On August 6.08.2018, 17, Tamron 35-2.8mm F / 4-037 Di OSD (Model AXNUMX) full-frame lens was announced for Nikon and Canon DSLR systems.
Details can be found on the official website, image data was taken from the same place.
NIKON
The following is a list of all original super wide-angle autofocus lenses for Nikon FX cameras:
Nikkor F for SLR cameras:
- Nikon 14 mm 1: 2.8D AF
- Nikon 16 mm 1: 2.8D Fisheye AF
- Nikon 18 mm 1: 2.8D AF
- Nikon 20 mm 1:2.8 AF
- Nikon 20 mm 1: 2.8D AF
- Nikon 20 mm 1: 1.8G N AF S
- Nikon 8-15 mm 1: 3.5-4.5E Fisheye AF S
- Nikon 14-24 mm 1: 2.8G N AF S
- Nikon 16-35 mm 1: 4G VR N AF S
- Nikon 17-35 mm 1: 2.8D AF S
- Nikon 18-35 mm 1: 3.5-4.5D AF
- Nikon 18-35 mm 1: 3.5-4.5G AF S
- Nikon 20-35 mm 1: 2.8D AF
Nikkor Z for mirrorless cameras:
CANON
Below is a list of all of the original full-frame super wide-angle autofocus lenses for Canon cameras:
The range of zoom lenses:
- Canon EF 8-15 mm 1:4 L Fisheye USM
- Canon EF 11-24 mm 1:4 L USM
- Canon RF 15-35 mm F2.8 L IS USM
- Canon EF 16-35 mm 1:2.8 L USM
- Canon EF 16-35 mm 1:2.8 L II USM
- Canon EF 16-35 mm 1:2.8 L III USM
- Canon EF 16-35 mm 1:4 L IS USM
- Canon EF 17-35 mm 1:2.8 L USM
- Canon EF 17-40 mm 1:4 L USM
- Canon EF 20-35 mm 1:2.8 L
- Canon EF 20-35 mm 1: 3.5-4.5 USM
- Canon EF 22-55 mm 1: 4-5.6 USM
Line of fixed lenses:
- Canon EF 14 mm 1:2.8 L USM
- Canon EF 14 mm 1:2.8 L II USM
- Canon EF 15 mm 1:2.8 Fisheye
- Canon EF 20 mm 1: 2.8 USM
Comments on this post do not require registration. Anyone can leave a comment. Many different photographic equipment can be found on AliExpress.
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval. Training/Consultations | Youtube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Telegram
Wide with an electronic diaphragm under nikon and at a price of $ 600? wrap two !!!
Fucking review.
Where is it indicated here that this is a review? In black and white, I indicated that this was the announcement. Please be more careful.
I want! I did not see the price
it was shown just a couple of days ago, the price tag is still around $ 600
He is without a stabilizer, this is bad
Dear, even if you have hand tremor, a stub is not necessary for such a width.
Hmm .. Everything new is good (or bad) old forgotten;) Interestingly, the optical scheme differs from its predecessor Tamron 17-35mm f / 2.8-4 Di SP AF or the internal device is the same and only the case with the motor was changed? But, in any case, for $ 600, I think a potential bestseller, especially if it is working at 17mm 2.8, astrophotographers and other lovers of the starry sky will catch up
No, everything is fine, but again black. Directly the era of Charlie Chaplin. Where is the color?
Well, at least not white, like some. Better without any color, does not stand out
Cool. Sony has never re-released this minolta under its brand. But the tamron was honored after a bunch of years, but without a version for its original native mount. Although I could be wrong, and this lens has a completely new optical design.
In the internet, the reviews indicate that the lens is what you need, really up to the top one. After Tamron developed lenses for Zeiss (yes, yes, do not be surprised, this is exactly the case, the Milvus series), he himself began to use optical glass of the highest quality, and in the technical part of lens building, he was already selenium, so a new lens went with superior optical performance and the best housings on the market. Or almost the best ... Recently Ken Weller (and he knows a lot about ads, besides, no one pays him for reviews!) Put him among the top ...