-bit, no crop, 400 Mbps
- Phase autofocus for which 3.78 million points is responsible, you can choose one of 425 points, there is focusing on the eyes / face
- Memory cards SD, UHS-II, 2 slots
- Metal alloy combo case, weatherproof
- Weight 1400 grams
- Price: about $ 10.000
Fujifilm GFX100
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval. Training/Consultations | Youtube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Telegram
lope?
And how much did you think for the camera of all time? And for the lenses as much.
10 bucks is a carcass. A lens capable of pumping it? Each for $ 5000? Although a set for 1 million rubles in people is not so rare, though there is a carcass of 200 r and the rest of the glass. The camera is certainly cool in terms of characteristics, you can’t say anything.
there is such a good site of the St. Petersburg photographer Dmitry Efteev ... one thing is sad there - he has reviews of digital photographic equipment, as a rule, only extra-class and at a price unaffordable for us mortals :-)))))) and therefore those reviews are practically useless for the average reader ... and won't Radozhiva slide down to something like that? I would not like to :-))
Dmitry’s site is like going to a museum
Like a trip to the exhibition of supercars, you lick your lips, you ride the old nine yourself
To Zeiss Museum)
I’m not shy to write about any technique, I’m glad for people
😁👍👍👍
Arkady is our candidate!
I’m watching technics cooler and they’re shooting everything the same
need to take small in the kindergarten at the matinee I will shoot
And for how much nonche can you sell a kidney?
The camera, judging by the characteristics, fully justifies its price. Those who need it will buy it. And for us - something simpler and cheaper, like the Canon EOS R.
You do not come out with envious saliva when reading about the new Rolls-Royce or Bentley?
Bentley ... Ghrhhhh
It’s interesting that she does the color correction, or still she needs to twist the lyrema
Total Star 102 Mega Pixel CARL! one question ha..i? It would be better if they made the medium format already for that kind of money :)
This is the medium format.
This is a medium format crop, slightly larger
usual 35 * 24. Hasel - true 6 cm medium format
It bothers me more that the aspect ratio of the frame is 4: 3, as in soap dishes and double crop. Under standard 3: 2, you still have to sprinkle.
And 102MP on this matrix size, in terms of pixel density - like 64MP on an FF camera (or like 28MP on a crop) - that is, too dofig, the diffraction limit of 5,6 will happen? This is despite the fact that most of the glasses on it are f / 2.8 or even f / 4. A gorgeous aperture maneuver will then turn out - from f / 4 to f / 5.6, a whole stop after all. Almost like a shit-sized crop - from f / 5,6 to f / 8.
Too high density, there will be a strong Sharp from the processor. 50 MP on real Hasel just right
Well, it will be so with the diaphragm) But why do I sprinkle it under 3: 2 ...
This is the standard aspect ratio - and when printing 10x15,20x30, 30x45, 60x90, it's all 3: 2. So you still have to sprinkle.
By the way, an interesting fact - if you sprinkle up to 16: 9 (most modern monitors and TVs), then the height of the involved area of the matrix will be almost the same as that of a conventional FF, i.e. Over 24mm.
For instagram the most)
there 1: 1 like, it’s necessary to shoot at 6x6)
Cool! But the price ... though, it's a start. Fuji S5 Pro at the start of sales cost $ 2500 (camera without lens), today's price is $ 300 in perfect condition. And it will be the same with this monster. The case is small: to live another 13 years)))
Cool, cool ... What's cool ?? The physical size is slightly larger than the classic FF, not even 6x6. There is no ISO 50, but the camera is still more studio than reportage. The mechanical reliability of the matrix stub is generally a huge question (in a carcass for 10 kilo bucks, I would refuse it).
SF suggests studio
I wonder what kind of shooting you can pay for this Fujik or Hassel with the first phase?
If one of the readers of Arcadia shoots on the SF, share your experience?
Shabbat wedding bambila, how else? :)
For example, budget aerial photography. There, wild grandmas are consumed for any reason, and this camera for such an application is not just a budget solution, but an EXTRA budget one!
FazaVan, by the way, has long been releasing medium-format cameras specifically for aerial photography, the issue price is 150 kilobaxes, against the background of some full-format aerial camera - a mere penny! )))
Nope, we are waiting for ZENIT ...
For this article, a census of beggars and couch warriors is open, with burnt chairs / armchairs.
Now someone is sure to come out of the mud and meow about the noise control at ISO 100, a plastic piggy skin, about the rummaging, that there are no lenses for gfx and about other erotic evening fantasies for cheap beer and doshirak.
