25.09.2018/XNUMX/XNUMX the medium format mirrorless camera was announced Fujifilm GFX 50R.
Fujifilm GFX 50R
Key features include:
- Protected case with magnesium alloy
- 51.4 MP CMOS sensor, sensor size 43.8 X 32.9 mm (crop factor 0.78 X), the maximum size of pictures is 8256 x 6192
- X-Processor Pro
- 3 fps with a mechanical shutter and 1.8 fps with an electronic shutter
- OLED EVI 3.69 million points with a magnification of 0.77x
- 3.2 inch touch screen with 2.36 million dots
- Full HD 1080P 30fps 36Mbps
- Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, USB TYPE-C 3.1, Micro HDMI TYPE-D
- The shortest excerpt 1/4000 with a mechanical shutter and 1 / 16.000 with an electronic shutter. Exposure 1/125 flash sync
- Dual card slot SD, UHS-II high-speed bus supported
- Price: here
Fujifilm GFX 50R
Fujifilm GFX 50R
Fujifilm GFX 50R
Fujifilm GFX 50R
Fujifilm GFX 50R
Fujifilm GFX 50R
Lenses for Fujifilm GFX 50R. Photos taken from the official site.
dimensions Fujifilm GFX 50R и Fujifilm GFX 50S
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval. Training/Consultations | Youtube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Telegram
To all whose hands fit the XE series, is dedicated!
To everyone who owns LARGE black DSLRs with a “full” matrix - a rhetorical question, who is now “fuller”))
Welcome to the world without a mirror, friends! The first Sony NEX has long identified a vector for the development of digital photography, the future is coming.
We are waiting for new products from PENTAX;))
Thank you for your hospitality. And by the way, in your mirrorless medium-format world, do lenses exist (at least in theory / plans) lighter than f / 2? Otherwise, somehow the whole medium format is somehow leveled, both for managing the depth of field and for the possibilities of shooting in low light.
2 on a medium format it is already a large aperture and a small DOF, akin to a narrow format 1.4
In this case, the depth of field will be F / 2 * Kf = 2 * 0.78 = 1.56
Rather - 1,6, as Arkady correctly noted.
Even if it were 1,4, there is still no advantage over the narrow format.
A good camera, 5 thousand dollars for the average is quite adequate. Compared to ff, the sensor area is 66% larger (crop 1.6 and ff the difference is almost 2.5 times (250%)) so I don’t think that the difference will be felt so much. It will, but not like ff and crop. + the shape of the sensor is different not 3 * 2, as it is non-standard.
For very retarded:
https://itc.ua/news/fujifilm-pokazala-pervuyu-v-mire-100-megapikselnuyu-sredneformatnuyu-bezzerkalnuyu-kameru-i-obektiv-s-diafragmoy-f-1-i-avtofokusom-tozhe-pervyiy-v-svoem-rode/
Well Anonymous, well, he made fun of, "For the very backward",))))
Carefully read for yourself what they threw off. X-mount lens, and here it is about the medium format!
There is 80mm f / 1.9 ... but in the average 2,8 format it is quite a portrait aperture, for example 2,4 ...
https://www.flickr.com/photos/hamadahideaki/3968046083
.. a feeling that the focus fell on hand with a machine !!! in general then trouble!
In terms of depth of field and field of view, this lens is similar to 105 / 1.4 on FF.
This is not a medium format. This is a medium format crop. Medium format is too loud. If there the sensor size was 60 * 60, or at least 60 * 40.
It is not clear what is the difference from 50s?
The difference in price, $ 50R is $ 1500 cheaper than $ 50S.
This is currently the cheapest medium format camera.
Respectfully to Arkady for his work.
The feeling of continuous marketing from the announced cameras. Of course, like many ordinary people, I did not hold such cameras in my hands, but “cut down” medium format, why? 3 fps - entry-level DSLRs can shoot faster. Video mode at 30 fps, I'm not even talking about FullHD. I did not find information about the sensitivity. And all the pleasure is almost half a million rubles. I do not know which is worse Zenith licked with Leica or this Fudji. The Japanese are cunning as they can! Nintendo is all puffed up with its consoles, which are hopelessly behind. Canon is making some weird entry-level plastic DSLRs. Fudji, for me personally, is one solid question mark.
By the way, yes, about sensitivity where, or ISO from 100? ..
And the medium format is a landscape, a portrait, creative filming and others like them, the rate of fire is useless here, the main picture is here, and this medium format, even though deadly cropped, still allows you to touch this segment, previously inaccessible to the bulk of amateurs ...
