The camera was introduced on 10.04.2019/XNUMX/XNUMX Canon EOS 250D.
Canon EOS 250D
Main Specifications Canon EOS 250D / Canon EOS REBEL SL3 / Canon EOS Kiss X10
- 24 MP, maximum photo size 6000 x 4000 pixels, sensor APS-C Kf = 1.6. Most likely the same sensor that is used in Canon EOS 200D, 800Dand Canon EOS M50
- ISO 100-25.600 expandable to 51.200
- maximum speed 5 frames per second
- Focusing in Live View with Dual Pixel CMOS AF
- 9-point focus module, only one cruciform (module still from an old woman 20D 2004 of the year)
- metering sensor exposure 63-zone dual layer SPC and iFCL
- CPU DIGIC 8
- 4K video, 3840 x 2160 (23.98, 25 fps) 120 Mbps. But without Dual Pixel CMOS AF support and with 2.64X crop!
- excerpt 30 seconds to 1/4000 s
- JVI based on pentazerum 95% coverage and 0.73 magnification
- 3 inch and 1.040.000 dots rotary and touch display
- Wi-fi, bluetooth
- prices here
Canon EOS 250D
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval.
Tsіkava іgrashka .. marveled chi to give tudi takі speech к yak timelapse that іnshi buns ..
Precisely, it would be better to add timelaps.
250D? So another 300D is just around the corner! I wonder how these victims of marketing will name the next model, how will they “get out” of their (as it turned out - clearly ill-conceived in terms of perspective) model numbering system?
I do not think that there is any kind of problem with numbering. They call it differently, the numbers are infinity.
This last one, the next one will obviously be mirrorless.
I don’t think, I’m sure that there will be many more similar solutions from Canon. They will make a full 4K, then something else. After all, they still have millions of lenses to sell.
Yes, yes with the lenses there everything is in order recently 14-21 / 1.4 for the BZK has patented well and it seems for EF a lot of fast
But with cameras they are often wise
No, I mean among the miniature DSLRs.
And now they are not or what? The 250D is a cheaper EOS M50, with the same processor and sensor, with the same 4K, only with a mirror, slower burst shooting and a mirror instead of an EVF. What is the benefit for them to substitute one for the other, if it is more profitable for them to sell both at the same time?
Start with 0,100D (one hundred grams), finish with a liter, not counting beer)))
I would call the color "polar bear", it is also black inside
the viewfinder and lens of the white camera are black)
This is "panda")))
Kenan, this is a breakthrough !!!
with chrome 2.64X!
)
What is "cromop"
?
fixed
Kenon, as always, is releasing outdated junk. But Sony \ Fuji sales will increase, compared with this, 250d)))
9 focus points, a huge crop in the video with the lack of autofocus)) Kenon falls into the abyss, breaking another bottom.
there only the dual pixel does not work, focusing by contrast is preserved, but who needs it in 2019?
Kenon takes the promotion of the brand and a huge fleet of lenses. Well, + fist whistles for amateur models.
not only kenon, but also sony, nikon crop, in fact, nobody needs anymore in 2019.
with the exception of 1-2 pro models for the pros.
there is some sense in double cropping, and then it makes sense to switch to a full frame.
the intermediate one and a half crop has already essentially died. Rip
What is so special about double crop
Particularly in double crop is exactly double crop)
The matrix produces a picture comparable to one and a half crop at the same time
- dimensions and weight are much less
- 2x crop for great telephoto
- matrix stub gives 5 stops
- the matrix is more than sufficient for professional 4k video
Immediately the bundle of smartphone / 2x crop / ff begs
Such a set does not overlap in tasks.
Crop 1.5x is comparable in price / weight and dimensions with ff at the same time does not give pluses ff for flu, noise and color. There is simply no sense in it in 2019.
"2x crop provides great telephoto."
Those. focal multiplied by crop - gives telephoto?
This means if you need good quality at 600mm with small dimensions with 16mp or 20mp then crop 2x is the best choice.
