answers: 16

  1. B. R. P.
    27.05.2018

    Thanks for the review. Nothing else was expected from this lens.

    Reply

  2. Michael
    28.05.2018

    Nothing bad is visible in the photo. Unless, the exposure errors of the camera, where there is underexposure. Well, the lens has nothing to do with it.

    Reply

  3. Denis
    28.05.2018

    did not see anything wrong in image quality

    Reply

  4. Onotole
    28.05.2018

    Thanks for the review.
    I don’t see a critical defect in the picture, nevertheless the general “cheapness” of the image is sharply felt in comparison, for example, with the same 80-200 / 2.8D. So-so micro-contrast, poor sharpness, no color rendition. At the time of the production of this lens, there may not have been comparable in price alternatives, but now - about the same picture is obtained from almost any superzoom. Those. putting on such a lens on a new full-frame camera (of course, expensive and heavy, because there are no cheap and light ones now, there were 20 years ago) you thereby downgrade its image quality to a soap dish 5-10 times cheaper and almost as much lighter ... Moreover, the zoom range will be much smaller.
    Is that bokeh is the only consolation prize.

    Reply

    • Onotole
      28.05.2018

      PS And on the crop - everything will be even sadder because of even less sharpness.

      Reply

      • Alexey de Paris
        28.05.2018

        On crop, everything will be as it is in the review) Photos on the D90 are available for viewing in high resolution.

        Reply

      • Onotole
        28.05.2018

        Of course I'm not talking about a 12-year-old crop with fairly large pixels, but at least a relatively modern crop camera, which, as a rule, has 24 MP on board.

        Reply

      • Valentine
        28.05.2018

        Modern ones don't have a low pass filter. In addition, the pixel size is judged by simply dividing the matrix area by their number. In fact, the area of ​​the photosensitive element differs from this calculated value (in addition to the sensor, there are also auxiliary elements and tracks that are placed on the chip and they take up more space for the old technical process). I'm not talking about different physical characteristics of the same sensors of different generations. Therefore, it is not at all a fact that any D3300 in sharpness will not be ahead of the D90.

        Reply

      • Onotole
        29.05.2018

        Valentine, I don’t want to sound rude, but you didn’t understand the issue at all before starting to oppose. Roughly speaking, I'm talking about Thomas - you're talking about Erema. Perhaps this is also part of my fault, because in the previous post I allowed myself a somewhat simplified characterization of the matrix.
        In fact, the area of ​​the photosensitive element is not important in the context of the obtained physical resolution, the density of pixels (in pieces per unit area) is important - and this is pure arithmetic.
        The absence of a low-pass filter in this particular case under consideration will also have no practical value. To simplify again, this lens simply will not produce such high frequencies that this filter can begin to influence.

        Reply

      • Valentine
        29.05.2018

        A pairwise comparison of the D90 and D3300 might clear up your doubts. A couple of years ago, I watched at the same time how the D70 - D90 - D3300 were being practiced with simple whales. Lenses with F24-4 did not have any special problems with 5.6MP, but then, with comparable dimensions, the picture with 24MP (despite the fact that I was also skeptical about them) seemed to me better. I closed this topic for myself then, because for real photography, it seems to me, well, it is very secondary.

        Reply

      • Onotole
        29.05.2018

        Doubts? I have no doubt whatsoever.
        I’ll ask you straight: Valentine, have you ever dealt with low price glass film?

        Reply

      • Valentine
        29.05.2018

        Yes, it was. And I understand what you are talking about and in which direction you are leaning. You can only be convinced with this lens in practice - you won't try at 24MP next to 12MP, you won't understand. I am inclined that it will not get worse. You think it will be worse. Whatever we count is not important, as long as there are no paired frames.

        Reply

      • anonym
        03.06.2018

        I changed Kenon 1100d to 650d. And something I noticed on the advantages of a bold pixel. The new camera gives a more juicy and sharp. A picture with the same lenses ..

        Reply

  5. Alexey de Paris
    28.05.2018

    Good day ! Thanks for the comments. The fact that the photos are not bad is just a careful selection of the best shots) Yes, and bokeh is the only thing that you might like in this lens, as you correctly noted. If anyone else has experience using this lens (preferably on a number) then share your impressions. People and I are interested.

    Reply

  6. Denis
    29.05.2018

    You are talking to Muncho :)

    Reply

  7. Julia
    29.01.2019

    Hello everybody!
    I am the owner of this lens :)
    Acquired about 4 years ago.
    I really needed a budget tele zoom.
    I came across an ad (price 900UAH.)
    I tried to find a review or feedback on the lens…. found nothing.
    I decided to take it at my own peril and risk.
    When buying, I checked autofocus, sharpness. Outwardly, it looked like new.
    Arriving home, I began to test more thoroughly ...
    So I share my impressions of this lens. (Nikon d80, d600 camera)
    1. I liked the accurate and relatively fast autofocus (on the focal 200-240 a bit soft)
    2. Bokeh in natural light is simply gorgeous at long focus.
    3. The color rendition is decent, in comparison with the whale 18-55, 75-240 - super color :)))
    4. Very light, like a toy :)
    5. It sits comfortably in the hand, the zoom ring is so wide that you can zoom in with the whole palm :)))
    6.Perfectly focuses in low light, but it is better to use it for shooting during the day, as the aperture is a bit small.
    7. Used for shooting concerts, so in conjunction with nikon d80 it turns out superZoom!
    I did not notice much difference with the DX and FX cameras.
    If you need a wider angle - I put the lens on the FX camera (d600) and if you need the length, then - DX (d80)
    All in all, a good lens for a ridiculous price.

    Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer