answers: 45

  1. Lynx
    02.12.2018

    Irix entered the market quite well, right away with width.
    By the way, they are not delivered to Russia.

    Reply

  2. Lynx
    02.12.2018

    And the design is very nice, and after all Switzerland.

    Reply

    • Sergei
      02.12.2018

      it says it’s made in Korea, doesn't it?

      Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        02.12.2018

        Lynx speaks about design, and the design is Swiss, there is an inscription SWISS DESIGN

        Reply

  3. Czeslaw
    02.12.2018

    Arkady, as always, an excellent review! It was interesting to read about my lens :) By the way, there are rumors on the forums that Irix are produced at Samyang factories and there is a small percentage of defects in which the lenses are crookedly inserted, which is why part of the frame is not in sharpness (ghm ... Samyang 14mm 2.8 has such a jamb often happens)

    Reply

  4. B. R. P.
    02.12.2018

    Thanks for your review. Very interesting things - hyperfocal distance marking, focus calibration, Hard-clik, Lock / Unlock. And the image quality is on par.

    Reply

  5. Alexey
    02.12.2018

    Nice lens. Is there a version for nikon?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      02.12.2018

      Yes, it exists, it is indicated in the review. Here's a.

      Reply

      • Alexey
        02.12.2018

        Thank you.

        Reply

  6. Serhiy Todoriuk
    02.12.2018

    Great review of a great lens! Thanks. My little note as the owner of the three firstfruits iso 50 in 5d takes one and a half two stops of DD. It’s unrealistic to pull out the light from the ravah after ISO 50, they are stuck as if from a jpeg, with ISO 100 the light is pulled to the second stop calmly. The shadows on ISO 50 are also a little darker, but the main problem is of course the stuck light, so it’s the first thing ..

    Reply

    • Alexey de Paris
      02.12.2018

      this is a valuable infa, I myself have heard about this for a long time and since then I have not been chasing the opportunity to use, well, the lowest ISO straight. But is it only in the first place so? A reduced value is always an extreme. no ?

      Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      02.12.2018

      no matter how much raw 5d with iso 50/100 I didn’t pick, I never saw the difference of two stops there, because “stop-second” is not quite a reality. According to my observations, no more than a stop

      Reply

    • koba
      03.12.2018

      and why the first 5d, the second and the third do the same, everything below iso200 immediately removes the light, well, their matrices cannot pull out dd without iso200, there is even their dd on this - this is already the result of manipulations with curves during the creation of a RAW file. Irix is ​​like a Polish company, or am I wrong? But they make first-class lenses, and for the right price, such a one would have set $ 3000, since they will not deteriorate often and the company will not be able to recoup money for new sales.

      Reply

  7. Aries
    03.12.2018

    IRIX 15 f / 2.4 Firefly is a manual ultra-wide-angle lens for full-frame sensors. not 15mm

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      03.12.2018

      Crop Nikon and Kenon are slightly different. Canon cameras based on APS-C sensor have a crop factor Kf = 1.6, while Nikon has Kf = 1.5. Canon also has APS-H cameras with a crop factor of Kf = 1.3. EFR is recalculated as always - very simply, FR * crop factor. As a result, the EGF on the Canon crop 15 * 1.6 = 24 mm, without any options.

      Reply

  8. zengarden
    03.12.2018

    Interesting Firefly; for landscapes very much, but for architecture - too much distortion will have to be corrected.

    Reply

    • Vladimir
      14.01.2019

      I completely disagree with you. If you work correctly with the lens, distortion and perspective distortion are minimal. I have been shooting professionally at him for a year now, only positive Emotions !!!

      Reply

  9. Dima
    03.12.2018

    Found a very interesting comparison of this Irix Firefly 15mm with Laowa 15mm f / 2.
    http://www.tommasodidonato.com/Blog/Laowa-VS-Irix/
    Irix wins in the center and loses in the corners, and this is on all diaphragms. In general, Laowa is lighter, more even, less vignetting, less hares, so it’s better for assembling panoramas. Laowa has a smaller filter diameter and is suitable for 100mm gradient filters, unlike Irix, which needs 150mm plates. Well, dimensions with weight, too. However, Laova is only under Sonya, but Irix can be installed almost anywhere natively, or through an adapter.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      03.12.2018

      Laowa 15mm f / 2 FE Zero-D has a shorter working distance, apparently making shirik with such a segment easier.

      Reply

      • Aperturer
        04.12.2018

        There is an even darker Laowa 15mm F / 4 macro - it has a large flange focal distance and is suitable for DSLRs. It would be interesting to compare with her.

        Reply

  10. anonym
    04.12.2018

    Arkady, it’s necessary to block these bots, to prevent them from publishing posts without pre-moderation.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      04.12.2018

      They are filtered, very rarely some sly spam can slip through

      Reply

  11. Max kotov
    04.12.2018

    Thanks for the review, I liked the lens. On A7, the colors are weird in the examples, any improvements when converting the type of resonance?

    Reply

    • Czeslaw
      04.12.2018

      These are already processed photos. Unfortunately, I didn’t save the source code.