Meanwhile, the d5100 kept gathering dust in the closet from 18-55 ...
and you can shoot it, if not a handshake). I hope there is no disagreement with this?
Hitler, at one time, defined those who were not worthy to live on this planet - by the shape of the skull. And his grand-nephews - by the presence of D5100?
Will Helios-44 work normally on it?
No, take Yangnuo 50 1.8, through the adapter)
An incomprehensible camera, to be honest. How do they even position it? In form - like a reportage (and even a stub), but in terms of characteristics more like a studio. no longer FF, but not yet SF, but something in between, with a huge pixel (and pixel density). Shoot weddings, concerts, fashion shows? or for videos? (but why, if there is Panasonic) It's not just that it is released, they clearly studied the market and demand.
Nobody has blundered yet that I need a mid-level server for image processing, I’m barely tossing the d800 from D7 in Chopin even though i16 and 100 GB and then immediately 12 MPx, the SSD is canceled, I buy XNUMXTB hard
Strangely, my i7 with 32GB (six-year-old laptop) perfectly turns (in NX-D) hundred megabyte raves with the D850, almost without straining. Not to say that it flies straight, but it certainly does not “barely turn and turn”.
Although it may be due to the fact that I have a specialized graphics card.
Macbook Pro i7 16 gb - I don't feel any problems (PS, RPP, Dxo). The same is true on i5 16Gb - the difference is not felt, although on the first ssd, and on the second hdd. But here NX-D on a Mac slows down mercilessly
Or d700
Popular medium format?)
I can imagine what quality can be achieved using a sayuzh.
Here are examples with the Fujifilm GFX 50S
https://500px.com/tpoulton001
Some of them are all too far-HDR-n ... it’s more interesting to get the “raw” material, rather than the edited dead.
I agree. Here are other authors with the same camera ...
https://500px.com/gear/cameras/fujifilm/gfx-50s
By displaying halftones, it clearly loses to the latest Nikon models ..
There are the most ordinary photos.
Somewhere there was a test to choose 5dsr and 50s.
5dsr won.
The fuja SLR crop is a very good tool for a narrow range of tasks when you need an ultra-small flu, a relatively bold pixel, 50MP or more, and the price, weight and dimensions of the system do not matter.
Color accuracy does not change from the size of the matrix, and the Fudzh 50s is a good example - it has a large color error, deltas 11% -15%, which is three times! more matrices with accurate color, and has saturation up to 13%.
So these cropped sf cameras are a very good option for those who know why they are for him. The price does not play a huge role, it is not a mass market, there are other rules and it is full of rentals, as an option.
Yes, there is a noticeable color display problem. Although, editing photos of any new models always requires their own developments and a lot of time ..
It is unlikely that a camera for 10 pieces is bought by one who has only 10 pieces. It is bought by someone who has many times 10 pieces, so it’s not a problem to buy lenses to match, have the appropriate equipment for processing, etc. There are exceptions when people buy things too expensive, but these are unjustified show-offs, if not with an eye on financial returns.
Such systems are usually for studios, companies and for rental.
A piece goods, which absolutely didn’t give up to the average consumer, and even for that kind of money ... So Zhyvenko imagined the weight of his one RAW. ))) Most likely, you won't see much difference in the quality of a picture, but in size - no doubt. Do you need a print the size of a small house ?! )))
In short, useless news for us ...)))
But here’s useful, for Sony Alpha ILCE-7M2 ILCE-7M2 Ver. 4.01 (Windows)!
Good luck to everyone who needs it! )
I hope such Fuj phones will not catch up in quality anymore)))
Or pull as much from this phone as this fuja
Uh-huh. No matter how big a quantum yield is - and there are no more photons per unit area of a single pixel. And if readout, quantization and thermal noises were more or less overcome, then how to deal with photon noise? No way - just increase the pixel area and / or the accumulation time, and then you won't fill in a small pixel much - it will overflow! And if you try to increase the photon flux using a super-high-aperture lens, with a subject format, there will inevitably be an ultra-small depth of field and “soap”.
In general, marketing has no chance against physics! )))
Yes, but physics is here only at the initial stage, then “digital” comes into play. The software will draw any data you want. You work in the editor not with a physical matrix, but with a virtual image. And all these “pulled / not pulled” depend only on the capabilities of the software.
Evtifeev also decided to hype on this camera, only with his "opinions"