Matrices no longer give normal quality, matrices 1.5x or 1.6x require optics of much larger sizes and weights.
Crop x2 is the optimal balance for the tasks above.
But the depth of field is even higher than at 1,5 crop, noise is greater than 1,5 crop. At 10-18 with a stub, I shoot stably at a shutter speed of 1/3 second. What shutter speeds are available for 2 * crop?
Fuck, fuck, I'm all about my. We cling to a 2x 300mm crop and get 600 super telephoto?
For macro and telephoto, 2 * crop is better, but a portrait on 1,5 * crop of 50-85mm is quite convenient for focal lengths and on 2 * crop, fifty dollars is already turning into a 100mm narrower like that
Do you like to watch about magicians and psychics? They transform ...
focal never changes, even four times the crop ...!
But the flu is changing and the viewing angle from larger to smaller
focal is the angle of view of the lens.
draw on a leaf or open the alphabet on the nikon website.
x2 crop a small matrix has 16MP-24MP at 600mm focal length (on crop x1 it is 300mm).
To understand how it all works, Nikon D800 and D5100 paired shots. put the d800 in crop mode and get an almost identical d5100 frame. )))) and DOF DOES NOT CHANGE! ))))) very easy to check)))
the flu changes from other reasons))) again, read the alphabet of digital photo. there is a circle of confusion and distance.
those. to obtain the angle of view, for example, the equivalent of a 50mm crop x1 (full frame) for a crop x2, you need to change the distance - the grip will change.
"For macro and telephoto, 2 * crop is better, but a portrait at 1,5 * crop 50-85mm is quite comfortable focal lengths, and at 2 * crop, fifty dollars is already turning into 100mm, which is a bit narrow"
=================================
so did I ever say somewhere that crop x2 is good for everything ???
read carefully what I said.
crop x2 is great for macro (large depth of field + stacking) and telephoto. also for video.
he asks for a full frame in a couple, the benefit of the price is ridiculous, this is for portraits and landscapes.
1.5 crop something in the middle. expensive, hard, dimensional, without the advantages of crop x2 and without the advantages of a full frame. and as a rule, it makes no sense to invest in crop lenses 1.5 since sooner or later you switch to a full frame.
“But the depth of field is even higher than 1,5 crops, it makes more noise than 1,5 crops. At 10-18 with a stub I shoot stably at a shutter speed of 1/3 of a second. What shutter speeds are available for 2 * crop? "
===========================
noise more, but quite bearable after post processing.
DOF is greater than 1.5 and noticeably larger, which is very good for macro. Plus has stacking. Plus smaller overall dimensions and weight of the system.
Stab gives about 5 stops, see reviews on the net, there are many examples.
Add FF crop to x2 and get a kit for any tasks.
Crop 1.5 is something incomprehensible, all the disadvantages of the FF (dimensions, weight) and no pluses. And as a rule, no one invests in 1.5crop lenses, they still buy lenses from FF))))
ABC photo, understanding focal from the manufacturer.
https://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/dslr/basics/19/01.htm
according to Nikon (do you know such a company?) the focal length is
the distance between the lens and the sensor when the subject is in focus.
The focal length of the lens is the distance between the lens and the image sensor when the subject is in focus
I hope now it is clear why the focal one changes when the matrix is resized? change the size of the sensor - change the focal length to get the object in focus - change the focal length)))
"The Canon EOS 250D will go on sale at the end of April for $ 600 (US) or $ 750 with the EF-S 18-55mm f / 4-5,6 IS lens."
IMHO, Canon needs to clean up its crop and decide whether it stays on the mirrors or switches to the bzk in the crop segment (EOS M). Based on the number of crop cameras, Canon will soon catch up with Samsung in the number of burial grounds.
Oh. T9 screwed up - sorry. Mobile phones, of course.
Canon, in my opinion, they themselves don’t know what to do with RF EOS-M lenses without a crutch you can’t put (unlike EF on EF-S), and it’s not profitable to develop two lines of lenses for one in-line (BZK) lens. Look at the DSLR-sane glass under the crop for so many years have not been offered (with the exception of a pair without weather protection).
yeah .. weaving was so awesome, so no, they redesigned the design miserable.