      Reply

  12. Nicholas
    04.12.2018

    Where can I download the originals of photos taken on the A7 III? Or how to contact the author? Fell in love with them, I want myself on the desktop all of them: D

    Reply

    • Czeslaw
      04.12.2018

      You flatter me: D

      Reply

      • Nicholas
        07.12.2018

        Can I contact you in social networks somehow? Interested in some of the nuances of the lens and your photos

        Reply

      • Czeslaw
        07.12.2018

        My Viber: +380678662359

        Reply

  13. Dmitriy
    05.12.2018

    Hello. Sorry if my questions seem silly, I'm just starting to photograph. Here I am looking at the photos taken on the "shiriki" and I do not understand, the photo in which the horizons are rounded, buildings and trees are tilted, is this normal? Or is it then somehow aligned using programs? It just seems to me that crooked objects in the photo are not very beautiful, or is it considered the norm for such photos?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      05.12.2018

      This is a transfer of perspective. For example, this lens is almost without distortion, because all straight lines remain straight, including the horizon, but they can have an inclination towards the center

      Reply

      • Valery A.
        05.12.2018

        Hello. Dmitry, I agree with you, the falling tree houses are very good. they look unnatural, these are already “perspective distortions”, there are, of course, measures to correct them digitally, in Photoshop and some other programs. In this case, the "bonus" reduces the resolution of the picture (slightly blurred) and cropped (cut) part of it. Prevention of P.I. when shooting wide (not counting the use of special lenses) - keeping the FA in a position close to horizontal, which is still possible for a landscape, but not for architecture.

        Reply

      • Dmitriy
        05.12.2018

        Arkady and Valery thanks for the answers. All clear.

        Reply

      • anonym
        05.12.2018

        tilt & shift will save everyone, especially when shooting architecture

        Reply

  14. lech
    05.12.2018

    It seems like a modern version of the lens from the 80s. As far as I remember, then all the lenses were tightly cranked. With the advent of autofocus, they gradually turned into plastic rattles.

    Reply

  15. Molchanov Yuri
    06.12.2018

    Finally, an intelligent overview of this lens has appeared! On English-language sites it is written that it is impossible to understand whether it suits me personally or not (the test in the magazine fotomagazin.de, photographie and digitalphoto.de does not count, they are in German).
    Thanks to Arkady for an interesting and detailed review.

    Reply

  16. lech
    07.12.2018

    11mm is so a beast!

    Reply

  17. Alexander
    10.12.2018

    Good afternoon, the question is off topic - where to get such filters?

    Reply

  18. anonym
    24.01.2019

    Is the large diameter of the filters a drawback? Yes, on such FRs it’s generally a miracle that there is an opportunity to use front filters! For me personally, this has become a decisive factor. still, the wide-angle frames with the ND400, for example, are simply excellent.

    Reply

  19. yuricxn
    11.04.2019

    I have such, wrote from Lativia
    the review is actually exhaustive, the hood is of course a separate sadness for installation
    like 15 more than 15-30 / 2,8 G1 tamron
    expensive filters of this diameter and very rare

    Reply

  20. R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
    25.04.2019

    I own such a lens.
    The lens is beautiful, Nikon d750 carcass.

    Reply

  21. Danil
    07.07.2019

    I recently bought it. Very like. While in the landscape and astro did not use.
    Unrealistically expensive filters for him. Now on Ali I found two - NiSi and Wtianya. I sit and think what to buy. The price is almost the same, but as I understood NiSi the old version, not the one presented on the site and the thickness is 5.2mm, but the second is 2.5mm, but no-name.
    There is one more nuance. Does not confirm focus in the LiveView (no green frame).

    Reply

  22. Novel
    03.05.2020

    Arkady, thanks for the review! Having bought this lens in the Blackstone version and put it through an adapter on the Sony A7S, I faced the problem of blur at infinity. It is quite a normal situation, but an attempt to calibrate it manually was unsuccessful - in the focus adjustment window on the lens barrel, everything turned out to be not quite the same as in the manufacturer's video. While the officials do not answer, I thought - is manual adjustment as such a good or bad thing? After all, it would seem that adapters are created in order to compensate for the focal length of the optical system. What else does she need?

    Reply

  23. Johnny
    07.06.2020

    A wonderful lens, the sharpest super-shirik of all that I had (and I had: sigma 10-20mm f3,5; tokina 11-16mm; tamron 17-35mm f2,8-4 old; samyang 14mm - and all of them except samyang, so-so). At f4 it reaches absolute sharpness. The only negative: large mdf (25cm).

    Reply

  24. Nick
    22.02.2021

    strange. Downloaded examples to RAV, very unsharp, worse than the cheapest samyang 14mm. I don't understand what to pay 30 tr (well, or $ 400)

    Reply

  25. Andy
    11.08.2024

    I have this lens for Canon. I bought it used. It was difficult to get sharpness from him at infinity. Tighten the adjusting screw as much as possible. At the maximum flight beyond infinity (according to the mark on the lens), only then is sharpness achieved at infinity. Apparently that's why it was sold by the owner. The picture quality is very good.

    Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer