For Nikon, the official sites do not provide the entire line of lenses, and sometimes there are no differences even in the new product versions.
Roland's Nikon Pages - almost a desktop encyclopedia for those who like to delve into the line of all (all, all!) Nikon lenses. The database can be viewed in different modes:
- By serial numbers
- By type of lens
- By generalized form
- By accessories
- There is also data on all of the CZK
I express my gratitude to photosynthesis.co.nz for the creation and support of such a resource. Personally, I have accessed these summary tables millions of times and even tried to supplement them by writing a couple of letters to Roland.
Canon is much easier.
Information on all lenses and cameras can be found in the official online museum. The museum is divided into two rooms: lenses and cameras.
Lenses can be viewed:
Cameras / cameras can be viewed in the same way:
The museum has been operating since 1996, and I also turned to it more than once. Unfortunately, it is not always possible to find detailed information on a particular lens, but still this is the most comprehensive collection.
For Pentax, a lot of lens information can be found Pentaxforums. Almost everyone who has Pentax and who is interested in Pentax products sooner or later gets to PentaxFormum.
A warm tube site with lots of detailed information on virtually all Pentax / Asahi Opt lenses. Co. Data presented on a series of lenses.
I want to separately note a very pleasant photo community of Pentax owners who love to share information about Pentax products.
Unfortunately, all the above resources are available only in English, but an online translator will be able to help out in many ways.
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval. Training/Consultations | Youtube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Telegram
I don’t know how with lenses, and Canon’s cameras are not all presented.
++ quite popular 35-70 2.8 also did not find
apparently in development
They looked bad. He is there, however, like all Nikon lenses
Mid-Zoom Professional
AF 35-70 / 2.8 200001 - 329846 - Oct 1987 - Sep 1992 etc.
In fact, it is there, in all three versions, in the Mid Zoom Professional section, or in xx-70 Pro
Does Canon have 35-70 2.8?
Canon doesn't
This lens resource is also good:
http://allphotolenses.com/
This, IMHO, is a terrible tracing-paper with a lens-club, which has pulled over all of its jambs
Hello!
What about the Sony database?
You can add, if you know a proven place. I only know for E / FE lenses.
share it!
Here https://briansmith.com/aps-e-mount-lenses-for-sony-mirrorless-cameras/
Thank you!
1) https://www.dyxum.com/lenses/index.asp
2) https://mhohner.de/sony-minolta/lenses.php?ov=1
I used Nikonovskaya repeatedly :) it’s good that you collected them all in one place.
And what about IX Nikkor lenses (which are for APS film cameras)? I know that they definitely won’t fit the fullframe, but what about crop? Will there be any compatibility at all? And did anyone use these at all?
They are microprocessor compatible but not mechanically compatible with DSLRs. They have too long a protrusion from the back of the lens, which abuts against the mirror. Especially cunning can install them on cameras and shoot in Live View with a raised mirror, but only with those cameras that do not slam a mirror in Live View (starting with D800). But on the Z6 / Z7, Nikon 1 and the adapter F-> Z, there should not be any problems with the installation, but it will lose auto focus. In general, they have no practical application.
Panasonic
Compatibility of cameras and lenses (and not only Panasonic):
https://av.jpn.support.panasonic.com/support/global/cs/dsc/connect/index.html
Firmware for cameras and lenses (again not only Panasonic):
https://av.jpn.support.panasonic.com/support/global/cs/dsc/connect/index.html
Wrong firmware link:
https://av.jpn.support.panasonic.com/support/global/cs/dsc/download/index.html
There is such a lens base for Pentax http://kmp.pentaxians.eu/lenses/
Interestingly about the conic-minolta))) after the merger, if something was inside the catalogs, it ceased to be interesting for Sonya ... Officially - I recommend looking - there is NOTHING on the minolte on the off-page Yapovskaya page about the fact that before the 87th. But - !!! - written by ATP for the use of the manufacturer's technique))) and so on and so on. Bark in the other - catalogs of both manufacturers in the database of another manufacturer. But this is a completely different story) In general, it is strange that neither Mina nor Koni, who now live and feel good, just put it on themselves. Themselves. Pysy - respect to boots. Very nice site with old school. That's why we love. Nikons of course against this background #fuckers. And why they, too, are not shaken by this topic, for example, is not very clear to me.
For cameras and lenses SONY (Konica / Minolta) with A and E mounts, there are several sites:
https://www.mhohner.de - Mikhail Horner's website with a database of SONY / Konica / Minolta cameras and lenses with A and E mounts, as well as flashes, batteries, chargers, remotes and other accessories, but there are almost no reviews
https://www.mhohner.de/sony-minolta/lenses.php?lang=e - SONY / Konica / Minolta lenses with A and E mounts
https://www.mhohner.de/sony-minolta/bodies.php?ov=1 - SONY / Konica / Minolta cameras with A and E mounts (there are also film cameras with A mount)
https://www.mhohner.de/sony-minolta/flashes.php? - SONY / Minolta flash units
https://www.mhohner.de/sony-minolta/camera_acc.php - accessories for SONY / Minolta cameras
http://kurtmunger.com/ - Kurt Manger's website with reviews and a list of SONY (Konica / Minolta) lenses cameras with A and E mounts, but unfortunately it is not being updated now (new project of the author's site http://www.photojottings.com/)
http://kurtmunger.com/lens_reviews_id21.html - many reviews of SONY lenses (Konica / Minolta), as well as a few reviews of lenses from other systems
http://kurtmunger.com/sony_lens_chartid223.html - SONY A-mount lenses
http://kurtmunger.com/nex_lens_chartid324.html - E-mount lenses (SONY and other manufacturers)
http://kurtmunger.com/nex_camera_specsid134.html - SONY cameras with E mount
http://kurtmunger.com/sonydslrspecsid5.html - SONY cameras with A-mount
The SONY website has a section with information on the compatibility of cameras, camcorders and other SONY equipment with lenses, flashes and other accessories, including those made by Konica / Minolta:
http://support.d-imaging.sony.co.jp/www/cscs/accessories/?area=eu&lang=ru
yes, photosynthesis is the best for Nikon ...
Very useful blog:
http://m43photo.blogspot.com/
Arkady, thanks for the work!
I use your site as a reference in all technical issues - as a kind of Wikipedia for the world of photography!
Hats off for your work!
thank :)
Friends,
please tell me similar resources on Olympus lenses.
Thank you
And if the serial number of the lens is not in the database?
That is, is the serial number greater than the last issued?
For lovers of medium format Pentacon Six there is a wonderful site http://www.pentaconsix.com/
Fans of old-school Nikon, as well as fans of Canon FD, Olympus, and Leica, can stop by here. http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/
I didn't find something on Nikon's AF-S 35 \ 1: 1,8 G ... 35 mm cam, some DIFFERENT fix, maybe for a full frame
Are you talking about this one?
https://radojuva.com/2011/03/obzor-nikkor-af-s-35mm-f1-8-dx/