He is not sickly so crooked: medium format APS-C
Yes, finally hard-cropped, closer to small format than to medium
Lenses give a picture, not a camera
A controversial camera for enthusiasts. It looks like X-E3, current fed for the holidays with my grandmother.
It is positioned as compact, although it will be convenient to shoot it with only 2 hands. It is unclear why they removed the built-in puff? The rate of fire is low, perhaps this processor does not pull as many megapixels and artistic characteristics, wait for the photo masterpieces shot on it.
It looks like a marketing warm-up for the public before the release of the medium-sized flagship GFX 100M.
Never before has the medium-crop format been so accessible and compact. In addition, you need to promote your mount and bite off market share.
This is a calculation.
Small inaccuracy) “Protected magnesium alloy casing” - magnesium alloy.
Fujivody pulled themselves up, will now flaunt cameras ... But there are no optics for them from the word at all
There is:
http://photar.ru/tri-novyx-obektiva-fujifilm-g/
*
And there are adapters from the film SF Pentax to Fuji.
There is also an adapter for glass with Mamiyi: FUG / MAM
Wow 340 pieces per body + how much more was announced for the lens? At least fifty dollars? This topic stops my thoughts about choosing between FF and a medium-sized kid 😬
And that one is completely dark, zooms are not brighter than f / 4, fixes are not brighter than f / 2.0.
And?
Owners of SF cameras like this were enough.
Read Evtifeev - he has a reason why, moreover, 645Z does not require high-aperture optics. Compared to FF GRIP, it is different and then, money will cost and weigh this whole thing inadequate.
If you need high-aperture optics - there is a cheap Zenitar 50 / 1.2 ... true and manual for a crop ;-)
And in general to Caesar - Caesar's, and locksmith's locksmiths.
The owners of the Northern Fleet do not sit on Radozhiv. Schoolchildren are sitting (and even writing) taking pictures of all sorts of flowers on 450D and Helios, well, and their sympathetic citizens are enthusiasts. And that's okay. There is no money for the Northern Fleet (! And there was none!), And in general, how was one comrade bequeathed - when there is no money, you have to hold on, yes ..
Yes, we hold on) And there is money on the SF, just film)
Where did the information come from?
I myself was thinking about acquiring the GFX system, but I love the very small depth of field and without any Eftifeevs I can consider that the depth of field on 110/2 on the SF will be more than on the banal 85 / 1,4 FF.
Cost and weigh - I agree, well, this is physics, the inevitable payment for the SF.
And by the way, where did you get that question in money? For any money, Fuji does not have an auto focus fast fix that would wash the background more than 85 / 1,4 (I'm not talking about 135/2 and 80-200 / 2,8 or even 200/2)
In the West, “serious” photographers work wonders at 200 / 2.0, 300 / 2.8 and 400 / 2.8
What is meant by this, not tasted?
Go to the subject of sf fuji in the photo gallery and find out that a bunch of ff lenses cover 44x33, including f1.2.
There, by the way, some bought body current, but apparently they didn’t have enough for the lenses, in short they remove it for some reason) but I’ll test the coverage of the SF frame with 35mm lenses)))
"No matter how many wolves you feed, the elephant still has ... thicker ..." :)
From an interview with Ikegama, Nikon's development director (nikonrumors):
“On whether the Z is Nikon's best system in image quality, it depends on what you shoot. There are photos that you can take only with a DSLR. It's hard to tell ... "
Like this. “The world without a mirror” so far exists only in the heads of ardent vyunosh.
There are all sorts of different interviews there. If you look closely, you can even see something through the marketing noodles.
For example, sports reporters certainly will not get off their CZK. Until they cease to do at all. And they will not stop making them in the near future, otherwise they will immediately switch to another brand.
And in general, in order to build a decent park of mirrorless optics, you need a dofig of time, over how many years the optics at the Central Control Center have been improved and honed. Etc.
It's all very interesting, but also very expensive and not practical ((my ardor for full-frame DSLRs has cooled down after a year of owning a Sony A7 ... Medium format ... Come on ... cool ... who is more ?!
Something is not entirely clear what they said in comments about the diaphragm.
Then on the crop, the aperture will grow? Full frame 2.0 and on the crop 3.0 will be?
Will not, do not strain.
This is the diaphragm in the concept of depth of field. The diaphragm is not only responsible for aperture ratio, but also for DOF.
The camera GFX 50R, according to the available information, will be equipped with two slots for SD memory cards, an electronic viewfinder and a display with a variable position. The camera will ship with a new m lens.