30.08.2018/15/30 the lens was announced Tamron SP 2.8-2mm F / 041 Di VC USD GXNUMX (Model AXNUMX)
Key features include:
- focal length: 15-30 mm
- Aperture: F / 2.8 to F / 22 over the entire range of focal lengths
- Designed for: Nikon and Canon full-frame digital SLR cameras
- protected case
- USB TAP console for updating lens firmware and fine-tuning focus
- optical design: 18 elements in 13 groups, including 1 XGM (eXpanded Glass Molded Aspherical) aspherical element, 3 LD (Low Dispersion) low-dispersion elements, 2 molded Aspherical molded aspherical elements
- enlightenment optics: eBAND (Extended Bandwidth & Angular-Dependency) + BBAR (Broad-Band Anti-Reflection) + AX (Anti-reflection eXpand)
- special fluorine-coated front lens with a water-repellent effect
- ultrasonic focusing motor Tamron USD (Ultrasonic Silent Drive)
- minimum focusing distance: 28 cm
- maximum magnification ratio: 1: 5
- number of aperture blades: 9
- electromagnetic diaphragm for Canon and for Nikon
- weight: 1100 (Nikon) or 1110 (Canon) grams
- built-in image stabilizer compensating for 4.5 steps by shutter speed
- Canon version may use filters mounted on the lens mount side
- part of the 'Trinity' of lenses 15-30 / 2.8 VC, 24-70 / 2.8 VC, 70-200 / 2.8 VC
Photos taken from the official site.
NIKON
The following is a list of all original super wide-angle autofocus lenses for Nikon FX cameras:
Nikkor F for SLR cameras:
- Nikon 14 mm 1: 2.8D AF
- Nikon 16 mm 1: 2.8D Fisheye AF
- Nikon 18 mm 1: 2.8D AF
- Nikon 20 mm 1:2.8 AF
- Nikon 20 mm 1: 2.8D AF
- Nikon 20 mm 1: 1.8G N AF S
- Nikon 8-15mm 1: 3.5-4.5E Fisheye AF S
- Nikon 14-24mm 1: 2.8G N AF S
- Nikon 16-35mm 1: 4G VR N AF S
- Nikon 17-35mm 1: 2.8D AF S
- Nikon 18-35mm 1: 3.5-4.5D AF
- Nikon 18-35mm 1: 3.5-4.5G AF S
- Nikon 20-35mm 1: 2.8D AF
Nikkor Z for mirrorless cameras:
CANON
Below is a list of all of the original full-frame super wide-angle autofocus lenses for Canon cameras:
The range of zoom lenses:
- Canon EF 8-15mm 1:4 L Fisheye USM
- Canon EF 11-24mm 1:4 L USM
- Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8 L IS USM
- Canon EF 16-35mm 1:2.8 L USM
- Canon EF 16-35mm 1:2.8 L II USM
- Canon EF 16-35mm 1:2.8 L III USM
- Canon EF 16-35mm 1:4 L IS USM
- Canon EF 17-35mm 1:2.8 L USM
- Canon EF 17-40mm 1:4 L USM
- Canon EF 20-35mm 1:2.8 L
- Canon EF 20-35mm 1: 3.5-4.5 USM
- Canon EF 22-55mm 1: 4-5.6 USM
Line of fixed lenses:
- Canon EF 14 mm 1:2.8 L USM
- Canon EF 14 mm 1:2.8 L II USM
- Canon EF 15 mm 1:2.8 Fisheye
- Canon EF 20 mm 1: 2.8 USM
Comments on this post do not require registration. Anyone can leave a comment.
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval.
I wonder why it is better than the previous version, if it is very, very good.
The ability to update firmware, calibrate focus accuracy at different focal lengths and at different distances to the subject, and customize buttons on the lens via the TAP-in Console
Eheheh ... When will Nikon finally do this with VR.
And not only that.
Although why am I dreaming. Probably never will.
You bet 14-24 on s6 and voila
Why stub an ultra-wide angle? I even have enough light on the crop. Here are TVs - yes - very much needed
I would not refuse. Video. Shooting architecture without a tripod when there is not enough light. When you need a very large depth of field or hyperfocal from a non-remote object, sometimes it takes short exposures without grease. In general, I am for a stub on almost any lens or on the matrix itself.
Well, short excerpts are not about stubs. I won't comment on the video, I don't know. The depth of field is already long on such lenses, the limiting exposure is long. Well, can't you take pictures at night without a tripod ... In practice, for me personally, I never needed
And there is also a myth that the stub is washing the picture
The grip is large, but when it is necessary to include a close object and a distant one in sharpness, it must be very large, or hyperfocal. It is not uncommon for landscape or architecture to shoot with such lenses. By closing the aperture tightly, we can get an increase in shutter speed until the frame is blurry. It also depends on the pixel size. ISO, too, does not really want to raise, the detail is important. Stab can be helpful here. About the fact that he lathers - I think it's a myth, the more you can turn it off when not needed. In general, of course, I agree that the larger the focal point, the more relevant the stub. The Panasonic even puts 42.5mm on the portrait lens, and this is useful. Useful for video if handheld shooting. Again, the larger the focal point, the more noticeable the impact.
Valentin, do you fundamentally do not recognize a tripod on the set if you cannot shoot without a stub? Especially with regards to the video! If you have a tripod, you don't need a stub. There are, however, exceptions - post-stroke condition, congenital tremor of the hands, etc.
Victor, I wrote above - if without a tripod. It doesn't seem to follow that I am against the tripod. And so, I consider the stub to be a useful function, especially since if it is not needed, you can turn it off. Again, if you don't want to overpay, there are usually no stub alternatives. But why do we need a stub, including wide, I think, in general, it is clear.
It happens sometimes, Valentine said everything correctly. I rarely use this for work, but still, Nikon would like to see an ultra-wide professional lens with a stub. Here you need to understand that 16-35 f / 4 has a different quality, it is not professional. There can be no talk of a tripod, the speaker is no longer the same. No one will wait for you.
Again, I am not a mega-master, my experience is very, very limited. Perhaps more experienced photographers do not need a stub here.
Nikon has long had 16-35 f4 vr
Skoda scho filter it is impossible to deliver, nikor 16-35 for me less addictive.
This misfortune of many super-wide, especially recently
Thanks Arkady for "News" and "Enlightenment"
Good luck and success!
Add the letter “c” to the word fix, where the canon ruler is.
I'd like to see a review of sigma 14 / 1.8.
Good luck to all)
The link "Aliexpress" does not work.
I’ll leave it here, comparing the new and old versions is very interesting :)
https://youtu.be/AAcbux8SjkM
Where is the review?
Obviously not where the announcement.
For myself, I solved the problem with the polarizer as follows: WYATT 145 mm thin circular polarizer. This 145 mm filter must be used with the TY T150 metal 150 mm square filter holder. Chinese comrades help out. Somewhat cumbersome, but the kit is quite working.