Weaving was really awesome, the most underestimated boot box. But the weaving was like “for people”.
And here, if you look closely at the advertisements, children are displayed in the form of a target audience;))) - and the box looks somewhat toy, especially in white.
We'll see.
Sometimes I really miss a turn signal on a hundred square meters, but knowing the shoemakers, just a generation later it makes sense to think about a new box ...
The problem is not in 9 autofocus points, it can be enough for an amateur for their eyes, but in the fact that it is 200d only for 200 dollars more expensive, the difference is only in the processor. 77d a more balanced solution in the case of kenon and the price is about the same
Size is very important. Together with the small and very decent 18-55IS STM, this is a wonderful SLR for a blogger, which also allows you to take pictures. With 24 / 2.8 a very compact camera.
Well, and so, in fact, that's why the 250D is simply the improved characteristics of the previous model. Well, as a bonus to the new process, energy saving is promised under 1000 frames instead of 600.
I agree and add: under a macro, instead of my 60D, a tripod would fit an order of magnitude easier and Chinese rails are two orders of magnitude cheaper; and the 200D does not have a rotary screen.
The 200d has a swivel screen
On a hundred square meters, I easily do on a single charge. What an energy saving, I beg you!
Each new camera in this line is becoming more and more in size. If you started with a very small 100D, then the next camera in this line at this pace will already be the size of 800D.
So it is better to take the EOS 800D. For the amateur, a prowling contrast autofocus in 4K and on .. is not needed. A dual pixel only at full HD. The 800D does not have 4K. but ergonomics are better, focus points 45 and all cross type, versus 9 with one cross in D200, D250. The buffer is larger for burst shooting 27 raw prototype 6 raw in 200D. And importantly enough, the 800D allows autofocus to be sharpened in low light at -3EV, as in prof. cameras, versus -0.5EV on the 200D. Therefore, if someone chooses a camera among these models, I recommend it is 800D. Prices in some stores evened out, that for 200D, that for 800D not to mention the 250D, which with the launch of sales will be significantly more expensive. He took a version for the US market with the name Canon Rebel T7i. The camera is great. In terms of working ISO 800D, the Canon EOS M50 wins a bit in comparative tests!
It is clear, as it were, that the camera is positioned as a cheap option for video shooting, with DualPixel AF, rotating screen, purely marketing 4K and all that. But 9 AF points, in 2019, in not the most budget camera is a shame.
UPD: It does not have a mechanism for raising the flash, it is raised by hands (there are slots on the sides for this). And she has no central contact on the hot shoe. This means that you cannot use any manual flashes and synchronizers, they are only native to TTL. This is a bastard. So they did in the super-deshmanish 4000D, but at least it costs 19000 rubles.
And you complain that Nikon cut the EE lever from the D3400, which no owner of this camera will ever use. Rejoice until you follow in the footsteps of Canon)
On the black one you can see the central contact?
Fuck you understand. On black - yes, on white - no.
If there is no Central Committee, I will not take it for sure.
If there is - most likely, I'll take it, sometimes we really don't have enough of a rotary screen.
On a black 200D, by mistake the picture was inserted apparently.
slag. another castrated whistle.
is it worth wondering such news
“Digital camera shipments in the first two months of 2019 plummeted from the same period a year earlier, according to a new report from the Camera and Imaging Industry Association (CIPA).
In January, sales fell 74,1% to around 1 million units. And in February, sales fell by 69,7%, which resulted in 935 thousand cameras, of which about 521 thousand were SLR cameras with interchangeable lenses. The number of interchangeable lenses sold for the year decreased from 798 thousand units to 521 thousand units. "
Another unremarkable walk-through model. Like Nikon with their D3xxx and D5xxx series. Only the price tag from model to model increases
A number of Godox flash units can be used, for example TT350 or V860II, but after firmware update to version 27. Downloaded from off site.